Assessing Scar Outcomes Using Objective Scar Measurement Tools: An Adjunct to Validated Scar Evaluation Scales.

INTRO: The assessment of scar outcomes is important to both patient care and research focused on understanding the results of medical and surgical interventions. The Vancouver Scar Scale and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale are validated and simple instruments to assess scars. However, these subjective scales have shortcomings. The VSS fails to capture patient perception and has indeterminate validity and reliability. The POSAS captures patient perception, but the observer scale has been shown to have moderate amounts of inter-rater variability. Studies highlighting the ability of objective scar assessment tools to produce reliable and reproducible results are needed. In this study, we aimed to validate the use of the Fibrometer ®, Elastimeter ®, and SkinColorCatch ® as an objective adjunct in the assessment of hypertrophic scar and keloid outcomes. METHODS: This was a prospective single-center study which assessed patient scars using the Vancouver Scar Scale, the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment scale, and the aforementioned objective study tools. Correlations between the different methods of scar assessment were measured. RESULTS: The Fibrometer ® and SkinColorCatch ® showed significant correlations with the VSS total and the Observer POSAS total. The Elastimeter ® showed significant correlations with both the Patient and Observer POSAS totals. Unexpected correlations between Elastimeter ® measurements and the vascularity/pigmentation of scars indicate that scoring of these categories may be influenced by how severe the scar looks to the observer subjectively, further necessitating the need for reliable objective scar assessment tools. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the ability of these devices to assess scars and demonstrate their potential in serving as an important adjunct to previously validated scar assessment scales.

Laser-Assisted Drug Delivery in the Treatment of Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids: A Systematic Review.

Hypertrophic scars and keloids are the results of an exaggerated healing process and are often associated with significant patient morbidity. Fractional ablative lasers create microchannels in the skin and penetrate into the substance of the scar, inducing a normal healing response in zones of created damage. Focal delivery of scar-modulating agents into the scar through these microchannels-a process termed laser-assisted drug delivery (LADD)-is a promising and developing treatment modality. In this systematic review, we aim to critically examine the evidence of LADD in the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids. The evidence suggests that LADD improves outcomes in hypertrophic scars and keloids. LADD is a more effective treatment modality than the topical application of agents in hypertrophic scars and equally effective as the intralesional injection of agents in keloids. There were few reports of adverse events. Evidence supports the use of LADD as an adjunct to non-surgical measures or a treatment modality to be used before more invasive measures such as surgical excision. However, the quality of evidence supporting this conclusion is inconsistent and lacks power. Additional studies are required to optimize dosages, laser settings, and agent choices for the treatment of these lesions.

Combining scar-modulating agents for the treatment of hypertrophic scars and keloids: A systematic review.

Injury to the skin can cause abnormal wound healing and continuous inflammation that leads to the formation of hypertrophic scars and keloids. These lesions often cause significant negative impact on a patient's life due to aesthetic, physical, social, and psychological consequences. Numerous treatment modalities exist for these hypertrophic scars and keloids, which include silicone sheeting, pressure garments, intralesional injection/topical application of scar-modulating agents, laser therapy, and surgical excision. Due to increased efficacy, an evolving treatment paradigm encourages the use of multiple treatment modalities instead of one treatment modality. However, no gold standard treatment exists for these lesions, leaving many people with unsatisfactory results. Adding scar-modulating agents such as 5-Fluorouracil, bleomycin, or Botulinum Toxin A to triamcinolone monotherapy has emerged as a potential drug combination for treating hypertrophic scars and keloids. We sought to critically analyze the evidence that exists for the use of more than one scar-modulating agent. This was done by conducting a systematic review to determine the efficacy of these combined drug regimens. We found that many of these combinations show evidence of increased efficacy and fewer/similar adverse events to triamcinolone monotherapy. Triamcinolone and 5-Fluorouracil showed the strongest and most consistent evidence out of all combinations. With this review, we intend to encourage more research into unique drug combinations that may improve outcomes for patients with symptomatic hypertrophic scars or keloids.

First fixed-ratio combination of insulin degludec and liraglutide for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

When oral hypoglycemic agents do not successfully suppress hyperglycemia, the traditional approach has been to add insulin injections. With the coming of glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists carrying the benefits of weight loss and reduced risk of hypoglycemia, it has been suggested that GLP-1 agents should be used instead. There is equivalent lowering of HbA1c with either treatment. Insulin therapy is associated with hypoglycemia and weight gain while GLP-1 receptor agonists promote weight loss. Gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance is the chief obstacle to GLP-1 treatment. The combined use of basal insulin and GLP-1 receptor agonists results in improved glycemic control and mitigates weight gain. The recent approval of insulin degludec/liraglutide administered in a fixed ratio combination is unique not simply for the additive benefits of the two agents, but because it now permits adjustable dosing of liraglutide together with insulin, providing better glucose control than with either agent alone at lower dose levels. Lower dosage of insulin degludec reduces the risk of hypoglycemia. Liraglutide combats the weight gain that accompanies the introduction of insulin therapy, and a reduced dose of liraglutide induces less GI intolerance. This first combined basal insulin-GLP-1 receptor agonist combination represents a conceptual advance in the treatment of insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes.

Technosphere inhaled insulin (Afrezza).

Technosphere® insulin uses a unique carrier -fumaryl diketopiperazine (FDKP)- which adsorbs insulin to form microparticles to permit delivery to the alveoli by inhalation. Toxicity studies have been entirely negative. The pulmonary absorption of insulin is very rapid, and the disappearance time is shorter than for subcutaneously delivered rapid-acting insulins. As a result, after inhalation, there is a rapid drop in glucose levels which subsequently return to normal in a shorter time than after subcutaneous insulin administration. Consequently, there is a lower incidence of hypoglycemic reactions. Pulmonary function studies have shown a small, reversible decrease in FEV1, and pulmonary imaging studies have shown no adverse effect. The inhalation of Technosphere insulin can produce a cough in up to 27% of patients. The cough has resulted in discontinuance in as many as 9% of users. Technosphere insulin has been approved for use in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Long-term studies of pulmonary safety and surveillance for malignancy will be performed in the future. Studies to assess the optimal time dosing regimen are needed.

Insulin degludec: a long-acting modern insulin analogue with a predictable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile.

Insulin degludec is, like insulin detemir, a product of coupling of Des-B30 threonine insulin to fatty acid side chains. After injection, degludec self associates, precipitating in subcutaneous tissue. There is a continuous and highly predictable slow dissociation of insulin monomers from this depot; insulin levels rise immediately reaching tmax at 10-12 hours, followed by a slow decline with a t½ of 17-21 hours, roughly double the duration of action of insulin glargine. An important property of degludec not shared by glargine is miscibility with rapid-acting insulin. Although the effect of coadministered insulin aspart is somewhat blunted by coformulation with degludec, a preparation of 70% degludec and 30% aspart has predictable pharmacodynamics. Daily administration of degludec has glucose-lowering benefits not different from those of glargine, with purportedly less hypoglycemia. Although degludec is approved and marketed in Europe under the brand name Tresiba®, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, in a surprising development, challenged the assertion of lower tendency to hypoglycemia with degludec, and, more importantly, raised concerns that degludec may have a higher cardiovascular risk than glargine. Only a long-term study in a large patient population can resolve these questions. However, release of degludec for marketing to appropriate patients should proceed while awaiting the results of such a study.

Influence of preprandial vs. postprandial insulin glulisine on weight and glycaemic control in patients initiating basal-bolus regimen for type 2 diabetes: a multicenter, randomized, parallel, open-label study (NCT00135096).

AIM: Insulin therapy is commonly associated with weight gain. The timing of prandial insulin administration may enhance its efficacy/safety and maintain effective weight control. This study examined the effect of postprandial vs. preprandial insulin glulisine on weight gain and glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients taking basal insulin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial conducted in 45 centres in the USA. A total of 716 patients with type 2 diabetes and glycated haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c) ) ≥ 7.5% and ≤10.0% were screened; 345 were randomized and 322 comprised the intent-to-treat group (premeal, 163; postmeal, 159). Insulin glargine once daily, ±metformin and subcutaneous injections of premeal or postmeal insulin glulisine were given for 52 weeks. Main outcome measures included changes in HbA(1c) , fasting plasma glucose and weight from study baseline to endpoint (week 52). RESULTS: At study end, insulin glulisine achieved similar glycaemic control whether it was administered before or after meals (HbA(1c) : 7.04% premeal vs. 7.16% postmeal, p = NS). Overall hypoglycaemia incidence and severe hypoglycaemia rates were not significantly different between premeal and postmeal groups; however, symptomatic and nocturnal hypoglycaemia rates were higher in the postprandial group. Mean body weight was lower in the postmeal group, with the difference between postmeal and premeal weight change from baseline to week 52 of -0.87 kg (p = 0.243). CONCLUSION: Postprandial glulisine administration provided similar glycaemic control and was non-inferior to preprandial administration on weight gain, without additional risk of severe hypoglycaemia, showing dosing flexibility and the feasibility of such approach when clinically indicated.

Alogliptin added to insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes reduces HbA(1C) without causing weight gain or increased hypoglycaemia.

AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of alogliptin added to insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with insulin alone or combined with metformin. METHODS: In this 26-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 390 patients were randomized to receive alogliptin 12.5 mg (n = 131), alogliptin 25 mg (n = 129) or placebo (n = 130) once daily, as add-on to stable insulin therapy with or without metformin. The primary endpoint was change in haemoglobin A(1C) (HbA(1C)) at week 26. RESULTS: At week 26, mean HbA(1C) changes from the mean baseline value of 9.3% were significantly greater for alogliptin 12.5 mg (-0.63 +/- 0.08%) and alogliptin 25 mg (-0.71 +/- 0.08%) than placebo (-0.13 +/- 0.08%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater proportions of patients receiving alogliptin 12.5 or 25 mg than placebo had HbA(1C) decreases of > or =0.5, > or =1.0 and > or =1.5%. Insulin doses remained unchanged, and there were no differences in the proportions of patients experiencing hypoglycaemia among placebo (24%), alogliptin 12.5 mg (27%) and alogliptin 25 mg (27%). Mean weight increases from baseline at week 26 were similar for placebo (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg), alogliptin 12.5 mg (0.7 +/- 0.2 kg) and alogliptin 25 mg (0.6 +/- 0.2 kg). Incidences of overall adverse events, and of gastrointestinal, dermatological and infection-related events, were similar among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Adding alogliptin to previous insulin therapy (with or without metformin) significantly improved glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on insulin, without causing weight gain or increasing the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Further studies are warranted to explore the role of alogliptin added to optimized basal insulin regimens.

Effect of a barley breakfast cereal on blood glucose and insulin response in normal and diabetic patients.

Prowashonupana (Prowash) is a shrunken-endosperm, short awn, waxy starch, hulless barley with low starch, high fiber, high protein, and a relatively high concentration of free sugars. The study was designed to compare equivalent breakfast meals (w/w) of Prowash and oatmeal for glycemic response in diabetic and non-diabetic subjects. A commercial liquid meal replacer (LMR) was included as a reference standard. A substantial reduction of the post-prandial glycemic peak following ingestion of Prowash was observed as compared to LMR or oatmeal. In the non-diabetic subjects, the maximal rise in glucose from baseline was 26.3 +/- 3.9 mg/dL after LMR, 41.3 +/- 3.9 mg/dL after oatmeal and 6.4 +/- 2.7 mg/dL after Prowash (p < 0.01). The maximal increase in glucose in the diabetic patients was 69.9 +/- 4.5 mg/dL after LMR, 80.8 +/- 8.8 mg/dL after oatmeal and 28.4 +/- 3.5 mg/dL after Prowash (p < 0.01). The maximal increase in insulin post-LMR was 33.9 +/- 3.6 mIU/ml in the diabetic patients and 54.0 +/- 9.8 mIU/ml in the non-diabetic controls. Oatmeal elicited a maximal insulin increase of 29.9 +/- 4.2 mIU/ml in the control subjects and 21.4 +/- 2.5 mIU/ml in the diabetic patients. In contrast, the maximal insulin increase after Prowash was 8.6 +/- 1.5 mIU/ml in the non-diabetic controls and 6.8 +/- 1.2 mIU/ml in the diabetic patients (p < 0.01).

Post pressure hyperemia in the rat.

In prior studies in man, we have demonstrated that pressure-induced hyperemia lasts for prolonged periods as compared to the short-term hyperemia created by proximal arterial occlusion. We have analyzed this phenomenon in our well-studied rat model of skin blood flow. Skin blood flow was measured using laser Doppler techniques in Wistar Kyoto rats at the back, a nutritively perfused site, and at the plantar surface of the paw, where arteriovenous anastomotic perfusion dominates. A customized pressure feedback control device was used to vary applied pressures. At the back, pressures in excess of 80 mmHg resulted in occlusion, whereas at the paw 150 mmHg was required. The peak hyperemic flow after release of pressure was comparable to that elicited by proximal arterial occlusion with a blood pressure cuff. However, the post pressure hyperemia peak descended to a plateau value, which was 50-100% greater than baseline and continued for up to 20 min while the peak following proximal arterial occlusion returned to baseline within 4 min. At the back, post pressure hyperemia reached a maximum after application of 100 mmHg pressure. The application of higher pressures than required for occlusion produced no greater hyperemic response. At the paw, maximum post pressure hyperemia occurred at 100 mmHg, although this pressure level was not totally occlusive. Higher pressures resulted in no greater hyperemia. At the back, 10 min of occlusion produced a maximal peak value whereas 1 min was sufficient at the paw. The application of pressure to a heated probe with subsequent release, produced a hyperemic response. Normalized to baseline blood flow, there was no difference between the hyperemic responses at basal skin temperature and at 44 degrees C. There is a prolonged hyperemic response following local pressure occlusion compared to a much shorter period following proximal ischemic occlusion. One can presume two different mechanisms, one related to ischemia and the other a separate pressure related phenomenon. The thermal vasodilatory response is additive, not synergistic with the post pressure hyperemia we have demonstrated. This finding suggests that different mechanisms are involved in thermal vasodilation and post pressure hyperemia.

Determination of hemoglobin levels in the finger using near infrared spectroscopy.

We previously demonstrated that near-infrared spectroscopy can be used to measure blood flow. The spectrum of blood is dominated by hemoglobin. Therefore, it should be possible to determine the concentration of hemoglobin in tissue using near-infrared transmittance. We attempted to do this in the finger using a unique handheld multiple wavelength spectrophotometer. We took samples from 73 subjects and performed repeat measurements in several subjects. Hemoglobin level was determined at the time of near-infrared measurement. We performed correlation analysis between the hemoglobin values and the absorbance values. There was a strong correlation between hemoglobin levels and the 14 wavelengths (r = 0.738, n = 121, SEE = 1.7). We categorized the patients by hemoglobin level as either normal (12-16 g/dl), mildly anemic (10-12 g/dl), or moderately anemic (<10 g/dl). There were 21 patients in the low hemoglobin group, 29 in the middle range, and 23 in the normal range. The mean hemoglobin levels were 8.4 +/- 0.3 g/dl for the low group, 10.9 +/- 0.1 g/dl for the mildly anemic group, and 13.8 +/- 0.3 g/dl for the group with normal hemoglobin. There was a clear separation of absorbance values among the three groups. The major differences seen were in the midrange of the spectrum. It is encouraging that this first study of hemoglobin measurement yielded data permitting a discrimination of hemoglobin levels. It is hoped that future refinements will lead eventually to a non-invasive technique for the measurement of blood hemoglobin concentration.

Effects of estrogen replacement therapy on abdominal fat compartments as related to glucose and lipid metabolism in early postmenopausal women.

The effects of estrogen replacement therapy on lipid and glucose metabolism as related to abdominal fat distribution were investigated in fifty-one healthy postmenopausal women aged 52-53 years. They were randomized to treatment with either estradiol 2 mg or placebo daily for three months in a double-blind design. Forty-six women continued with estradiol for another nine months in an open design with the addition of medroxyprogesterone for ten days every three months. Intra-abdominal and subcutaneous abdominal fat, and intrapelvic and subcutaneous pelvic fat was estimated by computed tomography before and after one year of estrogen treatment. Euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp, oral glucose tolerance test and analyses of blood lipids were performed after 3 and 12 months of treatment. Estrogen replacement therapy decreased body fat mass as well as intra-abdominal and intrapelvic fat, but not the subcutaneous fat compartments. LDL cholesterol decreased and HDL cholesterol increased, whereas triglycerides were not changed by one year of estrogen treatment. Insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance were not affected by estrogen treatment. In postmenopausal women estrogen treatment for one year decreased intra-abdominal and intrapelvic fat compartments, but this was not related to changes in plasma lipid levels. Insulin sensitivity and plasma triglycerides were not affected by estrogen treatment.

Pioglitazone hydrochloride in combination with sulfonylurea therapy improves glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, placebo-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of pioglitazone in combination with a sulfonylurea in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: This 16-week, double-blind study included patients on a stable regimen of a sulfonylurea for > or = 30 days and with a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C) level > or = 8.0%. Patients were randomly assigned to receive once daily pioglitazone 15 mg (n = 184), pioglitazone 30 mg (n = 189), or placebo plus sulfonylurea (n = 187). RESULTS: Patients receiving pioglitazone + sulfonylurea had significant (P < 0.05) decreases from baseline in HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose levels compared with patients treated with placebo + sulfonylurea. As compared with placebo, HbA1C decreased by 0.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.06% to 1.2%) with pioglitazone 15 mg and 1.3% (CI: 1% to 1.6%) with 30 mg pioglitazone; fasting plasma glucose levels decreased by 39 mg/dL (95% CI: 27 to 52 mg/dL) with pioglitazone 15 mg and by 58 mg/dL (95% CI: 46-70 mg/dL) with 30 mg pioglitazone. Both pioglitazone + sulfonylurea groups had significant (P < 0.05) mean percent decreases in triglyceride levels (17%, 95% CI: 6% to 27% for 15 mg; 26%, 95% CI: 16% to 36% for 30 mg) and increases in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (6%, 95% CI: 1% to 11% for 15 mg; 13%, CI: 8% to 18% for 30 mg) compared with placebo + sulfonylurea. There were small but statistically significant mean percent increases in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in all groups. Pioglitazone was well tolerated, and the rates of adverse events were similar in all groups. CONCLUSION: In patients with type 2 diabetes, pioglitazone plus sulfonylurea significantly improves HbA1C and fasting plasma glucose levels with beneficial effects on serum triglyceride and HDL-cholesterol levels.

A randomized trial of rosiglitazone therapy in patients with inadequately controlled insulin-treated type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy and safety of rosiglitazone (RSG) when added to insulin in the treatment of type 2 diabetic patients who are inadequately controlled on insulin monotherapy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: After 8 weeks of insulin standardization and placebo (PBO) run-in, 319 type 2 diabetic patients with mean baseline HbA(1c) > or = 7.5% (8.9 +/- 1.1 to 9.1 +/- 1.3) on twice-daily insulin therapy (total daily dose > or = 30 U) were randomized to 26 weeks of additional treatment with RSG (4 or 8 mg daily) or PBO. Insulin dose could be down- titrated only for safety reasons. The primary end point was reduction of HbA(1c) from baseline. RESULTS: RSG 4 and 8 mg daily significantly improved glycemic control, which was unchanged on PBO. By intent-to-treat analysis, treatment with RSG 8 mg plus insulin resulted in a mean reduction from baseline in HbA(1c) of 1.2% (P < 0.0001), despite a 12% mean reduction of insulin dosage. Over 50% of subjects treated daily with RSG 8 mg plus insulin had a reduction of HbA(1c) > or = 1.0%. Neither total:HDL cholesterol nor LDL:HDL cholesterol ratios significantly changed with RSG treatment. Serious adverse events did not differ among groups. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of RSG to insulin treatment results in significant improvement in glycemic control and is generally well tolerated.

Hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal women: a randomized, placebo-controlled study of effects on coagulation and fibrinolytic factors.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on von Willebrand factor, factor (F)VIII, factor (F)VII, fibrinogen, antithrombin (AT) III, prothrombin fragments 1 and 2, protein C, total and free protein S, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1), tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) and resistance to activated protein C. DESIGN: Part 1: double blind randomized trial for 3 months. Part 2: open study for 9 months. SETTING: Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one postmenopausal women with a history of amenorrhoea of at least 6 months and body mass index > or = 24 kg m-2 participated in part 1 and 46 participated in part 2. INTERVENTION: Randomization for placebo (n=24) or HRT (n=27). HRT was given as 2 mg oestradiol valerate for the first 3 months, with the addition of 10 mg medroxyprogesterone for 10 days every third month thereafter. MEASUREMENTS: At baseline and after 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: During 0-3 months in the HRT group, FVII increased (P < 0.01), whereas fibrinogen, AT III and total protein S all decreased (P < 0.001 for all). Changes in variables were expressed as Delta-values. After 3 months Delta-values differed between groups for fibrinogen (P < 0.05), AT III (P < 0.001), total protein S (P < 0.001), and PAI-1 (P < 0.001). During 0-12 months, fibrinogen, total protein S, tPA (P < 0.01 for all) and AT III (P < 0.05) decreased. In the control group, all variables were unchanged during the study, except for increases (P < 0.05) in total protein S after 3 and 12 months, and a decrease (P < 0.01) in FVIII after 12 months. After 12 months Delta-values differed for fibrinogen (P < 0.05), AT III (P < 0.05) and total protein S (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Unopposed oestrogen substitution was associated with both potentially beneficial effects, such as decreases in fibrinogen, and potentially thrombogenic effects such as decreasing AT III and protein S and increasing FVII. During prolonged follow-up and addition of progesterone, differences between groups concerning FVII were attenuated. These data suggest that effects of HRT upon coagulation are most pronounced early after institution of unopposed treatment.

Relationship between abdominal fat compartments and glucose and lipid metabolism in early postmenopausal women.

The relationships between abdominal and pelvic fat compartments and glucose and lipid metabolism were investigated in early postmenopausal women. Fifty-five healthy, postmenopausal women aged 52-53 yr participated in the study. Fat distribution (intra-abdominal and sc abdominal fat, and intrapelvic and sc pelvic fat) was estimated by computed tomography. Insulin sensitivity was assessed by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. In a multiple regression analysis, the size of the intra-abdominal fat compartment was the only significant predictor of insulin sensitivity (r(2) = 24%; P = 0.0002). Plasma triglycerides were closely related to the size of the intra-abdominal fat compartment (r(2) = 26%; P < 0.0001), whereas plasma free fatty acid concentrations only correlated to the size of the sc abdominal fat compartment (r(2) = 18.5%, P = 0.001). In early postmenopausal women the amount of the intra-abdominal fat strongly influences insulin sensitivity and plasma triglyceride levels, whereas plasma free fatty acids are closely related to the amount of the sc abdominal fat. Accordingly, from a metabolic standpoint it seems most essential to reduce intra-abdominal fat in postmenopausal women.

Efficacy and safety of recombinant human nerve growth factor in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy: A randomized controlled trial. rhNGF Clinical Investigator Group.

CONTEXT: Nerve growth factor is a neurotrophic factor that promotes the survival of small fiber sensory neurons and sympathetic neurons in the peripheral nervous system. Recombinant human nerve growth factor (rhNGF) has demonstrated efficacy as treatment for peripheral neuropathy in experimental models and phase 2 clinical trials. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 12-month regimen of rhNGF in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial conducted from July 1997 through May 1999. SETTING: Eighty-four outpatient centers throughout the United States. PATIENTS: A total of 1019 men and women aged 18 to 74 years with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes and a sensory polyneuropathy attributable to diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either rhNGF, 0.1 microg/kg (n = 504), or placebo (n = 515) by subcutaneous injection 3 times per week for 48 weeks. Patients were assessed at baseline, 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was a change in neuropathy between baseline and week 48, demonstrated by the Neuropathy Impairment Score for the Lower Limbs, compared between the 2 groups. Secondary outcome measures included quantitative sensory tests using the CASE IV System, the Neuropathy Symptom and Change questionnaire, the Patient Benefit Questionnaire (PBQ), and a global symptom assessment, as well as nerve conduction studies and occurrence of new plantar foot ulcers. Patients also were evaluated for presence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among patients who received rhNGF, 418 (83%) completed the regimen compared with 461 (90%) who received placebo. Administration of rhNGF was safe, with few adverse events attributed to treatment apart from injection site pain/hyperalgesia and other pain syndromes. However, neither the primary end point (P =.25) nor most of the secondary end points demonstrated a significant benefit of rhNGF. Exceptions were the global symptom assessment (P =.03) and 2 of 32 comparisons within the PBQ, which showed a modest but significant benefit of rhNGF (P =.05 for severity of pain in the legs and P =.003 for 6-month symptoms in the feet and legs). CONCLUSION: Unlike previous phase 2 trials, this phase 3 clinical trial failed to demonstrate a significant beneficial effect of rhNGF on diabetic polyneuropathy. JAMA. 2000;284:2215-2221.

Pharmacotherapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVE: To review the drug treatments and some of the popular, nontraditional remedies now available for type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as selected investigational agents; to describe each medication's place in the overall approach to treatment. DATA SOURCES: English-language journals, abstracts, review articles, and newspaper accounts. DATA SYNTHESIS: In the past five years, there has been tremendous progress in the pharmacotherapy of diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes. Several new agents have entered the clinical arena, and many more are in the late stages of investigation leading to approval. Sulfonylureas stimulate the production and release of insulin; these drugs must be used in patients with an intact pancreas. The meglitinides are nonsulfonylurea agents that are also insulin secretagogues. Unlike the sulfonylureas, repaglinide appears to require the presence of glucose to close the adenosine triphosphate-sensitive potassium channels and induce calcium influx. Metformin reduces hepatic glucose production in some patients and increases peripheral glucose utilization, but its use is hampered by a high percentage of adverse reactions. Disaccharidase inhibitors effectively compensate for the defective early-phase insulin release by slowing the production of sugars from carbohydrates. Thiazolidinediones appear to activate peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, which is involved in the metabolism of lipids. Short-acting insulin and the role of weight-loss agents are also discussed. CONCLUSIONS: The availability of new options for diabetes therapy provides a chance for successful therapy in a larger number of patients. However, it is important to consider how much true benefit these new forms of treatment will have on the diabetic community. The best choice for a patient remains controversial.

Hormone replacement therapy in healthy postmenopausal women. Effects on intraplatelet cyclic guanosine monophosphate, plasma endothelin-1 and neopterin.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate beneficial effects of postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) on endothelial function, measured as intraplatelet cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP, mediator of nitric oxide), cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP, mediator of prostacyclin) and plasma endothelin-1 (ET-1), and on monocyte activation, measured as plasma neopterin. DESIGN: Part 1: double-blind randomized trial for 3 months; part 2: open study for 9 months. SETTING: The study was performed at the Department of Endocrinology, University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one postmenopausal women participated in part 1 and 46 in part 2. Inclusion criteria included a history of amenorrhoea for at least 6 months before the study and body mass index >/= 24 kg m-2. INTERVENTION: Randomization for either placebo (n = 24) or HRT (n = 27). HRT was given as 2 mg oestradiol valerate for the first 3 months with the addition of 10 mg medroxyprogesterone for 10 days every third month thereafter. MEASUREMENTS: Performed at baseline and after 3 and 12 months of the study. RESULTS: In the HRT group, intraplatelet cGMP increased from 0.56 (0.35-0.94) to 0.61 (0.42-3. 40) and 0.65 (0.43-1.08) pmol (109 platelets)-1 after 3 and 12 months, respectively (P = 0.01), whereas plasma ET-1 decreased from 3.2 (1.1-6.8) to 2.0 (0.8-5.1) and 1.8 (0.4-15.4) pg mL-1 (P < 0. 001). Intraplatelet cAMP and plasma neopterin were unchanged. When smokers (n = 15) and non-smokers (n = 12) in the HRT group were analysed separately, significant effects were seen only amongst smokers. The control group showed unchanged levels of cGMP, cAMP, ET-1 and neopterin. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest beneficial effects of HRT on endothelial function which may account for anti-atherogenic effects of HRT in postmenopausal women, especially in smokers. No effects of HRT were seen upon monocyte activation.