Clinical features and predictors of delayed neurological syndrome in carbon monoxide poisoning: the AMICO study. / Caracterización clínica y factores predictivos de desarrollo de síndrome neurológico tardío en la intoxicación por monóxido de carbono: estudio AMICO.

OBJECTIVES: To identify predictors for developing delayed neurological syndrome (DNS) after an initial episode of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning in the interest of detecting patients most likely to develop DNS so that they can be followed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective review of cases of CO poisoning treated in the past 10 years in the emergency departments of 4 hospitals in the AMICO study (Spanish acronym for the multicenter analysis of CO poisoning). We analyzed demographic characteristics of the patients and the clinical characteristics of the initial episode. The records of the cohort of patients with available follow-up information were reviewed to find cases of DNS. Data were analyzed by multivariant analysis to determine the relationship to characteristics of the initial exposure to CO. RESULTS: A total of 240 cases were identified. The median (interquartile range) age of the patients was 36.2 years (17.6-49.6 years); 108 patients (45.0%) were men, and the poisoning was accidental in 223 cases (92.9%). The median carboxyhemoglobin concentration on presentation was 12.7% (6.2%-18.7%). Follow-up details were available for 44 patients (18.3%). Eleven of those patients (25%) developed DNS. A low initial Glasgow Coma Scale score predicted the development of DNS with an odds ratio (OR) of 0.61 (95% CI, 0.41-0.92) and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.876 (95% CI, 0.761-0.990) (P .001). CONCLUSION: The initial Glasgow Coma Scale score seems to be a clinical predictor of DNS after CO poisoning. We consider it important to establish follow-up protocols for patients with CO poisoning treated in hospital EDs.

OBJETIVO: Identificar factores pronósticos de desarrollo de síndrome neurológico tardío (SNT) después de un episodio inicial de intoxicación por monóxido de carbono (ICO), con el fin detectar precozmente a la población más susceptible y facilitar su acceso a un seguimiento específico. METODO: Revisión retrospectiva de todos los casos de ICO que acudieron a los servicios de urgencias (SU) de 4 hospitales durante los últimos 10 años. Se analizaron datos demográficos y características clínicas en el momento del episodio. En la cohorte de pacientes con datos de seguimiento disponibles, se evaluó la aparición de SNT y su relación con diferentes variables en la exposición inicial al CO a través de técnicas de análisis multivariante. RESULTADOS: Se identificaron 240 pacientes. La mediana de edad fue de 36,2 años (17,6-49,6). De ellos 108 (45,0%) eran hombres y 223 casos (92,9%) fueron accidentales. El nivel medio de COHb fue del 12,7% (6,2-18,7). En 44 (18,3%) episodios se disponía de datos de un seguimiento específico. En esta cohorte, 11 (25%) pacientes desarrollaron SNT. Una puntuación inicial más baja en la Escala Coma de Glasgow (GCS) (OR: 0,61, IC 95%: 0,41-0,92) fue predictor independiente del desarrollo del SNT, con un ABC en la curva COR de 0,876 (IC 95%: 0,761-0,990, p 0,001). CONCLUSIONES: Una puntuación inicial baja en la GCS parece ser un predictor clínico de desarrollo de SNT en la ICO. Dada la incidencia de SNT, consideramos fundamental establecer protocolos de seguimiento específico de estos pacientes tras su asistencia inicial en los SU.

Performance of 3 frailty scales for predicting adverse outcomes at 30 days in older patients discharged from emergency departments. / Rendimiento de tres escalas de fragilidad para predecir resultados adversos a 30 días en los pacientes mayores dados de alta en los servicios de urgencias.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the ability of 3 frailty scales (the Clinical Frailty Scale [CFS], the Functional Index - eMergency [FIM], and the Identification of Seniors at Risk [ISAR] scale) to predict adverse outcomes at 30 days in older patients discharged from hospital emergency departments (EDs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from the FRAIL-Madrid registry of patients aged 75 years or older who were discharged from Madrid EDs over a period of 3 months in 2018 and 2019. Frailty was defined by a CFS score over 4, a FIM score over 2, or an ISAR score over 3. The outcome variables were revisits to an ED, hospitalization, functional decline, death, and a composite variable of finding any of the previously named variables within 30 days of discharge. RESULTS: A total of 619 patients were studied. The mean (SD) age was 84 (7) years, and 59.1% were women. The CFS identified as frail a total of 339 patients (54.8%), the FIM 386 (62.4%), and the ISAR 301 (48.6%). An adverse outcome occurred within 30 days in 226 patients (36.5%): 21.5% revisited, 12.6% were hospitalized, 18.4% experienced functional decline, and 3.6% died. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were as follows: CFS, 0.66 (95% CI, 0.62-0.70; P = .022); FIM, 0.67 (95% CI, 0.62-0.71; P = .021), and ISAR, 0.64 (95% CI, 0.60-0.69; P = .023). Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) showed that frailty was an independent risk factor for presenting any of the named adverse outcomes: aOR for CFS >4, 3.18 (95% CI, 2.02-5.01), P .001; aOR for FIM > 2, 3.49 (95% CI, 2.15-5.66), P .001; and aOR for ISAR >3, 2.46 (95% CI, 1.60-3.79), P .001. CONCLUSION: All 3 scales studied - the CFS, the FIM and the ISAR - are useful for identifying frail older patients at high risk of developing an adverse outcome (death, functional decline, hospitalization, or revisiting the ED) within 30 days after discharge.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la capacidad de tres escalas de fragilidad, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS), Functional Index ­ eMergency (FIM) e Identification Senior at Risk (ISAR), para predecir resultados adversos (RA) a 30 días en los pacientes mayores dados de alta desde el servicio de urgencias hospitalario (SUH). METODO: Análisis secundario del registro FRAIL-Madrid que incluyó pacientes 75 años dados de alta de 10 SUH de Madrid durante un periodo de 3 meses entre 2018 y 2019. Se definió fragilidad como CFS 4, FIM 2 e ISAR 3. Las variables de resultado fueron revisita en urgencias, hospitalización, deterioro funcional, muerte y la variable compuesta por algún RA de los anteriores en los 30 días posteriores al alta del SUH. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 619 pacientes, la edad media fue de 84 años (DE 7), 59,1% eran mujeres. Hubo 339 pacientes (54,8%) identificados como frágiles en el SUH según CFS 4, 386 (62,4%) según FIM 2 y 301 (48,6%) según ISAR 3. Hubo 226 pacientes (36,5%) que presentaron algún RA a los 30 días tras el alta (21,5% revisita, 12,6% hospitalización,18,4% deterioro funcional y 3,6% muerte). El área bajo la curva (ABC) de la escala CFS fue de 0,66 (0,62-0,70; p = 0,022), de FIM 0,67 (0,62-0,71; p = 0,021) y de ISAR 0,64 (0,60-0,69; p = 0,023). La presencia de fragilidad fue un factor independiente de presentar algún RA a los 30 días tras el alta (CFS 4 ORa 3,18 [IC 95% 2,02-5,01, p 0,001], FIM 2 ORa 3,49 [IC 95% 2,15-5,66, p 0,001] e ISAR 3 ORa 2,46 [IC 95% 1,60-3,79, p 0,001]). CONCLUSIONES: Las tres escalas estudiadas ­CFS, FIM, ISAR­ son útiles y tienen una capacidad similar para identificar al paciente mayor frágil dado de alta del SUH con alto riesgo de presentar RA (muerte, deterioro funcional, hospitalización o revisita al SUH) a los 30 días.

Differences in clinical signs and severity of intoxication due to street drugs in adolescents and young adults treated in emergency departments. / Características diferenciales en las manifestaciones clínicas y la gravedad de las intoxicaciones por drogas de abuso en adolescentes atendidos en servicios de urgencias en comparación con adultos jóvenes.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether symptoms and levels of severity of intoxication from street drugs differ between adolescents and young adults who come to hospital emergency departments for treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We studied a consecutive cohort of adolescents (aged 12-17 years) and young adults (aged 18-30 years) who were treated in 11 hospital emergency departments belonging to the Drug Abuse Network of Spanish Hospital Emergency Departments (REDURHE). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics and level of severity were recorded for comparison between between adolescents and young adults, adjusted for sex, alcohol co-ingestion, and type of drug used. An intoxication was recorded as severe if at least 1 of the following indicators was present: cardiac arrest, tracheal intubation, intensive care unit admission, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: We included a total of 2181 patients: 249 adolescents (11.4%) and 1932 young adults (88.6%). Alcohol coingestion and use of multiple drugs were less common in adolescents, who had significantly more events related to cannabis (in 81.1% vs 49.0% of young adults) and benzodiazepines (13.3% vs 5.5%). The adolescents had significantly fewer intoxications from the use of cocaine (10.8% vs 45.1%), amphetamines (17.3% vs 32.3%), ketamine (0.4% vs 6.0%) and gamma-hydroxybutyrate (0.4% vs 4.0%). A higher proportion of adolescents than young adults presented with diminished consciousness (23.0% vs 16.9%), but fewer manifested anxiety (15.9% vs 26.3%), palpitations (11.0% vs 19.5%), or chest pain (2.8% vs 9.2%). The pattern of associations was similar in the subgroup of intoxications due to cannabis. The adjusted model confirmed that the adolescents were more likely to have diminished consciousness, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.851 (95% CI, 1.204-2.844) and less likely to have anxiety (OR, 0.529 (95% CI, 0.347-0.807). Intoxication was severe in 46 patients overall (2.1%); in adolescents and young adults the proportions were 0.8% and 2.3%, respectively (P = 0.129). In adolescents, the OR was 0.568 (95% CI, 0.131-2.468) for severity; for component indicators, the ORs were 0.494 (95% CI, 0.063-3.892) for intubation and 0.780 (95% CI, 0.175-3.475) for intensive care unit admission. No deaths occurred. CONCLUSION: Adolescents requiring emergency care for street drug intoxication had co-ingested alcohol or taken multiple drugs less often than young adults. Cannabis was the drug most often used by adolescents, who presented more often with diminished consciousness but less often with anxiety. We detected no differences related to event severity.

OBJETIVO: Investigar si existen diferencias en las drogas, sintomatología y gravedad entre adolescentes y jóvenes atendidos por intoxicación por drogas en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH). METODO: Entre los pacientes consecutivos atendidos por consumo de drogas en los 11 SUH de la REDURHE (Red de estudio de Drogas en Urgencias Hospitalarios en España), se seleccionaron los adolescentes (edad = 12-17 años) y los jóvenes (edad = 18-30 años). Se compararon las características sociodemográficas, clínicas y la gravedad (evento adverso combinado ­EAC­: parada cardiorrespiratoria, intubación endotraqueal, ingreso en cuidados intensivos o muerte intrahospitalaria) en adolescentes y jóvenes, ajustadas por sexo, coingesta de etanol y drogas involucradas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 2.181 pacientes (adolescentes = 249, 11,4%; jóvenes = 1.932, 88,6%). En adolescentes, la coingesta de etanol y múltiples drogas fue menos frecuente. Hubo significativamente más asistencias por cannabis (81,1% vs 49,0%) y benzodiacepinas (13,3% vs 5,5%) y menos por cocaína (10,8% vs 45,1%), anfetamínicos (17,3% vs 32,3%), ketamina (0,4% vs 6,0%) y gamma-hidroxibutirato (0,4% vs 4,0%). Los adolescentes presentaron más disminución de consciencia (23,0% vs 16,9%) y menos ansiedad (15,9% vs 26,3%), palpitaciones (11,0% vs 19,5%) y dolor torácico (2,8% vs 9,2%). Estas asociaciones se mantuvieron al analizar el subgrupo de intoxicados por cannabis. En el modelo ajustado, los adolescentes presentan más disminución de consciencia con (OR = 1,851, IC 95%: 1,204-2,844) y menos ansiedad (OR = 0,529, IC 95%: 0,347-0,807). Se observó EAC en 46 pacientes (2,0%; 0,8% vs 2,3%, p = 0,129). La OR ajustada en adolescentes para EAC fue 0,568 (IC 95%: 0,131-2,468), y para intubación 0,494 (IC 95%: 0,063-3,892) y para ingreso en intensivos 0,780 (IC 95%: 0,175-3,475). No hubo fallecimientos. CONCLUSIONES: Los adolescentes intoxicados por drogas atendidos en SUH presentan con menor frecuencia coingesta de etanol o múltiples drogas. La droga más frecuentemente implicada es el cannabis, y presentan más disminución de consciencia y menos ansiedad. No detectamos diferencias en la gravedad entre adolescentes y jóvenes.

Spanish Research Network on Drugs in Hospital Emergency Departments - the REDUrHE registry: general analysis and comparisons between weekend and weekday poisonings. / Red de Estudio de Drogas en Urgencias Hospitalarias en España (Registro REDUrHE): análisis general y comparación según asistencia en día laborable o festivo.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the sociodemographic characteristics, drug use patterns, and the severity of drug overdoses treated in hospital emergency departments according to the registry of the Spanish Research Network on Drugs in Hospital Emergency Departments (REDUrHE project), and to identify differences between patterns on weekdays and weekends/national holidays. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Eleven hospitals participated in the REDUrHE project, studying consecutive patients with symptoms of drug overdose over a 24-month period. The drugs implicated were extracted from clinical records or toxicology reports. An overdose was considered severe if management required intubation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or admission to the intensive care unit, or if in-hospital death occurred (composite event). Each of these variables was also analyzed by itself. RESULTS: A total of 4526 patients were studied (2218 [49%] on weekends/holidays; 2308 [51%] on workdays). The mean (SD) age was 33 (11) years, and 75.5% were men. The most commonly used drugs were cocaine (47.8%), paciencannabis (44.4%), amphetamine derivatives (25.5%), benzodiazepines (8.8%), and opioids (7.3%). Patients treated on weekends/holidays were younger (32.1 vs 33.1 years on weekdays, P = .006), and they were more often taken to the hospital in an ambulance (60.5% vs 57.3%, P = .035). Hospitals in large cities (Barcelona and Madrid) saw more patients on weekends/holidays (55.8%). Major tourist destinations (the Balearic and Canary Islands) saw fewer patients on weekends/holidays (44.7%, P .001). Alcohol was ingested along with a drug by 58.2%; this combination was more common on weekends/holidays (in 63.3% vs 52.9% on weekdays, P .001), and 39.4% used more than 1 drug. Use of more than 1 drug was less common on weekends (in 37.6% vs 41.2%, P = .013). Opioid emergencies were also less frequent on weekends (6.0% vs 8.6%, P = .001), when gamma-hydroxybutyrate (GHB) overdoses were more common (5.8% vs 3.6%, P .001). Severity indicators were present (the composite event) more often on weekends (in 3.6% vs 2.2%, P = .006). Likewise, weekends saw more intubations (in 2.3% vs 1.0%, P = .001) and intensive care unit admissions (2.4% vs 1.6%, P = .047). Twelve patients (0.3%) died; mortality was similar on weekends (0.2%) and weekdays (0.3%) (P = .826). After adjusting for age, sex, combined use of alcohol, and type of drug, the risk of the severe-event composite was greater on weekends (odds ratio, 1.569; 95% CI, 1.088-2.263). CONCLUSION: Weekend and holiday emergencies due to drug overdoses are more frequent in large city hospitals. Weekend emergencies share certain distinctive characteristics: patients are younger, alcohol more often is ingested with drugs but multiple-drug combinations are less common, and GHB is used more often while opioids are used less often. Severe poisonings occur more often on weekends and holidays.

OBJETIVO: Conocer las características sociodemográficas, el patrón de consumo y la gravedad de los pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) españoles por intoxicación por drogas (Proyecto REDUrHE) e investigar si existen diferencias entre los días festivos y los días laborables. METODO: Once SUH integrantes del proyecto REDUrHE incluyeron durante 24 meses de forma consecutiva a los pacientes atendidos por sintomatología derivada del consumo de drogas ilegales. Estas se determinaron por la historia clínica o la determinación toxicológica. El indicador primario de gravedad fue el evento adverso combinado formado por intubación, parada cardiorrespiratoria, ingreso en cuidados intensivos o muerte intrahospitalaria y los indicadores secundarios cada uno de estos eventos adversos considerado individualmente. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 4.526 pacientes (festivo: 2.218, 49%; laborables: 2.308, 51%), con edad media de 33 años (DE 11) y 75,5% hombres. Las drogas más frecuentemente involucradas fueron cocaína (47,8%), cannabis (44,4%), derivados anfetamínicos (25,5%), benzodiacepinas (8,8%) y opiáceos (7,3%). Los pacientes atendidos en festivos eran más jóvenes (32,1 vs 33,1 años, p = 0,006) y más frecuentemente traídos al SUH en ambulancia (60,5% vs 57,3%, p = 0,035). Los SUH de grandes ciudades (Barcelona, Madrid) tuvieron la mayor afluencia en festivo (55,8%) y los de zonas de alto turismo lúdico (Baleares, Canarias) los de menor afluencia (44,7%; p 0,001). El 58,2% ingirió simultáneamente etanol (más en festivos, 63,3% vs 52,9%, p 0,001) y el 39,4% más de una droga (menos en festivos, 37,6% vs 41,2%, p = 0,013). En festivo, los opiáceos fueron menos frecuentes (6,0% vs 8,6%, p = 0,001) y el gamma- hidroxibutirato más (5,8% vs 3,6%, p 0,001). También en festivo, hubo más eventos combinados adversos (3,6% vs 2,2%; p = 0,006), más intubaciones (2,3% vs 1,0%, p = 0,001) y más ingresos en cuidados intensivos (2,4% vs 1,6%, p = 0,047). Fallecieron 12 pacientes (0,3%), sin diferencias entre grupos (0,2% vs 0,3%, p = 0,826). Al ajustar por edad, sexo, ingesta combinada de etanol y tipos de drogas implicadas, los pacientes atendidos en festivos tuvieron más riesgo de evento adverso combinado, con OR = 1,569 (IC 95% = 1,088-2,263). CONCLUSIONES: Las intoxicaciones por drogas atendidas en SUH en día festivo suceden con mayor frecuencia en grandes ciudades y presentan ciertas características distintivas (pacientes más jóvenes, más ingesta conjunta con etanol, menos combinación de drogas, más frecuente gamma-hidroxibutirato y menos frecuente piáceos). Durante los festivos, las intoxicaciones atendidas son de mayor gravedad.

A case-control analysis of stroke in COVID-19 patients: Results of unusual manifestations of COVID-19-study 11.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the incidence, predictor variables, clinical characteristics, and stroke outcomes in patients with COVID-19 seen in emergency departments (EDs) before hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all COVID-19 patients diagnosed with stroke during the COVID-19 outbreak in 62 Spanish EDs. We formed two control groups: COVID-19 patients without stroke (control A) and non-COVID-19 patients with stroke (control B). We compared disease characteristics and four outcomes between cases and controls. RESULTS: We identified 147 strokes in 74,814 patients with COVID-19 seen in EDs (1.96‰, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.66‰ to 2.31‰), being lower than in non-COVID-19 patients (6,541/1,388,879, 4.71‰, 95% CI = 4.60‰ to 4.83‰; odds ratio [OR] = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.35 to 0.49). The estimated that standardized incidences of stroke per 100,000 individuals per year were 124 and 133 for COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 individuals, respectively (OR = 0.93 for COVID patients, 95% CI = 0.87 to 0.99). Baseline characteristics associated with a higher risk of stroke in COVID-19 patients were hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and previous cerebrovascular and coronary diseases. Clinically, these patients more frequently presented with confusion, decreased consciousness, and syncope and higher D-dimer concentrations and leukocyte count at ED arrival. After adjustment for age and sex, the case group had higher hospitalization and intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates (but not mortality) than COVID-19 controls without stroke (OR = 3.41, 95% CI = 1.27 to 9.16; and OR = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.69 to 8.50, respectively) and longer hospitalization and greater in-hospital mortality than stroke controls without COVID-19 (OR = 1.55, 95% CI = 1.24 to 1.94; and OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.37 to 2.30, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of stroke in COVID-19 patients presenting to EDs was lower than that in the non-COVID-19 reference sample. COVID-19 patients with stroke had greater need for hospitalization and ICU admission than those without stroke and longer hospitalization and greater in-hospital mortality than non-COVID-19 patients with stroke.

Analysis of clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with COVID-19 based on a series of 1000 patients treated in Spanish emergency departments. / Evaluación de las características clínicas y evolución de pacientes con COVID-19 a partir de una serie de 1000 pacientes atendidos en servicios de urgencias españoles.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) treated in hospital emergency departments (EDs) in Spain, and to assess associations between characteristics and outcomes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, nested-cohort study. Sixty-one EDs included a random sample of all patients diagnosed with COVID-19 between March 1 and April 30, 2020. Demographic and baseline health information, including concomitant conditions; clinical characteristics related to the ED visit and complementary test results; and treatments were recorded throughout the episode in the ED. We calculated crude and adjusted odds ratios for risk of in-hospital death and a composite outcome consisting of the following events: intensive care unit admission, orotracheal intubation or mechanical ventilation, or in-hospital death. The logistic regression models were constructed with 3 groups of independent variables: the demographic and baseline health characteristics, clinical characteristics and complementary test results related to the ED episode, and treatments. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age of patients was 62 (18) years. Most had high- or low-grade fever, dry cough, dyspnea, and diarrhea. The most common concomitant conditions were cardiovascular diseases, followed by respiratory diseases and cancer. Baseline patient characteristics that showed a direct and independent association with worse outcome (death and the composite outcome) were age and obesity. Clinical variables directly associated with worse outcomes were impaired consciousness and pulmonary crackles; headache was inversely associated with worse outcomes. Complementary test findings that were directly associated with outcomes were bilateral lung infiltrates, lymphopenia, a high platelet count, a D-dimer concentration over 500 mg/dL, and a lactate-dehydrogenase concentration over 250 IU/L in blood. CONCLUSION: This profile of the clinical characteristics and comorbidity of patients with COVID-19 treated in EDs helps us predict outcomes and identify cases at risk of exacerbation. The information can facilitate preventive measures and improve outcomes.

OBJETIVO: Describir las características clínicas de los pacientes con COVID-19 atendidos en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios (SUH) españoles y evaluar su asociación con los resultados de su evolución. METODO: Estudio multicéntrico, anidado en una cohorte prospectiva. Participaron 61 SUH que incluyeron pacientes seleccionados aleatoriamente de todos los diagnosticados de COVID-19 entre el 1 de marzo y el 30 de abril de 2020. Se recogieron características basales, clínicas, de exploraciones complementarias y terapéuticas del episodio en los SUH. Se calcularon las odds ratio (OR) asociadas a la mortalidad intrahospitalaria y al evento combinado formado por el ingreso en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI), la intubación orotraqueal o ventilación mecánica invasiva (IOT/ VMI), crudas y ajustadas con modelos de regresión logística para tres grupos de variables independientes: basales, clínicas y de exploraciones complementarias. RESULTADOS: La edad media fue de 62 años (DE 18). La mayoría manifestaron fiebre, tos seca, disnea, febrícula y diarrea. Las comorbilidades más frecuentes fueron las enfermedades cardiovasculares, seguidas de las respiratorias y el cáncer. Las variables basales que se asociaron independientemente y de forma directa a peores resultados evolutivos (tanto a mortalidad como a evento combinado) fueron edad y obesidad; las variables clínicas fueron disminución de consciencia y crepitantes a la auscultación pulmonar, y de forma inversa cefalea; y las variables de resultados de exploraciones complementarias fueron infiltrados pulmonares bilaterales y cardiomegalia radiológicos, y linfopenia, hiperplaquetosis, dímero-D > 500 mg/dL y lactato-deshidrogenasa > 250 UI/L en la analítica. CONCLUSIONES: Conocer las características clínicas y la comorbilidad de los pacientes con COVID-19 atendidos en urgencias permite identificar precozmente a la población más susceptible de empeorar, para prever y mejorar los resultados.

[Physical structure, human resources, and health care quality indicators in public hospital emergency departments in the autonomous communities of Madrid and Catalonia: a comparative study]. / Estudio comparativo de la estructura física, recursos humanos e indicadores de actividad asistencial entre los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios públicos de las comunidades autónomas de Madrid y Cataluña.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the general, structural, and organizational characteristics of public hospital emergency departments in the Spanish autonomous communities of Madrid and Catalonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Descriptive survey-based study covering 3 areas of inquiry: general hospital features (18 questions), structural features of the emergency department (14 questions), and organizational and work-related policies of the emergency department (30 questions). Hospitals were grouped according to complexity: local hospitals (level 1), high-technology or referral hospitals (levels 2-3). RESULTS: We studied 26 hospital departments in Madrid (21, levels 2-3; 5, level 1) and 55 in Catalonia (24, levels 2-3; 31, level 1). Hospitals in Madrid are in newer buildings (P=.002), have more beds on conventional wards and in critical care units (P<.001, both comparisons), are more often affiliated with a university (P<.001), and serve larger populations (P=.027). The emergency departments in Madrid have larger surface areas available for clinical care and more cubicles for preliminary evaluations and observation beds (P=.001, all comparisons). Hospitals in Madrid also attended a larger median number of emergencies (P<.001). More physicians were employed in Catalonia overall, but the numbers of physician- and nurse-hours per hospital were higher in Madrid, where it was more usual for physicians to work exclusively in the emergency department (92.5% in Madrid vs 56.8% in Catalonia, P<.001). However, fewer of the employed physicians had permanent contracts in Madrid (30.5% vs 75.1% in Catalonia, P<.001). The ratio of resident physicians to staff physicians differs between the 2 communities on afternoon/evening, night, and holiday shifts (3:1 in Madrid; 1:1 in Catalonia). CONCLUSION: The physical and functional structures of hospital emergency departments in the communities of Madrid and Catalonia differ significantly. The differences cannot be attributed exclusively to geographic location.

OBJETIVO: Comparar las características generales, estructurales y organizativas de los servicios de urgencias de hospitales públicos (SUHP) de la Comunidad de Madrid con los de Cataluña. METODO: Estudio descriptivo tipo encuesta estructurada con 3 apartados: aspectos generales del hospital (18 preguntas), aspectos generales y estructurales de urgencias (14 preguntas), y aspectos organizativos y laborales de urgencias (30 preguntas). Los centros se agruparon según complejidad: niveles I-hospital comarcal y niveles II y III-hospital de alta tecnología o de referencia. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron los 26 SUHP de la Comunidad de Madrid (21 nivel II-III y 5 nivel I), y 55 de Cataluña (24 nivel II- III y 31 nivel I). En Madrid, comparada con Cataluña: los hospitales son de construcción más reciente (p = 0,002); tienen mayor número de camas de hospitalización (p < 0,001) y de cuidados críticos (p < 0,001); están más frecuentemente vinculados a la universidad (p < 0,001) y cubren mayor población (p = 0,027). Los servicios de urgencias: tienen mayor superficie para la actividad clínica (p < 0,001) y la primera asistencia (p < 0,001); mayor número de puestos de primera asistencia (p < 0,001) y camas de observación (p = 0,001) y la mediana del número de atenciones urgentes es mayor (p < 0,001). De forma global, hay más facultativos contratados en Cataluña, pero el número de horas de médico y enfermera contratadas por centro es mayor en Madrid, donde los médicos suelen realizar su actividad exclusivamente en urgencias (92,5% frente a 56,8%; p < 0,001), muy pocos con contrato fijo indefinido (30,5% frente a 75,1%; p < 0,001) con relación médico residente/adjunto diferente en turnos de tarde, noche y días festivos en comparación con los SUHP catalanes (3:1 frente a 1:1). CONCLUSIONES: La estructura física y funcional de los SUHP madrileños y catalanes difiere de forma significativa sin que pueda explicarse, exclusivamente, por los aspectos geográficos.