Preoperative pain and recurrence risk in patients with peritoneal endometriosis.

OBJECTIVE: Pain symptoms in endometriosis patients do not necessarily correlate with the extent of the disease, and there is little evidence regarding the recurrence risk. Aim of this study was to assess the risk factors for the recurrence of endometriosis, with regard to preoperative and postoperative pain. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single institution study. POPULATION: A total of 150 patients were followed up for recurrence after surgical treatment for endometriosis. METHODS: The patients were interviewed retrospectively to obtain information about pain levels during the course of the disease. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Disease free survival. RESULTS: High preoperative pain levels were associated with a higher risk of recurrence after 4 years of follow-up. The hazards ratio was 2.30 (95% CI, 1.22-4.31; p = 0.009). None of the other parameters assessed for medical history, reproductive history, or lifestyle was associated with the recurrence risk. CONCLUSIONS: The risk for recurrence after surgery for endometriosis may be substantially influenced by the patients' perception of pain. Risk classifications for the recurrence risk in endometriosis are nonexistent. Developing these is imperatively needed soon to improve further treatment and/or prophylaxis for patients after surgery. A classification might be improved by adding sensory testing before surgery.

Acceptance for preventive genetic testing and prophylactic surgery in women with a family history of breast and gynaecological cancers.

The fear of family members of patients with breast or gynaecologic cancer of developing a similar disease is often high. We investigated the acceptance for genetic testing of untested women with a positive family history and their attitude for prophylactic surgery. A total of 659 women with a familial history of breast or gynaecologic cancer were asked to answer a questionnaire regarding their interest in genetic testing for breast cancer as well as for gynaecologic carcinoma and their interest in prophylactic surgery. Genetic testing is seen to be accepted by the majority of participants: 85.0 and 77.8% chose a genetic test for breast and gynaecologic cancer, respectively. Prophylactic surgery was much less chosen; prophylactic mastectomy as well as prophylactic hysterectomy or bilateral prophylactic oophorectomy was an option only for a minority of women. Genetic testing for risk assessment of healthy women with a positive family history was observed to be accepted by a majority of participants. Prophylactic surgery was an option only for a minority and was not acceptable for most of the women.

Awareness of general and personal risk factors for uterine cancer among healthy women.

Participation rates in gynaecological cancer screening are influenced by different factors. The knowledge of general and personal risk factors for uterine cancer among women might influence their interest in gynaecological cancer screening. Two thousand nine hundred women in 23 gynaecological outpatient services were invited to answer a structured questionnaire regarding general and personal risk factors for cervical and endometrial carcinoma; 2108 women participated. Women with a history of cancer were excluded from the study. It was found that levels of knowledge about uterine carcinoma were low. Only 47.4% of women knew the difference between the sites of origin of cervical and endometrial cancer. Seventy-seven per cent of participants assessed their knowledge about uterine malignancies as insufficient; 96.3% would appreciate more information about uterine cancer. Younger women were significantly less well informed than postmenopausal women. Known risk factors such as smoking or human papillomavirus (HPV) infection as factors for cervical cancer were underestimated; most women assessed genetic factors as most important for the development of uterine cancer. The level of information about risk factors as well as general facts about gynaecological cancer in women is low. Ameliorating this lack of information might influence the perception of uterine cancer and result in higher participation rates in gynaecological cancer screening.