Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Profile in Renal Donors in Aguascalientes, Mexico: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: In the last decade, kidney donation has been recognized as a risk factor for end-stage renal disease (ESRD). ESRD risk calculators have been recently perfected in North American populations. In Mexico, the rates of overweight, obesity, and diabetes mellitus (DM) are among the highest worldwide; nevertheless, most kidney transplants are obtained from living donors. This study aims to describe the risk profile for chronic kidney disease (CKD) development in kidney donors in a highly active transplant center in Central Mexico. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational, descriptive cohort study of kidney donors followed at the Hospital Centenario Miguel Hidalgo (CHMH). We used the pretransplant CKD risk calculator at 15 years and over a lifetime (www.transplantmodels.com/esrdrisk). Aside from the calculator of kidney failure risk, we also used the calculator for postdonation CKD risk (www.transplantmodels.com/donesrd/). Factors associated with a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <60 mL/min were evaluated by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The study included 543 donors. The average follow-up period was 1.7 years (±2.7) with a median of 0.7 years (interquartile range, 0.2-2.1). The average predicted risk for ESRD development at 15 years was 0.08% (±0.1); 25.6% had a risk >0.1%, and only 1 patient had a risk >1%. The lifetime ESRD risk was 0.62% (±0.5); 15% had a risk >1%, and the greatest risk was 3.5%. The median of patients at risk of developing postdonation ESRD was 1 in 10,000 donors (0.6-1.5) at 5 years, 5.7 in 10,000 donors (3.5-8.8) at 10 years, 15 in 10,000 donors (9.1-23.2) at 15 years, and 31 in 10,000 donors (18.9-47.7) at 20 years. During the follow-up period, 52 patients developed a GFR of <60 mL/min. Both risk estimation formulas were significantly associated with a GFR of <60 mL/min. Among the individual factors, the GFR (hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.94-0.97, P < .001) and the urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (hazard ratio 1.009, 95% confidence interval 1.005-1.01, P < .001) remained statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The risk of ESRD in kidney donors in Aguascalientes, Mexico, is similar to that described in the United States. Risk calculators are an indispensable decision-making tool to better understand kidney donors in our milieu.

[Renal transplantation program at the Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo in Aguascalientes, Mexico]. / Programa de trasplante renal del centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo en Aguascalientes, México.

INTRODUCTION: Miguel Hidalgo Hospital in Aguascalientes is dependent from the Federal Secretary of Health and operates in integrity with State health system in Aguascalientes. It capacity is based on 132 censored beds and 71 no censored beds. Is considered a specialty hospital in the region of Bajío. Renal transplant program activity was initiated in 1990 and gives care for adult and pediatric population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective, comparative and longitudinal study to describe and analyze our experience. Data base and clinical charts of renal transplant recipients were reviewed. Age, gender, date of transplant, etiology of renal disease, type of donor, HLA compatibility and PRA, immunosuppressive therapy, acute rejection, serum creatinina, graft loss and mortality were registered. Statistical analysis included 2, unpaired Student T test and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with Log Rank test. Cox Analysis was also done. RESULTS: 1050 renal transplants were done from November 1990 to June 2011. 50 were excluded because follow-up was not longer than 3 months. 1000 consecutive renal transplant patients from January 1995 to June 2011 were included for analysis. Patients were divided in 2 groups: group A transplanted January 1995 to December 2004; group B transplanted January 2005 to June 2011. Etiology for end stage renal disease is unknown in 61% of cases, 11% developed renal disease to diabetes mellitus. 93% patient survival was observed at median follow-up and 84.9% graft survival at median follow-up (6 years). Biopsy proven acute rejection in group A 19.9 vs. 10% in group B. Two haplotype matching shows 92% graft survival. Diabetic patients exhibit 73% graft survival vs. other as hypertension (87%). PRA >0 and serum creatinine > 2.0 mg/dL increase risk for graft loss according to Cox analysis. CONCLUSION. Results are comparable to international data. Importance of developing regional transplant centers is emphasized.

[Prevalence of posttransplant hypertension in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: effect on long term allograft survival]. / Prevalencia de la hipertensión arterial postrasplante renal en receptores pediátricos: Efecto en la supervivencia del injerto a largo plazo.

BACKGROUND: Arterial hypertension after renal transplantation has been identified as an adverse factor over the long term allograft function, thus identification and treatment of this entity has an impact on graft survival, as in patient survival. Studies about pediatric receptor populations have reported a prevalence of hypertension after renal transplantation ranging from 58 to 90%. In Mexico, the pre-valence of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation has been reported as 71% for an adult population attending a main hospital center in Mexico. No pediatric receptor studies in Mexico have reported the prevalence of hypertension after renal transplantation so far. The purpose of our study was to document the prevalence of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation in pediatric receptors, as well as its impact on allograft survival on a long term basis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis among pediatric patients who underwent renal transplantation at our center, Centenario Hospital Miguel Hidalgo, between years 2000 to 2006. RESULTS: A total of 111 pediatric renal transplantation receptors were included, among whom 56 patients were classified as hypertensive (HT) and 54 patients were classified as nomotensive (NT) (one patient had to be excluded due to early allograft dysfunction). The mean age at the time of transplantation for the population under study was 14 +/- 3 years, with a predominance of male gender over females (1.5:1). In 89% of the transplantations, the source of the allograft was a living donor. The prevalence of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation in our population was 50.5%. Among patients in the HT group at least an episode of acute rejection presented in 8.9% (n=5) of the cases, compared to only 3.7% (n=2) of patients in the NT group with an episode of acute rejection. Likewise, the prevalence of chronic allograft nephropathy detected in the HT group was 11% (n=6) vs. 7% (n=4) in the NT group. The mean serum creatinine levels were 1.0 +/- 0.4 mg/dL for the HT group and 0.9 +/- 0.3 mg/dL for the NT group at the first month followup, however mean serum creatinine levels addressed at the last consult were different among groups: 1.7 +/- 1.8 mg/dL for the HT group versus 1.1 +/- 0.5 mg/dL for the NT group. Patient survival was similar for both groups (98%) and the follow-up period was also similar, being 39 +/- 12 months for the HT group and 39 +/- 17 months for the NT group. The multivariate Cox proportional hazard analysis demonstrated that the number of antihypertensive drugs needed to achieve the control of blood pressure, and the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy, were the independent risk factors associated to a graft loss at long term. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of hypertension after renal transplantation in our pediatric population was 50.5%, which is clearly towards the inferior limit of the reported prevalence in other studies (50-90%). The tight control of blood pressure is an intervention that may have a significant impact on graft survival at long term. In our study, the severity of arterial hypertension after renal transplantation represented as the number of antihypertensive drugs needed to achieve control of blood pressure, as well as the presence of chronic allograft nephropathy, were the factors associated to long term graft loss.