Urgent care-seeking and injury severity for intimate partner violence during COVID-19: a Canadian retrospective chart review.

BACKGROUND: Early reports raised alarms that intimate partner violence (IPV) increased during the COVID-19 pandemic, but initial studies showed that visits to emergency departments (EDs) decreased. This study assessed the impact of the prolonged pandemic and its associated restrictions on both rates of urgent care-seeking and injury severity for IPV. METHODS: Data from the Kingston Health Sciences Centre's (KHSC) ED were utilized to compare IPV presentations during 'Pre-COVID' (December 17, 2018 - March 16, 2020) and 'COVID' (March 17, 2020 - June 16, 2021), as well as three periods of heightened local restrictions: 'Lockdown-1' (March 17 - June 12, 2020), 'Lockdown-2' (December 26, 2020 - February 10, 2021) and 'Lockdown-3' (April 8 - June 2, 2021). The primary outcomes were incidence rate of IPV visits and injury severity, which was assessed using the Clinical Injury Extent Score (CIES) and Injury Severity Score (ISS). RESULTS: A total of 128 individuals were included. This sample had mean age of 34 years, was comprised of mostly women (97%), and represented a variety of intimate relationship types. Some individuals presented multiple times, resulting in a total of 139 acute IPV presentations. The frequency of IPV visits during COVID was similar to the Pre-COVID time period (67 vs. 72; p = 0.67). Incidence rate was 13% higher during COVID, though this difference was non-significant (6.66 vs. 5.90; p = 0.47). IPV visit frequency varied across lockdown periods (11 in Lockdown-1, 12 in Lockdown-2 and 6 in Lockdown-3), with the highest incidence rate during Lockdown-2 (12.71). There were more moderate and severe injuries during COVID compared to Pre-COVID, but mean CIES was not statistically significantly different (1.91 vs. 1.69; p = 0.29), nor was mean ISS (11.88 vs. 12.52; p = 0.73). CONCLUSIONS: During the 15-months following the start of COVID-19, there were small, but non-significant increases in both incidence rate and severity of IPV presentations to the KHSC ED. This may reflect escalation of violence as pandemic restrictions persisted and requires further investigation.

Navigating gaps in practice: consensus recommendations for educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from gaps in practice.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify the learning needs of emergency physicians returning to Emergency Medicine (EM) practice after clinical leaves of less than 2 years, summarize existing return to practice programs, and propose recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for these physicians both during their practice gaps and upon return to EM. METHODS: A multiple-phased study was conducted to establish recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for emergency physicians returning from practice gaps of less than 2 years. The overall design involved an initial environmental scan of existing and exemplar programs and regulatory body positions, followed by interviews with EM Department Heads from across Canada, and then subsequent content analysis and recommendation derivation by EM medical education expert group consensus. These summary recommendations were further revised by consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium to derive a final set of consensus recommendations. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed a set of recommendations regarding ideal educational and support structures for physicians experiencing gaps in practice of less than 2 years. This set of recommendations was informed by review of existing and exemplar programs, policies and experience of regulatory bodies, interviews with EM Department Heads across Canada, and a subsequent process of consensus at the 2022 CAEP conference academic symposium. It is hoped that this set of recommendations will inform discussions and potential strategies employed by departments to facilitate the smooth and effective return to EM practice for individuals experiencing gaps.

ABSTRAIT: OBJECTIFS: Le but de cette étude était de déterminer les besoins d'apprentissage des médecins d'urgence qui retournent à la pratique de la médecine d'urgence (ME) après des congés cliniques de moins de deux ans, de résumer les programmes de retour à la pratique existants. et de proposer des recommandations concernant les structures de formation et de soutien idéales pour ces médecins, à la fois pendant leurs lacunes dans la pratique et à leur retour à la GU. MéTHODES: Une étude en plusieurs phases a été menée afin d'établir des recommandations concernant les structures de formation et de soutien idéales pour les médecins d'urgence qui reviennent de lacunes de moins de deux ans. La conception globale comprenait une première analyse de l'environnement des programmes existants et exemplaires et des postes d'organismes de réglementation, suivie d'entrevues avec les chefs des services de GU de partout au Canada. et ensuite l'analyse du contenu et la formulation de recommandations par consensus du groupe d'experts en éducation médicale de la SE. Ces recommandations résumées ont été révisées par consensus lors du symposium universitaire de la conférence 2022 de l'ACMU afin d'en arriver à une série finale de recommandations consensuelles. CONCLUSION: Nous avons élaboré une série de recommandations concernant les structures de formation et de soutien idéales pour les médecins qui connaissent des lacunes dans la pratique depuis moins de deux ans. Cette série de recommandations a été éclairée par l'examen des programmes, des politiques et de l'expérience des organismes de réglementation existants et exemplaires, des entrevues avec les chefs des services de GU partout au Canada et un processus subséquent de consensus au symposium universitaire de la conférence 2022 de la CAEP. On espère que cette série de recommandations éclairera les discussions et les stratégies potentielles employées par les ministères pour faciliter le retour en douceur et efficace à la pratique de GU pour les personnes qui connaissent des lacunes.

Peek at the glass ceiling: gender distribution of leadership among emergency medicine residency programs.

BACKGROUND: A gender gap in faculty rank at academic institutions exists; however, data among graduate medical education (GME) programmes are limited. There is a need to assess gender disparities in GME leadership, as a lack of female leadership may affect recruitment, role modelling and mentorship of female trainees. This cross-sectional study aimed to describe the current state of gender in programme leadership (department chair, programme director (PD), associate/assistant PD (APD) and clerkship director (CD)) at accredited Emergency Medicine (EM) programmes in the USA to determine whether a gender gap exists. METHODS: A survey was distributed to EM residency programmes in the USA assessing demographics and gender distribution among programme leadership. If no response was received, information was collected via the programme's website. Data were organised by position, region and length of the programme. We obtained data on the number of female EM physicians in practice and in training/fellowship in 2017 from the Association of American Medical Colleges. Data analysis was completed using descriptive statistics and χ2 analysis. RESULTS: Of the 226 programmes contacted, 148 responded to the survey (66.3%). Among US EM residency programmes, 11.2% of chairs, 34.6% of PDs, 40.5% of APDs and 46.5% of CDs are women. The percentage of female chairs is significantly lower than the percentage of women in practice or in training in EM. The percentage of female PDs did not differ from the percentage of women in practice or in training in EM. The percentage of female APDs and CDs was significantly higher than the percentage of women in practice but did not differ from the percentage in training. There was wide variability across regions. Four-year programmes had more women in PD and APD positions compared with 3-year programmes (p=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: While the representation of women in educational roles is encouraging, the number of women holding the rank of chairperson remains disproportionately low. Further studies are needed to evaluate reasons for this and strategies to increase gender equality in leadership roles.

Harnessing the power of simulation for assessment: Consensus recommendations for the use of simulation-based assessment in emergency medicine.

OBJECTIVES: To address the increasing demand for the use of simulation for assessment, our objective was to review the literature pertaining to simulation-based assessment and develop a set of consensus-based expert-informed recommendations on the use of simulation-based assessment as presented at the 2019 Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians (CAEP) Academic Symposium on Education. METHODS: A panel of Emergency Medicine (EM) physicians from across Canada, with leadership roles in simulation and/or assessment, was formed to develop the recommendations. An initial scoping literature review was conducted to extract principles of simulation-based assessment. These principles were refined via thematic analysis, and then used to derive a set of recommendations for the use of simulation-based assessment, organized by the Consensus Framework for Good Assessment. This was reviewed and revised via a national stakeholder survey, and then the recommendations were presented and revised at the consensus conference to generate a final set of recommendations on the use of simulation-based assessment in EM. CONCLUSION: We developed a set of recommendations for simulation-based assessment, using consensus-based expert-informed methods, across the domains of validity, reproducibility, feasibility, educational and catalytic effects, acceptability, and programmatic assessment. While the precise role of simulation-based assessment will be a subject of continued debate, we propose that these recommendations be used to assist educators and program leaders as they incorporate simulation-based assessment into their programs of assessment.

What Emergency Medicine Rewards: Is There Implicit Gender Bias in National Awards?

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Multiple studies have demonstrated a gender gap in the percentage of women recognized in national awards, but to our knowledge this gap has not been studied within emergency medicine. This study is designed to evaluate the presence of a gender gap in female representation in awards from national emergency medicine organizations in the United States and Canada. METHODS: The awards from 5 national organizations during the past 5 years were reviewed. We developed a data extraction tool to identify and categorize the awards and recipients. Data were grouped according to gender distribution and assessed with respect to emergency medicine organization, year of award, category of award, and career phase specified by award. RESULTS: The overall percentage of female awardees across all 5 organizations from 2014 to 2018 was 28%. Only 16% of all named awards were named after women, and female awardees were more likely to be recognized early in their career for advocacy and work pertaining to the advancement of women, whereas men were favored for awards recognizing mentorship and organizational contributions. CONCLUSION: Emergency medicine is unique among other specialties in that the percentage of women represented in national awards (28%) closely mirrors the overall representation of women in emergency medicine (27.6% in the United States, 31% in Canada). This is in contrast to the documented leadership gap in academic medicine and emergency medicine, which may reflect a lag time between receiving national awards and earning academic and professional promotion. Although some organizations had significantly lower representation of female awardees, the overall trends indicate that women have closed the gender gap in award representation. This may signal a forthcoming change in other domains with established gaps in emergency medicine; specifically, in leadership and pay.

Cognitive load theory as a framework for simulation-based, ultrasound-guided internal jugular catheterization training: Once is not enough.

OBJECTIVE: The main objective of this study was to use the principles of cognitive load theory to design a curriculum that incorporates a progressive part practice approach to teaching ultrasound-guided (USG) internal jugular catheterization (IJC) to novices. A secondary objective was to compare the technical proficiency of residents trained using this curriculum with the technical proficiency of residents trained with the current local standard of a single simulation session. METHODS: The experimental group included 16 residents who attended three 2-hour sessions of progressive part practice in a simulation lab. The control group included 46 residents who attended the current local standard of a single 2-hour simulation session just prior to their intensive care unit rotation. Technical proficiency was assessed using hand motion analysis and time to procedure completion. RESULTS: After three sessions, median scores for right hand motion (RHM) (34.5; [27.0-49.0]), left hand motion (LHM) (35.5; [20.0-45.0]), and total time (TT) (117.0 s; [82.7-140.0]) in the experimental group were significantly better than the control group (p<0.001). Results for eight experimental group residents who were assessed for retention at a later date revealed median scores for RHM (45.0; [32.0-58.0]), LHM (33.5; [20.0-63.0]), and TT (150.0 s; [103.0-399.6]), which were significantly better than those of the control group (p=0.01, p<0.01, and p=0.02, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results support multiple sessions of progressive part practice in a simulation lab as an effective competency-based approach to teaching USG IJC in preparation for the clinical setting.

The biological effects of lung-derived mediators on the liver.

Despite the use of lung-protective mechanical ventilation (MV), the mortality of patients with acute lung injury remains at 30 to 40%, predominantly due to multiorgan failure. The objective of this study was to determine the biological significance of lung-derived mediators on peripheral organ inflammation. The authors utilized an isolated perfused mouse lung model of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced lung inflammation and protective MV to collect lung-derived mediators. Aliquots of perfusate from these animals (or appropriate controls) were then injected intravenously into a cohort of normal animals whose livers were subsequently assessed in vivo using intravital video microscopy. Perfusate from LPS-inflamed lungs contained significantly higher concentrations of inflammatory mediators than perfusate from saline-instilled lungs. Assessment of livers in the second cohort of animals 120 minutes after perfusate injection revealed decreased sinusoidal blood flow, leukocytosis, and increased cell death in those receiving perfusate from LPS-inflamed lungs compared to perfusate from saline controls. There were no differences between control animals that received pure perfusate or pure LPS mixed with perfusate. These results showed that lung-derived mediators had a significant biological effect on nonpulmonary organs within a short period of time after administration. Therapies targeting these mediators may prevent multiorgan failure and death in patients with acute lung injury.