RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To examine the healthcare utilization of patients with non-English language preference (NELP) who utilized a professional language interpreter (PLI) in the intensive care unit (ICU) compared to similar patients with NELP who did not utilize a PLI in the ICU. METHODS: Single center cohort study of patients with NELP with at least one ICU admission a large academic medical center in the U.S. Midwest (1/1/2008-12/31/2022). The first model examined ICU length-of-stay (LOS) using a negative binomial and the second model examined whether a patient was readmitted to the ICU using a logistic regression with each model controlling for PLI utilization and covariates. RESULTS: Patients with NELP who utilized a PLI in the ICU had 0.87-days longer in the ICU (p < 0.01) and had a 46 % decreased odds of being readmitted to the ICU (p < 0.01) than a comparable patient with NELP who did not utilize a PLI in the ICU. CONCLUSION: Providing patients with NELP with access to a PLI in the ICU can improve patient outcomes and reduce language barriers. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: These results can provide the justification to potentially increase PLI staffing levels or increase the access to existing PLIs for more patients with NELP in ICUs.
Assuntos
Barreiras de Comunicação , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Tradução , Humanos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idioma , Idoso , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Estudos de Coortes , Proficiência Limitada em InglêsRESUMO
ABSTRACT: Background: Although central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO 2 ) has been used as an endpoint for the treatment of circulatory shock, its role in guiding the evaluation and treatment of patients with severe hypoxemia remains to be assessed. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of low ScvO 2 in a cohort of hypoxemic patients and the association of this finding with differences in clinical management and patient outcomes. Methods: Retrospective review of data from adult intensive care unit patients with hypoxemia who required invasive mechanical ventilation for over 24 h and had at least one ScvO 2 measured within 6 h of a PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio <200. Results: Of 442 mechanically ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia, 249 (56%) had an ScvO 2 <70%. When compared with patients with ScvO 2 ≥70%, those with low ScvO 2 had worse systemic oxygenation and hemodynamic parameters and were more likely to receive red blood cell transfusions (31.7% vs. 18.1%, P = 0.001), epinephrine (27.3% vs. 16.6%, P = 0.007), and inodilators. Outcomes such as median intensive care unit length of stay (7.5 vs. 8.3 days, P = 0.337) and hospital mortality (39.8% vs. 35.7%, P = 0.389) were not different between groups. When stratified by the central venous-to-arterial CO 2 difference (∆PCO 2 ), patients with a low ScvO 2 and normal ∆PCO 2 had lower median PaO 2 and hemoglobin levels and received more red blood cell transfusions, whereas those with an increased ∆PCO 2 had a lower pulse pressure and cardiac index and were more likely to receive epinephrine and milrinone. Conclusion: Low ScvO 2 is frequently observed in mechanically ventilated patients with severe hypoxemia, and these patients receive different interventions. Clinicians often use therapies targeting systemic oxygen delivery to correct low ScvO 2 . Prospective research is needed to identify patients with severe hypoxemia that might benefit from interventions targeting systemic oxygen delivery.