Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 13 de 13
Filtrar
1.
J Med Internet Res ; 26: e59791, 2024 Oct 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39466303

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Health information technology (health IT) has revolutionized health care in the United States through interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and electronic patient access to health information. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to examine progress in health IT adoption and its alignment with the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy/Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ASTP's) mission to enhance health care through data access and exchange. METHODS: This study leverages data on end users of health IT to capture trends in engagement in interoperable clinical care data exchange (ability to find, send, receive, and integrate information from outside organizations), e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and capabilities to enable patient access to electronic health information. Data were primarily sourced from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey IT Supplement (2008 to 2023), Surescripts e-prescribing use data (2008 to 2023), the National Cancer Institute's Health Information National Trends Survey (2014 to 2022), and the National Center for Health Statistics' National Electronic Health Records Survey (2009 to 2023). RESULTS: Since 2009, there has been a 10-fold increase in electronic health record (EHR) use among hospitals and a 5-fold increase among physicians. This enabled the interoperable exchange of electronic health information, e- prescribing, electronic public health data exchange, and the means for patients and their caregivers to access crucial personal health information digitally. As of 2023, 70% of hospitals are interoperable, with many providers integrated within EHR systems. Nearly all pharmacies and 92% of prescribers possess e-prescribing capabilities, an 85%-point increase since 2008. In 2013, 40% of hospitals and one-third of physicians allowed patients to view their online medical records. Patient access has improved, with 97% of hospitals and 65% of physicians possessing EHRs that enable patients to access their online medical records. As of 2022, three-fourths of individuals report being offered access to patient portals, and over half (57%) report engaging with their health information through their patient portal. Electronic public health reporting has also seen an increase, with most hospitals and physicians actively engaged in key reporting types. CONCLUSIONS: Federal incentives have contributed to the widespread adoption of EHRs and broad digitization in health care, while efforts to promote interoperability have encouraged collaboration across health care entities. As a result, interoperable clinical care data exchange, e-prescribing, electronic public health reporting, and patient access to health information have grown substantially over the past quarter century and have been shown to improve health care outcomes. However, interoperability hurdles, usability issues, data security concerns, and inequitable patient access persist. Addressing these issues will require collaborative efforts among stakeholders to promote data standardization, implement governance structures, and establish robust health information exchange networks.


Assuntos
Informática Médica , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Prescrição Eletrônica/estatística & dados numéricos , Interoperabilidade da Informação em Saúde
2.
JMIR Form Res ; 8: e64085, 2024 Oct 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39393063

RESUMO

This study identified 22 features that are used and the needs for desired features/data in patient portals that enable online access to medical records. Data collected at a Midwestern state fair indicates that while most participants used patient portals, use and desirability of specific features varied widely. Identified needs for enhanced data access, portal functionality, and usability can be used to inform effective patient portal design.


Assuntos
Portais do Paciente , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Avaliação das Necessidades , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39401254

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To understand barriers to obtaining and using interoperable information at US hospitals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 2023 nationally representative survey data on US hospitals (N = 2420), we examined major and minor barriers to exchanging information with other organizations, and how barriers vary by hospital characteristics and methods used to obtain information. Using a series of regression models, we examined how hospital experiences with barriers relate to routine use of information at responding hospitals. RESULTS: In 2023, most hospitals experienced at least one minor (81%) or major (62%) barrier to exchange, with the most common major barriers relating to different vendors and exchange partners' capabilities. Higher-resourced hospitals and those often using network-based exchange tended to experience more minor barriers whereas lower-resourced hospitals and those often using mail/fax or direct access to outside electronic health records experienced more major barriers. In multivariate regression, hospitals indicating "Patient matching" and "Costs to exchange" were a major or minor barrier had the strongest independent negative association with the likelihood of reporting providers at their hospital frequently use information from outside organizations. DISCUSSION: Despite progress in interoperable exchange, various barriers remain. The prevalence of barriers varied by hospital type and methods used, with barriers more often preventing exchange for lower-resourced hospitals and those using outdated exchange methods. CONCLUSION: While several technical and policy efforts are underway to address prevalent barriers, it will be important to monitor whether efforts are successful in ensuring information from outside organizations can be seamlessly exchanged and used to inform patient care.

4.
Health Serv Res ; 2024 Jul 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38952231

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in hospitals' collection and use of data on patients' health-related social needs (HRSN) by availability of programs or strategies in place to address patients' HRSN and social determinants of health (SDOH) of communities. DATA SOURCES: The 2021 American Hospital Association Annual Survey and 2022 Information Technology (IT) Supplement. STUDY DESIGN: This cross-sectional study described hospitals' engagement in screening and the availability of programs or strategies to address nine different HRSN. We assessed differences in screening rates and uses of data collected through screening among hospitals with and without programs or strategies in place to address HRSN or SDOH using Chi-squared tests of independence. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Analyses were restricted to IT Supplement respondents with complete data for social needs questions asked in the Annual Survey (N = 1997). PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In 2022, hospitals used social needs data collected through screening for various purposes including discharge planning and clinical decision-making at their hospital as well as to refer patients to needed resources and assess community-level needs. Hospitals with a program or strategy in place had higher rates of screening across all domains and higher rates of using of data collected through screening for uses involving exchange or coordination with external entities. CONCLUSIONS: Collection of social needs data may help inform the development of programs or strategies to address HRSN and SDOH, which in turn can enable providers to screen for these needs and use the data in the near term for care delivery and in the long term to address community and population needs.

5.
JAMIA Open ; 6(4): ooad103, 2023 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38033785

RESUMO

Objective: To understand whether hospitals had electronic access to information needed to treat COVID-19 patients and identify factors contributing to differences in information availability. Materials and methods: Using 2021 data from the American Hospital Association IT Supplement, we produced national estimates on the electronic availability of information needed to treat COVID-19 at US non-federal acute care hospitals (N = 1976) and assessed differences in information availability by hospital characteristics and engagement in interoperable exchange. Results: In 2021, 38% of hospitals electronically received information needed to effectively treat COVID-19 patients. Information availability was significantly higher among higher-resourced hospitals and those engaged in interoperable exchange (44%) compared to their counterparts. In adjusted analyses, hospitals engaged in interoperable exchange were 140% more likely to receive needed information electronically compared to those not engaged in exchange (relative risk [RR]=2.40, 95% CI, 1.82-3.17, P<.001). System member hospitals (RR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.36-1.92, P<.001) and major teaching hospitals (RR = 1.35, 95% CI, 1.10-1.64, P=.004) were more likely to have information available; for-profit hospitals (RR = 0.14, 95% CI, 0.08-0.24, P<.001) and hospitals in high social deprivation areas (RR = 0.83, 95% CI, 0.71-0.98, P = .02) were less likely to have information available. Discussion: Despite high rates of hospitals' engagement in interoperable exchange, hospitals' electronic access to information needed to support the care of COVID-19 patients was limited. Conclusion: Limited electronic access to patient information from outside sources may impede hospitals' ability to effectively treat COVID-19 and support patient care during public health emergencies.

6.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(11): e2343312, 2023 Nov 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962892

RESUMO

This cross-sectional study analyzes the use of patient portal apps and third-party apps for managing multiple patient portals between 2019 and 2022.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Aplicativos Móveis , Humanos
7.
JAMA Health Forum ; 4(11): e233883, 2023 Nov 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37948063

RESUMO

Importance: Patient access to electronic health information (EHI) available via online medical records and through patient portals has been shown to help individuals make informed health decisions, which are associated with better health outcomes. Objective: To assess progress in patient engagement with EHI and to identify racial or ethnic disparities in access to patient portals. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a repeated cross-sectional study using data from the US Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS), a nationally representative survey of US adults that tracks individuals' access and use of their health information. Six cycles of HINTS were included (2014, 2017-2020, 2022); data for the disparities analysis came from the 2022 HINTS. Data analyses were performed in April 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient reports of (1) being offered portal access by a health care provider (HCP); (2) being encouraged by the HCP to use the portal; (3) accessing their portal; and (4) using the portal for various purposes. Additional key measures included methods used to access portals and self-reported ease of understanding information contained in the online medical records or portals. Results: The total study population included 22 266 individuals (mean [SE] age, 49.9 [0.15] years) of whom 13 348 (54%) were female; 909 (5%) self-identified as Asian, 3523 (12%) as Black, 3178 (14%) as Hispanic, 13 555 (66%) as White, and 785 (3%) as another or more than 1 race. Nationally, patient portal access increased each year from 2014 through 2022, with a 46% increase observed between 2020 (n = 3319) and 2022 (n = 5437). However, in 2022, Black and Hispanic individuals reported being offered access to a portal by their HCP at significantly lower rates compared with White individuals (73% vs 81%; χ21 = 22.24; P < .001; and 62% vs 81%; χ21 = 135.57; P < .001, respectively) as well as accessing a patient portal at lower rates (60% vs 70%; χ21 = 23.80; P < .001; and 57% vs 70%; χ21 = 49.02; P < .001, respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this repeated cross-sectional study of US adult respondents to the HINTS suggest that access to and engagement with patient portals increased significantly from 2014 through 2022, but racial and ethnic disparities in patient access persisted in 2022. However, there were no significant differences in use or understanding of information available in the online medical records among those who accessed them, which suggests that efforts to promote equitable opportunities to access EHI would likely be associated with increased patient access.


Assuntos
Acesso à Informação , Portais do Paciente , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Transversais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Inquéritos e Questionários , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Brancos
8.
Am J Manag Care ; 29(1): 50-55, 2023 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36716154

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To understand hospitals' access to and use of data from electronic health record (EHR) developers that quantify the amount of time clinicians spend documenting clinical care in EHRs. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive analysis of 4 waves of a nationally representative survey of US nonfederal acute care hospitals from 2017 to 2019 and 2021 (N = 10,662 across years). METHODS: We identified the share of hospitals that had access to EHR documentation time measures between 2017 and 2021 and how access varied by hospital and EHR characteristics. We then described how EHR data were used among hospitals with access and whether use varied by developer. RESULTS: The share of hospitals with access to EHR documentation time measures increased significantly each year between 2017 and 2021, when more than two-thirds of hospitals reported having access to these measures. Despite hospitals' increased access to measures that track EHR time, lower-resourced hospitals, nonteaching hospitals, and hospitals with non-market-leading EHR developers were less likely to report having access than their counterparts. In 2021, the 2 most common uses of EHR data were "identifying providers in need of training and support" and "identifying areas to improve clinical workflow." The share of hospitals indicating use of EHR data increased between 2019 and 2021 for all studied uses. CONCLUSIONS: A higher proportion of hospitals with access to EHR documentation time measures used them for more purposes over time, suggesting their increased value. Although hospitals' access to and use of EHR documentation measures increased significantly in the last 5 years, future research efforts should investigate whether the use of these measures translates into reduced burden for providers.


Assuntos
Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hospitais , Humanos , Fatores de Tempo , Documentação
9.
J Am Med Inform Assoc ; 30(2): 308-317, 2023 01 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36451262

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify racial and ethnic disparities in patient portal offers, access, and use and to examine the role of providers in facilitating access to electronic health information (EHI) by offering patient portals and encouraging their use. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using nationally representative survey data from 2019 and 2020 (N = 8028), we examined disparities in patients being offered access to a portal by their provider and differences in subsequent access and use. Using multivariable models, we estimated the effect of race and ethnicity on the likelihood of being offered, accessing or using a portal. Among those offered, we examined the relationship between provider encouragement and portal access; and for those who did not access their portal, we explored reasons for nonuse. RESULTS: Black and Hispanic individuals were offered and accessed patient portals at significantly lower rates than White individuals. Compared to Whites, Black and Hispanic individuals were 5.2 percentage-points less likely to be offered a portal (P < .05) and, among those offered, 7.9 percentage-points less likely to access their portal (P < .05). Black and Hispanic individuals who were offered and accessed a portal were 12 percentage-points more likely than Whites to use it to download or transmit information (P < .01). Individuals who were offered a portal and encouraged to use it were 21 percentage-points more likely to access it. DISCUSSION: Differences in patient portal access and use are likely driven by disparities in which groups of patients reported being offered a portal. CONCLUSIONS: Providers play an important role in increasing access to EHI by facilitating access to patient portals.


Assuntos
Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Portais do Paciente , Papel do Médico , Humanos , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Portais do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , População Branca , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/etnologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano
10.
J Gen Intern Med ; 38(4): 881-888, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36229762

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite widespread adoption of state prescription drug monitoring programs (PDMPs), it is unclear how often PDMPs are accessed through an electronic health record system (EHR-PDMP integration), or whether efforts to make PDMPs easier to access and use have improved their utility. OBJECTIVE: To produce national-level estimates on the use of PDMPs among office-based physicians and benefits associated with their use. DESIGN: We use nationally representative survey data to produce descriptive statistics on PDMP use and associated benefits among office-based physicians in the USA. PARTICIPANTS: 1398 office-based physicians who prescribe controlled substances. MAIN MEASURES: We examined physician-reported ease and frequency of PDMP use, and how EHR-PDMP integration affects frequency and ease of use. Multivariate models were used to assess whether characteristics of PDMP use were related to physician-reported benefits such as reduced prescribing of controlled substances and perceived improvements in clinical decision-making. KEY RESULTS: In 2019, two-thirds of office-based physicians in the USA reported frequent use of their state PDMP and over three-quarters reported they were easy to use. Both frequency and ease of use were positively correlated with PDMP integration status. Respondents who frequently checked their state's PDMP were 8.7 percentage points (95% CI -.4 to 17.8) more likely to report perceived benefits and reported 2.2 (95% CI 1.54 to 2.83) more benefits. Respondents who indicated their PDMP was easy to use were 12.7 percentage points (95% CI .040 to .214) more likely to report perceived benefits and reported 0.94 (95% CI 0.26 to 1.61) more benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest efforts to make PDMPs easier to access and use aided physicians in making informed clinical decisions that may not be captured by reduced prescribing alone. Efforts to further increase frequency and ease of use-including advancing a standards-based approach to PDMP and EHR data interoperability-may further increase the benefit of PDMPs.


Assuntos
Médicos , Programas de Monitoramento de Prescrição de Medicamentos , Humanos , Analgésicos Opioides , Substâncias Controladas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Padrões de Prática Médica
12.
Ann Emerg Med ; 78(6): 726-737, 2021 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34353653

RESUMO

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The goals of this study were to determine the current and projected supply in 2030 of contributors to emergency care, including emergency residency-trained and board-certified physicians, other physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants. In addition, this study was designed to determine the current and projected demand for residency-trained, board-certified emergency physicians. METHODS: To forecast future workforce supply and demand, sources of existing data were used, assumptions based on past and potential future trends were determined, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine how the final forecast would be subject to variance in the baseline inputs and assumptions. Methods included: (1) estimates of the baseline workforce supply of physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants; (2) estimates of future changes in the raw numbers of persons entering and leaving that workforce; (3) estimates of the productivity of the workforce; and (4) estimates of the demand for emergency care services. The methodology assumes supply equals demand in the base year and estimates the change between the base year and 2030; it then compares supply and demand in 2030 under different scenarios. RESULTS: The task force consensus was that the most likely future scenario is described by: 2% annual graduate medical education growth, 3% annual emergency physician attrition, 20% encounters seen by a nurse practitioner or physician assistant, and 11% increase in emergency department visits relative to 2018. This scenario would result in a surplus of 7,845 emergency physicians in 2030. CONCLUSION: The specialty of emergency medicine is facing the likely oversupply of emergency physicians in 2030. The factors leading to this include the increasing supply of and changing demand for emergency physicians. An organized, collective approach to a balanced workforce by the specialty of emergency medicine is imperative.


Assuntos
Educação de Pós-Graduação em Medicina , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicina de Emergência/educação , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Médicos/provisão & distribuição , Serviços Médicos de Emergência/tendências , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Humanos
13.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(3): e213789, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33787910

RESUMO

Importance: The COVID-19 pandemic coupled with health disparities have highlighted the disproportionate burden of disease among Black, Hispanic, and Native American (ie, American Indian or Alaska Native) populations. Increasing transparency around the representation of these populations in health care professions may encourage efforts to increase diversity that could improve cultural competence among health care professionals and reduce health disparities. Objective: To estimate the racial/ethnic diversity of the current health care workforce and the graduate pipeline for 10 health care professions and to evaluate whether the diversity of the pipeline suggests greater representation of Black, Hispanic, and Native American populations in the future. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used weighted data from the 2019 American Community Survey (ACS) to compare the diversity of 10 health care occupations (advanced practice registered nurses, dentists, occupational therapists, pharmacists, physical therapists, physician assistants, physicians, registered nurses, respiratory therapists, and speech-language pathologists) with the diversity of the US working-age population, and 2019 data from the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) were used to compare the diversity of graduates with that of the US population of graduation age. Data from the IPEDS included all awards and degrees conferred between July 1, 2018, and June 30, 2019, in the US. Main Outcomes and Measures: A health workforce diversity index (diversity index) was developed to compare the racial/ethnic diversity of the 10 health care professions (or the graduates in the pipeline) analyzed with the racial/ethnic diversity of the current working-age population (or average student-age population). For the current workforce, the index was the ratio of current workers in a health occupation to the total working-age population by racial/ethnic group. For new graduates, the index was the ratio of recent graduates to the population aged 20 to 35 years by racial/ethnic group. A value equal to 1 indicated equal representation of the racial/ethnic groups in the current workforce (or pipeline) compared with the working-age population. Results: The study sample obtained from the 2019 ACS comprised a weighted total count of 148 358 252 individuals aged 20 to 65 years (White individuals: 89 756 689; Black individuals: 17 916 227; Hispanic individuals: 26 953 648; and Native American individuals: 1 108 404) who were working or searching for work and a weighted total count of 71 608 009 individuals aged 20 to 35 years (White individuals: 38 995 242; Black individuals: 9 830 765; Hispanic individuals: 15 257 274; and Native American individuals: 650 221) in the educational pipeline. Among the 10 professions assessed, the mean diversity index for Black people was 0.54 in the current workforce and in the educational pipeline. In 5 of 10 health care professions, representation of Black graduates was lower than representation in the current workforce (eg, occupational therapy: 0.31 vs 0.50). The mean diversity index for Hispanic people was 0.34 in the current workforce; it improved to 0.48 in the educational pipeline but remained lower than 0.50 in 6 of 10 professions, including physical therapy (0.33). The mean diversity index for Native American people was 0.54 in the current workforce and increased to 0.57 in the educational pipeline. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that Black, Hispanic, and Native American people were underrepresented in the 10 health care professions analyzed. Although some professions had greater diversity than others and there appeared to be improvement among graduates in the educational pipeline compared with the current workforce, additional policies are needed to further strengthen and support a workforce that is more representative of the population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Atenção à Saúde/etnologia , Etnicidade , Pessoal de Saúde , Mão de Obra em Saúde , Pandemias , Grupos Raciais , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Competência Cultural , Diversidade Cultural , Feminino , Previsões , Pessoal de Saúde/educação , Pessoal de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Grupos Minoritários , SARS-CoV-2 , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA