Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed) ; 68(10): 708-715, 2021 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34924159

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prediabetes is a high-risk state for diabetes. The study aims to describe routine clinical practice and the views of physicians and pharmacists on prediabetes management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 410 physicians and 393 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Self-adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was reported by 51.5% and 23.2% of physicians and pharmacists, respectively. Less than 60% of participants defined prediabetes according to main CPG. Regarding the use of screening strategies to detect prediabetes (physicians: 96%; pharmacists: 42.1%), reports indicate the opportunistic strategy is widely employed (≥75%) whereas systematic screening is unusual (<20%). Changes in lifestyle were deemed essential by almost all participants (≥95%), but in clinical practice only 58.3% of healthcare centers and 28.0% of pharmacies were found to provide awareness-raising/instruction. The role of pharmacists in the prevention of prediabetes/diabetes was judged useful by most participants. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CPG, systematic prediabetes screening strategies, and specific strategies for patient education are scarce. The support of community pharmacists in prediabetes management was well valued. Therefore, it is crucial that the lines of action followed by both physicians and pharmacists align with each other and with the CPG.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus , Médicos , Estado Pré-Diabético , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Estado Pré-Diabético/diagnóstico , Estado Pré-Diabético/terapia
2.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34016564

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prediabetes is a high-risk state for diabetes. The study aims to describe routine clinical practice and the views of physicians and pharmacists on prediabetes management. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted using a structured questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 410 physicians and 393 pharmacists completed the questionnaire. Self-adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) was reported by 51.5% and 23.2% of physicians and pharmacists, respectively. Less than 60% of participants defined prediabetes according to main CPG. Regarding the use of screening strategies to detect prediabetes (physicians: 96%; pharmacists: 42.1%), reports indicate the opportunistic strategy is widely employed (≥75%) whereas systematic screening is unusual (<20%). Changes in lifestyle were deemed essential by almost all participants (≥95%), but in clinical practice only 58.3% of healthcare centers and 28.0% of pharmacies were found to provide awareness-raising/instruction. The role of pharmacists in the prevention of prediabetes/diabetes was judged useful by most participants. CONCLUSIONS: Use of CPG, systematic prediabetes screening strategies, and specific strategies for patient education are scarce. The support of community pharmacists in prediabetes management was well valued. Therefore, it is crucial that the lines of action followed by both physicians and pharmacists align with each other and with the CPG.

3.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 31(5): 203-209, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31320121

RESUMO

AIM: To describe the management of atherogenic dyslipidemia (AD) in routine clinical practice in the Primary Care (PC) setting in Spain. METHODS: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study based on a structured questionnaire designed for this study and addressed to PC physicians. The questionnaire content was based on a literature review and was validated by 3 experts in AD. RESULTS: A total of 1029 PC physicians participated in the study. 96.99% indicated that AD is determinant for cardiovascular risk, even if LDL-C levels are appropriate. 88.43% evaluated residual cardiovascular risk in their clinical practice, however, only 27.89% of them evaluated it in secondary prevention. Regarding diagnosis, 82.22% reported that TC, TG, HDL-C and non-HDL-C are essential measures when evaluating AD. Almost all physicians reported that they can request fractionated cholesterol to assess HDL-C and LDL-C, however 3.69% could not. Physicians (95.63%) considered that the first step in AD treatment should be diet, regular exercise, smoking cessation and pharmaceutical treatment, if necessary. 19.1% agreed partially or completely that gemfibrozil is the most suitable fibrate to associate with statins. 74.83% completely agreed that fenofibrate is the most suitable fibrate to combine with statins. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians have access to general Spanish guidelines and recommendations associated with AD management, however, it is necessary to continue rising awareness about the importance of early detection and optimal control of AD to reduce patients' cardiovascular risk.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/terapia , Dislipidemias/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Fenofibrato/administração & dosagem , Genfibrozila/administração & dosagem , Pesquisas sobre Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Hipolipemiantes/administração & dosagem , Lipídeos/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Atenção Primária à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Espanha
4.
Clin Investig Arterioscler ; 29(4): 178-184, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28648670

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The "DAT-AP" (from the Spanish, "Dislipemia ATerogénica en Atención Primaria", for Atherogenic Dyslipidaemia in Primary Care) study objective is to determine to what extent published consensus guidelines for the diagnostic and therapeutic management of AD are used in the primary care setting, and to evaluate the approach of the participating physicians towards the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of AD. METHODS: This is descriptive, cross-sectional, multicentre study performed between January and May 2015 in primary care centres throughout Spain. Study data were collected in 2 independent blocks, the first addressing theoretical aspects of AD and the second, practical aspects (clinical cases) RESULTS: The theoretical part is in the process of publication. This manuscript depicts the clinical cases block. Although study participants showed good knowledge of the subject, the high prevalence of this disease requires an additional effort to optimise detection and treatment, with the implementation of appropriate lifestyle interventions and the prescription of the best treatment.


Assuntos
Aterosclerose/terapia , Dislipidemias/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Atenção Primária à Saúde/métodos , Aterosclerose/diagnóstico , Estudos Transversais , Dislipidemias/diagnóstico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Espanha
5.
Patient Prefer Adherence ; 11: 707-718, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28435229

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: A good relationship between diabetes patients and their health care team is crucial to ensure patients' medication adherence and self-management. To this end, we aimed to identify and compare the views of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients, physicians and pharmacists concerning the factors and strategies that may be associated with, or could improve, medication adherence and persistence. METHODS: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted using an electronic self-administered questionnaire comprising 11 questions (5-point Likert scale) concerning factors and strategies related to medication adherence. The survey was designed for T2DM patients and Spanish National Health System professionals. RESULTS: A total of 963 T2DM patients, 998 physicians and 419 pharmacists participated in the study. Overall, a lower proportion of pharmacists considered the proposed factors associated with medication adherence important as compared to patients and physicians. It should be noted that a higher percentage of physicians in comparison to pharmacists perceived that "complexity of medication" (97% vs 76.6%, respectively) and "adverse events" (97.5% vs 72.2%, respectively) were important medication-related factors affecting adherence. In addition, both patients (80.8%) and physicians (80.8%) agreed on the importance of "cost and co-payment" for adherence, whereas only 48.6% of pharmacists considered this factor important. It is also noteworthy that nearly half of patients (43%) agreed that "to adjust medication to activities of daily living" was the best strategy to reduce therapeutic complexity, whereas physicians believed that "reducing the frequency of administration" (47.9%) followed by "reducing the number of tablets" (28.5%) was the most effective strategy to improve patients' adherence. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight the need for pharmacists to build a stronger relationship with physicians in order to improve patients monitoring and adherence rates. Additionally, these findings may help to incorporate greater patient-centeredness when developing management strategies, focusing on adjusting medication regimens to patients' daily lives.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA