Factors associated with second-line triplet therapy in routine care in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Second-line therapy (SLT) trials in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) report superior outcomes with triplet combinations. We sought to determine factors associated with triplet SLT in routine practice. METHODS: A retrospective cohort with claims for MM between 01/01/2008 and 03/31/2015 was grouped by 1-2 ("doublet") or 3+ ("triplet") agent therapy. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and disability status; CRAB symptoms (hypercalcaemia, renal/bone disease, anaemia); and relapse risk were determined. RESULTS: Among 623 patients, the triplet group (n=146 [23%]) was younger (65.2 vs 69.8 years) and more likely to have high-risk relapse (67% vs 50%), CRAB symptoms (94.5% vs 81.1%), triplet first-line treatment (75% vs 51%) and frontline stem cell transplant (38% vs 20%) (P<0.001 for all). In multivariate analyses, CRAB symptoms (OR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.47, 7.10), high-risk relapse (OR: 1.71, 95% CI: 1.12, 2.62) and prior triplet therapy (OR: 2.16, 95% CI: 1.38, 3.40), but neither CCI nor disability, were associated with triplet SLT. A trend towards triplets among younger patients (<65 vs >75 years, OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.99, 3.04) was observed. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The majority of patients did not receive triplet regimens. Treatment selection with triplet therapy for RRMM should carefully consider comorbidities and patient-specific characteristics.

Meeting the 12 lymph node (LN) benchmark in colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Examining >or=12 LN in colon cancer has been suggested as a quality metric. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the 12 LN benchmark is achieved at NCCN centers compared to a US population-based sample. METHODS: Patients with stage I-III disease resected at NCCN centers were identified from a prospective database (n = 718) and were compared to 12,845 stage I-III patients diagnosed in a SEER region. Age, gender, location, stage, number of positive nodes were compared for NCCN and SEER data in regards to number of nodes evaluated. Multivariate logistic regression models were developed to identify factors associated with evaluating 12 LNs. RESULTS: 92% of NCCN and 58% of SEER patients had >or=12 LN evaluated. For patients treated at NCCN centers, factors associated with not meeting the 12 LN target were left-sided tumors, stage I disease and BMI >30. CONCLUSIONS: >or=12 LN are almost always evaluated in NCCN patients. In contrast, this target is achieved in 58% of SEER patients. With longer follow-up of the NCCN cohort we will be able to link this quality metric to patterns of recurrence and survival and thereby better understand whether increasing the number of nodes evaluated is a priority for cancer control.

Effect of lymph node retrieval rates on the utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

BACKGROUND: Failing to meet the benchmark of 12 lymph nodes in resection specimens is an indication for adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer. METHODS: Among consecutive eligible patients with pathologic stage II colon cancer treated at eight NCI-designated comprehensive cancer centers between September 1, 2005 and February 19, 2008, we analyzed receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy, with less than 12 versus 12+ lymph nodes removed and examined the primary explanatory variable of interest. RESULTS: Among 258 patients, 46% received adjuvant chemotherapy. An oxaliplatin-containing regimen was used 67% of the time. Younger age (<50 years, P < 0.001), presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.007), and higher T stage (P = 0.007) were independently associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use. There was significant inter-institutional variability in practice with the proportion receiving treatment ranging from 17% to 64% (P < 0.05). Notably, presence of less than 12 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen was a strong predictor of treatment (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy use after resection of stage II colon cancer is common, but by no means standard practice at National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) institutions. More attention to achieving the recommended benchmark for lymph node dissection has the potential to decrease exposure to the toxicity of adjuvant treatment.