Clinical characteristics and long-term prognosis of female patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Background: Cardiovascular disease has traditionally been studied predominantly in men, but understanding its manifestations in women is crucial for effective management. This study aims to evaluate the long-term prognosis of female patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) within a tertiary hospital setting in Spain. Methods: Retrospective observational study based on a cohort of consecutive hospitalized patients with ACS from January 2009 to December 2014. Data on demographics, risk factors, treatment, and outcomes were collected, with a median follow-up of 9.2 years. Results: Women with ACS, constituting 27.3% of 2,330 patients, were older and had a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors such as obesity, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus compared to men. They presented with more non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and underwent less coronary angiography. Female patients were also less likely to be treated with acetylsalicylic acid, a second antiplatelet drug, or statins. Despite initial higher mortality rates [hazard ratio (HR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-1.49; p < 0.001], female patients exhibited a more favorable long-term prognosis after adjustments (adjusted HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.96; p = 0.014), even in the subgroup analysis excluding patients with unstable angina. Conclusions: Women with ACS are more comorbid, but after adjustments, female sex appears to be a protective factor that confers a better long-term prognosis.

Prevalence and prognostic implications of myocardial injury across different waves of COVID-19.

Introduction: The prognostic ability of myocardial injury across different waves of the COVID-19 pandemic is not well established. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and prognostic implications of myocardial injury in the first and sixth wave of COVID-19. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study that included patients admitted to the emergency department with COVID-19 with data on concentrations of cardiac troponin during the first and sixth wave. We compared the prevalence of myocardial injury and its predictive capacity for 30-day all-cause death in both waves. Results and discussion: A total of 346 patients were included (1st wave 199 and 6th wave 147 patients). The prevalence of myocardial injury was 21% with non-significant differences between waves. Myocardial injury was associated, in both waves, with a higher prevalence of comorbidities and with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause death [1st wave HR: 3.73 (1.84-7.55); p < 0.001 and 6th wave HR: 3.13 (1.23-7.92); p = 0.016], with non-significant differences in predictive capacity between groups after ROC curve analysis [AUC: 1st wave 0.829 (95% CI: 0.764-0.895) and 6th wave 0.794 (95% CI: 0.711-0.876)]. As limitations, this is a retrospective study with a relatively small simple size and troponin assay was performed at the discretion of the emergency physician so selection bias could be present. In conclusion, the prevalence of myocardial injury and its prognostic capacity was similar in both waves despite vaccination programs. Myocardial injury predicts short-term mortality in all COVID-19 patients, so they should be treated intensively.