Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Anaesthesiol ; 22(1): 30-4, 2005 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15816570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study compares three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia in parturients during labour. METHODS: Eighty-four women were randomized to one of three groups. The epidural solution used in all the three groups was 0.1% bupivacaine with fentanyl 2 microg mL(-1). Patients were able to self administer a demand dose of 3 mL with a lockout interval of 6 min in Group A, 6 mL with a lockout interval of 12 min in Group B and 9 mL with lockout interval of 18 min in Group C. All patients received a background infusion at a rate of 6 mL h(-1). Visual analogue pain scores, pinprick analgesia and motor block were assessed hourly by a blinded observer. The physician-administered supplementation and the cumulative dose of bupivacaine were also compared between the three groups. RESULTS: Pain scores, sensory level and motor block were not different among the study groups. Patients' satisfaction was rated good to excellent with no difference among groups. The cumulative dose of bupivacaine was not significantly different. However, there was a trend towards a decreased need for rescue analgesia in Group C. Within each group, the physician-administered supplementations were significantly higher during the second stage of labour than during the first stage (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The three modes of patient-controlled epidural analgesia supplemented by a background infusion of 6 mL h(-1) were equally effective for labour analgesia with a trend for decreased rescue analgesia in the group with a larger bolus dose and a longer lockout interval.


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Adulto , Anestésicos Locais , Índice de Apgar , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Bupivacaína , Cesárea , Método Duplo-Cego , Efedrina/administração & dosagem , Efedrina/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Frequência Cardíaca/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Medição da Dor , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez , Vasoconstritores/administração & dosagem , Vasoconstritores/uso terapêutico
2.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 49(3): 300-4, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15752392

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The frequency of emergence agitation in children is increased following sevoflurane anesthesia. However, controversies still exist concerning the exact etiology of this postanesthetic problem. Although this phenomenon is present with adequate pain relief or even following pain-free procedures, pain is still regarded as a major contributing factor. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study, we enrolled 48 premedicated and calm 2-6-year-old children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. We assigned children to one of two groups: children assigned to the caudal group (n = 24) received a caudal block to supplement sevoflurane, while children assigned to the fentanyl group (n = 24) received a bolus injection of 1 microg kg(-1) intravenous fentanyl before skin incision to supplement sevoflurane. In the post anesthesia care unit, all children were received by their parent, and the incidence of emergence agitation and pain scores, as well as hemodynamic changes, were compared in both groups. RESULTS: Forty-four children completed the study. In the fentanyl group, 59% of the children were agitated following emergence from anesthesia as compared to 4.5% in the caudal group (P < 0.001). Also, pain scores, mean values of heart rate and blood pressure as well as morphine requirement were significantly higher in the post anesthesia care unit in the fentanyl group compared to the caudal group. CONCLUSION: Our results show that in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair, pain control with a preoperative caudal block as compared to intraoperative intravenous fentanyl significantly reduces the incidence of emergence agitation and pain scores following sevoflurane anesthesia.


Assuntos
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Anestesia Caudal/métodos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Éteres Metílicos/efeitos adversos , Cuidados Pré-Operatórios/métodos , Agitação Psicomotora/prevenção & controle , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Inalatórios/uso terapêutico , Anestésicos Intravenosos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Fentanila/uso terapêutico , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Hérnia Inguinal/cirurgia , Humanos , Masculino , Éteres Metílicos/uso terapêutico , Morfina/uso terapêutico , Medição da Dor/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos , Sevoflurano , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Reg Anesth Pain Med ; 26(4): 310-5, 2001.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11464348

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A multimodal approach to postcesarean pain management may enhance analgesia and reduce side effects after surgery. This study evaluates the postoperative analgesic effects of propacetamol and/or diclofenac in parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia. METHODS: After randomization, 80 healthy parturients received the following: placebo (group M), 100 mg diclofenac rectally every 8 hours (group MD), 2 g propacetamol intravenously every 6 hours (group MP), or a combination of 2 g propacetamol and 100 mg diclofenac (group MDP) as described above. Drugs were administered for 24 hours after surgery. Postoperative pain was controlled with a patient controlled analgesia pump, using morphine. The visual analog scale (VAS) at rest and on coughing, as well as the morphine consumption, were evaluated at 2, 6, and 24 hours postoperatively. Also, the side effects experienced after undergoing the different regimens were compared. RESULTS: The patients' characteristics did not differ significantly between the 4 groups. VAS score at 2 hours, both at rest and on coughing were lower in group MDP and MD compared with group M (P <.05). At 24 hours, there was still a tendency toward lower pain scores in the groups MDP and MD; however, this difference was only statistically significant at rest between the MDP group and the MP and M groups. Morphine consumption at 2, 6, and 24 hours was lower in the MDP and MD groups compared with the MP and M groups (P <.05). The morphine-sparing effect was higher in groups MDP and MD compared with group MP (57% and 46%, respectively, v 8.2%, P <.05). The incidence of side effects was similar in all groups. However, the power of the study was too low to permit an evaluation of potential side effects. CONCLUSION: Diclofenac after cesarean delivery improves analgesia and has a highly significant morphine-sparing effect. We were unable to demonstrate significant morphine-sparing effect of propacetamol or additive effect of propacetamol and diclofenac in this group of patients.


Assuntos
Acetaminofen/análogos & derivados , Acetaminofen/administração & dosagem , Analgesia Obstétrica , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente , Analgésicos Opioides/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/administração & dosagem , Diclofenaco/administração & dosagem , Morfina/administração & dosagem , Dor Pós-Operatória/tratamento farmacológico , Cesárea , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Satisfação do Paciente , Gravidez
4.
Anesth Analg ; 92(3): 636-40, 2001 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11226091

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: In this double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled study, we assessed the effect of dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg IV administered preoperatively in 110 children 2-12 yr old, undergoing electrodissection adenotonsillectomy, using a standardized anesthetic technique. The incidence of early and late vomiting, the time to first oral intake, the quality of oral intake, the satisfaction scores, and the duration of IV hydration were compared in both groups. The overall incidence of vomiting, as well as the incidence of late vomiting, was significantly less in the Dexamethasone group as compared with the Saline group (23% and 19% vs 51% and 34%, respectively). The time to first oral intake and the duration of IV hydration were shorter in the Dexamethasone group compared with the Saline group (P < 0.05). The quality of oral intake and the satisfaction scores were better in the Dexamethasone group than in the Saline group (P < 0.05). This report confirms the beneficial effect of IV dexamethasone on both vomiting and oral intake in children undergoing electrodissection adenotonsillectomy. IMPLICATIONS: In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, we examined the efficacy of a single dose of dexamethasone 0.5 mg/kg IV on posttonsillectomy vomiting and oral intake in children 2-12 yr old. Dexamethasone significantly decreased the incidence of postoperative vomiting during the first 24 h, shortened the time to the first oral intake and the duration of IV hydration, and improved the quality of oral intake and the satisfaction scores of the patients.


Assuntos
Antieméticos/uso terapêutico , Dexametasona/uso terapêutico , Náusea e Vômito Pós-Operatórios/prevenção & controle , Tonsilectomia/efeitos adversos , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA