Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of stage I endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Recent reports in both cervical and endometrial cancer suggest that minimally invasive surgery (MIS) had an unanticipated negative impact on long-term clinical outcomes, including recurrence and death. Given increasing use of robotic surgery since the LAP2 trial, we sought to compare the intermediate and long-term outcomes between those who underwent robotic surgery or laparoscopy for Stage I endometrial cancer. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients from a single, large, academic, urban practice who underwent either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIS (RA-MIS) for the treatment of endometrial carcinoma between 2006 and 2016, ensuring at least 5 years of potential follow-up. To adjust for differences in confounding variables between groups, propensity score-based inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was performed. Overall and recurrence-free survival were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusting for confounding weights. RESULTS: 1027 patients were included; 461 received laparoscopy and 566 received RA-MIS. RA-MIS use increased steadily during the study window, which resulted in longer mean surveillance in laparoscopy group (median 8.7 years versus 6.3 years, p < 0.001). RA-MIS was associated poorer recurrence-free (HR: 1.41, 95% CI: 1.12, 1.77) and overall survival (HR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.06, 1.83). Disease-specific survival was also poorer in the RA-MIS group (HR: 3.51, 95% CI: 2.19, 5.63). Among those who recurred, median time to first recurrence was shorter in the RA-MIS group than the laparoscopy group (16.3 vs. 28.7 months, p = 0.07). CONCLUSION: RA-MIS was associated with poorer long-term patient outcomes. Our data in this lower-risk population indicate relevant clinical endpoints may be occurring during intermediate and long-term follow-up windows. These findings support a prospective evaluation of the long-term outcomes of RA-MIS.

The effect of photobiomodulation on chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A randomized, sham-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common side effect of cancer therapy with few efficacious treatments. METHODS: We enrolled 70 patients with CIPN in a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled, cross-over trial to determine if photobiomodulation (PBM)±physiotherapy reduced the symptoms of neuropathy compared to sham treatment. At the conclusion of follow-up, sham-arm patients could cross-over into a third arm combining PBM and physiotherapy to determine if multimodal treatment had additive effects. Treatment included 30minute sessions 3-times weekly for 6weeks using either PBM or sham therapy. Neuropathy was assessed using the modified total neuropathy score (mTNS) at initiation and 4, 8, and 16weeks after initiating treatment. RESULTS: Sham-treated patients experienced no significant change in mTNS scores at any point during the primary analysis. PBM patients experienced significant reduction in mTNS scores at all time points. Mean changes in mTNS score (and corresponding percent drop from baseline) for sham and PBM-group patients respectively were -0.1 (-0.7%) and -4.2 (-32.4%) at 4weeks (p<0.001), 0.2 (0.0%) and -6.8 (-52.6%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and 0.0 (0.1%) and -5.0 (-38.8%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). Patients who crossed over into the PBM/PT-group experienced similar results to those treated primarily; changes in mTNS score from baseline were -5.5 (-40.6%) 4weeks (p<0.001), -6.9 (-50.9%) at 8weeks (p<0.001), and -4.9 (-35.9%) at 16weeks (p<0.001). The addition of physiotherapy did not improve outcomes over PBM alone. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with CIPN, PBM produced significant reduction in neuropathy symptoms.

Perioperative bowel habits of women undergoing gynecologic surgery: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: To describe perioperative bowel habits of women undergoing gynecologic surgery. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included women undergoing gynecologic surgery. Before surgery, participants completed the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), a validated instrument describing stool characteristics consistent with transit categories: slow (BSFS 1-2), normal (BSFS 3-5), and fast (BSFS 6-7). For 2 weeks after surgery, the participants recorded daily medications and bowel movements (BM), and completed BSFS. The χ(2) test, the Fisher exact test, analysis of variance, t tests, and ordinal regression were used. RESULTS: Preoperatively, most (70%) of 340 women had normal stool transit, with 15% having slow transit and 7% having fast transit. Complete postoperative data were available for 170 (50%). Mean ± SD time to first postoperative BM was 2.8 ± 1.4 days with transit classification: 48% normal, 32% slow, and 20% fast. CONCLUSIONS: Most women had normal stool transit both preoperatively and postoperatively. Time to first BM was longer after open surgery by approximately 3 days.