Risk of stroke in patients with prior VKA or DOAC: A population-based real-world registry analysis.

INTRODUCTION: To date, risk assessment of suffering ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke in individuals under oral anticoagulation (OAC) is limited to hospital-based cohorts and patients with atrial fibrillation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Through the combination of three individual datasets, (1) the population-based Tyrolean Stroke Pathway database, prospectively documenting all (unselected) stroke patients in the entire federal state of the Tyrol and (2) nation-wide prescription data, detailing each reimbursed prescription in Austria as well as (3) the Austrian Stroke Unit Registry, a nation-wide registry comprising data on all patients admitted to any of the 38 stroke units in Austria, we assessed risk of stroke in patients with prior oral anticoagulation and compared characteristics of patients taking direct oral anticoagulants and Vitamin-K-Antagonists. RESULTS: In Austria, oral anticoagulant prescription reimbursements increased from 292,475 in 2015 to 389,407 in 2021. In the Tyrol, prior oral anticoagulation treatment was evident in 586 of 3861 (15.2%) patients with ischemic and 131 of 523 (25.0%) with hemorrhagic stroke, with 20% and 35% of those stroke patients respectively having prior oral anticoagulation due to other indications than non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Considering prescription rates, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants was associated with a reduced stroke risk compared to Vitamin-K-Antagonists, especially in ischemic (1.05% vs 0.62%; RR 0.59, p < 0.001) but also in hemorrhagic stroke, even if less pronounced (0.21% vs 0.14%; RR 0.68, p = 0.06). In Austria, prior intake of direct oral anticoagulants was associated with lower risk of suffering acute large vessel occlusion stroke (RR 0.79, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: One in seven patients suffering ischemic and one in four suffering hemorrhagic stroke had prior oral anticoagulation treatment. Both ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes are less frequent in those with direct oral anticoagulant intake compared to those taking Vitamin-K-Antagonists. Establishment of clear standard operating procedures on how to best care for acute stroke patients with oral anticoagulation is essential.

Stroke Care Pathway ensures high-quality stroke management in the COVID-19 pandemic.

The aim of our study was to assess whether a well-established federal state-wide Stroke Care Pathway delivering high quality stroke care can cope with the COVID-19 pandemic and associated measures to contain the virus spread. The retrospective analysis is based on a prospective, quality-controlled, population-based registry of all stroke patients in the Tyrol, a federal state of Austria and one of the early hot-spots of COVID-19 in Europe. Patient characteristics, pre-hospital management, intra-hospital management and post-hospital were analysed. All residents of the Tyrol suffering ischemic stroke in 2020 (n = 1160) and four pre-COVID-19 years (n = 4321) were evaluated. In 2020, the annual number of stroke patients was the highest in this population-based registry. When local hospitals were overwhelmed with SARS-CoV-2-patients, stroke subjects were temporarily allocated to the comprehensive stroke centre. Stroke severity, quality metrics of stroke management, serious complications, and post-stroke mortality did not differ between 2020 and the four comparator years. Notably, iv. thrombolysis-rate was similar (19.9% versus 17.4%, P = 0.25) and endovascular stroke treatment even better (5.9% versus 3.9%, P = 0.003) but resources for in-patient rehabilitation were limited (25.8% versus 29.8%, P = 0.009). Concluding, a well-established Stroke Care Pathway was able to maintain high-quality acute stroke care even when challenged by a global pandemic.

[Tyrolean stroke pathway]. / Schlaganfallpfad Tirol.

Background: Recent advances in acute stroke therapy have been shown to improve clinical outcome and therefore reduce long-term disability. Acute therapy procedures in stroke have a limited time frame after onset of symptoms; thus, rapid emergency management is critical. The Tyrolean Stroke Pathway was developed to optimize the entire treatment pathway from stroke onset to outpatient rehabilitation. Objectives: The description of the Tyrolean Stroke Pathway as an example to optimize the entire treatment pathway of stroke patients in a central European alpine region with a focus on prehospital management. Materials and methods: In four subprojects from the prehospital phase up to outpatient rehabilitation, the project optimized intersections between different phases of care and evaluated the care processes using quality assurance measures. Results: After implementation, thrombolysis rates doubled and functional outcome of stroke patients after 3 months improved and complications, e.g., pneumonia, declined. Access to rehabilitation improved, particularly because of the establishment of quality assured and funded outpatient rehabilitation. Conclusions: The project showed that a holistic standardized stroke pathway from acute management up to outpatient rehabilitation can be successfully implemented in clinical routine. The project improved the entire health care pathway of stroke patients. The Stroke Action Plan for Europe 2018-2030 recommends to have national plans for stroke that encompass the entire chain of care.

Thrombolysis and clinical outcome in patients with stroke after implementation of the Tyrol Stroke Pathway: a retrospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis for ischaemic stroke remains underused worldwide. We aimed to assess whether our statewide comprehensive stroke management programme would improve thrombolysis use and clinical outcome in patients. METHODS: In 2008-09, we designed the Tyrol Stroke Pathway, which provided information campaigns for the public and standardised the entire treatment pathway from stroke onset to outpatient rehabilitation. It was commenced in Tyrol, Austria, as a long-term routine-care programme and aimed to include all patients with stroke in the survey area. We focused on thrombolysis use and outcome in the first full 4 years of implementation (2010-13). FINDINGS: We enrolled 4947 (99%) of 4992 patients with ischaemic stroke who were admitted to hospitals in Tyrol; 675 (14%) of the enrollees were treated with alteplase. Thrombolysis administration in Tyrol increased after programme implementation, from 160 of 1238 patients (12·9%, 95% CI 11·1-14·9) in 2010 to 213 of 1266 patients (16·8%, 14·8-19·0) in 2013 (ptrend 2010-13<0·0001). Differences in use of thrombolysis in the nine counties of Tyrol in 2010 (range, 2·2-22·6%) were reduced by 2013 (12·1-22·5%). Median statewide door-to-needle time decreased from 49 min (IQR 35-60) in 2010 to 44 min (29-60) in 2013; symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracerebral haemorrhages occurred in 28 of 675 patients (4·1%, 95% CI 2·8-5·9) during 2010-13. In four Austrian states without similar stroke programmes, thrombolysis administration remained stable or declined between 2010 and 2013 (mean reduction 14·4%, 95% CI 10·9-17·9). Although the 3-month mortality was not affected by our programme (137 [13%] of 1060 patients in 2010 vs 143 [13%] of 1069 patients in 2013), 3-month functional outcome significantly improved (modified Rankin Scale score 0-1 in 375 [40%] of 944 patients in 2010 vs 493 [53%] of 939 in 2013; score 0-2 in 531 [56%] patients in 2010 and 615 [65%] in 2013; ptrend 2010-13<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: During the period of implementation of our comprehensive stroke management programme, thrombolysis administration increased and clinical outcome significantly improved, although mortality did not change. We hope that these results will guide health authorities and stroke physicians elsewhere when implementing similar programmes for patients with stroke. FUNDING: Reformpool of the Tyrolean Health Care Fund.