Pharmacokinetics of propofol in severely obese surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Existing PK models of propofol include sparse data from very obese patients. The aim of this study was to develop a PK model based on standardised surgical conditions and spanning from normal-weight up to, and including, a high number of very obese patients. METHODS: Adult patients scheduled for laparoscopic cholecystectomy or bariatric surgery were studied. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol 2 mg/kg adjusted body weight over 2 min followed by 6 mg/kg/h adjusted body weight over 30 min. For the remainder of the operation anaesthesia was maintained with sevoflurane. Remifentanil was dosed according to clinical need. Eight arterial samples were drawn in a randomised block sampling regimen over a span of 24 h. Time-concentration data were analysed by population PK modelling using non-linear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS: Four hundred and seventy four serum propofol concentrations were collected from 69 patients aged 19-60 years with a BMI 21.6-67.3 kg/m2. Twenty one patients had a BMI above 50 kg/m2. A 3-compartment PK model was produced wherein three different body weight descriptors and sex were included as covariates in the final model. Total body weight was found to be a covariate for clearance and Q3; lean body weight for V1, V2 and Q2; predicted normal weight for V3 and sex for V1. The fixed allometric exponent of 0.75 applied to all clearance parameters improved the performance of the model. Accuracy and precision were 1.4% and 21.7% respectively in post-hoc performance evaluation. CONCLUSION: We have developed a new PK model of propofol that is suitable for all adult weight classes. Specifically, it is based on data from an unprecedented number of individuals with very high BMI.

Current status of perioperative hypnotics, role of benzodiazepines, and the case for remimazolam: a narrative review.

Anaesthesiologists and non-anaesthesiologist sedationists have a limited set of available i.v. hypnotics, further reduced by the withdrawal of thiopental in the USA and its near disappearance in Europe. Meanwhile, demand for sedation increases and new clinical groups are using what traditionally are anaesthesiologists' drugs. Improved understanding of the determinants of perioperative morbidity and mortality has spotlighted hypotension as a potent cause of patient harm, and practice must be adjusted to respect this. High-dose propofol sedation may be harmful, and a critical reappraisal of drug choices and doses is needed. The development of remimazolam, initially for procedural sedation, allows reconsideration of benzodiazepines as the hypnotic component of a general anaesthetic even if their characterisation as i.v. anaesthetics is questionable. Early data suggest that a combination of remimazolam and remifentanil can induce and maintain anaesthesia. Further work is needed to define use cases for this technique and to determine the impact on patient outcomes.

Standard setting anchor statements: a double cross-over trial of two different methods.

This article was migrated. The article was marked as recommended. Context: We challenge the philosophical acceptability of the Angoff method, and propose an alternative method of standard setting based on how important it is for candidates to know the material each test item assesses, and not how difficult it is for a subgroup of candidates to answer each item. Methods: The practicalities of an alternative method of standard setting are evaluated here, for the first time, with direct comparison to an Angoff method. To negate bias due to any leading effects, a prospective cross-over design was adopted involving two groups of judges (n=7 and n=8), both of which set the standards for the same two 100 item multiple choice question tests, by the two different methods. Results: Overall, we found that the two methods took a similar amount of time to complete. The alternative method produced a higher cut-score (by 12-14%), and had a higher degree of variability between judges' cut-scores (by 5%). When using the alternative method, judges reported a small, but statistically significant, increase in their confidence to decide accurately the standard (by 3%). Conclusion: This is a new approach to standard setting where the quantitative differences are slight, but there are clear qualitative advantages associated with use of the alternative method.

De-mystifying the "Mixifusor".

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using a mixture of propofol and remifentanil in the same syringe has become an accepted technique in Pediatric Anesthesia. A survey by a group of respected UK anesthetists demonstrated a low incidence of serious complications, related to the pharmacology and dose of the drugs. However, a current guideline for the safe use of TIVA recommends against this practice. Pharmaceutical concerns include the physical stability of the emulsion when remifentanil is mixed with propofol; changes in drug concentration over time; nonuniform mixing of propofol and remifentanil; the risk of bacterial contamination; and the potential for drug administration errors. Propofol and remifentanil have markedly different pharmacokinetic profiles. When remifentanil is mixed with propofol and delivered as a target-controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, remifentanil delivery is not target-controlled but passively follows the variable infusion rates calculated by the syringe driver to deliver predicted plasma or effect-site concentrations of propofol. The pharmacokinetic consequences can be illustrated using pharmacokinetic modeling similar to that used in TCI pumps. The clinical consequences reflect the dose-dependent pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Increasing the target propofol concentration produces a rapid increase and peak in remifentanil concentration that risks apnea, bradycardia, and hypotension, especially with higher concentrations of remifentanil. The faster decline in remifentanil concentration with falling propofol concentrations risks inadequate narcosis and unwanted responses to surgical stimuli. Remifentanil delivery is inflexible and dosing cannot be adjusted to the clinical need and responses of individual patients. The medicolegal considerations are stark. In UK and EU Law, mixing propofol and remifentanil creates a new, unlicensed drug and the person mixing takes on the responsibilities of manufacturer. If a patient receiving anesthesia in the form of a mixed propofol-remifentanil infusion suffered a critical incident or actual harm, the clinician's practice may come under scrutiny and criticism, potentially involving a legal challenge and the Medical Regulator.

Remimazolam for anaesthesia or sedation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anaesthesia and sedation are ubiquitous in contemporary medical practice. Developments in anaesthetic pharmacology are targeted on reducing physiological disturbance whilst maintaining or improving titrateability, recovery profile and patient experience. Remimazolam is a new short-acting benzodiazepine in the final stages of clinical development. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical experience with remimazolam comprises volunteer studies and a limited number of clinical investigations. In addition, laboratory investigations explore the implications of its 'soft drug' pharmacology. SUMMARY: Remimazolam provides effective procedural sedation with superior success rates and recovery profile when compared to midazolam. Comparisons with propofol are required. Preliminary studies suggest potential for using remimazolam as the hypnotic component of general anaesthesia. Definitive studies are awaited. As a benzodiazepine, remimazolam could be evaluated as an anticonvulsant and for intensive care sedation.

First human administration of MR04A3: a novel water-soluble nonbenzodiazepine sedative.

BACKGROUND: JM-1232(-), (-)-3-[2-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-2-oxoethyl]-2-phenyl-3,5,6,7-tetrahydrocyclopenta [f]isoindol-1(2H)-one, molecular formula, C(24)H(27)N(3)O(2); molecular weight, 389.49, is a novel isoindoline water-soluble benzodiazepine receptor agonist with favorable anesthetic/sedative properties in animals. MR04A3 is a 1% aqueous presentation of JM-1232(-). METHODS: In Step 1, healthy male volunteers received 10-min infusions of MR04A3, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg/kg, with three MR04A3 subjects and one placebo subject per dose concentration. In Step 2, doses were 0.025, 0.05, 0.075, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, and 0.4 mg/kg over 1 min with six MR04A3 subjects and one placebo subject per dose concentration. RESULTS: Hypnotic effects of MR04A3 were seen at all dose concentrations in Step 1 and at doses of 0.075 mg/kg or more in Step 2. Central nervous system effect was seen at all dose concentrations with larger doses of MR04A3 producing a deeper and longer reduction in bispectral index. Ramsay sedation scores were increased with higher doses causing sedation and then unresponsiveness. The adverse event profile of subjects receiving MR04A3 was similar to that of subjects given placebo except that some subjects receiving MR04A3 developed upper airway obstruction while sedated. This responded to simple maneuvers (i.e., chin lift). Changes in systolic arterial blood pressure and heart rate were minimal. CONCLUSIONS: MR04A3 is hypnotic in man with a satisfactory hemodynamic and safety profile.

Propofol and children--what we know and what we do not know.

The pharmacokinetics of propofol are relatively well described in the pediatric population. Recent work has confirmed the validity of allometric scaling for predicting propofol disposition across different species and for describing pediatric ontogenesis. In the first year of life, allometric models require adjustment to reflect ontogeny of maturation. Pharmacodynamic data for propofol in children are scarcer, because of practical difficulties in data collection and the limitations of currently available depth of anesthesia monitors for pediatric use. Hence, questions relating to the comparative sensitivity of children to propofol, and differences in time to peak effect relative to adults, remain unanswered. K(eo) half-lives have been determined for pediatric kinetic models using time to peak effect techniques but are not currently incorporated into commercially available target-controlled infusion pumps.

First administration to man of Org 25435, an intravenous anaesthetic: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Org 25435 is a new water-soluble alpha-amino acid ester intravenous anaesthetic which proved satisfactory in animal studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, tolerability and efficacy of Org 25435 and to obtain preliminary pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic data. METHODS: In the Short Infusion study 8 healthy male volunteers received a 1 minute infusion of 0.25, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg (n = 2 per group); a further 10 received 3.0 mg/kg (n = 5) or 4.0 mg/kg (n = 5). Following preliminary pharmacokinetic modelling 7 subjects received a titrated 30 minute Target Controlled Infusion (TCI), total dose 5.8-20 mg/kg. RESULTS: Within the Short Infusion study, all subjects were successfully anaesthetised at 3 and 4 mg/kg. Within the TCI study 5 subjects were anaesthetised and 2 showed signs of sedation. Org 25435 caused hypotension and tachycardia at doses over 2 mg/kg. Recovery from anaesthesia after a 30 min administration of Org 25435 was slow (13.7 min). Pharmacokinetic modelling suggests that the context sensitive half-time of Org 25435 is slightly shorter than that of propofol in infusions up to 20 minutes but progressively longer thereafter. CONCLUSIONS: Org 25435 is an effective intravenous anaesthetic in man at doses of 3 and 4 mg/kg given over 1 minute. Longer infusions can maintain anaesthesia but recovery is slow. Hypotension and tachycardia during anaesthesia and slow recovery of consciousness after cessation of drug administration suggest this compound has no advantages over currently available intravenous anaesthetics.

Electroencephalograph variables, drug concentrations and sedation scores in children emerging from propofol infusion anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Inadequate sedation or oversedation are common problems in Paediatric Intensive Care because of wide variations in drug response and the lack of objective tests for sedative depth. We undertook a pilot study to try to identify correlates of propofol drug concentration, electroencephalographic (EEG) variables and observed behaviour during a stepwise reduction in propofol infusion after paediatric cardiac surgery. METHODS: This was a prospective pilot study with 10 children (5 months to 8 years) emerging from propofol anaesthesia following cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients underwent a stepped wake-up from propofol anaesthesia during which the propofol infusion rate was decreased from 4 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) in 1 mg.kg(-1).h(-1) steps at 30 min intervals. EEG variables, propofol blood concentrations and clinical sedation scores (COMFORT scale) were recorded during the stepped wakeup. Analgesia was maintained with a standardized continuous infusion of fentanyl. RESULTS: : Mean (SD) whole blood propofol concentrations at arousal varied considerably [973 ng.ml(-1) (SD 523 ng.ml(-1))]. The summed ratio (SR) of high frequency to low frequency bands correlated with both propofol infusion rate (R2 value=0.47) and propofol blood concentrations (R2 value=0.64). The mean SR in deeply sedated patients was significantly different from that in the 5 min prior to wakening (6.84 vs 1.55, P=0.00002). There was no relationship between COMFORT scores and SR. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of patients receiving opioid analgesia and relatively high doses of propofol, sedation scores were unhelpful in predicting arousal. The SR correlated with propofol blood concentrations and clinical arousal and may have potential as a predictive tool for arousal in children.

Pharmacokinetics of propofol infusions in critically ill neonates, infants, and children in an intensive care unit.

BACKGROUND: Propofol is a commonly used anesthetic induction agent in pediatric anesthesia that, until recently, was used with caution as an intravenous infusion agent for sedation in pediatric intensive care. Few data have described propofol kinetics in critically ill children. METHODS: Twenty-one critically ill ventilated children aged 1 week to 12 yr were sedated with 4-6 mg. kg(-1).h(-1) of 2% propofol for up to 28 h, combined with a constant morphine infusion. Whole blood concentration of propofol was measured at steady state and for 24 h after infusion using high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: A propofol infusion rate of 4 mg. kg(-1).h(-1) achieved adequate sedation scores in 17 of 20 patients. In 2 patients the dose was reduced because of hypotension, and 1 patient was withdrawn from the study because of a increasing metabolic acidosis. Mixed-effects population models were fitted to the blood propofol concentration data. The pharmacokinetics were best described by a three-compartment model. Weight was a significant covariate for all structural model parameters; Cl, Q2, Q3, V1, and V2 were proportional to weight. Estimates for these parameters were 30.2, 16.0, and 13.3 ml. kg(-1).min(-1) and 0.584 and 1.36 l/kg, respectively. The volume of the remaining peripheral compartment, V3, had a constant component (103 l) plus an additional weight-related component (5.67 l/kg). Values for Cl were reduced (typically by 26%) in children who had undergone cardiac surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol kinetics are altered in very small babies and in children recovering from cardiac surgery. Increased peripheral distribution volume and reduced metabolic clearance following surgery causes prolonged elimination.