Cancer Treatment-Related Complications in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the potential clinical cardiotoxicity of oncological treatments in a cohort of consecutive patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), systematically followed-up at two national referral centers for HCM. Cardiotoxicity relates to the direct effects of cancer-related treatment on heart function, commonly presenting as left ventricular contractile dysfunction. However, limited data are available regarding cardiotoxic effects on HCM as most studies have not specifically analyzed the effects of oncological treatment in HCM populations. This gap in knowledge may lead to unjustified restriction of HCM patients from receiving curative cancer treatments. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed clinical and instrumental data of all consecutive HCM patients who underwent oncological treatment between January 2000 and December 2020 collected in a centralized database. RESULTS: Of 3256 HCM patients, 121 (3.7%) had cancer; 110 (90.9%) underwent oncological surgery, 45 (37.2%) received chemotherapy, and 22 (18.2%) received chest radiation therapy (cRT). After a median follow-up of 5.2 years (Q1-Q3: 2-13 years) from oncological diagnosis, 32 patients died. The cumulative survival at 5 years was 79.9%. The cause of death was mainly attributed to the oncological condition, whereas four patients died of sudden cardiac death without receiving previous chemotherapy or cRT. No patient interrupted or reduced the dose of oncological treatment due to cardiac dysfunction. No sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia was induced by chemotherapy or radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: Cancer treatment was well tolerated in HCM patients. In our consecutive series, none died of cardiovascular complications induced by chemotherapy or cRT and they did not require interruption or substantial treatment tapering due to cardiovascular toxic effects. Although a multidisciplinary evaluation is necessary and regimens must be tailored individually, the diagnosis of HCM per se should not be considered a contraindication to receive optimal curative cancer treatment.

Sterotactic Ablative Radiotherapy in a Multicentric Series of Oligometastatic SCLC: The SAMOS Cohort.

AIMS: SCLC is the most aggressive lung cancer histology with a 5-year OS <10%. At the diagnosis, almost two-thirds of the SCLC an Extended Disease presentation. Two randomized studies (CASPIAN and ImPower133) demonstrated an OS improvement, when immunotherapy was prescribed as maintenance therapy after standard chemotherapy. To date, SABR has had a limited indication in managing metastatic SCLC, although recent reports proposed it as a valid treatment option in selected patients. We propose a retrospective multicentric analysis of patients treated with SABR for oligometastatic SCLC. METHOD: Data of patients affected by oligometastatic-SCLC treated with SABR between 2017 and 2022 in 11 Italian centers were collected. Clinical and therapeutic variables together with OS and time to next treatment were analyzed. Univariate analysis with Kaplan-Meier curve were calculated, and log-rank test were applied. Cox proportional hazard model was used for multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Data from 93 patients and 132 metastatic lesions were analyzed. The median age was 64 years (36-86) and all but 1 had Performance Status 0 or 1. Fifty-two patients presented ED at diagnosis. The first line treatment was radiochemotherapy in 42%, CHT alone in 24% and CHT-IO in 28%, others treatment accounts for 4% and only 2% of patients underwent best supportive care. Of the 132 lesions treated with SBRT 55 were in brain, 27 in lung, 11 in liver, 10 in lymph nodes, 8 in bones and 20 in adrenal gland. Median OS was 14 months, 1 year-OS and 2 years OS were 53% and 27%, respectively. The median TtNT was 14 months for the entire population. Of all the analyzed variables only, the anatomical site of the metastases and their number showed statistical significance in the univariate analysist, confirmed in the subsequent multivariate. CONCLUSION: SABR seems to play a role in delaying further systemic lines in oligometastatic disease and to extend the use of ongoing treatment in oligoprogressive state. Prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Impact of radiation dose on patient-reported acute taste alteration in a prospective observational study cohort in head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC).

PURPOSE: Taste alteration (TA) is a frequent acute side effect of radiation treatment in HNSCC patients. Principal aim of our study was to investigate dosimetric parameters in relation to patient-assessed taste impairment in a prospective cohort treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS: All patients with locally advanced HNSCC and amenable to radical treatment were included. Chemotherapy-induced taste alteration scale (CITAS), EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-HN43 questionnaires at baseline (T0), 3 weeks (T1) and 3 months (T2) after radiotherapy conclusion were used to assess taste impairment. Base of tongue, submandibular glands (SG), parotid glands (PG) and taste buds, along with anterior and medium third of the tongue, were considered as organs at risk and thus delineated according to consensus guidelines. The mean dose to the above-mentioned structures was correlated with patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Between September 2019 and November 2020, 33 patients were recruited, 31 of which analyzed. 71% had oropharyngeal carcinoma, mostly HPV-related (60%). All were treated with tomotherapy. 77.4% had concurrent cisplatin. Mean scores of general taste alterations, global health status and dry mouth and sticky saliva were assessed. The mean doses to the anterior third, medium third and base of the tongue were 23.85, 35.50 and 47.67 Gy, respectively. Taste buds received 32.72 Gy; right and left parotid 25 and 23 Gy; right and left submandibular glands 47.8 and 39.4 Gy. At univariate analysis, dysgeusia correlated with SG mean dose (95% CI 0-0.02 p = 0.05) and PG mean dose (95% CI 0-0.02 p = 0.05); dry mouth with mean dose to anterior (95% CI 0.03-1.47 p = 0.04) and medium third (95% CI 0.02-0.93 p = 0.04) of the tongue, to taste buds (95% CI 0.06-0.96 p = 0.03) and to SGs (95% CI 0.06-0.63 p = 0.02); pain mouth with mean dose to taste buds (95% CI 0-0.02 p = 0.04), to SGs (95% CI 0-0.03 p = 0.03) and to base tongue (95% CI 0-0.02 p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis supports the influence of dose distribution on the development of TA in HNSCC patients. The contribution of dose to taste buds and tongue subvolumes remains unclear and worthy of further investigation.