A phase Ib randomized multicenter trial of isolated hepatic perfusion in combination with ipilimumab and nivolumab for uveal melanoma metastases (SCANDIUM II trial).

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy where 50% of patients develop metastatic disease primarily affecting the liver. Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic UM respond to one-time isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) with high-dose melphalan. This phase I trial investigates the safety and clinical efficacy of IHP combined with ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Immunotherapy-naïve patients were randomized in this phase I trial to receive either IHP followed by IPI 3 mg/kg and NIVO 1 mg/kg (IPI3/NIVO1) for four cycles (post-operative arm), or one cycle of preoperative IPI3/NIVO1, IHP and then three cycles of IPI3/NIVO1 (pre-post-operative arm), followed by maintenance therapy with NIVO 480 mg for 1 year. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled and randomized. Three patients did not undergo IHP as planned. In total, 11/18 patients (6 in the post-operative arm and 5 in the pre-post-operative arm) did not complete the planned four cycles of IPI3/NIVO1. Toxicity to IHP was similar in both groups, but the number of immune-related adverse events (AEs) was higher in the pre-post-operative arm. Among assessable patients, overall response rate was 57% in the post-operative arm (4/7) and 22% in the pre-post-operative arm (2/9). CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with IHP and IPI3/NIVO1 was associated with severe AEs. The efficacy of this combination is encouraging with high response rates. One cycle of preoperative IPI/NIVO before IHP did not show potential benefits in terms of safety or efficacy.

Patterns and resectability of colorectal cancer recurrences: outcome study within the COLOFOL trial.

BACKGROUND: Improvements in surgery, imaging, adjuvant treatment, and management of metastatic disease have led to modification of previous approaches regarding the risk of recurrence and prognosis in colorectal cancer. The aims of this study were to map patterns, risk factors, and the possibility of curative treatment of recurrent colorectal cancer in a multimodal setting. METHODS: This was a cohort study based on the COLOFOL trial population of patients who underwent radical resection of stage II or III colorectal cancer. The medical files of all patients with recurrence within 5 years after resection of the primary tumour were scrutinized. Follow-up time was 5 years after the first recurrence. Primary endpoints were cumulative incidence, site, timing, and risk factors for recurrence, and rate of potentially curative treatment. A secondary endpoint was survival. RESULTS: Of 2442 patients, 471 developed recurrences. The 5-year cumulative incidence was 21.4 (95 per cent c.i. 19.5 to 23.3) per cent. The median time to detection was 1.1 years after surgery and 87.3 per cent were detected within 3 years. Some 98.2 per cent of patients who had potentially curative treatment were assessed by a multidisciplinary tumour board. A total of 47.8 per cent of the recurrences were potentially curatively treated. The 5-year overall survival rate after detection was 32.0 (95 per cent c.i. 27.9 to 36.3) per cent for all patients with recurrence, 58.6 (51.9 to 64.7) per cent in the potentially curatively treated group and 7.7 (4.8 to 11.5) per cent in the palliatively treated group. CONCLUSION: Time to recurrence was similar to previous results, whereas the 21.4 per cent risk of recurrence was somewhat lower. The high proportion of patients who received potentially curative treatment, linked to a 5-year overall survival rate of 58.6 per cent, indicates that it is possible to achieve good results in recurrent colorectal cancer following multidisciplinary assessment.

Treatment patterns and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma in the Swedish national registry SweLiv.

BACKGROUND: Consistent data on clinical features, treatment modalities and long-term survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using nationwide quality registers are lacking. This study aimed to describe treatment patterns and survival outcomes in patients diagnosed with HCC using a national maintained database. METHODS: Characteristics and treatment patterns in patients diagnosed with HCC and registered in the national register of liver and bile duct tumours (SweLiv) between 2009 and 2016 were reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log rank test to compare subgroups for clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes according to the year of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 3376 patients with HCC were registered over 8 years, 246 (7·3 per cent) of whom underwent transplantation. Some 501 (14·8 per cent) and 390 patients (11·6 per cent) had resection and ablation as primary treatment. Transarterial chemoembolization and systemic sorafenib treatment were intended in 476 (14·1 per cent) and 426 patients (12·6 per cent) respectively; the remaining 1337 (39·6 per cent) were registered but referred for best supportive care (BSC). The 5-year survival rate was approximately 75 per cent in the transplantation group. Median OS was 4·6 (i.q.r. 2·0 to not reached) years after resection and 3·1 (2·3-6·7) years following ablation. In patients referred for palliative treatment, median survival was 1·4 (0·8-2·9), 0·5 (0·3-1·2) and 0·3 (0·1-1·0) years for the TACE, sorafenib and BSC groups respectively (P < 0·001). Median survival was 0·9 years for the total HCC cohort in 2009-2012, before publication of the Swedish national treatment programme, increasing to 1·4 years in 2013-2016 (P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: The survival outcomes reported were in line with previous results from smaller cohorts. The introduction of national guidelines may have contributed to improved survival among patients with HCC in Sweden.

ANTECEDENTES: Se carece datos consistentes acerca de las características clínicas, modalidades terapéuticas y supervivencia a largo plazo en pacientes con carcinoma hepatocelular (hepatocellular carcinoma, HCC) basados en registros de calidad de ámbito nacional. El objetivo de este estudio fue describir los patrones de tratamiento y los resultados de supervivencia en pacientes diagnosticados de HCC usando una base de datos nacional. MÉTODOS: Se revisaron las características de los pacientes y los patrones de tratamiento en pacientes con un diagnóstico de HCC incluidos en el registro nacional de tumores de hígado y vías biliares (SweLiv) entre 2009 y 2016. La supervivencia global (overall sirvival, OS) se analizó mediante el método de Kaplan-Meier y test de log-rank para la comparación de subgrupos según las características clínicas de los pacientes, las modalidades de tratamiento y los resultados en función del año de tratamiento. RESULTADOS: Durante un periodo de 7 años, se incluyeron en el registro un total de 3.076 pacientes con HCC, 246 de los cuales recibieron un trasplante (7,2%). Se practicó resección y ablación como tratamiento primerio en 501 (14,8%) y 390 (11,6%) pacientes, respectivamente. La quimioembolización (TACE) y el tratamiento sistémico con sorafenib se efectuó en 476 (14,1%) y 426 (12,6%) pacientes, respectivamente; los 1.337 pacientes restantes (40,0%) fueron incluidos en la base de datos pero se derivaron para recibir el mejor tratamiento de soporte. La tasa de supervivencia a los 5 años fue del 75% en el grupo trasplantado. La mediana de OS fue de 4,6 años (rango intercuartílico, interquartile range, IQR 2,0-no alcanzado) tras la resección y de 3,1 años (IQR 2,3-6,7) tras la ablación. En los pacientes derivados para tratamiento paliativo, la mediana de supervivencia fue de 1,4 años (IQR 0,8-2,9), 0,5 años (IQR 0,2-1,2) y 0,3 años (IQR 0,1-1,0) para los grupos de TACE, sorafenib y mejor tratamiento de soporte, respectivamente (P < 0,001). La mediana de supervivencia para toda la cohorte de HCC en 2009-2012 fue de 0,9 años antes de la publicación del programa de nacional de tratamiento sueco, aumentando a 1,4 años en 2013-2016 (P <0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: Los resultados de supervivencia referidos eran consistentes con resultados previos obtenidos en cohortes más pequeñas; la introducción de guías nacionales puede haber contribuido a mejorar la supervivencia de los pacientes con HCC en Suecia.

Influence of primary tumour and patient factors on survival in patients undergoing curative resection and treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Resection of the primary tumour is a prerequisite for cure in patients with colorectal cancer, but hepatic metastasectomy has been used increasingly with curative intent. This national registry study examined prognostic factors for radically treated primary tumours, including the subgroup of patients undergoing liver metastasectomy. METHODS: Patients who had radical resection of primary colorectal cancer in 2009-2013 were identified in a population-based Swedish colorectal registry and cross-checked in a registry of liver tumours. Data on primary tumour and patient characteristics were extracted and prognostic impact was analysed. RESULTS: Radical resection was registered in 20 853 patients; in 38·7 per cent of those registered with liver metastases, surgery or ablation was performed. The age-standardized relative 5-year survival rate after radical resection of colorectal cancer was 80·9 (95 per cent c.i. 80·2 to 81·6) per cent, and the rate after surgery for colorectal liver metastases was 49·6 (46·0 to 53·2) per cent. Multivariable analysis identified lymph node status, multiple sites of metastasis, high ASA grade and postoperative complications after resection of the primary tumour as strong risk factors after primary resection and following subsequent liver resection or ablation. Age, sex and primary tumour location had no prognostic impact on mortality after liver resection. CONCLUSION: Lymph node status and complications have a negative impact on outcome after both primary resection and liver surgery. Older age and female sex were underrepresented in the liver surgical cohort, but these factors did not influence prognosis significantly.

ANTECEDENTES: Para curar el cáncer colorrectal es necesaria la resección del tumor primario, pero cada día es más frecuente la realización de una metastasectomía hepática con intención curativa. Este estudio basado en un registro nacional analizó los factores pronósticos para los tumores primarios tratados con intención curativa, incluido un subgrupo de pacientes a los que se realizó una metastasectomía hepática. MÉTODOS: En el registro poblacional sueco de cáncer colorrectal se identificaron los pacientes a los que se realizó una resección primaria radical entre 2009-2013 y se cotejaron con un registro de tumores hepáticos. Se obtuvieron los datos sobre el tumor primario y las características del paciente, y se analizó su influencia en el pronóstico. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 20.853 pacientes con resección radical, de los que en un 38,9% se realizó la resección o ablación de metástasis hepáticas. La supervivencia relativa a 5 años, estandarizada por edad, después de la resección radical del cáncer colorrectal y después de la cirugía de las metástasis hepáticas colorrectales fue del 80,6% (i.c. del 95% 79,8-81,3) y del 49,6% (i.c. del 95%: 46,0-53,2), respectivamente. El análisis multivariable identificó la invasión ganglionar, las metástasis en varias localizaciones, una puntuación ASA alta y las complicaciones postoperatorias después de la resección del tumor primario como factores de riesgo tanto de la resección primaria como de la resección o ablación hepática. No tuvieron influencia sobre la mortalidad tras de la resección hepática ni la edad, el sexo o la ubicación del tumor primario. CONCLUSIÓN: El grado de invasión linfática y las complicaciones después de la resección primaria tuvieron un impacto negativo en los resultados tanto de la cirugía primaria, como de la cirugía hepática. Si bien la edad avanzada y el sexo femenino estaban infrarrepresentados en la cohorte de cirugía hepática, estos factores no influyeron significativamente en el pronóstico.

Identification of Inequalities in the Selection of Liver Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases in Sweden.

BACKGROUND:: Liver resection for colorectal liver metastases offers a 5-year survival rate of 25%-58%. This study aimed to analyze whether patients with colorectal liver metastases undergo resection to an equal extent and whether selection factors play a role in the selection process. MATERIAL AND METHODS:: Data were retrieved from the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (2007-2011) for colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases. The patients identified were linked to the Swedish Registry of Liver and Bile surgery and the National Patient Registry to identify whether liver surgery or ablative treatment was performed. Analyses for age, sex, type of primary tumor and treating hospital (university, county, or district), American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and radiology for detection of metastatic disease were performed. RESULTS:: Of 28,355 patients with colorectal cancer, 21.6% (6127/28,355) presented with liver metastases. Of the patients with liver metastases, 18.5% (1134/6127) underwent liver resection or ablation. The cumulative proportion of liver resection/ablation was 4% (1134/28,355) of all colorectal cancer. If "not bowel resected" were excluded, the proportion slightly increased to 4.7% (1134/24,262). Around 15% of the patients with metastases were registered as referrals for liver surgery. In a multivariable analysis patients treated at a university hospital for primary tumor were more frequently surgically treated for liver metastases (p < 0.0001). Patients with liver metastases from rectal cancer (p < 0.0001) and men more often underwent liver resection (p = 0.006). A difference was found between health-care regions for the frequency of liver surgery (p < 0.0001). Patients >70 years and those with American Society of Anesthesiologists class >2 underwent liver resection less frequently. Magnetic resonance imaging of the liver was more often used in diagnostic work-up in men. CONCLUSION:: Patients with colorectal liver metastases are unequally treated in Sweden, as indicated by the low referral rate. The proximity to a hepatobiliary unit seems important to enhance the patient's chances of being offered liver surgery.

Vasopressin and nitroglycerin decrease portal and hepatic venous pressure and hepato-splanchnic blood flow.

BACKGROUND: Various methods are used to reduce venous blood pressure in the hepato-splanchnic circulation, and hence minimise blood loss during liver surgery. Previous studies show that combination of vasopressin and nitroglycerin reduces portal pressure and flow in patients with portal hypertension, and in this study we investigated this combination in patients with normal portal pressure. METHOD: In all, 13 patients were studied. Measurements were made twice to confirm baseline (C1 and BL), during vasopressin infusion 4.8 U/h (V), and during vasopressin infusion combined with nitroglycerin infusion (V + N). Portal venous pressure (PVP), hepatic venous pressure (HVP), central haemodynamics and arterial and venous blood gases were obtained at each measuring point, and portal (splanchnic) and hepato-splanchnic blood flow changes were calculated. RESULTS: Vasopressin alone did not affect PVP, whereas HVP increased slightly. In combination with nitroglycerin, PVP decreased from 10.1 ± 1.6 to 8.9 ± 1.3 mmHg (P < 0.0001), and HVP decreased from 7.9 ± 1.9 to 6.2 ± 1.3 mmHg (P = 0.001). Vasopressin reduced portal blood flow by 47 ± 19% and hepatic venous flow by 11 ± 18%, respectively. Addition of nitroglycerin further reduced portal- and hepatic flow by 55 ± 13% and 30 ± 13%, respectively. Vasopressin alone had minor effects on central haemodynamics, whereas addition of nitroglycerin reduced cardiac index (3.2 ± 0.7 to 2.7 ± 0.5; P < 0.0001). The arterial-portal vein lactate gradient was unaffected. CONCLUSION: The combination of vasopressin and nitroglycerin decreases portal pressure and hepato-splanchnic blood flow, and could be a potential treatment to reduce bleeding in liver resection surgery.

Donor Monoclonal Gammopathy May Cause Lymphoproliferative Disorders in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients.

Prior research on donor monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) has been inadequate regarding the risk for lymphoproliferative disease in solid organ transplantation recipients. Seven organ recipients from two different donors developed lymphoproliferative disease. The origin of the malignancy was determined by use of microsatellite analysis, and the plasma of the two donors was analyzed with the use of electrophoresis. The clinical courses of the seven recipients were followed for 36-60 months. One donor transmitted lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma to two kidney recipients and MGUS to a liver recipient, all IgMκ. A second donor caused IgGλ myeloma in two kidney and one liver recipient, and IgGλ gammopathy in a heart recipient. Transplant nephrectomy was performed in three kidney recipients and remission was achieved. The fourth kidney recipient has kept the graft and the disease has progressed. The liver recipient died from myeloma. There were no clinical signs of lymphoproliferative disease in the donors, but retrospective serum analyses showed M-components, IgMκ (37 g/L) and IgGλ (8 g/L). Donors with MGUS may cause donor-transmitted malignancies via passenger lymphocytes/plasma cells in solid organ recipients. The results call for a large register study of the incidence of donor MGUS and lymphoproliferative disease in their recipients.

Vasopressin-induced changes in splanchnic blood flow and hepatic and portal venous pressures in liver resection.

BACKGROUND: To minimize blood loss during hepatic surgery, various methods are used to reduce pressure and flow within the hepato-splanchnic circulation. In this study, the effect of low- to moderate doses of vasopressin, a potent splanchnic vasoconstrictor, on changes in portal and hepatic venous pressures and splanchnic and hepato-splanchnic blood flows were assessed in elective liver resection surgery. METHODS: Twelve patients were studied. Cardiac output (CO), stroke volume (SV), mean arterial (MAP), central venous (CVP), portal venous (PVP) and hepatic venous pressures (HVP) were measured, intraoperatively, at baseline and during vasopressin infusion at two infusion rates (2.4 and 4.8 U/h). From arterial and venous blood gases, the portal (splanchnic) and hepato-splanchnic blood flow changes were calculated, using Fick's equation. RESULTS: CO, SV, MAP and CVP increased slightly, but significantly, while systemic vascular resistance and heart rate remained unchanged at the highest infusion rate of vasopressin. PVP was not affected by vasopressin, while HVP increased slightly. Vasopressin infusion at 2.4 and 4.8 U/h reduced portal blood flow (-26% and -37%, respectively) and to a lesser extent hepato-splanchnic blood flow (-9% and -14%, respectively). The arterial-portal vein lactate gradient was not significantly affected by vasopressin. Postoperative serum creatinine was not affected by vasopressin. CONCLUSION: Short-term low to moderate infusion rates of vasopressin induced a splanchnic vasoconstriction without metabolic signs of splanchnic hypoperfusion or subsequent renal impairment. Vasopressin caused a centralization of blood volume and increased cardiac output. Vasopressin does not lower portal or hepatic venous pressures in this clinical setting.

Nitroglycerine and patient position effect on central, hepatic and portal venous pressures during liver surgery.

BACKGROUND: To reduce blood loss during liver surgery, a low central venous pressure (CVP) is recommended. Nitroglycerine (NG) with its rapid onset and offset can be used to reduce CVP. In this study, the effect of NG on portal and hepatic venous pressures (PVP and HVP) in different body positions was assessed. METHODS: Thirteen patients undergoing liver resection were studied. Cardiac output (CO), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured. PVP and HVP were measured using tip manometer catheters at baseline (BL) in horizontal position; during NG infusion, targeting a MAP of 60 mmHg, with NG infusion and the patient placed in 10 head-down position. RESULTS: NG infusion reduced HVP from 9.7 ± 2.4 to 7.2 ± 2.4, PVP from 12.3 ± 2.2 to 9.7 ± 3.0 and CVP from 9.8 ± 1.9 to 7.2 ± 2.1 mmHg at BL. Head-down tilt during ongoing NG resulted in increases in HVP to 8.2 ± 2.1, PVP to 10.7 ± 3 and CVP to 11 ± 1.9 mmHg. CO at BL was 6.3 ± 1.1, which was reduced by NG to 5.8 ± 1.2. Head-down tilt together with NG infusion restored CO to 6.3 ± 1.0 l/min. CONCLUSION: NG infusion leads to parallel reductions in CVP, HVP and PVP at horizontal body position. Thus, CVP can be used to guide NG dosage and fluid administration at horizontal position. NG infusion can be used to reduce HVP. Head-down tilt can be used during NG infusion to improve both blood pressure and CO without substantial increase in liver venous pressure. In head-down tilt, CVP dissociates from HVP and PVP.

Isolated hepatic perfusion for ocular melanoma metastasis: registry data suggests a survival benefit.

BACKGROUND: Uveal melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy in adults. Despite successful control of the primary tumor, metastatic disease will ultimately develop in approximately 35% of the patients, with the liver being the most common site for metastases. These metastases are generally refractory to systemic chemotherapy, and the median survival for patients with liver metastases is about 6 months. This phase II trial reports the experience of isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) as a treatment option. METHOD: A total of 34 patients with isolated liver metastasis from ocular melanoma underwent IHP. An overall survival comparison was made using data retrieved from the National Patient Register managed by the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. RESULTS: An overall radiological response was seen in 68% of the patients, with 12% having a complete response. Time to local progression was 7 months; 68% of the patients developed extrahepatic metastases after a median of 13 months, and the median overall survival was 24 months. There was a significant survival advantage of 14 months (p = 0.029) when comparing these patients with a control group consisting of the longest surviving patients in Sweden with uveal melanoma liver metastases not treated with IHP. CONCLUSIONS: IHP is a treatment option with a high response rate and a potential survival benefit of more than 1 year. IHP should be considered an option in the treatment of uveal melanoma metastases. A randomized trial comparing IHP and best alternative care will start during 2013 (the SCANDIUM trial, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01785316).

Effect of patient position and PEEP on hepatic, portal and central venous pressures during liver resection.

BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that blood loss during liver resection may be reduced if central venous pressure (CVP) is kept at a low level. This can be achieved by changing patient position but it is not known how position changes affect portal (PVP) and hepatic (HVP) venous pressures. The aim of the study was to assess if changes in body position result in clinically significant changes in these pressures. METHODS: We studied 10 patients undergoing liver resection. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and CVP were measured using fluid-filled catheters, PVP and HVP with tip manometers. Measurements were performed in the horizontal, head up and head down tilt position with two positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) levels. RESULTS: A 10° head down tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O significantly increased CVP (11 ± 3 to 15 ± 3 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 76 ± 8 mmHg) while head up tilt at PEEP 5 cm H(2) O decreased CVP (11 ± 3 to 6 ± 4 mmHg) and MAP (72 ± 8 to 63 ± 7 mmHg) with minimal changes in transhepatic venous pressures. Increasing PEEP from 5 to 10 resulted in small increases, around 1 mmHg in CVP, PVP and HVP. There was no significant correlation between changes in CVP vs. PVP and HVP during head up tilt and only a weak correlation between CVP and HVP by head down tilt. CONCLUSIONS: Changes of body position resulted in marked changes in CVP but not in HVPs. Head down or head up tilt to reduce venous pressures in the liver may therefore not be effective measures to reduce blood loss during liver surgery.

Kidney transplantation--a 46-year experience from the Transplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.

The limiting factor in organ transplantation is the availability of organs. Ongoing work to improve donation rates both at the public and the organizational level in donating hospitals is essential. We also think that encouragement of live donation is important, and the possibility of ABO incompatible transplantation has increased the number of LD transplantations. The one-year graft survival rate is excellent and focus has shifted towards achieving long-term results to reduce the attrition rate. There is also an increasing interest in studying and working to reduce comorbidities on a long-term basis and thus, improve survival rates and recipient quality of life.

Living kidney donors developing end-stage renal disease.

The incidence of end-stage kidney failure (ESRF) was analyzed among the cohort of 1112 living kidney donors who underwent nephrectomy from 1965 through 2005. It was found that at least six persons had developed ESRF at 14 to 27 years (median = 20 years), following donation. Five of six were men. Five were parents and one, a sibling. The diagnoses were nephrosclerosis (n = 4), postrenal failure (n = 1), and renal carcinoma (n = 1). One donor, aged 45 years, underwent kidney transplantation.

Late mortality in 679 consecutive liver transplant recipients: the Gothenburg liver transplant experience.

PURPOSE: Liver transplantation (OLT) is an established treatment with excellent early outcome. However, the long-term results are hampered by side effects of immunosuppression, cardiovascular morbidity, recurrent disease, and chronic rejection. We analyzed causes of late death (>/=2 years post-OLT) in 679 consecutive primary recipients in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 679 primary OLT recipients including those retransplanted within 3 months between January 1985 and August 2005 were identified; 460 (67.7%) patients survived >/=2 years. The indications were cholestatic disease (35.1%), postviral (11.4%), alcoholic (12.9%), fulminant hepatic failure (7.0%), cryptogenic (3.1%), autoimmune hepatitis (4.8%), malignancy (7.7%), and others (18.0%). Sixty three patients (9.3%) died >/=2 years post-OLT. For 51 patients, sufficient records were present to establish the cause of death. RESULTS: Four hundred sixty (67.7%) patients survived >/=2 years. Their median age was 58 years with, 43.7% older than 60 and 11.1% older than 70 years. Sixty three patients (9.3%) died at a median time of 69 +/- 4.8 months post-primary OLT; 49.1% died of malignancy and 13.7% of vascular complications and infectious complications respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Late mortality in our material is mainly due to malignant disease. Compared to other published reports on late mortality, the proportion of malignancy, especially recurrent, as cause of late death is higher. This might reflect a more generous approach toward accepting older patients and a higher proportion of patients with various malignant diseases accepted for OLT.

Pseudoaneurysm of the hepatic artery following liver transplantation.

We report 12 cases of pseudoaneurysm hepatic artery (PA) among 825 liver transplantations (OLT) performed between January 1985 and December 2005. In the early period (1985 to 1995), the incidence was 2.6% and in the later period (1996 to 2005), 0.9%. Median time to onset was 39.5 days post-OLT (range 14 days to 5 years). Six patients presented with rupture into the peritoneum (n = 4) or gastrointestinal tract (n = 2), while five patients presented with gastrointestinal bleed due arteriobiliary fistulation with hemobilia. The twelfth PA was found incidentally during retransplantation. PAs were detected with radiological imaging (n = 4), exploratory laparotomy (n = 6), at autopsy (n = 1) or at retransplantation (n = 1). We performed immediate revascularization, after surgical excision was performed in three and endovascular embolization in one patient. In six patients hepatic artery ligation without revascularization was inevitable with subsequent successful retransplantation in four patients. No PA-specific treatment was attempted in two cases due to the poor prognosis or diagnostic ambiguity. In 10 cases microbial pathogens were cultured in the blood, subhepatic abscesses, or from the wall of the hepatic artery. A hepaticojejunostomy was performed for biliary reconstruction in six patients and two had a hepaticojejunostomy conversion due to biliary leak. Survival in the early period (1985 to 1995) was 14%, whereas during the later period (1996 to 2005), the survival increased to 100% with a 4.2-year median follow-up (range 7.4 months to 6.9 years). Infrequently PA complicates OLT, becoming evident primarily after rupture with hemoperitoneum or a gastrointestinal bleed. Early recognition with angiography is important but acute hemorrhage often requires immediate exploration with ligation of the PA, although surgical or endovascular exclusion of the PA followed by revascularization provides a feasible treatment option.

Extended right-sided liver resection for colorectal liver metastases--impact of percutaneous portal venous embolisation.

AIM: To compare the outcome after extended right liver lobe resection (ERL) for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer with preceding portal vein embolisation (PVE) with a non-PVE-group. METHODS: Nineteen patients underwent ERL (resection of segment 4-8) for colorectal liver metastases after PVE. They were compared with 21 patients that underwent an ERL without embolisation. A comparison was made with 84 patients undergoing right lobe liver resection during the same time period. Survival, post-operative morbidity and mortality were recorded and the volume of the future remnant liver (FRL) was measured with CT. RESULTS: There were major complications in 1/19 patients in the PVE-group and in 6/21 in the non-PVE-group (p=0.04). No post-operative deaths were observed in the PVE-group, compared to three deaths in the non-PVE-group (p=0.09). The median survival in the PVE-group was 32 months, which did not differ from the non-PVE-group. In 21% of the patients that underwent PVE, progression occurred during the time between embolisation and surgery. There was no difference in survival for patients that underwent PVE followed by ERL, compared to patients that underwent standard right lobe liver resection. CONCLUSION: The survival of patients after ERL is comparable with patients that undergo standard right lobe resection and have less liver tumour.