RESUMO
Among 196,766 commercially insured and Medicare Advantage patients who newly initiated biologic drugs with available biosimilar versions, biosimilar initiation increased from 1 percent in 2013 to 34 percent in 2022. Patients were less likely to initiate biosimilars if they were younger than age eighteen or the drug was prescribed by a specialist or administered in a hospital outpatient facility.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part CRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Originator drug manufacturers use several strategies to delay generic competition in the USA, but it remains unclear whether this results in longer market exclusivity compared to other countries. OBJECTIVES: We sought to understand how drug market exclusivity lengths vary between the USA and two comparable countries. METHODS: We focused on drugs approved within 2 years of each other in the USA, France, and Australia from 1995 to 2005, and we compared the lengths of exclusivity from marketing approval through first generic competition or June 2023 using Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Among 165 drugs in common between the USA and France, the median length of exclusivity was slightly longer in France (15.0 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 13.0-19.6) than the USA (14.5 years, IQR: 11.7-17.6). Among 100 drugs in common between the USA and Australia, the median length of exclusivity was longer in Australia (16.3 years, IQR: 13.9-22.4) than in the USA (14.4 years, IQR: 12.0-17.1). CONCLUSIONS: Market exclusivity lengths in the USA are not longer than in France and Australia. Potential reasons include the larger US market and incentives that offer transient high generic drug prices in the USA for manufacturers that successfully challenge originator market exclusivity.
Assuntos
Indústria Farmacêutica , Medicamentos Genéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Estados Unidos , França , Austrália , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Humanos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Indústria Farmacêutica/economia , Competição Econômica , Aprovação de Drogas , Fatores de Tempo , MarketingRESUMO
This Viewpoint discusses the limitations of state prescription drug spending targets for lowering medication costs.
Assuntos
Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Humanos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Estados Unidos , Gastos em Saúde , Governo Estadual , Custos de Medicamentos/tendênciasRESUMO
This Viewpoint explains some ways in which the alignment of incentives between payers and clinicians in value-based care (VBC) arrangements can be interrupted and proposes a multifaceted approach to realigning incentives for drug spending within VBC contracts to better provide value-based care and improve patient outcomes.
Assuntos
Reembolso de Incentivo , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Aquisição Baseada em Valor , Assistência Farmacêutica/economiaRESUMO
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists are effective for treating obesity, but the high cost of these medications endangers the financial viability of our health care system. To ensure that these drugs are available to Medicare beneficiaries, pharmaceutical manufacturers must lower their prices.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Custos de Medicamentos , Medicare , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/economia , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Medicare/economia , Obesidade/tratamento farmacológico , Obesidade/economia , Receptor do Peptídeo Semelhante ao Glucagon 1/agonistas , Cobertura do Seguro/economiaAssuntos
Negociação , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Custos de Medicamentos , Medicare Part D/economia , Medicare/economiaRESUMO
Importance: Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are safe and highly effective for curing hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, but their high cost led certain state Medicaid programs to impose coverage restrictions. Since 2015, many of these restrictions have been lifted voluntarily in response to advocacy or because of litigation. Objective: To estimate how the prescribing of DAAs to Medicaid patients changed after states eased access restrictions. Design, Setting, and Participants: This modified difference-in-differences analysis of 39 state Medicaid programs included Medicaid beneficiaries who were prescribed a DAA from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019. DAA coverage restrictions were measured based on a series of cross-sectional assessments performed from 2014 through 2022 by the US National Viral Hepatitis Roundtable and the Center for Health Law and Policy Innovation. Exposure: Calendar quarter when states eased or eliminated 3 types of DAA coverage restrictions: limiting treatment to patients with severe liver disease, restricting use among patients with active substance use, and requiring prescriptions to be written by or in consultation with specialists. States with none of these restrictions at baseline were excluded. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly number of HCV DAA treatment courses per 100â¯000 Medicaid beneficiaries. Results: Of 39 states, 7 (18%) eliminated coverage restrictions, 25 (64%) eased restrictions, and 7 (18%) maintained the same restrictions from 2015 to 2019. During this period, the average quarterly use of DAAs increased from 669 to 3601 treatment courses per 100â¯000 Medicaid beneficiaries. After states eased or eliminated restrictions, the use of DAAs increased by 966 (95% CI, 409-1523) treatment courses per 100â¯000 Medicaid beneficiaries each quarter compared with states that did not ease or eliminate restrictions. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this study suggest that there was greater use of DAAs after states relaxed coverage restrictions related to liver disease severity, sobriety, or prescriber specialty. Further reductions or elimination of these rules may improve access to a highly effective public health intervention for patients with HCV.
Assuntos
Hepatite C Crônica , Hepatite C , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Humanos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepacivirus , Medicaid , Hepatite C Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Hepatite C/induzido quimicamenteRESUMO
This study estimates public and private spending on genetically targeted treatments for Duchenne muscular dystrophy during years in which the drugs were marketed without completed confirmatory studies.
Assuntos
Terapia de Alvo Molecular , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne , Humanos , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/tratamento farmacológico , Distrofia Muscular de Duchenne/economia , Terapia de Alvo Molecular/economiaRESUMO
Importance: Biologic drugs account for a growing share of US pharmaceutical spending. Competition from follow-on biosimilar products (subsequent versions that have no clinically meaningful differences from the original biologic) has led to modest reductions in US health care spending, but these savings may not translate to lower out-of-pocket (OOP) costs for patients. Objective: To investigate whether biosimilar competition is associated with lower OOP spending for patients using biologics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used a national commercial claims database (Optum Clinformatics Data Mart) to identify outpatient claims for 1 of 7 clinician-administered biologics (filgrastim, infliximab, pegfilgrastim, epoetin alfa, bevacizumab, rituximab, and trastuzumab) from January 2009 through March 2022. Claims by commercially insured patients younger than 65 years were included. Exposure: Year relative to first biosimilar availability and use of original or biosimilar version. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients' annual OOP spending on biologics for each calendar year was determined, and OOP spending per claim between reference biologic and biosimilar versions was compared. Two-part regression models assessed for differences in OOP spending, adjusting for patient and clinical characteristics (age, sex, US Census region, health plan type, diagnosis, and place of service) and year relative to initial biosimilar entry. Results: Over 1.7 million claims from 190â¯364 individuals (median [IQR] age, 53 [42-59] years; 58.3% females) who used at least 1 of the 7 biologics between 2009 and 2022 were included in the analysis. Over 251â¯566 patient-years of observation, annual OOP costs increased before and after biosimilar availability. Two years after the start of biosimilar competition, the adjusted odds ratio of nonzero annual OOP spending was 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.12; P < .001) and average nonzero annual spending was 12% higher (95% CI, 10%-14%; P < .001) compared with the year before biosimilar competition. After biosimilars became available, claims for biosimilars were more likely than reference biologics to have nonzero OOP costs (adjusted odds ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.11-1.16]; P < .001) but had 8% lower mean nonzero OOP costs (adjusted mean ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.90-0.93; P < .001). Findings varied by drug. Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that biosimilar competition was not consistently associated with lower OOP costs for commercially insured outpatients, highlighting the need for targeted policy interventions to ensure that the savings generated from biosimilar competition translate into increased affordability for patients who need biologics.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Farmácia , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Masculino , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Gastos em Saúde , Estudos de Coortes , Custos e Análise de Custo , Fatores BiológicosRESUMO
This study examines state Medicaid coverage policies for antiobesity medications and their trends in Medicaid reimbursement from 2011 to 2022.
Assuntos
Fármacos Antiobesidade , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon , Cobertura do Seguro , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde , Medicaid , Humanos , Fármacos Antiobesidade/economia , Fármacos Antiobesidade/uso terapêutico , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/economia , Agonistas do Receptor do Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon/uso terapêutico , Cobertura do Seguro/economia , Cobertura do Seguro/estatística & dados numéricos , Cobertura do Seguro/tendências , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/economia , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Saúde/tendências , Medicaid/economia , Medicaid/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicaid/tendências , Governo Estadual , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Direct-to-consumer (DTC) pharmacies sell generic prescription drugs, often at lower prices than traditional retail pharmacies; however, not all drugs are available, and prices vary. OBJECTIVE: To determine the availability and cost of generic drugs at DTC pharmacies. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Five national DTC pharmacies in April and May 2023. PARTICIPANTS: Each qualifying form of 100 generic drugs with the highest cost-per-patient (expensive) and the 50 generic drugs with the highest number of patients (common) in Medicare Part D in 2020 MAIN MEASURES: Availability of these drugs and the lowest DTC pharmacy price for a standardized drug strength and supply (e.g., 30 pills), compared to GoodRx retail pharmacy prices. KEY RESULTS: Of the 118 expensive generic dosage forms, 94 (80%) were available at 1 or more DTC pharmacies; out of 52 common generic dosage forms, 51 (98%) were available (p < 0.001). Of the 88 expensive generics available in comparable quantities and strengths across pharmacies, 42 (47%) had the lowest cost at Amazon, 23 (26%) at Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company, 13 (14%) at Health Warehouse, and 12 (13%) at Costco; for 51 common generic formulations, 16 (31%) had the lowest cost at Costco, 14 (27%) at Amazon, 10 (20%) at Walmart, 6 (12%) at Health Warehouse, and 5 (10%) at Mark Cuban Cost Plus Drug Company. For the 77 expensive generics with available GoodRx retail pharmacy prices, the median cost savings at DTC pharmacies were $231 (95% CI, $129-$792) or 76% (IQR, 53-91%); for 51 common generics, savings were $19 (95% CI, $10-$34) or 75% (IQR, 67-83%). CONCLUSIONS: Many of the most expensive generic drugs are unavailable at direct-to-consumer pharmacies. Meanwhile, less expensive, commonly used generics are widely available, but drug prices vary by pharmacy and savings are modest, requiring patients to shop around for the lowest cost.
Assuntos
Custos de Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição , Estudos Transversais , Medicamentos Genéricos/economia , Humanos , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Medicamentos sob Prescrição/economia , Farmácias/economia , Farmácias/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part D/economiaRESUMO
Importance: The US lacks a systematic approach for aligning drug prices with clinical benefit, and traditional cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) faces political obstacles. The efficiency frontier (EF) method offers policymakers an alternative approach. Objective: To assess how the EF approach could align prices and clinical benefits of biologic medications for plaque psoriasis and estimate price reductions in the US vs 4 peer countries: Australia, Canada, France, and Germany. Design and Setting: This health economic evaluation used the EF approach to compare the prices and clinical benefits of 11 biologics and 2 biosimilars for plaque psoriasis in the US, Australia, Canada, France, and Germany. Data were collected from February to March 2023 and analyzed from March to June 2023. Main Outcome Measures: EFs were constructed based on each biologic's efficacy, measured using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 response rate, and annual treatment cost as of January 2023; US costs were net of estimated manufacturer rebates. Prices based on the EF were compared with traditional CEA-based prices calculated by the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review at a threshold of $150â¯000 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. Results: Among 13 biologics, PASI 90 response rates ranged from 17.9% (etanercept) to 71.6% (risankizumab); US net annual treatment costs ranged from $1664 (infliximab-dyyb) to $79â¯277 (risankizumab). The median (IQR) net annual treatment cost was higher in the US ($34â¯965 [$20â¯493-$48â¯942]) than prerebate costs in Australia ($9179 [$6691-$12â¯688]), Canada ($15â¯556 [$13â¯017-$16â¯112]), France ($9478 [$6637-$11â¯678]), and Germany ($13â¯829 [$13â¯231-$15â¯837]). The US EF included infliximab-dyyb (PASI 90: 57.4%; annual cost: $1664), ixekizumab (PASI 90: 70.8%; annual cost: $33â¯004), and risankizumab (PASI 90: 71.6%; annual cost: $79â¯277). US prices for psoriasis biologics would need to be reduced by a median (IQR) of 71% (31%-95%) to align with those estimated using the EF; the same approach would yield smaller price reductions in Canada (41% [6%-57%]), Australia (36% [0%-65%]), France (19% [0%-67%]), and Germany (11% [8%-26%]). Except for risankizumab, the EF-based prices were lower than the prices based on traditional CEA. Conclusions and Relevance: This economic evaluation showed that for plaque psoriasis biologics, using an EF approach to negotiate prices could lead to substantial price reductions and better align prices with clinical benefits. US policymakers might consider using EFs to achieve prices commensurate with comparative clinical benefits, particularly for drug classes with multiple therapeutic alternatives for which differences can be adequately summarized by a single outcome measurement.
Assuntos
Medicamentos Biossimilares , Psoríase , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapêutico , Medicamentos Biossimilares/uso terapêutico , Etanercepte/uso terapêutico , Fatores Biológicos/uso terapêutico , Psoríase/tratamento farmacológico , Psoríase/economia , Terapia BiológicaRESUMO
The recent launch of direct-to-consumer pharmacy LillyDirect prompts the author of this Viewpoint to consider why it was created and also to raise concerns about allowing manufacturers to sell their drugs directly to patients.
Assuntos
Publicidade Direta ao Consumidor , Farmácias , Comportamento do Consumidor , Indústria FarmacêuticaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether annual changes in prices for clinician-administered drugs are associated with changes in patient out-of-pocket costs. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: National commercial claims database, 2009 to 2018. STUDY DESIGN: In a serial, cross-sectional study, we calculated the annual percent change in manufacturer list prices and net prices after rebates. We used two-part generalized linear models to assess the relationship between annual changes in price with (1) the percentage of individuals incurring any out-of-pocket costs and (2) the percent change in median non-zero out-of-pocket costs. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We created annual cohorts of privately insured individuals who used one of 52 brand-name clinician-administered drugs. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: List prices increased 4.4%/yr (interquartile range [IQR], 1.1% to 6.0%) and net prices 3.3%/yr (IQR, 0.3% to 5.5%). The median percentage of patients with any out-of-pocket costs increased from 38% in 2009 to 48% in 2018, and median non-zero annual out-of-pocket costs increased by 9.6%/yr (IQR, 4.1% to 15.4%). There was no association between changes in prices and out-of-pocket costs for individual drugs. CONCLUSIONS: From 2009 to 2018, prices and out-of-pocket costs for brand-name clinician-administered drugs increased, but these were not directly related for individual drugs. This may be due to changes to insurance benefit design and private insurer drug reimbursement rates.
RESUMO
Importance: The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) requires Medicare to negotiate prices for some high-spending drugs but exempts drugs approved solely for the treatment of a single rare disease. Objective: To estimate Medicare spending and global revenues for drugs that might have been exempt from negotiation from 2012 to 2021. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study analyzed drugs that met the IRA threshold for price negotiation (Medicare spending >$200 million/y) in any year from 2012 to 2021 and had an Orphan Drug Act designation. We stratified drugs into 4 mutually exclusive categories: approved for a single rare disease (sole orphan), approved for multiple rare diseases (multiorphan), initially approved for a rare disease and subsequently approved for a nonrare disease (orphan first), and initially approved for a nonrare disease and subsequently approved for a rare disease (non-orphan first). Outcomes: The primary outcomes were the number of sole orphan drugs, estimated Medicare spending on those drugs from 2012 to 2021, and global revenue since launch. Results: Among 282 drugs, 95 (34%) were approved to treat at least 1 rare disease, including 25 sole orphan drugs (26%), 20 multiorphan drugs (21%), 13 orphan first drugs (14%), and 37 non-orphan first drugs (39%). From 2012 to 2021, Medicare spending on sole orphan drugs increased from $3.4 billion to $10.0 billion. Each year, a median (IQR) of $2.5 ($1.9-$2.6) billion in Medicare spending would have been excluded from price negotiation because of the sole orphan exemption. The cumulative global revenue of the median (IQR) sole orphan drug was $11 ($6.6-$19.2) billion. Conclusions and Relevance: The sole orphan exemption will exclude billions of dollars of Medicare drug spending from price negotiation. The high level of global revenues achieved by these drugs, however, suggests that special exemption is unnecessary for them to achieve financial success. Congress could consider removing the sole orphan exemption to obtain additional savings for patients and taxpayers and to eliminate any potential disincentive for developing additional indications for these drugs.
Assuntos
Medicare , Produção de Droga sem Interesse Comercial , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Doenças Raras/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos Transversais , Negociação , Custos de MedicamentosRESUMO
This cross-sectional study compares price data for ocrelizumab and rituximab to estimate the savings to Medicare and Medicaid if rituximab were used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis instead of the higher-priced ocrelizumab.
Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Medicaid , Medicare , Anticorpos Monoclonais , RituximabRESUMO
As the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) navigates the process of negotiating drug prices, it plans to compare the cost, safety, and effectiveness of each drug with its therapeutic alternatives. How CMS selects therapeutic alternatives is a consequential decision, and there remains uncertainty about their methodology. To understand the challenges CMS will face in selecting therapeutic alternatives, we developed a methodology that leverages clinical guidelines by US medical professional associations to identify potential therapeutic alternatives for etanercept, one of the first 10 drugs selected for Medicare price negotiation. For each of etanercept's 5 US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications, we identified all drugs with the same mechanism of action as etanercept and considered drugs with different mechanisms if they were recommended in place of etanercept at the same treatment stage, or if there was no strong comparative safety or effectiveness evidence that the drug differed from etanercept. We identified 22 potential therapeutic alternatives to etanercept, including 4 drugs with the same mechanism, 10 biologics with different mechanisms, and 8 small-molecule drugs. We faced several challenges in selecting therapeutic alternatives using clinical guidelines, such as how to reconcile strong recommendations that were based on weak evidence and how to consider combination therapies. This exercise demonstrates the complex considerations that CMS will face as it negotiates drug prices based on therapies' cost, safety, and effectiveness relative to therapeutic alternatives.