RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study is to determine if barium esophagram (BE) alone is sufficient to diagnose esophageal dysmotility when compared to the gold standard, high-resolution manometry (HRM). METHODS: This is a retrospective review of patients that underwent laparoscopic fundoplication by two surgeons at a single institution from 10/1/2015-6/29/2019. Patients with large paraesophageal hernias and patients without both BE and HRM were excluded. RESULTS: Forty-six patients met the inclusion criteria. BE was found to be concordant with HRM for esophageal motility in only 21 patients (46%). Setting HRM as the gold standard, BE had a sensitivity of 14% (95% CI: 5%-35%), specificity of 72% (95% CI: 52%-86%), PPV of 30% (95% CI: 11%-60%), and NPV of 50% (95% CI: 35%-66%). The accuracy was 46%, while a McNemar test showed p = 0.028. CONCLUSION: Traditional BE should not be used in place of HRM for assessing pre-operative motility in patients undergoing anti-reflux surgery.