Have epilepsy outcomes changed for children with tuberous sclerosis complex in Queensland, Australia?

OBJECTIVE: Historically, epilepsy has been the most frequently presenting feature of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Advances in TSC health care have occurred over the past decade; thus, we studied whether TSC epilepsy outcomes have changed. METHOD: A retrospective chart review was undertaken for all children with TSC in Queensland, Australia. Epilepsy outcome and TSC diagnosis data were extracted, and data were compared between children born before 2012 with those born in or after 2012. RESULTS: In this retrospective cohort, TSC diagnosis in children born in or after 2012 is now predominantly antenatal (51%, p < .05). Most patients with epilepsy are now known to have TSC before they develop epilepsy. Despite earlier TSC diagnosis, the frequency of epilepsy (85%) has not changed (p = .92), but diagnosis trends toward an earlier age (median = 3 months for patients born in or after 2012 vs. 5.5 months for those born before 2012, p = .23). Most (95%) patients had focal seizures as their initial clinical seizure type; it was rare (5%) for epileptic spasms (ES) to be the initial seizure type. The frequency of ES was lower in patients born in or after 2012 (36% vs. 50%, p = .27). Infantile (<24 months) onset ES was not associated with worse epilepsy outcome. Late onset ES was seen in 14%, and these patients had a lower rate of epilepsy remission. Lennox-Gastaut syndrome was seen in 7%. Febrile/illness-related status epilepticus occurred in 12% of patients, between 1 and 4 years of age. Despite many (78%) patients having multiple daily seizures at maximal seizure frequency, and 74% meeting criteria for treatment-refractory epilepsy, most patients achieved epilepsy remission (66%), either with epilepsy surgery (47%) or with age (53%). At the time of inclusion in this study, only 21% of patients had uncontrolled frequent (daily to 3 monthly) seizures and 14% had uncontrolled infrequent (3 monthly to <2 yearly) seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: This study provides updated information that informs the counseling of parents of newly diagnosed pediatric TSC patients.

Impaired GABAergic regulation and developmental immaturity in interneurons derived from the medial ganglionic eminence in the tuberous sclerosis complex.

GABAergic interneurons play a critical role in maintaining neural circuit balance, excitation-inhibition regulation, and cognitive function modulation. In tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC), GABAergic neuron dysfunction contributes to disrupted network activity and associated neurological symptoms, assumingly in a cell type-specific manner. This GABAergic centric study focuses on identifying specific interneuron subpopulations within TSC, emphasizing the unique characteristics of medial ganglionic eminence (MGE)- and caudal ganglionic eminence (CGE)-derived interneurons. Using single-nuclei RNA sequencing in TSC patient material, we identify somatostatin-expressing (SST+) interneurons as a unique and immature subpopulation in TSC. The disrupted maturation of SST+ interneurons may undergo an incomplete switch from excitatory to inhibitory GABAergic signaling during development, resulting in reduced inhibitory properties. Notably, this study reveals markers of immaturity specifically in SST+ interneurons, including an abnormal NKCC1/KCC2 ratio, indicating an imbalance in chloride homeostasis crucial for the postsynaptic consequences of GABAergic signaling as well as the downregulation of GABAA receptor subunits, GABRA1, and upregulation of GABRA2. Further exploration of SST+ interneurons revealed altered localization patterns of SST+ interneurons in TSC brain tissue, concentrated in deeper cortical layers, possibly linked to cortical dyslamination. In the epilepsy context, our research underscores the diverse cell type-specific roles of GABAergic interneurons in shaping seizures, advocating for precise therapeutic considerations. Moreover, this study illuminates the potential contribution of SST+ interneurons to TSC pathophysiology, offering insights for targeted therapeutic interventions.

Genetic causes of infection induced encephalitis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with encephalitis following a viral infection are often thought to have a para infectious, inflammatory, or autoimmune cause for their presentation. These diagnoses usually result in treatments with immunosuppressant therapies which can have side effects. However, there is an increasing body of evidence demonstrating that patients can have a direct genetic cause mediating viral infection triggered encephalitis, where inflammation is a secondary response. These patients may benefit not from immunosuppressive therapies, but from protection from infection through dedicated immunisation programs and early antiviral therapies at times of infection. METHODS: A small case series of paediatric neurology patients (n = 2) from a single institution with infection induced encephalitis and an underlying genetic cause, is presented. Patients with a confirmed genetic cause of infection induced encephalitis were identified and consented by their treating neurologist for inclusion in this case series. Ethics approval was gained for this case series and review of the surrounding literature. CONCLUSION: A case of both DBR1 and NUP214 genetic changes resulting in infection induced encephalitis is presented. This case series raises awareness of this rare group of disorders and provides clues to their identification. Features to prompt clinician consideration of such genetic conditions are also highlighted. Although rare, identification of these patients is important due to implications on treatment, prognosis, and family planning.

Diagnostic utility of exome sequencing followed by research reanalysis in human brain malformations.

This study aimed to determine the diagnostic yield of singleton exome sequencing and subsequent research-based trio exome analysis in children with a spectrum of brain malformations seen commonly in clinical practice. We recruited children ≤ 18 years old with a brain malformation diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging and consistent with an established list of known genetic causes. Patients were ascertained nationally from eight tertiary paediatric centres as part of the Australian Genomics Brain Malformation Flagship. Chromosome microarray was required for all children, and those with pathogenic copy number changes were excluded. Cytomegalovirus polymerase chain reaction on neonatal blood spots was performed on all children with polymicrogyria with positive patients excluded. Singleton exome sequencing was performed through a diagnostic laboratory and analysed using a clinical exome sequencing pipeline. Undiagnosed patients were followed up in a research setting, including reanalysis of the singleton exome data and subsequent trio exome sequencing. A total of 102 children were recruited. Ten malformation subtypes were identified with the commonest being polymicrogyria (36%), pontocerebellar hypoplasia (14%), periventricular nodular heterotopia (11%), tubulinopathy (10%), lissencephaly (10%) and cortical dysplasia (9%). The overall diagnostic yield for the clinical singleton exome sequencing was 36%, which increased to 43% after research follow-up. The main source of increased diagnostic yield was the reanalysis of the singleton exome data to include newly discovered gene-disease associations. One additional diagnosis was made by trio exome sequencing. The highest phenotype-based diagnostic yields were for cobblestone malformation, tubulinopathy and lissencephaly and the lowest for cortical dysplasia and polymicrogyria. Pathogenic variants were identified in 32 genes, with variants in 6/32 genes occurring in more than one patient. The most frequent genetic diagnosis was pathogenic variants in TUBA1A. This study shows that over 40% of patients with common brain malformations have a genetic aetiology identified by exome sequencing. Periodic reanalysis of exome data to include newly identified genes was of greater value in increasing diagnostic yield than the expansion to trio exome. This study highlights the genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity of brain malformations, the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and the large number of patients that remain without a genetic diagnosis despite clinical exome sequencing and research reanalysis.