Locoregional treatment of de novo stage IV breast cancer in the era of modern oncology.

Approximately 6% of metastatic breast cancers arise de novo. While systemic therapy (ST) remains the treatment backbone as for patients with metachronous metastases, locoregional treatment (LRT) of the primary tumor remains a controversial method. The removal of the primary has an established role for palliative purposes, but it is unclear if it could also determine a survival benefit. Retrospective evidence and pre-clinical studies seem to support the removal of the primary as an effective approach to improve survival. On the other hand, most randomized evidence suggests avoiding LRT. Both retrospective and prospective studies suffer several limitations, ranging from selection bias and outdated ST to a small sample of patients. In this review we discuss available data and try to identify subgroups of patients which could benefit the most from LRT of the primary, to facilitate clinical practice decisions, and to hypothesize future studies design on this topic.

Has breast cancer in the elderly remained the same over recent decades? A comparison of two groups of patients 70years or older treated for breast cancer twenty years apart.

OBJECTIVES: Breast cancer (BC) in the elderly population is by far the most frequent malignancy in Western countries; however, little evidence is available regarding the specific management of this group. The purpose of this study was to identify how the biological and clinical characteristics of cancer have changed over the past 20years by comparing two groups of elderly patients with breast cancer operated on 20years apart. The secondary endpoint was to underline potential changes in surgical strategy over the past 20years. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One group of consecutive elderly patients undergoing surgery for BC between January 1990 and December 1993 (Group A), and one group undergoing surgery between January 2008 and December 2011 (Group B) were identified and analyzed. Data regarding surgical treatment, stage, tumor grading, hormonal and HER2/neu receptors, and Ki-67 were collected and compared. RESULTS: A total of 422 elderly patients underwent surgical treatment, 142 in Group A and 280 in Group B. An earlier stage at presentation was detected in Group B, T1 (57.5% B vs. 31.6% A) and N0 (64.6% B vs. 54.2% A). Surgical treatment in the first group was more extensive while conservative procedures were more frequently performed in the second group. Despite the earlier presentation, tumor grade was higher in Group B (G3 10.6% A vs. 32.1% B, p<0.05). Overexpression of Ki-67 was again more frequent in Group B (56.2% B vs. 32.5% A, p<0.05). Hormonal and HER2/neu receptor expression was comparable. CONCLUSIONS: Nowadays, elderly patients with BC are more likely to present at an early stage; therefore, conservative surgery is a feasible option. Despite potential bias related to changes of pathology and immunohistochemistry examination techniques over the decades, the biological characteristics of recent patients with BC seem to be consistent with more aggressive tumors. Tailored treatment should be offered with regard to biological age, the cancer-specific profile and active life expectancy.