Comprehensive next-generation sequencing identifies novel putative pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in patients with concurrent tubo-ovarian and endometrial serous and endometrioid carcinomas or precursors.

BACKGROUND: Endometrial serous carcinoma (ESC) and tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) are characterized by late-stage presentation and high mortality. Current guidelines for prevention recommend risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in patients with hereditary mutations in cancer susceptibility genes. However, HGSC displays extensive genetic heterogeneity with alterations in 168 genes identified in TCGA study, but current germline testing panels are often limited to the handful of recurrently mutated genes, leaving families with rare hereditary gene mutations potentially at-risk. OBJECTIVE: To determine if there are rare germline mutations that may aid in early identification of more patients at-risk for ESC and/or HGSC by evaluating patients with concurrent ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions, and endometrial atypical hyperplasia (CAH) or low-grade endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma (LGEEA). METHODS: We performed targeted next-generation sequencing using TSO 500, a 523 gene panel, on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor and matched benign non-tumor tissue blocks from 5 patients with concurrent ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions, and CAH or LGEEA. RESULTS: We identified germline pathogenic, likely pathogenic or uncertain significance variants in cancer susceptibility genes in 4 of 5 patients - affected genes included GLI1, PIK3R1, FOXP1, FANCD2, INPP4B and H3F3C. Notably, none of these genes were included in the commercially available germline testing panels initially used to evaluate the patients at the time of their diagnoses. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive germline testing of patients with concurrent LGEEA or CAH and ESC, HGSC or precursor lesions may aid in early identification of relatives at-risk for cancer who may be candidates for RRSO with hysterectomy.

Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Leiomyoma of the Uterine Corpus: Comparative Morphologic Analysis of Protein-Deficient Tumors With and Without Pathogenic Germline Fumarate Hydratase Gene Mutations.

Deficiency of fumarate hydratase (FH) protein expression in uterine corpus leiomyomas may be attributable to either germline or somatic mutations of the FH gene, the former being definitional for the hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome. The authors assess whether, using previously reported FH-associated morphologic features, FH protein-deficient uterine corpus leiomyomas associated with a pathogenic germline mutations of the FH gene (group 1) are distinguishable from FH protein-deficient uterine corpus leiomyomas without such mutations (and whose FH protein loss is presumed to be attributable to somatic/epigenetic inactivation or other unknown phenomena: group 2). Groups 1 and 2 were compared regarding a variety of clinicopathologic features, including 7 core "FH-associated" tumoral morphologic features: staghorn vasculature; alveolar-type edema; bizarre nuclei; chain-like tumor nuclei; hyaline cytoplasmic globules; prominent nucleoli, intranuclear inclusions, and perinucleolar halos; and prominent eosinophilic/fibrillary cytoplasm. Among 2418 patients diagnosed with uterine corpus leiomyoma during the study period, FH-associated morphologic features were reported in 1.5% (37 patients), and FH immunohistochemistry was performed in 29 (1.19%). Fourteen (48.27%) of the 29 patients showed FH protein deficiency by immunohistochemistry. Twelve patients underwent germline testing, of which 8 (66.7%) were classified as group 1 and 4 (33.3%) as group 2. FH protein-deficient tumors were larger (10.44 vs 4.08 cm, P = 0.01) and associated with younger patients (42.05 vs 47.97, P = 0.004) than 370 randomly selected uterine leiomyoma controls. Groups 1 and 2 showed no significant differences in patient age and tumor size. In group 1 tumors, the FH-associated morphologic features were generally present diffusely; all group 1 tumors displayed ≥5 FH-associated features, whereas all group 2 tumors displayed <5 FH-associated features (means 6.5 ± 0.53 vs 3.5 ± 1.00, P < 0.001). Notably, eosinophilic/fibrillary cytoplasm and alveolar-type edema were each significantly more prevalent in group 1 tumors than group 2 tumors (P = 0.018 for both). No single morphologic feature was found to be completely sensitive and specific in making the distinction between group 1 and 2 tumors. Our findings suggest that groups 1 and 2 are unlikely to be morphologically distinguishable by individual morphologic features. Whether there is a combination of features that can reliably make this distinction is unclear and will require additional studies with larger cohorts.

Associations Between Intraductal Prostate Cancer and Metastases Following Radical Prostatectomy in Men With Prostate Cancer in the Veterans Affairs Database.

PURPOSE: Intraductal carcinoma of the prostate (IDC-P) is a relatively unstudied feature present in some prostate cancer (PC) diagnoses with several studies suggesting associations with higher Gleason scores (GS) and earlier time to biochemical recurrence (BCR) after definitive treatment. We looked to identify cases of IDC-P in the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) database and measure associations between IDC-P and pathological stage, BCR, and metastases. METHODS: Patients in the VHA database diagnosed with PC from 2000 to 2017, treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) at the VHA were included in the cohort. BCR was defined as post-RP PSA >0.2 or administration of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Time to event was defined as time from RP to event or censor. Differences in cumulative incidences were assessed through Gray's test. Associations with IDC-P and pathologic features at RP, BCR and metastases were assessed through multivariable logistic and Cox regression models. RESULTS: Of 13,913 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 45 patients had IDC-P. Median follow up was 8.8 years from RP. Multivariable logistic regressions showed patients with IDC-P were more likely to have GS ≥8 (Odds Ratio (OR) 1.14, P = .009) and higher T stages (T3 or 4 vs. T1 or 2 OR 1.14, P < .001). In total, 4,318 patients experienced a BCR, and 1,252 patients developed metastases of whom 26 and 12, respectively, had IDC-P. On multivariable regression IDC-P was associated with higher risk of BCR (IDC-P Hazard Ratio (HR) 1.71, P = .006) and metastases (HR 2.84, P < .001). Cumulative incidence of metastases at 4 years for IDC-P and non-IDC-P were 15.9% and 5.5% (P < .001) respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis, IDC-P was associated with higher Gleason score at RP, shorter time to BCR, and higher rates of metastases. Further studies are warranted to investigate the molecular underpinnings of IDC-P to better guide treatment strategies for this aggressive disease entity.

Clinical correlation of lymphovascular invasion and Silva pattern of invasion in early-stage endocervical adenocarcinoma: proposed binary Silva classification system.

Silva invasion pattern can help predict lymph node metastasis risk in endocervical adenocarcinoma. We analysed Silva pattern of invasion and lymphovascular invasion to determine associations with clinical outcomes in stage IA and IB1 endocervical adenocarcinomas. International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO; 2019 classification) stage IA-IB1 endocervical adenocarcinomas from 15 international institutions were examined for Silva pattern, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and other prognostic parameters. Lymph node metastasis status, local/distant recurrences, and survival data were compared using appropriate statistical tests. Of 399 tumours, 152 (38.1%) were stage IA [IA1, 77 (19.3%); IA2, 75 (18.8%)] and 247 (61.9%) were stage IB1. On multivariate analysis, lymphovascular invasion (p=0.008) and Silva pattern (p<0.001) were significant factors when comparing stage IA versus IB1 endocervical adenocarcinomas. Overall survival was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis (p=0.028); recurrence-free survival was significantly associated with lymphovascular invasion (p=0.002) and stage (1B1 versus 1A) (p=0.002). Five and 10 year overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were similar among Silva pattern A cases and Silva pattern B cases without lymphovascular invasion (p=0.165 and p=0.171, respectively). Silva pattern and lymphovascular invasion are important prognostic factors in stage IA1-IB1 endocervical adenocarcinomas and can supplement 2019 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging. Our binary Silva classification system groups patients into low risk (patterns A and B without lymphovascular invasion) and high risk (pattern B with lymphovascular invasion and pattern C) categories.

Horizontal tumor extent (HZTE) has limited prognostic significance in 2018 FIGO stage I endocervical adenocarcinoma (ECA): a retrospective study of 416 cases.

PURPOSE: The 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) update on cervical cancer staging eliminated horizontal tumor extent (HZTE) as a staging parameter in stage IA (microscopic) disease. We aimed to determine whether HZTE correlates with outcomes in early stage ECAs and FIGO should reinstate HZTE as a staging parameter in futures updates. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 416 FIGO 2009 stage I ECAs from 17 institutions and re-assigned stage using FIGO 2018. Correlation between HZTE, overall (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) was performed using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Re-staging 416 cases resulted in 126 (30.3%) IA and 290 (69.7%) IB cases; 85 (67.5%) IA tumors had HZTE ≤ 7 mm, while 41 (32.5%) were > 7 mm; 32 (11%) IB tumors had HZTE ≤ 7 mm, while 258 (89%) were > 7 mm (p = 0.0001). Four (3.2%) IA (1 IA1, 3 IA2) patients developed recurrence (3 ≤ 7 mm, 1 > 7 mm) compared to 41 (14.1%) IB patients (p = 0.002). Fourteen IB and no IA patients died of disease (8 IB1, 1 ≤ 7 mm). Cox univariate analysis demonstrated that only RFS is significantly influenced by HZTE (p = 0.01), while OS and RFS were not influenced by HZTE on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: HZTE has limited prognostic value in early stage ECAs and is only associated with RFS on univariate but not multivariate analysis. HZTE does not improve prognostication of patients with stage I ECAs as per 2018 FIGO staging. Consequently, the rationale to remove this variable from FIGO staging is justified for ECAs.

PTEN Loss and ARID1A Mutation in an HPV-positive Metastatic Adenocarcinoma Diagnosed Almost 18 yr After an Intact Cone Excision for Endocervical Adenocarcinoma In Situ.

There have been previous reports of neoplasms with the morphology of endocervical adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS) that secondarily involve the ovaries, presumably through transtubal spread, with a smaller subset metastasizing to distant sites. These ovarian metastases have been discovered up to 7 yr postexcision of the endocervical lesion, consistent with the known potential for overtly invasive cervical carcinomas to recur late after primary curative management. Herein, we present a case of a premenopausal woman with a pelvic mass classified as metastatic human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated endocervical adenocarcinoma (p16-block immunoreactive, high-risk HPV positive by in situ hybridization with PTEN loss, ARID1A, and PBRM1 mutations detected by qualitative next-generation sequencing), identified 17.7 yr (212 mo) after a fertility-sparing cone excision with negative margins for endocervical AIS [HPV-associated, p16-block immunoreactive; PTEN, and BAF250a (ARID1a) expression retained]. Our case highlights: (1) the potential for a subset of lesions with the morphology of AIS to metastasize, and the extraordinarily long timeframe (almost 18 y, the longest reported to date) during which metastases may still be identified; (2) alterations in PTEN and ARID1A may play a role in the progression of a subset of endocervical carcinomas; and (3) the need for studies to evaluate the utility of incorporating ovarian/pelvic imaging into surveillance protocols following fertility-sparing excisions or ovarian-preserving hysterectomies, during the management of endocervical adenocarcinomas, as well as the need to counsel patients about the small but real risk of delayed discovery of ovarian metastases following fertility-preserving surgeries for AIS.

Online Training and Self-assessment in the Histopathologic Classification of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and Diagnosis of Pattern of Invasion: Evaluation of Participant Performance.

Histopathologic classification of endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC) has recently changed, with the new system based on human papillomavirus (HPV)-related morphologic features being incorporated into the 5th edition of the WHO Blue Book (Classification of Tumours of the Female Genital Tract). There has also been the introduction of a pattern-based classification system to assess invasion in HPV-associated (HPVA) endocervical adenocarcinomas that stratifies tumors into 3 groups with different prognoses. To facilitate the introduction of these changes into routine clinical practice, websites with training sets and test sets of scanned whole slide images were designed to improve diagnostic performance in histotype classification of endocervical adenocarcinoma based on the International Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Criteria and Classification (IECC) and assessment of Silva pattern of invasion in HPVA endocervical adenocarcinomas. We report on the diagnostic results of those who have participated thus far in these educational websites. Our goal was to identify areas where diagnostic performance was suboptimal and future educational efforts could be directed. There was very good ability to distinguish HPVA from HPV-independent adenocarcinomas within the WHO/IECC classification, with some challenges in the diagnosis of HPV-independent subtypes, especially mesonephric carcinoma. Diagnosis of HPVA subtypes was not consistent. For the Silva classification, the main challenge was related to distinction between pattern A and pattern B, with a tendency for participants to overdiagnose pattern B invasion. These observations can serve as the basis for more targeted efforts to improve diagnostic performance.

The Silva Pattern-based Classification for HPV-associated Invasive Endocervical Adenocarcinoma and the Distinction Between In Situ and Invasive Adenocarcinoma: Relevant Issues and Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

The Silva pattern-based classification for human papilloma virus-associated invasive adenocarcinoma has emerged as a reliable system to predict risk of lymph node metastasis and recurrences. Although not a part of any staging system yet, it has been incorporated in synoptic reports as established by the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR). Moreover, the current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines include this classification as an "emergent concept." In order to facilitate the understating and application of this new classification by all pathologists, the ISGyP Endocervical Adenocarcinoma Project Working Group presents herein all the current evidence on the Silva classification and aims to provide recommendations for its implementation in practice, including interpretation, reporting, and application to biopsy and resection specimens. In addition, this article addresses the distinction of human papilloma virus-associated adenocarcinoma in situ and gastric type adenocarcinoma in situ from their invasive counterparts.

Tumor Staging of Endocervical Adenocarcinoma: Recommendations From the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) updated its staging system for cervical cancer in 2018 with changes that affect size criteria for early stage disease, as well as including pathology and radiology in addition to clinical assessment to be used in staging. Lymph node involvement was also included in the staging system. In early stage disease, pathologic findings are crucial in determining stage, which in turn determine treatment and prognosis for the patient. Therefore, it is imperative that there are unified and consistent methods and recommendations for assessing and reporting pathologic parameters for accurate staging. We describe the changes in the revised FIGO staging scheme and discuss controversial issues in cervical cancer staging from a pathologic perspective. We also provide practical recommendations regarding these parameters based on literature review and/or expert opinion/consensus.

FIGO 2018 stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas: an international study of outcomes informed by prognostic biomarkers.

OBJECTIVE: Prognostic factors for endocervical adernocarcinomas are well known, but little is known about prognostic biomarkers influencing outcome for the newly defined International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 IB sub-stages. The aim of this study was to identify prognostic biomarkers influencing recurrence-free and overall survival for FIGO 2018 stage IB cervical adenocarcinoma sub-types. We sought to identify these factors using a large international multi-institutional series of cases. METHODS: Stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas were retrospectively collected from nine international institutions; full slide sets (n=464) were used to assign prognostic biomarkers. Inclusion criteria were the following: FIGO stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas with follow-up in which all paraffin blocks/glass slides were available for review and/or additional studies and the patient was surgically treated from 1985 to 2019. The types of specimens included in the study were conizations, trachelectomies, and simple/radical hysterectomies with or without lymph node samples. We excluded in situ carcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, adenosquamous carcinomas, tumors with a neuroendocrine component, carcinosarcomas, and any tumor showing clinical, macroscopic, or microscopic features suggesting a lower uterine segment, uterine corpus, or an adnexal primary origin. Tumors treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy were also excluded, as well as biopsies and loop electrosurgical excision procedures. RESULTS: Of 464 cases, 225 (48%) were stage IB1, 177 (38%) were stage IB2, and 62 (13%) were stage IB3. Five-year and 10-year recurrence-free survivals were statistically different among stage IB sub-types (p=0.005). Silva pattern of invasion was significant for recurrence-free survival at 5 and 10 years (p=0.04); overall survival and recurrence-free survival were higher in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated cases (p=0.007 and p=0.001, respectively) and in cases without lymphovascular invasion (p=0.004 and p=0.00001, respectively). Factors that significantly influenced recurrence-free survival were HPV-independent status (p=0.05; HR 2.31; 95% CI 1.02 to 5.46), presence of lymphovascular invasion (p=0.011; HR 3.50; 95% CI 1.33 to 9.19), and presence of lymph node metastasis (p=0.016; HR 2.66; 95% CI 1.20 to 5.90). CONCLUSION: HPV status and the presence of lymphovascular invasion are prognosticators in stage IB endocervical adenocarcinoma sub-types. These parameters should be included in future sub-staging modifications of FIGO stage IB endocervical adenocarcinomas and in treatment strategies.

Ovarian mucinous neoplasms, intestinal type, in premenopausal patients, develop in abnormal ovaries.

Although several studies have addressed different aspects of mucinous neoplasms arising in the ovary, such as their clinicopathologic features, immunohistochemical profile, and molecular characteristics, no study has presented an analysis of the ovarian tissue where these neoplasms arise. In this study, we included 196 cases of intestinal-type ovarian mucinous neoplasms in premenopausal patients. Our main goal was to perform a rigorous examination of the ovarian tissue surrounding these neoplasms. We also reviewed the clinicopathologic features of these cases. For comparison, the background ovarian tissue in 85 cases of ovarian serous neoplasm and in 29 cases of metastatic neoplasms to the ovary, as well as 57 normal ovaries, was examined. All the patients in this study, which included those with mucinous and with serous neoplasms primary in the ovary, those with metastatic tumors to the ovaries, and those with normal ovaries, were also premenopausal. Patients affected by ovarian mucinous neoplasms ranged in age from 13 to 52 years (median = 36 years). Nulligravidity was seen in 50%, 32%, and 22% of patients with mucinous carcinomas, mucinous borderline neoplasms, and mucinous cystadenomas, respectively. Ovarian mucinous intestinal neoplasms arise in abnormal ovaries characterized by two important features: (1) an abnormal ovarian cortex, seen in 95% of the cases, which is hypocellular or with no distinction between the cellular cortex and medulla, and (2) a remarkable paucity of primordial follicles. The abnormalities detected in the background ovarian tissue might provide insights into the tumorigenesis of these neoplasms and might facilitate their distinction from metastasis to the ovary, in premenopausal patients.

Endometrial tumors with yolk sac tumor-like morphologic patterns or immunophenotypes: an expanded appraisal.

Uterine yolk sac tumors have gained increased recognition in recent years. The current study is a multi-faceted examination of yolk sac tumor-like phenotypes in endometrial tumors, based on an analysis of 3 groups of uterine tumors: Group 1: 9 endometrial tumors that had been classified as yolk sac tumor, or as having a yolk sac tumor component, were assessed with a 35-marker immunohistochemical panel, with the goal of defining their immunophenotypic spectrum; Group 2, comprised of 70 endometrial carcinomas of various histotypes, were analyzed for their expression of SALL4, Glypican-3, and AFP, to assess the specificity of these markers for yolk sac tumors relative to endometrial carcinomas; Group 3, comprised of 626 archived cases of endometrial carcinoma/carcinosarcoma, reviewed to define the frequency of yolk sac tumor-like morphology therein. Yolk sac tumor areas in the Group 1 cases were consistently immunoreactive for SALL4 and Glypican-3; variably positive for AFP (89%), Villin (89%), PLAP (78%), 34ßE12 (67%), CAM 5.2 (62.5%), EMA (56%), CD117 (50%), p16 (50%), CDX2 (44%), p53 (44% aberrant), MOC31 (37.5%), CK7 (33%), GATA3 (33%), CK5 (25%), and PAX8 (11%); and were negative for CD30, Napsin A, OCT4, estrogen, androgen, and progesterone receptors. 29 (41%) of the 70 group-2 cases expressed at least one of the 3 markers, and 96% of the positive cases was a high-grade histotype. Glypican-3, SALL4, and AFP were positive in 30, 20, and 2.8% of group-2 cases respectively; however, co-expression of any 2, or all 3 markers was uncommon (<9 and 1.4% of cases respectively). Potential yolk sac tumor-like morphology was identified in 5 (0.8%) of 626 group-3 cases, and three were ultimately deemed to be true yolk sac tumor phenotypes based on their morphologic and immunophenotypic similarity to the group 1 cases. These findings highlight the broad immunophenotypic spectrum of uterine yolk sac tumors, the potential pitfalls associated with using immunophenotypes alone to define yolk sac tumor differentiation in endometrial carcinoma, and the utility and limitations of morphologic assessment to identify yolk sac tumors at this site.

Implementation of the 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists Guidelines on HER2/neu Assessment by FISH in breast cancers: predicted impact in a single institutional cohort.

The 2018 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) and College of American Pathologists (CAP) update modified the interpretation guidelines for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) testing by incorporating immunohistochemistry (IHC) and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) results in a subset of cases. Importantly, the new guidelines eliminate "equivocal" results, as well as the use of alternative chromosome 17 probes as the primary strategy for resolving the indeterminate FISH results. Herein, we investigate the predicted impact of implementing the 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines on HER2 assessment by FISH in breast cancers, using data from a single institution. We compared the HER2 status of 1542 consecutive cases of breast carcinoma, interpreted by 2013 and 2018 ASCO/CAP guidelines. In total, 10.7% (165/1542) of the cases had a different final interpretation by 2018 guidelines compared with 2013 guidelines, including 70 previously HER2-positive cases reclassified as negative, four previously negative cases reclassified as positive, and 91 previously equivocal cases reclassified as negative. Overall, the number of HER2-positive cancers was reduced by 66 cases (4.3% reduction in the HER2 positivity rate). The newly HER2-negative cases were mostly estrogen receptor positive (90%), progesterone receptor positive (80%), stage 1 (60.9%), and grade 1-2 (59.4%) cancers; 70% of them had been designated as HER2 positive only after the use of an alternative chromosome 17 FISH probe after an intially equivocal result from the standard CEP17 probe. Overall, implementing the revised 2018 HER2 guidelines is predicted to change the HER2 results of 10.7% of breast cancers, mainly by reclassifying previously equivocal to negative results.

Breast cancers with a HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2.0 or greater and an average HER2 copy number of less than 4.0 per cell: frequency, immunohistochemical correlation, and clinicopathological features.

The 2013 American Society of Clinical Oncology and College of American Pathologists (ASCO/CAP) guidelines classified breast cancers with a fluorescence in situ hybridization dual-probe HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater as "amplified," inclusive of cases with a HER2 copy number less than 4. The 2018 ASCO/CAP update assigns HER2/neu status for the latter group in a fashion that is highly dependent on the associated immunohistochemical findings. Herein, the authors define the frequency, immunohistochemical correlates, and other clinicopathological features of breast cancers with HER2/CEP17 ratio of 2 or greater and HER2/neu copy number less than 4 (group A), based on an analysis of an institutional cohort assessed for HER2/neu status by both florescence in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry and scored using 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. Group A cases were compared with a group B of HER2/neu-amplified breast cancers with a HER2/neu copy number of 4 or greater regarding a variety of clinicopathological features. One hundred sixty-nine (14%) of 1201 cases were HER2/neu amplified, 18 (10.7%) in group A and 151 (89.3%) in group B. By immunohistochemistry, 61.1% of group A cases were HER2/neu negative, 7 (38.9%) were equivocal, and none were positive. In contrast, 66.9% of group B cases were HER2 positive (3+). We could not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the 2 groups regarding standard clinicopathological variables. In summary, our group A cases account for 1.5% of breast cancers, and 10.7% of all HER2/neu-amplified cancers classified as such based on 2013 ASCO/CAP criteria. They are predominantly HER2/neu negative by immunohistochemistry, which suggests that they are biologically different from classically HER2/neu-amplified cases and which validates the 2018 ASCO/CAP guideline against automatically classifying such cases as HER2/neu amplified.

Estrogen Receptor, Progesterone Receptor, and Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2 Testing in Breast Cancer: Assessing the Value of Repeated Centralized Testing in Excision Specimens.

At some tertiary breast care centers, where many patients are referred from other institutions, it is routine to repeat testing for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2/neu) in excision specimens if these tests were performed on the preceding biopsy at the referring facility. The goal of this study is to assess the value of this practice. We documented results from ER, PR, and HER2 testing in 541 consecutive invasive breast cancers excised over a 2.5-year period and analyzed the subset (n=153) for which testing was performed on the excision specimen solely due to the fact that testing on the preceding biopsy was performed at an outside institution. The rates and directions of biopsy-to-excision change were as follows: ER [1.3% (2/153), 100% from (+) to (-)]; PR [4% (6/153), 83% from (+) to (-)]; HER2/neu assessed by immunohistochemistry [21% (29/137)]; HER2/neu assessed by fluorescence in situ hybridization [3.3% (2/61); 50% from amplified to nonamplified and 50% vice versa]. There were no ER(-) and PR(-) biopsy cases that became ER and/or PR(+) in the excision. By coordinate analysis for the hormone receptors [ie, ER and/or PR(+) being indicative of "hormone receptor" (HR) positivity], there were no cases that changed from HR(+) in the biopsy to HR(-) in the excision (or vice versa), which suggests that repeat testing for ER and PR in this setting is of limited value. In an analysis that incorporated both immunohistochemistry and in situ fluorescence hybridization results, there were 2 cases with a clinically significant biopsy-to-excision change in HER2/neu status in which that change was detected primarily because the excision was retested. These findings provide baseline data for formulating policies on whether repeat testing should routinely be performed in the described scenario.

The pathologic distinction of primary and metastatic mucinous tumors involving the ovary: A re-evaluation of algorithms based on gross features.

The problems associated with the pathologic distinction of primary ovarian mucinous tumors from their metastatic counterparts are well-recognized. Herein, we systematically evaluate a variety of gross parameters to determine the combination of features that most optimally separate primary from secondary mucinous ovarian tumors, and to address the tumor types that are most frequently associated with exceptions. 129 consecutive mucinous tumors involving the ovary formed the study set, including 61 primary mucinous tumors (16 carcinomas, 45 borderline tumors), and 68 metastatic carcinomas (21 colon; 28 appendix; 5 breast; 3 lung; 3 pancreas; 3 cervix; 1 bladder; 4 stomach). Consistent with prior studies, we found that as compared with metastases, primary ovarian mucinous tumors tend to be larger, more frequently unilateral and were more likely to be predominantly cystic and devoid of surface nodules. 41 of the 68 cases in the metastatic group showed intraperitoneal disease, as compared with only 3 of the 61 cases in the primary group (p < 0.0001). In 21% (14/68) of the metastatic group, the ovarian tumor was the first clinical indication of the primary tumor, and 82% of those cases were of gastrointestinal tract primary; this group of cases showed significantly larger tumors than ovarian tumors for patients with an established diagnosis of cancer. Receiver operating curve analyses showed that a tumor size cut off of <13 cm for metastatic disease yielded the maximal area under the curve of 0.877 (sensitivity 80%; specificity 80%); the most frequent exception to the size cut off of <13 cm for metastases was colorectal carcinoma, 30% of which were ≥13 cm. An algorithm whereby a tumor ≥13 cm is considered primary unless it displays surface nodules or bilaterality, and a tumor <13 cm is considered metastatic unless it is unilateral, correctly classified 94% (64/68) of the metastatic tumors and 98% (60/61) of the primary tumors. 3 of the 4 incorrectly classified cases in the metastatic group had intraperitoneal disease. We conclude that gross features are very useful in the distinction of primary from metastatic mucinous tumors in the ovary, and the presence of intraperitoneal disease provides additional diagnostic information. Although algorithms such as the one described herein are imperfect classifiers, they do provide baseline information on which additional findings, including microscopic features, can be added to ultimately provide the most accurate diagnostic classification.

A Single Institutional Experience With the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology: Correlation of Cytology and Histology in 194 Cases.

OBJECTIVES: The Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (TPS) is designed to standardize the criteria and terminology used in urinary tract cytology reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of implementing TPS and to analyze the correlation with follow-up biopsies in order to assess its reproducibility. METHODS: Urinary tract cytology specimens with follow-up biopsies over a 2-year period were reviewed and reclassified according to TPS criteria. Surgical follow-up diagnoses were correlated with the initial cytology diagnoses and TPS interpretations, and the results were compared. RESULTS: Applying TPS in comparison to our previous reporting system resulted in fewer cases in the atypia category (11.8% vs 24.2%) and higher specificity, accuracy, and predictive value. We observed acceptable interobserver agreement in diagnostic categories of this reporting system. CONCLUSIONS: TPS improves the overall performance of urinary tract cytology by standardizing the criteria and terminology.

Comparative Pathologic Analysis of Breast Cancers Classified as HER2/neu-Amplified by FISH Using a Standard HER2/CEP17 Dual Probe and an Alternative Chromosome 17 Control Probe.

At our institution, breast cancer cases that generate an equivocal HER2/neu (HER2) result by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using the dual HER2/chromosome enumeration probe (CEP17) are reflexed to an assay that utilizes an alternative control probe (lissencephaly gene1 [LIS1] [17p13.3]/retinoic acid receptor α [RARA] [17q21.2]). This study examines whether cancers that are classified as HER2-amplified with an alternate probe are clinicopathologically similar to those that are classified as such using the HER2/CEP17 probe. Reports for 1201 breast cancers were reviewed, and clinicopathologic findings were compared between HER2/CEP17-equivocal cases that became HER2-amplified using the alternate probe (group A: n=48), HER2-amplified cases using the HER2/CEP17 probe (group B: n=169), and HER2-nonamplified cases using the HER2/CEP17 probe (group C: n=910). Of 1201 cases tested using the HER2/CEP17 probe, 169 (14%) were HER2-amplified, 122 (10%) were equivocal, and 910 (76%) were nonamplified. Additional testing with the alternative probe on the 122 equivocal cases reclassified 48 (39%) of them to HER2-amplified, and such cases comprised 22% of all HER2-amplified tumors. A higher proportion of tumors with HER2 copy number between 5.0 and 5.9 became positive upon additional testing when compared with those with a priori HER2 copy numbers between 4.0 and 4.9 (P=0.0362). Group A cases, compared with group B cases, were more frequently positive for estrogen receptor (97.91% vs. 72.18%, P<0.0001) and progesterone receptor (85.41% vs. 59.17%, P=0.0009). Most group A cases (71%) were HER2 equivocal (score 2+) by immunohistochemistry, whereas most group B cases (60%) were positive (score 3+). Groups A and B showed no significant differences regarding patient age, lymph node status, tumor grade, histotype, and stage distribution. In summary, among our HER2-amplified cohort of breast cancers, alternative probe-detected cases were more frequently estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive than HER2/CEP17-detected cases, and were more frequently discordant with HER2 immunohistochemistry results. These findings raise the possibility of underlying biologic differences between these 2 groups, which warrants further study. However, the tumors were largely comparable regarding all other clinicopathologic variables. As it is unknown whether HER2-targeted therapy is truly beneficial in this subgroup of patients, future clinical trials should specifically evaluate this subset.

The diagnosis of mucinous lesions in endometrial samplings by gynaecological pathologists: an analysis of diagnostic reproducibility.

The purpose of this study is to assess the reproducibility among gynaecological pathologists in their diagnosis of mucinous alterations in endometrial sampling specimens. Twenty-six cases were independently reviewed by four experienced gynaecological pathologists from four academic medical centres. Pathologists were asked to classify each case into one of four groups, including three World Health Organization (WHO)-recognised categories: (1) mucinous metaplasia; (2) atypical mucinous glandular proliferation; (3) carcinoma; and (4) 'other' (absence of a true mucinous alteration and/or an alteration of non-endometrial origin). The overall reproducibility was 'fair' (κ = 0.39). In an analytical scenario that established three clinically significant groups ('benign/non-neoplastic', 'atypical', and 'carcinoma') by redistributing all group 4 responses, the resultant kappa improved to 0.51 (moderate reproducibility). In another analysis with only two categories-'benign/non-neoplastic' versus 'atypical/carcinoma'-reproducibility was similarly moderate (κ = 0.46). However, with one exception, all cases that were ultimately diagnosed as carcinoma in a follow-up hysterectomy specimen, were classified as atypical or carcinoma in the preceding sampling. For 11 cases that were classified as either 'carcinoma' or 'atypical' by all observers, there was moderate reproducibility (κ = 0.53) in making that distinction, and none of a wide array of morphological features were found to significantly distinguish between these two categories. For five cases that all observers classified as either mucinous metaplasia or benign endocervix, reproducibility was substantial (κ = 0.67). In summary, gynaecological pathologists show moderate reproducibility in categorising mucinous alterations in endometrial sampling specimens as benign, atypical, or carcinomatous. They accurately classify as at least 'atypical' those cases that are ultimately diagnosed as carcinoma in the subsequent resection. Our findings suggest that there are indeed some mucinous alterations which have features that do not allow for reproducible assignment by pathologists into the WHO-recognised categories. In this subset of cases, there may be a need for better-defined diagnostic criteria and/or extra-morphological diagnostic tools.

The pattern is the issue: recent advances in adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.

In this article, we review a novel risk stratification system for endocervical adenocarcinoma, developed by an international consortium of pathologists after reviewing over 350 such tumors. Their analysis culminated in a three-tiered histopathologic system based on morphologic examination of the tumor, independent of clinical features and stage (depth of invasion). It resulted in better determination of patients' tumors and likelihood of lymph node metastasis as well as aggressive behavior. A non-destructive pattern (that in some cases was in the histologic differential diagnosis with adenocarcinoma in situ) had an indolent behavior and was labeled pattern A. The other two patterns had destructive invasion, one only focally (pattern B) while pattern C showed diffuse destructive invasion. This system can help select appropriate treatment modalities avoiding unnecessary complications. We comment on specifics of this system as well as issues in differentiation of the tumor patterns, its clinical utility and recent advances in the molecular arena.