Gypsum amendment of agricultural fields to decrease phosphorus losses - Evidence on a catchment scale.

Amending agricultural fields with gypsum has been proposed as a cost-effective measure to reduce P load on coastal waters. We treated 1490 ha of clayey fields with phosphogypsum (4 t ha-1) in Southwest Finland and monitored the recipient river with online sensors and water sampling for the preceding spring and 5 years after the amendment. Gypsum immediately decreased the riverine fluxes, the effect lasting at least 5 years for particulate P (PP), total suspended solids (TSS), and dissolved organic C (DOC) and 1-2 years for dissolved reactive P (DRP). Compared with an upstream control area, the fluxes of PP, TSS, and DOC decreased by 15%, 25%, and 8.9%, respectively, as a 5-year average. Assuming the change in the fluxes occurred only due to gypsum, the amended fields showed 35%, 59%, and 64% lower losses for PP, TSS, and DOC than the unamended ones. More than half of the gypsum remained in the soil even after 5 years; thus, although the efficiency of gypsum lessened over time, its residual effect may be present. However, the difference in the erodibility between the control and treatment areas impacted the validity of the results, especially as the pre-gypsum period was short. In addition, the performance of gypsum showed spatial variation.

Diffuse sources dominate the sulfate load into Finnish surface waters.

Sulfate (SO42-) affects the cycling of ecologically important substances, such as carbon, nutrients and metals, but the contribution of anthropogenic activities in sulfate load entering aquatic systems is poorly known. We calculate specific sulfate loads for land cover types, atmospheric deposition and point sources, and then estimate the source-specific flux of sulfate to Finnish surface waters. The largest sulfate flux, entering mostly the Baltic Sea, originates from agricultural fields on acid sulfate soil (24% of total flux). Forests on mineral soil, which cover 67% of the country's surface area, form the second largest source (21%). Additionally, agricultural fields on non-acid soil cause noticeable sulfate flux (16%). Pulp and paper mills were the key point sources (20%) for sulfate. We find that anthropogenic activities contribute to elevated sulfate levels in waters potentially affecting the cycling of nutrients, metals and formation of greenhouse gases in naturally sulfate-poor freshwaters. Based on these findings, sulfate should be systematically included in monitoring and pollution control measures.