Assessment of price and nutritional quality of gluten-free products versus their analogues with gluten through the algorithm of the nutri-score front-of-package labeling system.

Evidence has shown that the nutritional quality of gluten-free products (GFPs) is lower than that of non-GFPs. Our main objective was to compare the nutritional quality through nutritional profiles of foods underlying the Nutri-Score front-of-pack and the price of GFPs with respect to non-GFPs, and to evaluate whether there is a correlation between both parameters. Nutritional information of all products was obtained from the CELIACBASE database and the price through Spanish supermarkets websites. Global quality using the Nutri-Score algorithm and the price were compared between both types of products. GFPs do not always have poorer quality than their counterparts. A better quality of gluten-free pasta was correlated with the higher price but also a worse quality of gluten-free muesli was correlated with the higher price. The price of GFPs compared to non-GFPs was higher up to 391.5%. However, for ham and cheese pizza, ham pizza, Marie biscuits, and baby biscuits, the difference was not statistically significant. Generally, the price of GFPs did not correlate with better nutritional quality. Nutri-Score would ease the nutritional quality identification, empowering consumers and could also influence manufacturers to improve the nutritional quality of GFPs. Nowadays, given that many GFPs have poor nutritional quality, they should be included only occasionally in a balanced gluten-free diet.

A comparison of the nutritional profile and price of gluten-free products and their gluten-containing counterparts available in the Spanish market.

INTRODUCTION: Background: to date, gluten-free (GF) diet is the only treatment available for individuals with celiac disease. Both individual and collective food intake assessments are a challenge because a food composition database of GF products (GFPs) is lacking. Objectives: to describe the process of developing a food composition database of GFPs, and to compare the nutritional profile and price of some GFPs and non-GFPs. Methods: initially, a total of 216 brands of GFPs marketed in Spain were recorded. Nutritional information was collected from nutritional labels and product fact sheets that had been provided by food companies or collected first-hand by researchers. Then, the nutritional profile and price of the cereal and cereal byproducts foodstuff groups, including 19 types of products, were compared. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS statistical program (22.0 edition; SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). Results: a total of 2,247 GFPs from 126 different foodstuff brands were included in the food composition database of GFPs (CELIAC-BASE). We classified these products into 14 foodstuff groups. The protein content of the GFPs studied was significantly lower, and the price was higher, than that of their non-GFP counterparts. Some, but not all, GFPs had a higher content of fat and sugar, and a lower content of dietary fiber as compared to their non-GFP counterparts. Some GFPs were up to 6 times more expensive than the corresponding non-GFPs. Conclusions: CELIAC-BASE is a pioneering tool for dietitians. Many GFPs have poor nutritional profiles and should be consumed only occasionally in a balanced GF diet.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Introducción: hasta la fecha, una dieta sin gluten (SG) es el único tratamiento para las personas con enfermedad celíaca. Tanto las evaluaciones de ingesta de alimentos individuales como las colectivas son un desafío debido a la falta de una base de datos de composición de productos SG (PSG). Objetivos: describir el proceso de desarrollo de una base de datos de composición de PSG y comparar el perfil nutricional y el precio de algunos PSG y productos con gluten. Métodos: inicialmente, se registraron un total de 216 marcas de PSG comercializadas en España. La información nutricional se recopiló de las etiquetas nutricionales y hojas informativas de los productos, que habían sido proporcionadas por las compañías de alimentos o recopiladas de primera mano por los investigadores. Luego, se compararon el perfil nutricional y el precio de los grupos de cereales y subproductos alimenticios, incluidos 19 tipos de productos. Los análisis estadísticos se realizaron utilizando el programa estadístico SPSS (edición 22.0; SPSS, Chicago, IL, EUA). Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 2247 PSG de 126 marcas de alimentos diferentes en la base de datos de composición de PSG (CELIAC-BASE). Clasificamos estos productos en 14 grupos de alimentos. El contenido de proteínas de los PSG estudiados fue significativamente menor, y el precio de los mismos fue más alto, que el de sus homólogos con gluten. Algunos PSG, pero no todos, presentaron un mayor contenido de grasa y azúcar, y un menor contenido de fibra dietética, que sus contrapartes con gluten. Algunos PSG eran hasta 6 veces más caros que sus homólogos con gluten. Conclusiones: CELIAC-BASE es una herramienta pionera para dietistas-nutricionistas. Muchos PSG tienen perfiles nutricionales no saludables y deben consumirse solo ocasionalmente en una dieta equilibrada libre de gluten.