Early Identification of Acute Lung Injury in a Porcine Model of Hemorrhagic Shock.

BACKGROUND: Acute lung injury (ALI) is a frequent complication after severe trauma. Lung-protective ventilation strategies and damage control resuscitation have been proposed for the prevention of ALI; however, there are no clinical or laboratory parameters to predict who is at risk of developing ALI after trauma. In the present study, we explored pulmonary inflammatory markers as a potential predictor of ALI using a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Female swine were randomized to mechanical ventilation with low tidal volume (VT) (6 mL/kg) or high VT (12 mL/kg). After equilibration, animals underwent pressure-controlled hemorrhage (mean arterial pressure [MAP] 35 ± 5 mmHg) for 1 h, followed by resuscitation with fresh whole blood or Hextend. They were maintained at MAP of 50 ± 5 mmHg for 3 h in the postresuscitation phase. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluids were collected hourly and analyzed for inflammatory markers. Lung samples were taken, and porcine neutrophil antibody staining was used to evaluate the presence of neutrophils. ELISA evaluated serum porcine surfactant protein D levels. Sham animals were used as negative controls. RESULTS: Pigs that underwent hemorrhagic shock had higher heart rates, lower cardiac output, lower MAPs, and worse acidosis compared with sham at the early time points (P < 0.05 each). There were no significant differences in central venous pressure or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure between groups. Pulmonary neutrophil infiltration, as defined by neutrophil antibody staining on lung samples, was greater in the shock groups regardless of resuscitation fluid (P < 0.05 each). Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid neutrophil levels were not different between groups. There were no differences in levels of porcine surfactant protein D between groups at any time points, and the levels did not change over time in each respective group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates the reproducibility of a porcine model of hemorrhagic shock that is consistent with physiologic changes in humans in hemorrhagic shock. Pulmonary neutrophil infiltration may serve as an early marker for ALI; however, the practicality of this finding has yet to be determined.

The Massive Transfusion Score as a decision aid for resuscitation: Learning when to turn the massive transfusion protocol on and off.

BACKGROUND: Previous work proposed a Massive Transfusion Score (MTS) calculated from values obtained in the emergency department to predict likelihood of massive transfusion (MT). We hypothesized the MTS could be used at Hour 6 to differentiate who continues to require balanced resuscitation in Hours 7 to 24 and to predict death at 28 days. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled patients in whom the MT protocol was initiated from 2005 to 2011. Data including timing of blood products were determined at Hours 0, 6, 12, and 24. For each patient, transfusion needs were defined based on either an inappropriately low hemoglobin response to transfusion or a hemoglobin decrease of greater than 1 g/dL if no transfusion. Timing and cause of death were used to account for survivor bias. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine independent predictors of outcome. RESULTS: A total of 190 MT protocol activations were included, and by Hour 6, 61% required 10 U or greater packed red blood cells. Calculated at initial presentation, a revised MTS (systolic blood pressure < 90 mm Hg, base deficit ≥ 6, temperature < 35.5°C, international normalized ratio > 1.5, hemoglobin < 11 g/dL) was superior to the original MTS (including heart rate ≥ 120 beats per minute, Focused Assessment With Sonography in Trauma [FAST] status, mechanism) or the Assessment of Blood Consumption (ABC) score for predicting MT (area under the curve [AUC] MT at 6 hours, 0.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57-0.79; at 24 hours, 0.72; 0.61-0.83; p < 0.05). For those alive at Hour 6, the revised MTS was predictive of future packed red blood cell need (AUC, 0.87) in Hours 7 to 12, 24-hour mortality (AUC, 0.95), and 28-day mortality (AUC, 0.77). For each additional positive trigger of the MTS at Hour 6, the odds of death at 24 hours and 28 days were substantially increased (24-hour odds ratio, 4.6; 95% CI, 2.3-9.3; 28-day odds ratio, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.5-3.2; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Early end points of resuscitation adopted from the components of the revised MTS are predictive of ongoing transfusion. Failure to normalize these components by Hour 6 portends a particularly poor prognosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic study, level 3.