On the Frontlines: Protecting and Advancing Gender-Affirming Care in a Hostile Sociopolitical Environment.

Since 2020, there has been a significant cultural and political backlash in the USA to growing acceptance of gender diversity and gender-affirming care. Legislative attacks, particularly targeting gender-affirming care access for transgender and gender diverse youth, have occurred in a media environment rife with misinformation and disinformation. Even in states where a ban is not enacted, we have seen significant harm caused by such misinformation and disinformation, to transgender and gender diverse patients, their families, and clinicians who provide this important and much needed care, in the form of clinic closures and disruption of services. In this hostile sociopolitical environment, we present strategies for health care organizations and workers to continue to provide this lifesaving care thoughtfully, to safeguard the protections currently in place, and to continue to advocate for patients, families, and health care staff.

Trust and Biomedical Research Engagement of Minority and Under-Represented Communities in Mississippi, USA.

Trust is critical to the development and maintenance of effective research collaborations and community engagement. The purpose of this study was to assess the current attitudes and level of trust pertaining to health research among residents of Central Mississippi, the priority health region for the Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) Center for Health Disparities Research (RCHDR) at Jackson State University. The cross-sectional study was conducted from November 2021 to April 2022. The data were analyzed using descriptive statistics carried out by SPSS statistical software. A total of 146 participants responded to the survey. The participants were predominately African American (99%) and female (75%). Historical research studies, the researchers' qualities, and potential benefits from participation were factors affecting the level of trust in the research process. Ninety percent (n = 131) expressed that it was important to be involved in the research process, and 98.5% (n = 144) agreed that discussing the research findings with the participants was important for establishing trust in the research process. While trust in the research process does not guarantee participation, trust is a precursor for those who decide to engage in health disparities research. Key findings will be integrated into the RCHDR research agenda to foster further development and implementation of innovative community-based participatory research toward the control and/or prevention of diseases that disproportionately affect minority and under-represented populations in Mississippi.