Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 39(2): 278-292, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37910590

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The European University Hospitals Alliance (EUHA) recognises the need to move from the classical approach of measuring key performance indicators (KPIs) to an anticipative approach based on predictable indicators to take decisions (Key Decision Indicators, KDIs). It might help managers to anticipate poor results before they occur to prevent or correct them early. OBJECTIVE: This paper aims to identify potential KDIs and to prioritize those most relevant for high complexity hospitals. METHODS: A narrative review was performed to identify KPIs with the potential to become KDIs. Then, two surveys were conducted with EUHA hospital managers (n = 51) to assess potential KDIs according to their relevance for decision-making (Value) and their availability and effort required to be predicted (Feasibility). Potential KDIs are prioritized for testing as predictable indicators and developing in the short term if they were classified as highly Value and Feasible. RESULTS: The narrative review identified 45 potential KDIs out of 153 indicators and 11 were prioritized. Of nine EUHA hospitals, 25 members from seven answered, prioritizing KDIs related to the emergency department (ED), hospitalisation and surgical processes (n = 8), infrastructure and resources (n = 2) and health outcomes and quality (n = 1). The highest scores in this group were for those related to ED. The results were homogeneous among the different hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Potential KDIs related to care processes and hospital patient flow was the most prioritized ones to test as being predictable. KDIs represent a new approach to decision-making, whose potential to be predicted could impact the planning and management of hospital resources and, therefore, healthcare quality.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Hospitalização , Humanos , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Hospitais Universitários , Pacientes Internados
2.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 143 Suppl 1: 68-73, 2014 Jul.
Artigo em Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25128363

RESUMO

The implementation of an accreditation model for healthcare centres in Catalonia which was launched for acute care hospitals, leaving open the possibility of implementing it in the rest of lines of service (mental health and addiction, social health, and primary healthcare centres) is described. The model is based on the experience acquired over more tan 31 years of hospital accreditation and quality assessment linked to management. In January 2006 a model with accreditation methodology adapted to the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) model was launched. 83 hospitals are accredited, with an average of 82.6% compliance with the standards required for accreditation. The number of active assessment bodies is 5, and the accreditation period is 3 years. A higher degree of compliance of the so-called "agent" criteria with respect to "outcome" criteria is obtained. Qualitative aspects for implementation to be stressed are: a strong commitment both from managers and staff in the centres, as well as a direct and fluent communication between the accreditation body (Ministry of Health of the Government of Catalonia) and accredited centres. Professionalism of audit bodies and an optimal communication between audit bodies and accredited centres is also added.


Assuntos
Acreditação , Hospitais/normas , Fundações , Órgãos Governamentais , Humanos , Relações Interinstitucionais , Auditoria Médica , Modelos Organizacionais , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Melhoria de Qualidade , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Espanha , Gestão da Qualidade Total
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA