Progress in ovarian cancer research: proceedings of the 5th Biennial Ovarian Cancer Research Symposium.

Ovarian cancer remains the most lethal gynecological malignancy. The 5th Biennial Symposium overviewed the progress of ovarian cancer research over the last few years. Molecularly based technologies have allowed the identification of multiple biomarkers to aid in ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment. Furthermore, data analysis systems evaluating the behavior of these markers have been designed. Therapeutic use of ovarian cancer protein markers has been fueled by the development of animal models that more closely simulate the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer, and multiple new therapies are being developed that may have impact against the disease. Finally, the design of clinical trials both for ovarian cancer treatment and prevention are key in advancing the science of ovarian cancer into the clinic. The need for strategies that would optimize patient participation in clinical trials is paramount.

Advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma: a phase II trial of paclitaxel by 96-hour infusion (SWOG 9714): a Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: There are no published prospective trials of chemotherapy for advanced bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC), a subtype of non-small-cell lung cancer for which there is no current standard therapy. This phase II study assesses the efficacy and toxicity of 96-h paclitaxel in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced BAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically confirmed stage IIIB (with pleural effusion) or stage IV BAC were eligible. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 35 mg/m2/24 h continuously infused over 96 h (days 1-4) every 21 days for up to six courses. RESULTS: A total of 58 eligible patients were enrolled. The objective response rate was 14% (all partial responses, 9% confirmed); 40% of patients demonstrated stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 5 and 12 months, respectively. Grade 3 or greater toxicities included neutropenia/granulocytopenia (43%), febrile neutropenia (12%), infection (22%), and stomatitis/pharyngitis (10%); there were five treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSIONS: S9714 represents the first prospective multi-institutional cooperative group trial focusing on treatment outcomes in BAC. Studies targeting this population are feasible, and while first-line paclitaxel administered as a prolonged infusion is active in this setting, toxicities limits the utility of this regimen. S9714 serves as a historical control for BAC patients against which future therapeutic approaches can be compared.

Prognostic factors and response to fludarabine therapy in patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia: results of United States intergroup trial (Southwest Oncology Group S9003).

Current information on Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is based on retrospective or single-institution studies of patients requiring therapy. Between 1992 and 1998, 231 patients with WM were enrolled in a prospective observational multicenter clinical trial. Of these, 182 patients with symptomatic or progressive disease were treated with 4 to 8 cycles of therapy with a purine nucleoside analogue, fludarabine (FAMP; 30 mg/m(2) of body-surface area daily for 5 days every 28 days). A serum beta2-microglobulin (beta2M) level below 3 mg/L and a hemoglobin level of at least 120 g/L (12 g/dL) at presentation predicted a lower likelihood of requiring therapy. The overall rate of response to FAMP therapy was 36% (95% confidence interval, 29%-44%), with 2% complete remissions. Patients who were 70 years old or older had a substantially lower likelihood of response (odds ratio, 0.34; P =.004) than younger patients. On multivariate analysis, a serum beta2M level of 3 mg/L or higher, hemoglobin level below 120 g/L, and serum IgM level below 40 g/L [4 g/dL] were significant adverse prognostic factors for survival. We developed a simple staging system for WM by using these variables and identified 4 distinct subsets of patients with estimated 5-year overall survival rates of 87%, 64%, 53%, and 22%, and 5-year progression-free survival rates of 83%, 55%, 33%, and 12%. Prognosis in WM is highly variable and serum beta2M was the dominant predictor of a need for therapy and of survival. FAMP has activity against WM. Our staging system may provide guidance for a risk-based approach to the treatment of WM.

Infusional interleukin-2 and 5-fluorouracil with subcutaneous interferon-alpha for the treatment of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: a southwest oncology group Phase II study.

BACKGROUND: A Phase II trial was conducted to determine the response rate of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma to a three-drug combination of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), interleukin-2 (IL-2), and interferon-alpha-2b (IFN-alpha). METHODS: A 2-stage accrual plan was used that was designed to determine whether response to this regimen was consistent with a true response rate of >/= 30%. The regimen was comprised of 5 treatment days weekly for 4 weeks every 6 weeks. Each weekly treatment was comprised of 5-FU, 1750 mg/m(2), continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion over 24 hours followed by IL-2, 6 MIU/m(2)/day, continuous i.v. infusion for 4 days. IFN-alpha, 6 MU/m(2), was given subcutaneously on Days 1, 2, and 5. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were entered on study, 3 of whom were ineligible. Among the 35 eligible patients there were 3 confirmed partial responses (PR) and 1 complete response (CR), for an overall response rate of 11% (95% confidence interval, 3-27%). One patient considered as having a PR had minimal evidence of residual disease and was free from disease progression at > 2.5 years of follow-up, as was the patient with CR. Three additional patients not qualified as having a PR were showing signs of response at the time they were removed from protocol, and another patient who was removed from protocol early for management of an infection subsequently responded to the same regimen off protocol. Thirteen patients were considered nonassessable (NASS) for response, many of whom had multiple poor risk features and were unable to complete 1 cycle of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: This multicenter study failed to confirm an advantageous overall response rate for this three-drug regimen. However, there were two durable responses and indications of responsiveness not scored as PRs among patients with more favorable risk factor patterns, and many poor risk NASS patients. For these reasons, the response rate reported in the current study may be a conservative reflection of the effectiveness of this regimen.

Cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin for the treatment of carcinoma of the penis: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: We ascertained whether combined cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin have efficacy for treating locally advanced or metastatic carcinoma of the penis, and evaluate the toxicity resulting from this regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients had biopsy proved locally advanced or metastatic epidermoid carcinoma of the penis. Chemotherapy consisted of 75 mg./m.2 cisplatin infused intravenously on day 1, 25 mg./m.2 intravenous bolus of methotrexate on days 1 and 8, and 10 unit per m.2 intravenous bolus of bleomycin on days 1 and 8 with a cycle length of 21 days. Our study was performed as a standard phase II evaluation with 2 stages of accrual. RESULTS: Enrolled in this study were 45 patients, including 40 who were evaluable for a response. There were 5 complete and 8 partial responses for a 32.5% response rate. Five treatment related deaths occurred and 6 of the 36 remaining patients evaluable for toxicity had 1 or more life threatening toxic episodes. CONCLUSIONS: A regimen of cisplatin, methotrexate and bleomycin appears to have promising results. However, toxicity was prodigious, and an emphasis of future research should be to decrease toxicity.

A multicenter, phase II trial of weekly irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with previously treated colorectal carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: This multicenter, Phase II trial was performed to evaluate the antitumor activity and toxicity of irinotecan (CPT-11) in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that had recurred or progressed after 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy. METHODS: CPT-11 was given as a 90-minute intravenous infusion in repeated 6-week (42-day) courses comprising weekly treatment for 4 consecutive weeks followed by a 2-week rest. Tumor measurements were obtained after every second course of therapy. Toxicity was assessed weekly using the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. RESULTS: A total of 166 patients were entered into the trial. The first 64 patients received a starting dose of 125 mg/m2. An additional 102 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 100 mg/m2 to determine whether a reduction in the starting dose would result in lower toxicity without sacrificing efficacy. Objective responses to CPT-11 were observed in 18 patients (1 complete response and 17 partial responses) (response rate [RR] = 10.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.1-15.6%). An additional 67 patients (40.4%) had stable disease as their best response. At the 125 mg/m2 starting dose, the RR was 14.1% (9 of 64 patients; 95% CI, 5.5-22.6%). Among patients given a starting dose of 100 mg/m2, the RR was 8.8% (9 of 102 patients; 95% CI, 3.3-14.3%). The overall median survival was 9.9 months (range, 0.3-36.8 months). The most frequently observed Grade 3/4 toxicities were gastrointestinal events (i.e., diarrhea [27.1%], nausea [15.1%], emesis [9.6%], abdominal cramping [22.2%], and neutropenia [19.9%]). There were no significant differences in the frequencies of Grade 3/4 toxicities between the 125 mg/m2 and 100 mg/m2 starting dose levels except for Grade 3/4 emesis (21.9% vs. 2%; P < 0.001). Patients age > or = 65 years were twice as likely (38.6% vs. 18.8%; P < 0.008) to develop Grade 3/4 diarrhea compared with younger patients when all courses of therapy were evaluated. However, older age did not significantly predict for a higher incidence of first-course diarrhea (25.0% vs. 14.7%; P = 0.106). CONCLUSIONS: CPT-11 can induce tumor regression in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma that has progressed during or shortly after 5-FU-based chemotherapy. Gastrointestinal events and neutropenia were the most common serious toxicities. Given the trend toward a higher response rate without substantially greater toxicity, 125 mg/m2 has been selected as the preferred starting dose for further studies. Careful attention to appropriate CPT-11 dose modification and early intervention with loperamide may be especially important in elderly patients.

Interferon versus interferon plus prednisone remission maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma: a Southwest Oncology Group Study.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone (VAD) regimen alone or with chemosensitizers for remission induction and interferon (IFN) versus IFN plus prednisone (IFN/P) for remission maintenance in previously untreated multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three patients were registered for remission-induction therapy with VAD or VAD plus the chemosensitizers verapamil and quinine. Patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance therapy with IFNalpha 3 MU in the evening three times weekly or IFN plus 50 mg of prednisone (IFN/P) on the morning after IFN until relapse. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-nine patients were eligible for induction. Fatal toxicities in nine patients who received VAD plus verapamil and quinine led to closure of this arm after 47 registrations. Subsequently, all patients received VAD induction. Despite the high early mortality rate on VAD plus sensitizers, overall survival by induction arm did not differ for median or 5-year survival with approximately 40% of patients surviving 5 years. Eighty-nine eligible patients who achieved remission were randomized to maintenance. Patients who received IFN/P had improved progression-free survival (median, 19 v9 months for IFN; P = .008). After 48 months, progression-free survival on IFN/P was at the thirtieth percentile, whereas it was below the tenth percentile on IFN alone. Median survival from start of maintenance was long on both arms (57 months for IFN/P v 46 months for IFN; P = .36). CONCLUSION: IFN/Pwas more effective than IFN alone. Improved relapse-free survival may be attributable to IFN/P or to the use of prednisone for maintenance. This latter alternative is currently being studied.

Phase II trial of edatrexate in relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors: a Southwest Oncology Group study (SWOG 9124).

Up to 30% of patients with advanced germ cell tumors will fail induction chemotherapy or will relapse. New agents with activity in this still potentially curable subgroup of patients are needed. Edatrexate (10-ethyl, 10-deaza-aminopterin) is a methotrexate analogue that has preclinical and clinical activity in breast, lung, and head and neck cancers, as well as in non-Hodgkin's lymphomas. A phase II trial of edatrexate in relapsed or refractory malignant germ cell tumors was conducted by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG). Twenty-five patients were enrolled in the trial. Edatrexate was administered intravenously at a dose of 80 mg/m2 weekly for four weeks followed by a one-week rest period. The treatment course was repeated every five weeks. Among the 23 patients evaluable for response, there were no objective responses with all patients developing progressive disease. Thirteen patients (56%) developed Grade 3-4 toxicities, predominantly stomatitis and malaise/fatigue/lethargy. One patient developed Grade 4 anemia while another developed grade 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia. No patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity nor were there any toxic deaths. Edatrexate administered in this dose and schedule has no antitumor activity and has substantial toxicity in patients with relapsed or refractory germ cell tumors.

Adjuvant CMFVP versus adjuvant CMFVP plus ovariectomy for premenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether the addition of surgical ovariectomy to standard chemotherapy prolongs disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival in premenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer with positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred fourteen premenopausal patients with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled between July 1979 and July 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive either of the following: (1) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 i.v. weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (2) bilateral ovariectomy followed by CMFVP. RESULTS: The median follow-up time is 7.7 years and the maximum 13.2 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (one-sided log-rank, P = .55 and .70, respectively). The 7-year survival rate is 71% on the CMFVP arm and 73% on CMFVP plus ovariectomy. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. CONCLUSION: We conclude that, in this study, the addition of ovariectomy did not improve results over chemotherapy alone in the treatment of premenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer. Our sample size was too small to detect a small improvement. The death hazards ratio of CMFVP/CMFVP plus ovariectomy was 1.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], .79 to 1.89).

Adjuvant CMFVP versus tamoxifen versus concurrent CMFVP and tamoxifen for postmenopausal, node-positive, and estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To compare chemohormonal therapy, chemotherapy alone, and hormonal therapy alone in postmenopausal patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive operable breast cancer and positive axillary nodes with respect to survival and disease-free survival (DFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eight hundred ninety-two postmenopausal women with ER-positive, node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) from July 1979 to March 1989 and 74 by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) between June 1987 and March 1989. Patients were stratified according to number of involved nodes and type of primary surgery and randomized to receive the following: (1) tamoxifen 10 mg twice daily by mouth for 1 year; (2) cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2/d by mouth for 1 year, methotrexate 15 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly for 1 year, fluorouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV weekly for 1 year, vincristine .625 mg/m2 IV weekly for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone during weeks 1 to 10 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 2.5 mg/m2 (CMFVP); or (3) the combination of tamoxifen and CMFVP. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 6.5 years, with a maximum of 12.8 years. Treatment arms are not significantly different with respect to either survival or DFS (log-rank, 2 df, P = .82 and .23, respectively). The 5-year survival rate is 77% for the tamoxifen arm, 78% for CMFVP, and 75% for the combination. No significant differences were observed in node or receptor level subsets. Severe or worse toxicity was experienced by 56% of patients on CMFVP and 61% on CMFVP plus tamoxifen, compared with 5% on tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSION: CMFVP chemotherapy, either alone or in combination with tamoxifen, has not been shown to be superior to tamoxifen alone in the treatment of postmenopausal women with node-positive, ER-positive, operable breast cancer.

Phase II trial of dimethyltriazenoimidazole carboxamide in patients with metastatic carcinoid. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: The use of chemotherapy in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors has been of limited value, and investigation of new agents is necessary. Previous reports have suggested that dimethyltriazenoimidazole carboxamide (DTIC) may have antitumor activity. METHODS: A Phase II trial to investigate the clinical response rate to DTIC in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors was performed. DTIC was administered at low (650 mg/m2) or high (850 mg/m2) doses every 28 days. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients were entered into the study, and 56 were evaluable for toxicity and response. Toxicity was moderate, with the most common side effect being nausea and vomiting (88%). Nine patients (16%; 95% confidence interval, 8-28%) had partial responses, 5 of 25 receiving 850 mg/m2 and 4 of 31 receiving 650 mg/m2 of DTIC. Median survival time of all patients was 20 months. CONCLUSIONS: DTIC has minimal activity in patients with metastatic carcinoid tumors.

One versus 2 years of CMFVP adjuvant chemotherapy in axillary node-positive and estrogen receptor-negative patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine if prolonged adjuvant treatment (2 years v 1 year) with combination chemotherapy (cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, fluorouracil [5-FU], vincristine, and prednisone [CMFVP]) in poor-prognosis breast cancer patients (estrogen receptor [ER]-negative, stage II to IIIA) would result in improved disease-free and overall survival rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred forty-five women with ER-negative node-positive breast cancer were enrolled by the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) over a period of 5 years (1979 to 1984). Randomized assignments were made to either 1 or 2 years of adjuvant CMFVP. Doses were daily oral cyclophosphamide 60 mg/m2, intravenous (i.v.) weekly methotrexate 15 mg/m2, i.v. weekly 5-FU 400 mg/m2, i.v. weekly vincristine .625 mg/m2 for the first 10 weeks, and prednisone weeks 1 through 6 with doses decreasing from 30 mg/m2 to 10 mg/m2. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration is 8.6 years, with a maximum of 11.3 years. Treatment arms were not significantly different as regards either survival or disease-free survival rates (P = .33 and P = .24, respectively). The five-year survival rate is 57% on the 1-year arm and 62% on the 2-year arm. Patients with three or fewer nodes and premenopausal status were associated with improved survival. Compliance on the 2-year arm was poor, with only 37% completing the full 2 years of treatment. SWOG grade 3 to 4 toxicity was experienced by 47% of patients on the 1-year arm and by 52% on the 2-year arm. There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: We conclude that 2-year adjuvant treatment with CMFVP is not an improvement over 1-year treatment. Moreover, 2 years of CMFVP is difficult to complete. However, the results are not definitely negative. A moderate improvement attributed to prolonged chemotherapy, especially among patients with four or more positive nodes, cannot be ruled out.

Doxorubicin, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of hormone refractory adenocarcinoma of the prostate: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

In a Southwest Oncology Group phase II clinical trial, 68 patients with hormone refractory carcinoma of the prostate were treated with a combination of doxorubicin, mitomycin C and 5-fluorouracil. Of the patients 11 were classified as good risk and 57 as poor risk. There were 1 complete and 10 partial remissions for a response rate of 16.2% (exact 95% confidence interval 8.4 to 27.1%). Median survival was 9 months (maximum 14) for good risk patients and 10 months (maximum 42) for poor risk patients. Toxicity was significant with leukopenia identified as dose limiting. Because of the low rate of response and significant toxicity, this regimen cannot be recommended as standard therapy for metastatic hormone refractory prostate cancer.

An intergroup phase III randomized study of doxorubicin and dacarbazine with or without ifosfamide and mesna in advanced soft tissue and bone sarcomas.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Doxorubicin alone or with dacarbazine (DTIC; AD) is considered the best available therapy for metastatic adult sarcomas. Ifosfamide is active in sarcomas that have failed to respond to a doxorubicin-based regimen. This study was designed to determine if ifosfamide added to doxorubicin and DTIC (ADI) significantly effects toxicity, response rate, and survival. Patients with measurable metastatic or unresectable sarcoma were randomized to receive AD or ADI. Patients with chondrosarcomas, fibrosarcomas, and other sarcomas of bone were eligible, although those with osteosarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, Kaposi's sarcoma, and mesothelioma were excluded, as were patients with prior chemotherapy for sarcoma or prior doxorubicin. RESULTS: Between 1987 and 1989, 340 eligible patients were randomized. Significantly more myelosuppression, a higher response rate (17% v 32%; P < .002) and longer time to progression (4 v 6 months; P < .02) were observed for patients who received ifosfamide. An overall survival advantage for the two-drug regimen (12 v 13 months; P = .04) was not significant by multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In all three randomized trials of doxorubicin with and without ifosfamide (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG], European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC], and this study), the response rate was higher for the ifosfamide-containing arm, significantly so in this and the ECOG studies. An improved response rate may be particularly important for the preoperative management of high-grade, borderline resectable lesions or pulmonary metastases, particularly in younger patients. In older patients, or for low-to intermediate-grade lesions, doxorubicin and DTIC followed by ifosfamide on progression is preferred.

Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

BACKGROUND: Hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer remains a therapeutic challenge. Cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil (CMF), a drug combination that is active in solid tumors, was evaluated using specific response criteria. METHODS: Fifty-two eligible patients with measurable (19), evaluable (29), or bone scan only (4) metastatic prostate cancer were treated with cyclophosphamide, 100 mg/m2 every day by mouth, methotrexate, 15 mg/m2 intravenously weekly, and 5-fluorouracil, 300 mg/m2 intravenously weekly. Treatment was given continuously unless interrupted by toxicity or disease progression. RESULTS: There were two partial responses (7%) among the evaluable patients. Six (32%) measurable patients and four (14%) evaluable patients had stable disease. Median time to progression was 3.2 months for measurable and 2.8 months for evaluable disease patients. Median survivals were 10.9 and 10.2 months, respectively. There was no difference between the two groups with regard to response rate or survival. Toxicity was acceptable and consisted primarily of myelosuppression. CONCLUSIONS: CMF is minimally active in hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer.

Prognostic significance of progesterone receptor levels in estrogen receptor-positive patients with metastatic breast cancer treated with tamoxifen: results of a prospective Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) protocol 8228 is a prospective trial designed to investigate the prognostic significance of progesterone receptor (PgR) levels in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer patients who were treated with tamoxifen. This study was undertaken because the value of PgR measurements in advanced breast cancer had been assessed previously only in studies that were small, retrospective, or included heterogeneously treated patients. METHODS: Receptor assays were performed only in the laboratories that met strict quality control guidelines. Of the 398 patients entered, 342 patients were eligible and assessable for the study end points of objective clinical response, time to treatment failure, and overall survival. RESULTS: Multivariate analysis shows that elevated PgR levels significantly and independently correlated with increased probability of response to tamoxifen, longer time to treatment failure, and longer overall survival. Overall response rate (defined as complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or stable disease [SD] for greater than 6 months) in this trial was 54%. Response rates to tamoxifen were 43%, 53%, and 61% in subsets of patients with less than 10, 10 to 99, and more than 100 fmol/mg PgR, respectively. Exploratory subset analysis using PgR and other prognostic variables identified ER-positive patient subsets with response rates to tamoxifen ranging from 24% (premenopausal patients) to 86% (postmenopausal patients with ER greater than 38 and PgR greater than 329 fmol/mg). No groups of ER-positive patients were identified who had such a low response rate as to absolutely preclude considering the use of tamoxifen. Multivariate analysis showed the independent, statistically significant predictors were: for response to tamoxifen, menopausal status, PgR, and ER; for time to treatment failure, menopausal status, disease-free interval (DFI), PgR, and ER; and for overall survival DFI, PgR, ER, site of disease, and history of adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that knowledge of PgR levels together with other clinical information can improve the pretreatment assessment of ER-positive breast cancer patients with metastatic disease.

Phase II evaluation of amonafide in renal cell carcinoma. A Southwest Oncology Group study.

Twenty four patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were treated in a phase II trial with amonafide 300-450 mg/m2/day on days 1-5 every 21 days. There were no responders, 6 patients had stable disease, 14 experienced progressive disease and 4 were assumed to be non-responders as no evaluation was performed. There were no fatal toxicities although 8 patients had grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 1 patient had grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Other toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea in 1 patient, grade 3 myopathy in 1 patient, severe nausea and vomiting in 1 patient and a facial rash, possibly a hypersensitivity reaction, in 1 patient. The median survival is 7.5 months. At this dosage and schedule, there is no evidence that amonafide has meaningful anti-tumor activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Multicenter clinical trial of mitoxantrone in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and Hodgkin's disease.

In this phase II multicenter trial, the efficacy and safety of mitoxantrone (Novantrone; Lederle Laboratories, Wayne, NJ) were evaluated in the treatment of 206 patients with relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) or Hodgkin's disease (HD) previously treated with other agents. Sixty-nine percent of the patients had received prior therapy with doxorubicin. The patients received 14 mg/m2 of mitoxantrone every 3 weeks. Nineteen (12%) of the NHL patients and two (7%) of the HD patients had complete responses (CRs). The combined CR and partial response (PR) rates were 37% (60 of 163) for NHL patients and 36% (10 of 28) for HD patients; the median duration of response was 323 days for NHL patients and 209 days for HD patients. The median survival times were 337 days for patients with NHL and 469 days for patients with HD. The median survival time for patients with low-grade NHL was 589 days compared with 298 days for patients with intermediate-grade NHL and 167 days for patients with high-grade NHL. The median time to treatment failure was 73 days for NHL patients and 98 days for HD patients. The major toxicity was myelosuppression, which was moderate and reversible. Nausea, vomiting, and alopecia were mild. There were two cases of congestive heart failure (CHF) considered related to treatment; both patients had received prior treatment with doxorubicin. In this group of heavily pretreated patients, mitoxantrone was effective and well tolerated. Responses were seen with mitoxantrone in patients who had relapsed after prior therapy with doxorubicin and in patients who had failed to respond to prior therapy with doxorubicin. Mitoxantrone should be evaluated in less heavily pretreated patients and should be considered for incorporation into combination chemotherapeutic regimens for the treatment of malignant lymphoma.

Treatment of limited small-cell lung cancer with concurrent etoposide/cisplatin and radiotherapy followed by intensification with high-dose cyclophosphamide: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Between March 1986 and May 1988, the Southwest Oncology Group enrolled 58 previously untreated patients with limited small-cell lung cancer on a treatment program that administered high-dose cyclophosphamide (150 mg/kg) as late intensification. Treatment consisted of induction chemo-radiotherapy, (weeks 1 to 11), consolidation chemotherapy (weeks 11 to 18), and intensification (week 18). Median age was 61.5 years. Eighty-nine percent of patients had a Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) performance status of 0-1. Twenty-one patients completed all prescribed treatments. There were seven treatment-related deaths, four as a result of intensification. Fifty-six patients are available for response analysis. Thirty-two patients achieved a complete remission (CR) (57%) and fifteen achieved a partial remission (PR) (26%). Median survival for all patients is 11.1 months. Among the 21 patients who received intensification, nine remain alive in a CR with a median survival of 27 months. This sequence of treatments was not associated with a survival advantage for the group as a whole, possibly because of the toxicity of induction and consolidation treatment and the delayed administration of high-dose cyclophosphamide.