RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Postural instability and gait impairments are common in people with PD, both of which have a negative effect on their quality of life. Systematic reviews have demonstrated benefits of using exergaming in enhancing these outcomes. However, there is no consensus over whether exergaming therapy is better than conventional physical therapy for enhancing gait, balance, and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this overview is to systematically synthesize and evaluate the available evidence found in published systematic reviews and meta-analyses, on the effects of exergaming therapy on balance, gait, and quality of life, compared to conventional physical therapy or no intervention. METHODS: This overview was reported in accordance with the statement of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA). A comprehensive search was carried out in nine databases. Two reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized forms and the search strategy included terms related to intervention, population, and study type. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews/meta-analysis (SRs/Mas) was evaluated using the "A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2" (AMSTAR-2). The "Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation" (GRADE) was used to assess the quality of the evidence. The risk of bias assessment was performed using the "Risk Of Bias In Systematic Reviews" (ROBIS). PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021238131. RESULTS: 112 SRs/MAs were found and nine of them were selected. Six reviews were rated as very low methodological quality and three reviews as low methodological quality. Five reviews were classified with low risk of bias and four reviews with high risk of bias. Most of the SR/MAs demonstrated significant effects on balance favoring exergaming therapy over conventional therapy, however those studies had been rated as very low quality of evidence. Inconclusive results were found for the quality of life and gait outcomes. CONCLUSION: Exergaming therapy shows promise for the rehabilitation of PD. However, this overview was unable to conclude with certainty that exergaming therapy is superior to conventional physical therapy in improving gait, balance, or quality of life in people with PD. The effectiveness of exergaming therapy in the treatment of people with PD still need to be verified by high-quality studies.
RESUMO
Objetivo: Avaliar a eficácia e a usabilidade de um treinamento imersivo de realidade virtual usando o Samsung Gear VR OculusTM (SGVR) para marcha e cognitivo em pessoas com doença de Parkinson (DP). Foi realizado um ensaio clínico controlado, quase experimental e cego. Método: Quarenta pessoas com DP foram divididas em dois grupos. O Samsung Gear Virtual Reality Group (VRG) participou de 10 sessões, duas vezes por semana, com duração de uma hora cada, realizando quatro jogos que exigiam movimento da cabeça e deslocamento do centro de gravidade. O grupo controle não recebeu tratamento. Os participantes foram avaliados antes, após a intervenção e 30 dias após a intervenção, com avaliação da marcha por meio do teste Timed Up and Go, teste de caminhada de 10 metros, teste de caminhada de 30 segundos com tarefa simples e dupla e avaliação cognitiva com teste de fluência verbal, dígito para frente e para trás Testes de amplitude e teste Stroop Color. Ao final do treinamento, a VRG respondeu ao questionário System Usabilidade Scale para avaliar a usabilidade do sistema. Resultados: Embora o sistema tenha sido avaliado com excelente usabilidade pelos usuários, não houve efeitos de interação e, portanto, nossos resultados não suportam que o treinamento de realidade virtual imersiva usando jogos SGVR foi superior a nenhum treinamento. Conclusão: No entanto, quando cada grupo foi examinado separadamente, o VRG apresentou melhoras, após a intervenção e 30 dias após a intervenção, para velocidade da marcha (p<0,005 e p<0,001, respectivamente), memória de trabalho, atenção e processamento de informações (p<0,01 em ambos os momentos de avaliação), inibição de resposta, memória de trabalho e de longo prazo (p< 0,01 em 30 dias após a intervenção). A avaliação adicional do dispositivo SGVR é necessária
Objective: Evaluate the effectiveness and the usability of an immersive virtual reality training using Samsung Gear VR OculusTM (SGVR) for gait and cognitive in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). Controlled, quasi-experimental and blinded clinical trial was carried out. Methods: Forty people with PD were divided into two groups. Samsung Gear Virtual Reality Group (VRG) participated in 10 sessions, twice a week, lasting one hour each, performing four games that required head movement and center of gravity shift. Control group didn't receive treatment. Participants were evaluated before, after the intervention and 30 days after intervention, with the Timed Up and Go test, 10 meters walking test, single and dual tasking 30 seconds walking test, verbal fluency test, forward and backward Digit Span tests and Stroop Color test. At the end of the training, VRG responded to the System Usability Scale questionnaire to assess the usability of the system. Results: Even though the system was rated with excellent usability by the users, there were no interaction effects and, therefore, our results do not support that immersive virtual reality training using SGVR games was superior to no training. However, when each group was examined separately, the VRG experienced improvements, after the intervention and 30 days after intervention, for gait velocity (p<0.005, p<0.001, respectively), working memory, attention, and information processing (p<0.01 in both evaluation time points), response inhibition, working and long-term memory (p< 0.01 in 30 days after intervention). Conclusion: Further evaluation of the SGVR device is required