Direct peroral cholangioscopy with conventional upper gastrointestinal endoscope.

An 83-year-old male with a history of Whipple procedure (pancreatoduodenectomy) due to pancreatic cancer, underwent endoscopic retrograde colangiopancreatography (ERCP) for acute cholangitis. Because of the altered anatomy, an upper gastrointestinal endoscope was used. Severe stricture of the hepaticojejunal anastomosis was found. The anastomotic stricture was dilated with a 12mm through-the-scope (TTS) balloon under fluoroscopy and direct visualization. Right and left ducts were explored with Dormia basket and balloon, with extraction of bile duct stones and pus. Cholangioscopy with upper gastrointestinal endoscope was performed and residual cholesterol stones were identified in branches of the left hepatic duct and these were removed with the stone extraction balloon under endoscopic visualization. Ciprofloxacin was administered for 5 days and post interventional course was uneventful. Direct peroral colangioscopy using a conventional endoscope provides high quality endoscopic imaging, enabling access to virtual chromoendoscopy and the 2.8 mm diameter working channel allows for interventional procedures. This strategy is useful and economical, helping confirm clearance of common bile duct stones, while allowing extraction of any residual stones. New, cost effective scopes for peroral cholangioscopy are needed to improve the safety and success rate.

Refractory benign esophageal strictures - Cut or dilate?

A 67-year-old male patient with long term gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) on double dose proton pump inhibitors, presented with dysphagia for soft foods. He underwent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy which revealed a severe regular stricture at the level of the esophagogastric junction with a residual luminal orifice measuring 2 mm. Biopsies at the site of the stricture ruled out malignancy and were suggestive of peptic etiology. The patient underwent twelve endoscopic dilatation sessions, 11 of them with Savary-Guillard bougies and 1 with TTS balloon, up to a maximal diameter of 18 mm, with only partial relief of dysphagia symptoms. Due to the persistence of the stricture and dysphagia symptoms, incisional therapy was performed in two endoscopic sessions at the site of the stricture was performed with a Mori´s knife parallel to the longitudinal axis of the esophagus in a radial manner in all of the quadrants. There were no adverse events. On follow-up, 2 months later after the last session, the patient had a significant improvement and did not have any dysphagia symptoms. UGI endoscopy revealed minimal residual narrowing at the site of the previous stricture in the distal esophagus. He remains asymptomatic after 6 months follow-up.

Assessment of quality in screening colonoscopy for colorectal cancer.

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in decreasing the incidence of colorectal cancer (CRC) is largely dependent on the detection of polyps and the quality of the procedure. Several key quality measures have been proposed to improve the effectiveness of screening colonoscopies. AIM: To evaluate quality indicators of screening colonoscopy in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: All CRC screening colonoscopies performed between 2005 and 2009 in a single tertiary center were reviewed for internationally accepted quality measures. RESULTS: Of the 1545 individuals who underwent first-time screening colonoscopy 38% were male and 62% were female. The mean age of the patients was 60.4 years and the mean difference in ages was ± 10.3 years. Cecal intubation rate was 91% (1336), however ileocecal valve photo documentation was performed in only 81% (1248) colonoscopies. The quality of bowel preparation was classified as: good 76% (1171), reasonable 11% (174), and poor 13% (200). Polyp detection rate (PDR) was 33% (503). The prevalence of polyps ≥1 cm in size was 5% (82). PDR was significantly higher in men than in women (44% [260] vs 25% [243], P = 0.0001). Other factors significantly influencing PDR were quality of bowel preparation (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.9-1.6) and age over 50 (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3-2.9). Left colonic polyps were associated with a risk ratio of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.8-2.9) of lesions in the other colonic segments compared to no polyps in the left colon. None of the colonoscopists reported withdrawal time. CONCLUSION: Cecal intubation rate and quality of bowel preparation were suboptimal. The polyp detection rate compares favorably to accepted standards and its main determinants are male sex, age >50 years, quality of bowel preparation, and the presence of left colonic polyps.