RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between self-perceived use of shared decision-making among urologists with use of validated prediction tools and self-described surgical decision-making. METHODS: This is a convergent mixed methods study of these parallel data from two modules (Shared Decision Making and Validated Prediction tools) within the 2019 American Urological Association (AUA) Annual Census. The shared decision-making (SDM) module queried aspects of SDM that urologists regularly used. The validated prediction tools module queried whether urologists regularly used, trusted, and found prediction tools helpful. Selected respondents to the 2019 AUA Annual Census underwent qualitative interviews on their surgical decision-making. RESULTS: In the weight sampled of 12,312 practicing urologists, most (77%) reported routine use of SDM, whereas only 30% noted regular use of validated prediction tools. On multivariable analysis, users of prediction tools were not associated with regular SDM use (31% vs 28%, P = .006) though was associated with use of decision aids f (32% vs 26%, P < .001). Shared decision-making emerged thematically with respect to matching treatment options, prioritizing goals, and navigating challenging decisions. However, the six specific components of shared decision-making ranged in their mentions within qualitative interviews. CONCLUSION: Most urologists report performing SDM as supported by its thematic presence in surgical decision-making. However, only a minority use validated prediction tools and urologists infrequently mention specific SDM components. This discrepancy provides an opportunity to explore how urologists perform SDM and can be used to support integrated strategies to implement SDM more effectively in clinical practice.
Assuntos
Tomada de Decisão Compartilhada , Urologistas , Humanos , Autorrelato , Participação do Paciente/métodos , Confiança , Tomada de DecisõesRESUMO
PURPOSE: The aim of this mixed methods study was to investigate patient and provider perceptions of repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumors to improve counseling as new nonsurgical treatment modalities for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer emerge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Quantitative data were collected via a web-based survey through the Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network of patients with nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer who had undergone at least 1 transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Bivariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate associations of patient demographics and clinical variables with treatment preference. Qualitative data were collected with 60 in-depth telephone interviews with patients (n=40) and urologists (n=20) to understand experiences with bladder cancer and transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Telephone interviews were conducted by trained qualitative experts. Transcripts were imported into Dedoose to facilitate analysis. RESULTS: Survey data of 352 patients showed 210 respondents (60%) preferred repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor while 142 (40%) preferred intravesical chemoablation. Patients who preferred repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor were more likely to prioritize initial treatment effectiveness (63%), whereas those who preferred chemoablation prioritized risk of recurrence (55%). Variables associated with a preference for intravesical chemoablation included U.S. residence (OR=2; 95% CI 1.1, 3.8), or if they expressed their reason for treatment preference as priority of recurrence risk over effectiveness (OR=14.6; 95% CI 7.4, 28.5). Predominant interview themes varied across participants, with patients but not urologists emphasizing the emotional toll of the procedure along with the need for improved counseling regarding recurrence, terminology, and cancer-related signs and symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Differences exist in the way patients and urologists perceive repeat transurethral resection of bladder tumor for bladder cancer. Understanding transurethral resection of bladder tumor perception will aid in shared decision making as novel treatments emerge for nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer.
Assuntos
Ressecção Transuretral de Bexiga , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , PercepçãoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the local recurrence rates of men treated with Mohs microsurgery (MMS) for penile carcinoma. The secondary outcome was surgical complications from the MMS procedure or the subsequent reconstructive procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients from 2010 to 2020 with penile carcinoma at our institution were seen in a multidisciplinary setting. Patients with Ta, Tis, T1, and T2 disease were considered candidates for MMS. Clinical and pathologic data were collected for analysis. Local recurrence rates were stratified by stage and complications reported per the Clavien-Dindo Grade. RESULTS: A total of 43 patients met inclusion criteria. The median age at diagnosis was 64 years. Stage distribution was Ta in 4.7%, Tis in 58.1%, T1a in 14.0%, T1b in 7.0%, and T2 in 16.3%. No patients had a positive surgical margin after MMS. The overall local recurrence rate was 2% (n = 1) at a median of 47 months. Local recurrence rates at 1, 3, and 5 years for Ta, Tis, and T1 patients were 0%. Local recurrence rates for T2 patients were 14% at 1 year. Complications occurred in 12% (n = 5), all of which were Clavien-Dindo ≤ III. CONCLUSIONS: MMS provides effective local control for Ta, Tis, and T1 penile cancer with an overall local recurrence rate of 2% and an acceptable complication rate. A multi-disciplinary team involving urologic oncology, reconstructive urology, and MMS is essential to patient management.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas , Neoplasias Penianas , Neoplasias Cutâneas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirurgia/efeitos adversos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/cirurgia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Neoplasias Penianas/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To assess a potential source of bias that could contribute to underrepresentation of minorities in urology, we analyzed differences in linguistic characteristics in personal statements between urology residency applicants of various racial and ethnic groups. METHODS: Personal statements submitted by urology residency applicants to a urology program were evaluated with Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count, a validated text analysis program. Analyzed statements and application characteristics were compared according to self-identified race/ethnicity of the applicant using multivariable analysis and independent sample T-tests. RESULTS: Of 342 submitted personal statements, 181 applicants self-identified as White non-Hispanic, 86 as Asian, and 75 as "underrepresented in medicine" (URM) including Black and Hispanic/Latino applicants. Asian and URM applicants listed more research projects (11.7 and 12.9 vs 8.8, Pâ¯=â¯.01) and URM applicants had slightly lower USMLE Step 1 scores (238.5 vs 244.6, Pâ¯=â¯.01) compared to White applicants. When evaluating personal statements, all applicants wrote with the same degree of analytical thinking. Asian applicants scored lower in authenticity (Pâ¯=â¯.03) and emotional tone (Pâ¯=â¯.04) while URM applicants scored higher in clout (Pâ¯=â¯.04) compared to White applicants. In use of pronouns, Asian applicants used 'we/us/our' more often (P < .01), URM applicants used 'you' more often (Pâ¯=â¯.02), and White applicants used 'I' more often (Pâ¯=â¯.01). CONCLUSION: Significant linguistic differences exist among urology personal statements by racial/ethnic groups that may perpetuate stereotypes and bias in the application process. Appreciating these differences may help applicants avoid possibly detrimental linguistics and help residency programs recruit and support urology applicants from underrepresented backgrounds.
Assuntos
Internato e Residência , Urologia , Etnicidade , Humanos , Linguística , Autorrelato , Urologia/educaçãoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Children with spina bifida are at high risk for urinary tract infections (UTI). However, there is no standardized definition of UTI in this population, leading to variability in both clinical management and research. This was highlighted in the 2013 systematic review on the same topic. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the frequency with which researchers are defining UTI in their studies of children with spina bifida and to determine what parameters are used. DATA SOURCES: We searched Medline and Scopus databases for articles that included pediatric patients with spina bifida and used UTI as an outcome. STUDY SELECTION: Exclusion criteria included publication before October 1, 2012, non-English language, and nonprimary research articles. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers each extracted data. RESULTS: A total of 39 studies were included; 74% of these analyzed included an explicit definition of UTI. The most commonly used definition included a combination of symptoms and culture results (34.5%), whereas 31% used a combination of symptoms, culture results, and urinalysis data. Only 3.4% of articles used a urine culture alone to define UTI. CONCLUSIONS: More articles that focus on children with spina bifida included a definition of UTI. However, significant variability persists in the definition of UTI in this patient population.
Assuntos
Disrafismo Espinal , Infecções Urinárias , Criança , Bases de Dados Factuais , Humanos , Disrafismo Espinal/complicações , Disrafismo Espinal/diagnóstico , Disrafismo Espinal/epidemiologia , Urinálise , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Dissemination of misinformation through social media is a major societal issue. Bladder cancer is the second most common urological cancer in the world, but there are limited data on the quality of bladder cancer information on social networks. Our objective was to characterize the quality of information and presence of misinformation about bladder cancer on YouTube, the most commonly used social media platform. We reviewed the first 150 YouTube videos about "bladder cancer" using two validated instruments for consumer health information and assessed the videos for the presence of misinformation. The videos had a median of 2288 views (range, 14-511 342), but the overall quality of information was moderate to poor in 67%, based on scores of 1-3 out of 5 on the validated DISCERN instrument. A moderate to high amount of misinformation was present in 21% of videos and reached 1 289 314 viewers. Commercial bias was apparent in 17% of videos, which reached 324 287 viewers. From a networking perspective, comments sections in the videos were sometimes used to request medical advice (20%), provide medical advice to others (9%), or give support (19%). In conclusion, YouTube is a widely used source of information and advice about bladder cancer, but much of the content is of poor quality. PATIENT SUMMARY: A large quantity of content about bladder cancer is available on YouTube. Unfortunately, much of the content is of moderate to poor quality and presents a risk of exposure to misinformation.
Assuntos
Comunicação , Disseminação de Informação , Mídias Sociais , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Gravação em VídeoRESUMO
Clomiphene citrate (CC) is commonly used off-label for the treatment of male infertility, yet there is limited data to guide patient selection. To identify a subset of patients more likely to benefit from CC, we aimed to define predictors of improvement in semen parameters among men receiving CC. We retrospectively analysed 151 men treated with at least 25 mg CC daily for male infertility and/or hypogonadism at two institutions between 2004 and 2014. Men previously on testosterone were excluded. The primary outcome was change in semen parameters. Variables included baseline patient characteristics, pre-treatment hormone profiles and pre-treatment semen analyses. A total of 77 men met inclusion criteria. Median length of therapy was 2.8 months. There was significant improvement in sperm concentration (14-21 million/ml; p = 0.002) and total motile count (TMC; 13-28 million; p = 0.04). One third of patients who began with fewer than 5 million motile spermatozoon improved to a TMC > 5 million, increasing reproductive options to include intrauterine insemination. Patient characteristics, pre-treatment hormone profile and degree of oligozoospermia did not predict treatment response. While no predictors of improvement were identified, clinically useful response rates are described for use in shared decision-making.