A comprehensive safety profile of tafamidis in patients with transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy.

Background: Tafamidis is approved in over 40 countries to delay neurologic progression in patients with transthyretin amyloid polyneuropathy (ATTR-PN). A comprehensive, integrated analysis of safety data from interventional, observational and surveillance studies of tafamidis in ATTR-PN patients was conducted. Methods: Safety data from all sponsored, completed, or ongoing, Phase 2/3 studies of tafamidis in ATTR-PN patients as of 3 January 2017 were pooled. Also assessed were safety data from the ongoing Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS) as of 3 January 2017 and post-marketing surveillance reports as of 31 March 2017. Results: There were 137 patients in Phase 2/3 studies (mean duration of tafamidis exposure, 44.2 months), with 134 (97.8%) experiencing ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and 46 (33.6%) ≥1 treatment-emergent serious adverse event (TESAE). The most common TEAEs were diarrhoea (26.3%), urinary tract infection (UTI; 25.5%) and influenza (21.2%). In THAOS, 661 subjects had tafamidis exposure (mean duration, 27.6 months), with 250 (37.8%) experiencing ≥1 TEAE and 96 (14.5%) ≥1 TESAE. The most common TEAE was UTI (6.1%). Post-marketing surveillance reports generally reflected the known safety profile of tafamidis. Conclusions: This analysis did not reveal any significant new safety findings; tafamidis was generally safe and well tolerated in ATTR-PN patients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00409175, NCT00791492, NCT00630864, NCT01435655, NCT00925002, and NCT00628745.

Positive Effectiveness of Tafamidis in Delaying Disease Progression in Transthyretin Familial Amyloid Polyneuropathy up to 2 Years: An Analysis from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS).

INTRODUCTION: The effectiveness of tafamidis for the treatment of transthyretin familial amyloid polyneuropathy (TTR-FAP) was evaluated using data from the Transthyretin Amyloidosis Outcomes Survey (THAOS) registry. METHODS: Subjects receiving tafamidis (n = 252) were compared with untreated subjects in a non-randomized, matched cohort analysis. Subjects were matched with up to four untreated controls by genetic mutation, region of birth, and mean treatment propensity score. RESULTS: The matched, treated sample consisted predominantly of subjects with the Val30Met genotype (92.5%), from Portugal, and with a mean age of 40.4 years. Over the course of the 2-year follow-up period, subjects treated with tafamidis showed significantly less deterioration on the Neuropathy Impairment Score for Lower Limbs (p < 0.001) and its subscales (p < 0.023) compared with untreated subjects. There was significantly less deterioration among tafamidis-treated subjects compared with untreated subjects on the Norfolk Quality of Life scale (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences observed in functional (assessed by Karnofsky Performance Status Scale score) or nutritional (assessed by modified body mass index) status between the treated and untreated groups. The primary model which examined survival from baseline using the matched cohort was not able to yield estimates of the hazard ratio, as there were no deaths in the tafamidis-treated subjects. CONCLUSION: These findings support the results from clinical trials and strengthen evidence of the effectiveness of tafamidis beyond conventional clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00628745 FUNDING: Pfizer.

Safety and immunogenicity of a booster dose of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) in healthy adults: A randomized phase 1 study.

OBJECTIVE: A 2-stage, phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy adults to assess immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose at three dose levels of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) containing recombinant clumping factor A (ClfA) and capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8) conjugated to a diphtheria toxoid. METHODS: Six months after initial single vaccination, in Stage 2, SA3Ag recipients were randomized (1:1) to booster vaccination or placebo, while Stage 1 placebo recipients received placebo again. Pre- and post-vaccination blood samples were analyzed. RESULTS: In Stage 2 (n = 345), pre-booster CP5 and CP8 titers remained high with no increase post-booster. ClfA titers remained high after initial vaccination and increased post-booster, approaching the peak response to the initial dose. Post-booster local reactions were more frequent and of greater severity than reported after the initial vaccination, particularly for the high-dose level recipients. Post hoc analysis showed no dose-response pattern and no obvious association between diphtheria toxoid titers and local reactions after initial or booster vaccination. CONCLUSION: Immune responses after the initial vaccination persisted for the 12 months studied, with little additional response after the booster dose at 6 months. Post-booster injection site reactions were more frequent and more severe but self-limiting. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01018641.

A randomized phase I study of the safety and immunogenicity of three ascending dose levels of a 3-antigen Staphylococcus aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) in healthy adults.

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is a common cause of healthcare-acquired morbidity and mortality and increased healthcare resource utilization. A prophylactic vaccine is being developed that may reduce this disease burden. METHODS: Volunteers in good general health aged 50-85 (n=312) and 18-24 (n=96) years were randomized to receive a single intramuscular dose of one of three dose levels of a non-adjuvanted, 3-antigen S. aureus vaccine (SA3Ag) or placebo. SA3Ag antigens included capsular polysaccharides 5 and 8 (CP5 and CP8), each conjugated to cross-reactive material 197 (CRM197), and recombinant clumping factor A (ClfA). Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity were evaluated. RESULTS: At day 29 post-vaccination, robust immune responses were observed in both age cohorts at all three SA3Ag dose levels. In the primary analysis population, the 50- to 85-year age stratum, geometric mean-fold-rises in competitive Luminex(®) immunoassay antibody titers from baseline ranged from 29.2 to 83.7 (CP5), 14.1 to 31.0 (CP8), and 37.1 to 42.9 (ClfA), all (P<0.001) exceeding the pre-defined two-fold rise criteria. Similar rises in opsonophagocytic activity assay titers demonstrated functionality of the immune response. Most injection-site reactions were mild in severity and there were no substantial differences (SA3Ag vs. placebo) with regard to systemic or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this study of healthy adults aged 50-85 and 18-24 years, SA3Ag elicited a rapid and robust immune response and was well tolerated, with no notable safety concerns.

A randomized trial of tigecycline versus ampicillin-sulbactam or amoxicillin-clavulanate for the treatment of complicated skin and skin structure infections.

BACKGROUND: Complicated skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs) frequently result in hospitalization with significant morbidity and mortality. METHODS: In this phase 3b/4 parallel, randomized, open-label, comparative study, 531 subjects with cSSSI received tigecycline (100 mg initial dose, then 50 mg intravenously every 12 hrs) or ampicillin-sulbactam 1.5-3 g IV every 6 hrs or amoxicillin-clavulanate 1.2 g IV every 6-8 hrs. Vancomycin could be added at the discretion of the investigator to the comparator arm if methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) was confirmed or suspected within 72 hrs of enrollment. The primary endpoint was clinical response in the clinically evaluable (CE) population at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit. Microbiologic response and safety were also assessed. The modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population comprised 531 subjects (tigecycline, n = 268; comparator, n = 263) and 405 were clinically evaluable (tigecycline, n = 209; comparator, n = 196). RESULTS: In the CE population, 162/209 (77.5%) tigecycline-treated subjects and 152/196 (77.6%) comparator-treated subjects were clinically cured (difference 0.0; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.7, 8.6). The eradication rates at the subject level for the microbiologically evaluable (ME) population were 79.2% in the tigecycline treatment group and 76.8% in the comparator treatment group (difference 2.4; 95% CI: -9.6, 14.4) at the TOC assessment. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea rates were higher in the tigecycline group. CONCLUSIONS: Tigecycline was generally safe and effective in the treatment of cSSSIs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00368537.