Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Transplantation ; 97(6): 642-7, 2014 Mar 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24637863

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Allograft outcomes in patients undergoing repeat renal transplantation are inferior compared to first-time transplant recipient outcomes. Donor-specific antibodies detected by solid-phase assays (DSA-SPA) may contribute to the worse prognosis. The influence of DSA-SPA on repeat renal transplantation outcomes has not been previously studied in detail. DESIGN: This study reports the findings in 174 patients who underwent repeat renal transplantation between years 2007 and 2012. These included 62 patients with preformed DSA-SPA detected by Luminex at the time of transplantation. Patients received standard and consistent immunosuppression and were monitored closely for evidence of rejection. Recipients who underwent desensitization were excluded from this analysis. Endpoints included development of biopsy-proven acute rejection and analysis of graft survival and function. RESULTS: Patients in the DSA-SPA-positive and DSA-SPA-negative groups received similar immunosuppression, and a similar proportion of recipients had a peak panel reactive antibody greater than 20%; the two groups differed with respect to human leukocyte antigen mismatches (4.7 ± 1.1 vs. 4.1 ± 1.7, P=0.024). Recipients with preformed DSA-SPA had higher rejection rates (54.8% vs. 34.8%, P=0.01), including higher rates of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) (32.3% vs. 7.1%, P<0.001). Recipients who were DSA-SPA-positive and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM)-positive had a higher incidence of both AMR (OR 4.6, P=0.009) and of acute rejection (OR 3.57, P=0.02) as compared to those who were DSA-SPA-positive and FCXM-negative. Overall allograft survival was similar in the DSA-SPA-positive and DSA-SPA-negative groups (log-rank test=0.63, P=0.428). Differences in allograft function were detectable after 2 years (32.8 ± 13.1 vs. 47 ± 20.2 mL/min/1.73 m(2), P=0.023) and may be reflective of more AMR among DSA-SPA-positive patients. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis suggests that DSA-SPA increases the overall risk of acute rejection but does not appear to adversely impact allograft survival during the early follow-up period. Close monitoring of renal function and early biopsy for AMR detection appear to allow for satisfactory short-term allograft outcomes in repeat transplant recipients.


Assuntos
Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Isoanticorpos/sangue , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Doença Aguda , Adulto , Biópsia , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/sangue , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/patologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Imunossupressores/uso terapêutico , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Cidade de Nova Iorque/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Reoperação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Am Soc Hypertens ; 6(5): 338-45, 2012.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22995802

RESUMO

Aldosterone levels increase in 30%-40% of patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and/or angiotensin receptor blockers over the long term. This "aldosterone breakthrough" may carry important clinical consequences given aldosterone's nonepithelial, pro-fibrotic actions. The renin inhibitor, aliskiren, by suppressing the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) proximally, may limit breakthrough compared to conventional RAAS blockade. This open-label study (NCT01129557) randomized subjects to aliskiren 300 mg daily (A), valsartan 320 mg daily (V), or aliskiren 150 mg + valsartan 160 mg daily (A+V) for 9 months. Eligible subjects had proteinuria >300 mg/day, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >45 mL/min/1.73 m(2), and systolic blood pressure (BP) >130 or diastolic BP >80 mm Hg. Serum and 24-hour urine aldosterone (indexed to 24-hour urine Na) were checked before initiation of therapy and at 3, 6, and 9 months. Aldosterone breakthrough was defined as a sustained increase from baseline aldosterone by study end. The study was intended to enroll 120 subjects but was terminated early by the sponsor. We present here the results of 33 subjects who completed the protocol, of which 12 were randomized to A, 11 were randomized to V, and 10 were randomized to A+V. Mean baseline eGFR was 75.5 (±23.3) mL/min/1.73 m(2); baseline proteinuria was 3104 (±2943) mg/day; and baseline BP was 134.7 (±10.5)/84.8 (±8.4) mm Hg. Three (27%) subjects on V, three (25%) subjects on A, and three (30%) subjects on A+V had aldosterone breakthrough. Mean proteinuria reduction was 31% from baseline in all subjects: 30% in subjects with breakthrough vs. 32% in subjects without breakthrough. Mean BP reduction was 11.0/8.8 mm Hg in all subjects: 8.4/6.1 mm Hg in subjects with breakthrough vs. 12.0/9.8 mm Hg in subjects without breakthrough. Aliskiren, alone or in combination with valsartan, did not reduce the incidence of aldosterone breakthrough in subjects with hypertension and proteinuria compared with conventional RAAS blockade.


Assuntos
Aldosterona/metabolismo , Amidas , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Fumaratos , Hipertensão , Sistema Renina-Angiotensina/efeitos dos fármacos , Tetrazóis , Valina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Amidas/administração & dosagem , Amidas/efeitos adversos , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/administração & dosagem , Bloqueadores do Receptor Tipo 1 de Angiotensina II/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Enzima Conversora de Angiotensina/efeitos adversos , Anti-Hipertensivos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Hipertensivos/efeitos adversos , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Fumaratos/administração & dosagem , Fumaratos/efeitos adversos , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/metabolismo , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Proteinúria/tratamento farmacológico , Proteinúria/metabolismo , Proteinúria/fisiopatologia , Tetrazóis/administração & dosagem , Tetrazóis/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento , Valina/administração & dosagem , Valina/efeitos adversos , Valsartana
4.
J Am Soc Echocardiogr ; 25(4): 467-72, 2012 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22244000

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) has been applied clinically as a noninvasive therapeutic tool. Atrial septostomy is a palliative treatment for pulmonary artery hypertension. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of atrial septal ablation in vitro using HIFU. METHODS: Fourteen sections of atrial septum from pig hearts were treated. Focused ultrasound energy was applied with an operating frequency of 5.25 MHz at the nominal focal point intensity of 4.0 kW/cm(2) for 0.4 sec in 1-sec intervals. RESULTS: Lesions were created with ultrasonic exposures ranging from 40 to 120 pulses. There were significant relationships between HIFU exposure time and lesion area on the exposed site (R(2) = 0.3389, P < .0001) and lesion volume (R(2) = 0.6161, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: HIFU has the potential to create focal perforations without direct tissue contact. This method may prove useful for noninvasive atrial septostomy.


Assuntos
Septos Cardíacos/cirurgia , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade , Animais , Ecocardiografia Transesofagiana , Hipertensão Pulmonar Primária Familiar , Estudos de Viabilidade , Septos Cardíacos/diagnóstico por imagem , Ablação por Ultrassom Focalizado de Alta Intensidade/métodos , Hipertensão Pulmonar/cirurgia , Técnicas In Vitro , Suínos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção
5.
Diabetes Care ; 33(12): 2586-91, 2010 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20807871

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Women with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) maintain a higher risk for recurrent GDM and overt diabetes. Overt diabetes is a risk factor for development of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but GDM alone, without subsequent development of overt diabetes, may also pose a risk for CKD. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis included Kidney Early Evaluation Program (KEEP) participants from 2000 to 2009. Patient characteristics and kidney function among three categories (GDM alone, overt diabetes, and no history of diabetes) were compared. The prevalence of microalbuminuria, macroalbuminuria, and CKD stages 1-2 and 3-5 was assessed using logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 37,716 KEEP female participants, 571 (1.5%) had GDM alone and 12,100 (32.1%) had overt diabetes. Women with GDM had a higher rate of microalbuminuria but not macroalbuminuria than their nondiabetic peers (10.0 vs. 7.7%) that was substantially lower than the 13.6% prevalence in diabetic women. In multivariate analysis, women with GDM alone, compared with nondiabetic women, demonstrated increased odds of CKD stages 1-2 (multivariate odds ratio 1.54 [95% CI 1.16-2.05]) similar to the odds for women with overt diabetes (1.68 [1.55-1.82]). In stratified analyses, age, race, BMI, and hypertension modified the odds for CKD stages 1-2 but not CKD stages 3-5 among women with GDM. CONCLUSIONS: Women with GDM alone have a higher prevalence of microalbuminuria than women without any history of diabetes, translating to higher rates of CKD stages 1-2. These results suggest that GDM, even in the absence of subsequent overt diabetes, may increase the risk for future cardiovascular and kidney disease.


Assuntos
Albuminúria/epidemiologia , Albuminúria/etiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/epidemiologia , Diabetes Gestacional/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Gravidez
6.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 5(9): 1676-80, 2010 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20558564

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an increasingly recognized complication of familial dysautonomia (FD), a neurodevelopmental disorder with protean systemic manifestations that are the result of sensory and autonomic dysfunction. Progressive renal dysfunction occurs due to chronic volume depletion and cardiovascular lability with supine hypertension and orthostatic hypotension. By age 25, nearly one-half of all patients with FD will have reached stage 3 CKD. Furthermore, dialysis for ESRD in FD patients is associated with multiple complications and poor outcomes. DESIGN, SETTINGS, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We report two patients with FD who developed ESRD at ages 27 and 16, respectively, and underwent renal transplantation. Transplant was performed after 3 months on intermittent hemodialysis (HD) in the first case and after 1 month on twice-weekly continuous veno-venous hemodialysis (CVVHD) in the second case. RESULTS: Both patients tolerated surgery well and have maintained good graft function at 20 and 24 months posttransplantation, respectively. Symptomatic and functional improvements have included lower supine BP and increased sensitivity to antihypertensive agents. CONCLUSIONS: As general supportive care improves the lifespan of FD patients, issues related to the management of ESRD will become more important. Renal transplantation provides a viable alternative to dialysis for FD patients with ESRD.


Assuntos
Disautonomia Familiar/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/cirurgia , Transplante de Rim , Adolescente , Adulto , Anti-Hipertensivos/uso terapêutico , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Progressão da Doença , Disautonomia Familiar/fisiopatologia , Disautonomia Familiar/cirurgia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto , Humanos , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/etiologia , Hipertensão/fisiopatologia , Falência Renal Crônica/etiologia , Falência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Diálise Renal , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA