Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 5270662, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35103237

RESUMO

METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain received ultrasound-guided ACB with 14 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine and 100 mcg clonidine. At baseline and 1 month after the blockade, we assessed maximal and minimal pain intensity in the knee using a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). The range of motion in extension and flexion (ROMext and ROMflex) and quadriceps muscle strength of both knees (QS), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG), and 30-Second Chair Stand Test (30CST) results were determined at baseline, 1 hour, 1 week, and 1 month after the blockade. RESULTS: ACB with levobupivacaine and clonidine appeared to decrease pain severity (NRSmax 8.13 to 4.2, p < 0.001 and NRSmin 3.32 to 1.40, p < 0.001). Similarly, knee ROMext decreased from 3.90 preintervention to 2.89 postintervention at 1 month, p < 0.001; ROMflex decreased from 5.70 to 3.29, p < 0.001; TUG time decreased from 3.22 to 2.93, <0.001; QS increased from 18.43 to 22.77, p < 0.001; CST increased from 8.23 to 10.74, p < 0.001. The KOOS for pain (36.40 to 58.34), symptoms (52.55 to 64.32), activities of daily living functions (ADLs, 36.36 to 60.77), and quality of life (QoL, 17.87 to 30.97) also increased, all p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: ACB appeared to decrease pain and increase ambulation. If our preliminary results are reproducible in a planned randomized controlled trial, ACB could be a useful adjunctive pain therapy in patients with disabling pain due to knee OA.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/diagnóstico por imagem , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Bloqueio Nervoso/métodos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/fisiopatologia , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção , Atividades Cotidianas , Idoso , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Clonidina/administração & dosagem , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Humanos , Levobupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Amplitude de Movimento Articular
2.
J Biomech ; 49(16): 3996-4001, 2016 12 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27842781

RESUMO

In vivo linear penetration in total hip arthroplasty (THA) exhibits similar values for 28mm and 32mm femoral head diameter with considerable variations between and within the studies. It indicates factors other than femoral head diameter influence polyethylene wear. This study is intended to test the effect of patient׳s individual geometry of musculoskeletal system, acetabular cup orientation, and radius of femoral head on wear. Variation in patient׳s musculoskeletal geometry and acetabular cup placement is evaluated in two groups of patients implanted with 28mm and 32mm THA heads. Linear wear rate estimated by mathematical model is 0.165-0.185mm/year and 0.157-0.205mm/year for 28 and 32mm THA heads, respectively. Simulations show little influence femoral head size has on the estimated annual wear rate. Predicted annual linear wear depends mostly on the abduction angle of the acetabular cup and individual geometry of the musculoskeletal system of the hip, with the latter having the greatest affect on variation in linear wear rate.


Assuntos
Acetábulo/anatomia & histologia , Artroplastia de Quadril , Cabeça do Fêmur/anatomia & histologia , Prótese de Quadril , Músculo Esquelético/anatomia & histologia , Acetábulo/fisiologia , Idoso , Feminino , Cabeça do Fêmur/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Músculo Esquelético/fisiologia , Modelagem Computacional Específica para o Paciente , Polietileno
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA