Attracting neurology's next generation: A qualitative study of specialty choice and perceptions.

OBJECTIVES: To better understand the reasons medical students select or avoid a career in neurology by using a qualitative methodology to explore these factors, with the long-term objective of attracting more graduates to the field. METHODS: In 2017, 27 medical students and 15 residents participated in 5 focus groups, and 33 fourth-year medical students participated in semistructured individual interviews. Participants were asked predefined open-ended questions about specialty choice, experiences in their basic neuroscience course and neurology clerkship, and perceptions about the field. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed. We used a flexible coding methodology to generate themes across groups and interviews. RESULTS: Four main analytical themes emerged: (1) early and broad clinical exposure allows students to "try on" neurology and experience the variety of career options; (2) preclerkship experiences and a strong neuroscience curriculum lay the foundation for interest in the field; (3) personal interactions with neurology providers may attract or deter students from considering the specialty; and (4) persistent stereotypes about neurologists, neurology patients, and treatment options harm student perceptions of neurology. CONCLUSION: Efforts to draw more students to neurology may benefit from focusing on clinical correlations during preclerkship neuroscience courses and offering earlier and more diverse clinical experiences, including hands-on responsibilities whenever possible. Finally, optimizing student interactions with faculty and residents and reinforcing the many positive aspects of neurology are likely to favorably affect student perceptions.

A dozen years of evolution of neurology clerkships in the United States: Looking up.

OBJECTIVE: To report a 2017 survey of all US medical school neurology clerkship directors (CDs) and to compare the results to similar surveys conducted in 2005 and 2012. METHODS: An American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Consortium of Neurology Clerkship Directors (CNCD) workgroup developed the survey that was sent to all neurology CDs listed in the AAN CNCD database. Comparisons were made to similar 2005 and 2012 surveys. RESULTS: The response rate was 92 of 146 programs (63%). Among the responding institutions, neurology is required in 94% of schools and is 4 weeks in length in 75%. From 2005 to 2017, clerkships shifted out of a fourth-year-only rotation (p = 0.035) to earlier curricular time points. CD protected time averages 0.24 full-time equivalent (FTE), with 31% of CDs reporting 0.26 to 0.50 FTE support, a >4-fold increase from prior surveys (p < 0.001). CD service of >12 years increased from 9% in 2005 to 23% in 2017. Twenty-seven percent also serve as division chief/director, and 22% direct a preclinical neuroscience course. Forty-nine percent of CDs are very satisfied in their role, increased from 34% in 2012 (p = 0.046). The majority of CDs identify as white and male, with none identifying as black/African American. CONCLUSION: Changes since 2005 and 2012 include shifting of the neurology clerkship to earlier in the medical school curriculum and an increase in CD salary support. CDs are more satisfied than reflected in previous surveys and stay in the role longer. There is a lack of racial diversity among neurology CDs.