Delayed sample arrival at the laboratory does not lead to more false negatives in the Danish population screening for colorectal cancer.

In Denmark, biennial population screening for colorectal cancer was introduced in 2014 for all aged 50-74 years. Five laboratories representative for the regional division of Denmark perform the immunochemical testing of faecal occult blood in the screening samples (iFOBT, OC-Sensor (Eiken Chemical, cut-off 100 µg/L)). In July 2016, a new agreement on the public post-delivery entailed an increased lag time (five days) from the screening participant drops the screening sample into a mail-box until sample arrival at the laboratories. Previous work had reported that a lag time above five days led to more false negative iFOBT tests. We investigated if this was true also under Danish conditions. We performed two stability tests; one with sample storage at 30 °C for 14 days (N = 60), and another with sample storage at room temperature for 13 days (N = 10). We extracted data from our laboratory information system (LABKA) on all iFOBT tests performed in the entire Central Denmark Region (N = 104,328 patients) during the last six months for each calendar year 2014-16. For each year, we computed the distribution of iFOBT tests below and above cut-off. Our stability tests showed no positive samples switching to false negative after storage; however, some negative samples turned false positive, especially at 30 °C. The data showed no change in the distribution of iFOBT tests below and above cut-off after July 2016. We found no evidence that an enhanced lag time increased the number of false negative iFOBT tests in the Danish screening program for colorectal cancer.

Glycemic control in diabetes in three Danish counties.

BACKGROUND: Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) is a proxy measure for glycemic control in diabetes. We investigated the trend for glycemic control in patients from three Danish counties using HbA1c measurements. METHODS: We studied 2454 patients from a population of 807,000 inhabitants for whom routine monitoring of diabetes using HbA1c-DCCT aligned was initiated in 2001. We estimated the incidence of monitored patients in the population. The progress in patients with originally diabetic HbA1c levels was investigated by cumulative probability plots, and the individual trend in clinical outcome was investigated by a modified difference plot. RESULTS: The age-standardized incidence of monitored patients was <0.5% in all regions. Patients with diabetic first HbA1c concentrations (>or=6.62% HbA1c) showed on average 15% improved glycemic control in the first year. Further improvement was limited. The overall percentage above the treatment target (>or=6.62% HbA1c) was 51% in 2003 compared to 59% in 2001, and the percentage with poor glycemic control (>or=10.0% HbA1c) was reduced from 19% to 4%. Of patients with originally diabetic HbA1c levels, 15% showed progress in glycemic control, and 28% reached treatment targets. In patients with originally normal HbA1c, 75% showed an upward trend in HbA1c levels, which reached diabetic concentrations in 17%. CONCLUSION: Patients with diabetic first HbA1c concentrations (>or=6.62% HbA1c) showed on average 15% improved glycemic control in the first year. Further improvement was limited. In individual patients, 75% with originally diabetic HbA1c levels showed improved glycemic control after 3 years, while 78% with originally normal concentrations showed an upward trend in HbA1c levels.