Differences in music appreciation between bilateral and single-sided cochlear implant recipients.

OBJECTIVE: To compare changes in music appreciation after cochlear implant (CI) surgery for patients with bilateral and single-sided deafness (SSD). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed on all adult CI unilateral or bilateral recipients from November 2019 to March 2023. Musical questionnaire subset data from the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life (CIQOL) - 35 Profile Instrument Score (maximum raw score of 15) was collected. Functional CI assessment was measured with CI-alone speech-in-quiet (SIQ) scores (AzBio and CNC). RESULTS: 22 adults underwent CI surgery for SSD and 21 adults for bilateral deafness (8 sequentially implanted). Every patient group had clinically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in mean SIQ scores in the most recently implanted ear (Azbio (% correct) SSD: 14.23 to 68.48, bilateral: 24.54 to 82.23, sequential: 6.25 to 82.57). SSD adults on average had higher music QOL scores at baseline (SSD: 11.05; bilateral: 7.86, p < 0.001). No group had significant increases in raw score at the first post-operative visit (SSD: 11.45, p = 0.86; bilateral: 8.15, p = 0.15). By the most recent post-implantation evaluation (median 12.8 months for SSD, 12.3 months for bilateral), SSD adults had a significant increase in raw score from baseline (11.05 to 12.45, p = 0.03), whereas bilaterally deafened (7.86 to 9.38, p = 0.12) adults had nonsignificant increases. CONCLUSIONS: SSD patients demonstrate higher baseline music appreciation than bilaterally deafened individuals regardless of unilateral or bilateral implantation and are more likely to demonstrate continued improvement in subjective music appreciation at last follow-up even when speech perception outcomes are similar.

How Do Patients and Otolaryngologists Define Dizziness?

OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences in how patients and otolaryngologists define the term dizziness. METHODS: Between June 2020 and December 2022, otolaryngology clinicians and consecutive patients at 5 academic otolaryngology institutions across the United States were asked to define the term "dizziness" by completing a semantics-based questionnaire containing 20 common descriptors of the term within 5 symptom domains (imbalance-related, lightheadedness-related, motion-related, vision-related, and pain-related). The primary outcome was differences between patient and clinician perceptions of dizzy-related symptoms. Secondary outcomes included differences among patient populations by geographic location. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 271 patients and 31 otolaryngologists. Patients and otolaryngologists selected 7.7 ± 3.5 and 7.1 ± 4.3 symptoms, respectively. Most patients (266, 98.2%) selected from more than 1 domain and 17 (6.3%) patients identified symptoms from all 5 domains. Patients and clinicians were equally likely to define dizziness using terms from the imbalance (difference, -2.3%; 95% CI, -13.2%, 8.6%), lightheadedness (-14.1%; -29.2%, 1.0%), and motion-related (9.4; -0.3, 19.1) domains. Patients were more likely to include terms from the vision-related (23.6%; 10.5, 36.8) and pain-related (18.2%; 10.3%, 26.1%) domains. There were minor variations in how patients defined dizziness based on geographic location. CONCLUSIONS: Patients and otolaryngologists commonly described dizziness using symptoms related to imbalance, lightheadedness, and motion. Patients were more likely to use vision or pain-related terms. Understanding of these semantic differences may enable more effective patient-clinician communication.

Unique clinical and prognostic behavior of patients diagnosed with combined exophytic and inverted papilloma histologic subtype.

Objectives: To evaluate the clinical and prognostic behaviors of sinonasal papillomas. Methods: Patients diagnosed with sinonasal papilloma were reviewed between 2001 and 2016 at a tertiary rhinology practice. Using pathology-specific electronic medical record software, patients diagnosed with sinonasal papilloma were identified. Four subcategories of this lesion were identified: inverting (IP), exophytic (EP) oncocytic (OP) and inverting + exophytic (IP + EP) papillomas. Results: A total of 107 patients were identified with unique sinonasal papilloma diagnoses. Of these, the majority were diagnosed with IP (87, 81.3%). The subpopulation of patients co-diagnosed with IP and EP (IP + EP) was unique with respect to clinical presentation and prognosis relative to both the IP and EP alone populations. IP + EP patients (5, 4.7%) were older with an average age of 75.25 years compared to 45 (EP) and 55.26 (IP), p < .0001. IP + EP patients more often presented with epistaxis (60%) compared to 33.3% (EP) and 4.6% (IP). Finally, all IP + EP patients had at least one recurrence of their disease, compared to 33.3% (EP) and 28.5% (IP). Conclusions: Each histopathologic subtype of sinonasal papilloma has unique clinical characteristics and recurrence rates after surgical resection. The subpopulation of patients diagnosed with IP + EP tends to be older, more likely to present with epistaxis, and more likely to recur. Additional investigation and analysis of this subpopulation is warranted. Level of Evidence: 4.

Hypoglossal Nerve Stimulator in the Active Duty Population: Military Readiness and Satisfaction.

INTRODUCTION: Because inadequate sleep impairs mission performance, the U.S. Army regards sleep as a core pillar of soldier readiness. There is an increasing incidence of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) among active duty (AD) service members, which is a disqualifying condition for initial enlistment. Moreover, a new diagnosis of OSA in the AD population often prompts a medical evaluation board, and if symptomatic OSA proves refractory to treatment, this may result in medical retirement. Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation (HNSI) is a newer implantable treatment option, which requires minimal ancillary equipment to function and may provide a useful treatment modality to support AD service members while maintaining readiness in appropriate candidates. Because of a perception among AD service members that HNSI results in mandatory medical discharge, we aimed to evaluate the impact of HNSI on military career progression, maintenance of deployment readiness, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: The Department of Research Programs at the Walter Reed National Military Medical Center provided institutional review board approval for this project. This is a retrospective, observational study and telephonic survey of AD HNSI recipients. Military service information, demographics, surgical data, and postoperative sleep study results were collected from each patient.Additional survey questions assessed each service member's experience with the device. RESULTS: Fifteen AD service members who underwent HNSI between 2016 and 2021 were identified. Thirteen subjects completed the survey. The mean age was 44.8 years (range 33-61), and all were men. Six subjects (46%) were officers. All subjects maintained AD status following HNSI yielding 14.5 person-years of continued AD service with the implant. One subject underwent formal assessment for medical retention. One subject transferred from a combat role to a support role. Six subjects have since voluntarily separated from AD service following HNSI. These subjects spent an average of 360 (37-1,039) days on AD service. Seven subjects currently remain on AD and have served for an average of 441 (243-882) days. Two subjects deployed following HNSI. Two subjects felt that HSNI negatively affected their career. Ten subjects would recommend HSNI to other AD personnel. Following HNSI, of the eight subjects with postoperative sleep study data, five achieved surgical success defined as >50% reduction of apnea-hypopnea index and absolute apnea-hypopnea index value of <20. CONCLUSIONS: Hypoglossal nerve stimulator implantation for AD service members offers an effective treatment modality for OSA, which generally allows for the ability to maintain AD status, however: The impact on deployment readiness should be seriously considered and tailored to each service member based on their unique duties before implantation. Seventy-seven percent of HNSI patients would recommend it to other AD service members suffering from OSA.

Are you congested? A comparison of definitions between otolaryngologists and their patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of congestion-related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between June 2020 and October 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 16 common descriptors of congestion-related symptoms within four domains (obstructive-related, pressure-related, mucus-related, and other symptoms) was completed by patients and otolaryngologists at five tertiary otolaryngology practices. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of congestion-related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 349 patients and 40 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of 6.8 (standard deviation [SD] 3.0) terms compared with 4.0 (SD 1.6) terms for otolaryngologists (p < 0.001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select obstruction-related symptoms (difference 6.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.8%, 8.9%). Patients were more likely to describe congestion using pressure-related (-43.7%; -58.9%, -28.5%), mucus-related (-43.5%; -59.3%, -27.8%), and other symptoms (-44.2; -51.3%, -37.1%) compared with otolaryngologists. There were no significant differences identified based on geographic location with regard to symptom domains on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of congestion. Clinicians tended to have a narrower interpretation of congestion that was limited to the obstruction-related symptom domain, while patients defined congestion more broadly. This has important counseling and communication implications for the clinician.

Impact of dupilumab on medical readiness in a military population.

KEY POINTS: Military servicemembers reported high satisfaction rates of dupilumab treatment for CRSwNP. Some service members fear that dupilumab treatment may limit their career progression. Updated guidelines are needed for servicemembers to make decisions regarding dupilumab.

What Is Sinus Surgery?

This Patient Page describes the risks and benefits of sinus surgery for acute or chronic sinusitis.

Postoperative optimization of cochlear implantation for single sided deafness and asymmetric hearing loss: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Identify and evaluate the effectiveness of methods for improving postoperative cochlear implant (CI) hearing performance in subjects with single-sided deafness (SSD) and asymmetric hearing loss (AHL). DATA SOURCES: Embase, PubMed, Scopus. REVIEW METHODS: Systematic review and narrative synthesis. English language studies of adult CI recipients with SSD and AHL reporting a postoperative intervention and comparative audiometric data pertaining to speech in noise, speech in quiet and sound localization were included. RESULTS: 32 studies met criteria for full text review and 6 (n = 81) met final inclusion criteria. Interventions were categorized as: formal auditory training, programming techniques, or hardware optimization. Formal auditory training (n = 10) found no objective improvement in hearing outcomes. Experimental CI maps did not improve audiologic outcomes (n = 9). Programed CI signal delays to improve synchronization demonstrated improved sound localization (n = 12). Hardware optimization, including multidirectional (n = 29) and remote (n = 11) microphones, improved sound localization and speech in noise, respectively. CONCLUSION: Few studies meeting inclusion criteria and small sample sizes highlight the need for further study. Formal auditory training did not appear to improve hearing outcomes. Programming techniques, such as CI signal delay, and hardware optimization, such as multidirectional and remote microphones, show promise to improve outcomes for SSD and AHL CI users.

Sinonasal Complications Following the Sinus Lift Procedure.

Background: Although the incidence of postoperative acute and chronic rhinosinusitis in patients undergoing a sinus lift procedure is relatively high, a paucity of rhinology literature examines the management of and outcomes for this patient population. The objective of this study was to review the management and postoperative care of sinonasal complications and identify possible risk factors that should be considered prior to and following sinus augmentation. Methods: We identified sequential patients who had undergone a sinus lift procedure and were referred to the senior author (AK) at a tertiary rhinology practice for intractable sinonasal complications and reviewed their charts for demographic data, history of illness including prereferral treatment, examination findings, imaging results, treatment modalities, and culture results. Results: Nine patients were initially treated medically without improvement and subsequently underwent endoscopic sinus surgery. The sinus lift graft material remained intact in 7 patients. Two patients had extrusion of the graft material into the facial soft tissues, resulting in facial cellulitis requiring graft removal and debridement. Seven of the 9 patients had predisposing factors that could have prompted referral to an otolaryngologist for optimization prior to sinus lifting. The mean follow-up was 10 months, and all patients had full resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: Acute and chronic rhinosinusitis is a complication of the sinus lift procedure and is more commonly seen in patients with preexisting sinus disease, anatomic sinonasal obstruction, and Schneiderian membrane perforation. Preoperative evaluation by an otolaryngologist may improve outcomes in patients at risk of sinonasal complications from sinus lift surgery.

Layperson Perception of Reflux-Related Symptoms.

Objective: To assess for differences of intended meaning in the description of reflux-related symptoms among otolaryngology patients and clinicians. Study Design: Cross-sectional survey-based study. Setting: Five tertiary, academic otolaryngology practices. Methods: Between June 2020 and July 2022, a questionnaire consisting of 20 common descriptors of reflux-related symptoms within four domains (throat-, chest-, stomach-, and sensory-related symptoms) was completed by patients. Attending otolaryngologists at five academic medical centers then completed the same survey. The primary outcome was to assess differences in patient and clinician perceptions of reflux-related symptoms. Differences based on geographic location was a secondary outcome. Results: A total of 324 patients and 27 otolaryngologists participated. Patients selected a median of six terms compared with 10.5 for otolaryngologists (p < .001). Otolaryngologists were more likely to select sensory symptoms (difference: 35.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.2%, 52.4%), throat-related symptoms (32.4%; 21.2, 43.6%), and chest-related symptoms (12.4%; 8.8, 15.9). Otolaryngologists and patients were equally likely to consider stomach symptoms as related to reflux (4.0%, -3.7%, 11.7%). No significant differences were identified based on geographic location. Conclusion: There are differences between otolaryngologists and their patients in the interpretation of the symptoms of reflux. Patients tended to have a narrower interpretation of reflux with symptoms primarily limited to classic stomach-related symptoms, while clinicians tended to have a broader definition of reflux that included extra-esophageal manifestations of disease. This has important counseling implications for the clinician, as patients presenting with reflux symptoms may not comprehend the relationship of those symptoms to reflux disease.

Layperson Perception of Symptoms Caused by the Sinuses.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the perceived symptoms caused by the sinuses as defined by otolaryngology patients and clinicians. STUDY DESIGN: Multi-institutional cross-sectional study. SETTING: Six academic outpatient otolaryngology practices. METHODS: We performed a multi-institutional, cross-sectional study using a semantics-based questionnaire. Consecutive patients were enrolled at 6 academic otolaryngology centers from June 2020 to May 2021. The primary outcome examined patient and provider definitions for the symptoms caused by the sinuses from a list of 28 proposed terms covering 6 general categories. These data were also collected from otolaryngology faculty at the same institutions. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 451 patients (54% female, mean age 48.3 years) and 29 otolaryngologists (38% female, mean age 37.4 years). Patients selected a median of 12 terms, compared to 8.5 for otolaryngologists. Among patients, the most frequently selected symptom domains were mucus (419, 92.9%), airflow (412, 91.4%), and pain (389, 86.3%). Compared to clinicians, patients more frequently selected symptoms related to the ear (difference, 48.3%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 34.8%-59.3%), throat (difference, 35.7%, 95% CI, 22.0%-47.5%), systemic (difference, 34.4%, 95% CI, 21.2%-46.0%), mucus (difference, 20.5%, 95% CI, 10.2%-30.6%), and airflow domains (difference, 19.0%, 95% CI, 8.4%-29.3%). Multiple domains were selected by 98% of patients and 79% of providers. CONCLUSION: Semantic differences exist between patients and clinicians regarding the symptoms caused by the sinus with patients having a broader range of perceived symptoms. These differences may provide clues to improve communication between otolaryngologists and their patients.

What do we mean when we have a "sinus infection?"

INTRODUCTION: Sinus infections are a common reason patients seek medical care. However, the intended meaning of the term sinus infection among patients and otolaryngologists is incompletely understood. METHODS: In this multi-institutional cross-sectional study, a semantics-based questionnaire was provided to consecutive patients presenting to otolaryngology clinics at six academic centers from June 2020 until May 2021. The primary outcome was respondent definitions for sinus infection from a list of 28 proposed terms covering six general categories. Secondary outcome measures included differences between geographic regions. RESULTS: Responses were obtained from 560 patients (54% female, mean age 48.9 years) and 29 otolaryngologists (42% female, mean age 37.4 years). Patients and otolaryngologists selected a median of 10 and 11 terms, respectively, to define a sinus infection. Among patients the most frequently selected symptom categories were mucus (500, 89.3%), pressure/pain (480, 85.7%), and airflow (468, 83.6%). Compared to patients, clinicians selected with greater frequency the symptom categories of pressure/pain (14.3% difference; 95% CI, 7.6% to 22.5%), mucus (10.7% difference; 95% CI, 4.7% to 18.3%) and airflow (13.0% difference; 95% CI, 4.8% to 21.7%). Multiple categories were selected by 96% of patients and 100% of providers. CONCLUSION: The definition of sinus infection appears variable for both patients and otolaryngologists, though patients appear to apply a broader range of symptoms to the term sinus infection. There were no pronounced geographic differences in the description of a sinus infection in this US sample population. Patients commonly described sinus infection in the context of pain-related symptoms. Appreciation of these semantic differences may enable more effective patient-clinician communication.

Assessing the Impact of Military Service on Patient Health Literacy in an Otolaryngology Clinic.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of military service on health literacy. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, cross-sectional study. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The validated Brief Health Literacy Screen (BHLS) with military supplement was administered to sequential adult patients (military and civilian) treated at two outpatient academic military otolaryngology clinics between November and December 2019. Inadequate health literacy, defined by a BHLS score ≤9, was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included comparisons of inadequate BHLS scores with patient demographics and history of military service. RESULTS: Three hundred and eighty-two patients were evaluated during the study period. The median age was 48-57 years, with a majority being male (230, 60.2%), White (264, 69.1%), married (268, 70.2%), and active duty military (303, 79.3%). A minority reported history of PTSD (39, 13%) or traumatic brain injury (29, 9.6%). Overall, very few subjects (10, 2.6%) demonstrated inadequate health literacy. Patients with prior (1.6% vs 6.3%, P < .05) or current (0% vs 5.0%, P < .05) military service had lower rates of inadequate health literary as compared to civilians. Gender, race, marital status, history of PTSD, and history of traumatic brain injury did not significantly impact health literacy. In a multivariate regression model exploring history of military service, age was not predictive of inadequate health literacy. CONCLUSIONS: Both history of and current military service predict higher health literacy rates for patients treated at military otolaryngology clinics. Widely accessible health care and mandatory health evaluations for service members to maintain deployment readiness may contribute to this finding but warrant additional study.

Ergonomics in Otolaryngology: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the proportion of otolaryngologists with work-related musculoskeletal discomfort (WRMD) and to review objective ergonomic data that contribute to WRMD. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A comprehensive search of the literature identified 1121 articles for initial review of which 19 (3563 participants) met criteria for qualitative discussion and eight (2192 participants) met criteria for meta-analysis. Random effects meta-analyses were used to estimate the proportion of otolaryngologists reporting WRMD. RESULTS: The overall proportion (95% confidence intervals [CI]) of general otolaryngologists reporting WRMD was 0.79 (0.66, 0.88) for any symptoms; 0.54 (0.40, 0.67) for neck symptoms; 0.33 (0.20, 0.49) for shoulder symptoms; and 0.49 (0.40, 0.59) for back symptoms. Surgeons performing primarily subspecialty cases had a lower estimated overall prevalence of WRMD versus those performing general ENT cases, however the odds ratio (OR) was not statistically significant (OR [95% confidence interval] 0.53 [0.22, 1.25]). 23%-84% of otolaryngologists underwent medical treatment for WRMD. 5%-23% took time off work and 1%-6% stopped operating completely as a result of WRMD. 23%-62.5% of otolaryngologists believed WRMD negatively impacted their quality of life. Objective measures of ergonomic posture indicate moderate to severe risk of injury during the routine clinic and surgical procedures with none found to be low risk. CONCLUSIONS: Ergonomic stressors among otolaryngologists contribute to a high rate of WRMD across all subspecialties with notable impact on productivity, longevity, and quality of life. Laryngoscope, 133:467-475, 2023.

Image-Guided Cochlear Implant Programming: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To review studies evaluating clinically implemented image-guided cochlear implant programing (IGCIP) and to determine its effect on cochlear implant (CI) performance. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar were searched for English language publications from inception to August 1, 2021. STUDY SELECTION: Included studies prospectively compared intraindividual CI performance between an image-guided experimental map and a patient's preferred traditional map. Non-English studies, cadaveric studies, and studies where imaging did not directly inform programming were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION: Seven studies were identified for review, and five reported comparable components of audiological testing and follow-up times appropriate for meta-analysis. Demographic, speech, spectral modulation, pitch accuracy, and quality-of-life survey data were collected. Aggregate data were used when individual data were unavailable. DATA SYNTHESIS: Audiological test outcomes were evaluated as standardized mean change (95% confidence interval) using random-effects meta-analysis with raw score standardization. Improvements in speech and quality-of-life measures using the IGCIP map demonstrated nominal effect sizes: consonant-nucleus-consonant words, 0.15 (-0.12 to 0.42); AzBio quiet, 0.09 (-0.05 to 0.22); AzBio +10 dB signal-noise ratio, 0.14 (-0.01 to 0.30); Bamford-Kowel-Bench sentence in noise, -0.11 (-0.35 to 0.12); Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, -0.14 (-0.28 to 0.00); and Speech Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale, 0.13 (-0.02 to 0.28). Nevertheless, 79% of patients allowed to keep their IGCIP map opted for continued use after the investigational period. CONCLUSION: IGCIP has potential to precisely guide CI programming. Nominal effect sizes for objective outcome measures fail to reflect subjective benefits fully given discordance with the percentage of patients who prefer to maintain their IGCIP map.

The Draf III procedure: A review of indications and techniques.

The Draf Ⅲ procedure involves the creation of a common frontal sinus cavity. The most common indication for the Draf Ⅲ procedure is chronic rhinosinusitis of the frontal sinuses despite the failure of more conservative interventions such as bilateral Draf Ⅱa procedures. Primary Draf Ⅲ may be indicated in patients with a high risk of failures such as those with severe polyposis and those with a frontal sinus opening less than 4 mm on computed tomography imaging. Other indications for the Draf Ⅲ include access for tumor removal and repair of traumatic fractures of the frontal sinus. The "inside-out" Draf Ⅲ procedure is the standard approach when the frontal recess anterior-posterior diameter is wide enough for instrument access, usually larger than 4-5 mm. The "outside-in" Draf Ⅲ procedure can be done when the frontal recess is too narrow to safely accommodate instruments. Regular follow-up with debridement should be done to prevent neo-ostium stenosis.