The sensitivity and specificity of rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) to detect coagulopathy during moderate and severe postpartum haemorrhage: a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Point-of-care viscoelastic haemostatic assays such as rotational thromboelastometry (including ROTEM and TEG) have been used in the management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH). This study compared results obtained from the automated ROTEM Sigma with laboratory tests of coagulation and platelet count during PPH. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study recruited women with PPH ≥1000 mL (or clinical concern of bleeding). The Fibtem A5, Extem CT and Pltem (Extem A5 - Fibtem A5) results were compared with laboratory tests of fibrinogen, prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) and platelet count. RESULTS: 521 women were recruited, including 274/277 (98.9%) of women with PPH ≥1500 mL. Fibtem A5 results were matched with laboratory fibrinogen in 552/644 (85.7%) samples. The incidence of abnormal laboratory results was low: fibrinogen ≤2 g/L 23/464 (5.0%), PT or APTT >1.5 × midpoint of reference range 4/464 (0.9%), and platelet count <75 × 109/L 11/477 (2.3%). Area-under-the-receiver operator characteristic curve for Fibtem A5 to detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L was 0.96 (95% Confidence Interval (CI) 0.94 to 0.98, P<0.001), with sensitivity and specificity of Fibtem A5 ≤11 mm to detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L of 0.76 and 0.96. Prolonged Extem CT results improved after treatment of hypofibrinogenaemia alone. Intervention points for platelet and fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion based on ROTEM Sigma parameters could not be established. CONCLUSION: During PPH (≥1000 mL or cases of clinical concern about bleeding), ROTEM Sigma Fibtem A5 can detect fibrinogen ≤2 g/L and guide targeted fibrinogen replacement. Laboratory results should continue to be used to guide platelet and FFP transfusion.

Utility of viscoelastography with TEG 6s to direct management of haemostasis during obstetric haemorrhage: a prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: The TEG 6s is an automated cartridge-based device with limited description of use in obstetric haemorrhage. The aim of this analysis was to describe the utility of TEG 6s in identifying abnormal laboratory results of coagulation and platelet count, and inform an interventional treatment algorithm for postpartum haemorrhage. METHODS: A prospective observational cohort study of 521 women with moderate to severe obstetric haemorrhage (>1000 mL blood loss), including 372 women with at least one TEG 6s test. A non-pregnant control group was used for reference. TEG 6s test parameters Citrated Functional Fibrinogen (CFF), Citrated Kaolin TEG (CK) and Citrated Rapid TEG (CRT) were compared with paired laboratory tests of fibrinogen, PT/aPTT and platelet count, obtained during haemorrhage. RESULTS: Among 456 TEG 6s tests, 389 were matched with laboratory coagulation results. The receiver operator characteristic area-under-the-curve (95% CI) for CFF amplitude by 10 min to detect Clauss fibrinogen ≤2 g/L was 0.95 (0.91 to 0.99) (P<0.0001, sensitivity 0.74 and specificity 0.97 at ≤17 mm). False positives had median (IQR) Clauss fibrinogen of 2.4 (2.3-2.7) g/L. The CK-R time had some utility for detecting prolonged PT/aPTT, however a threshold for fresh frozen plasma transfusion was not established. A CRT maximum amplitude <57 mm, when CFF was ≥15 mm, identified four of eight samples with platelet count <75 × 109/L. CONCLUSION: The TEG 6s CFF can be used to identify low fibrinogen during obstetric haemorrhage. A value to identify transfusion thresholds for PT/aPTT and platelets was not established, and laboratory results should continue to be used.

When does obstetric coagulopathy occur and how do I manage it?

Anticipating obstetric coagulopathy is important when obstetric anaesthetists are involved in the clinical management of women with postpartum haemorrhage. Although the incidence of coagulopathy in women with postpartum haemorrhage is low, significant hypofibrinogenaemia is associated with major haemorrhage-related morbidity and thus early identification and treatment is essential to improve outcomes. Point-of-care viscoelastic haemostatic assays, including thromboelastography and rotational thromboelastometry, provide granular information about alterations in clot formation and hypofibrinogenaemia, allow near-patient interpretation of coagulopathy, and can guide goal-directed treatment. If these assays are not available, anaesthetists should closely monitor the maternal coagulation profile with standard laboratory testing during the active phase of postpartum bleeding in order to rule coagulopathy 'in or out', decide if pro-haemostatic therapies are indicated, and assess the response to haemostatic support.