Phase 1 pharmacokinetic and safety study of soticlestat in participants with mild or moderate hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function.

This phase 1, open-label, three-arm study (NCT05098054) compared the pharmacokinetics and safety of soticlestat (TAK-935) in participants with hepatic impairment. Participants aged ≥18 to <75 years had moderate (Child-Pugh B) or mild (Child-Pugh A) hepatic impairment or normal hepatic function (matched to hepatic-impaired participants by sex, age, and body mass index). Soticlestat was administered as a single oral 300 mg dose. Pharmacokinetic parameters of soticlestat and its metabolites TAK-935-G (M3) and M-I were assessed and compared by group. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and other safety parameters were also monitored. The pharmacokinetic analyses comprised 35 participants. Participants with moderate hepatic impairment had lower proportions of bound and higher proportions of unbound soticlestat than participants with mild hepatic impairment and normal hepatic function. Total plasma soticlestat pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum observed concentration [Cmax], area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to time of last quantifiable concentration [AUClast], and AUC from time 0 to infinity [AUC∞]) were approximately 115%, 216%, and 199% higher with moderate and approximately 45%, 35%, and 30% higher with mild hepatic impairment, respectively, than healthy matched participants. Moderate hepatic impairment decreased the liver's ability to metabolize soticlestat to M-I; glucuronidation to M3 was also affected. Mild hepatic impairment resulted in a lower total plasma M-I exposure, but glucuronidation was unaffected. TEAEs were similar across study arms, mild, and no new safety findings were observed. A soticlestat dose reduction is required for individuals with moderate but not mild hepatic impairment.

Tolerability and Safety of Large-Volume Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 10% Administered with or without Dose Ramp-Up: A Phase 1 Study in Healthy Participants.

PURPOSE: Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG; immune globulin infusion 10% [human] with recombinant human hyaluronidase [rHuPH20]) permits high-volume subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) infusion, shorter infusion times and reduced dosing frequency relative to conventional SCIG. It is initiated by gradually increasing infusion volumes over time (dose ramp-up) to achieve target dose level (TDL). Whether ramp-up strategies have tolerability or safety advantages over direct initiation at full TDL has not been evaluated clinically. METHODS: This phase 1 open-label study assessed tolerability and safety of fSCIG 10% with accelerated or no ramp-up compared with conventional ramp-up in healthy adults (NCT04578535). Participants were assigned to one of the three ramp-up arms to achieve TDLs of 0.4 or 1.0 g/kg/infusion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of infusions completed without interruption or infusion rate reduction owing to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Safety was assessed as a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 51 participants enrolled, 50 (98.0%) tolerated all fSCIG 10% infusions initiated (n = 174). Infusion rate was reduced in one participant owing to headache in the 0.4 g/kg/infusion conventional ramp-up arm. Study discontinuations were higher in the no ramp-up arm (70%) versus the conventional (0%) and accelerated (22%) arms at the 1.0 g/kg/infusion TDL. Safety outcomes did not substantially differ between treatment arms. CONCLUSION: The favorable tolerability and safety profiles of fSCIG 10% in healthy participants support initiating treatment with fSCIG 10% with accelerated ramp-up at TDLs up to 1.0 g/kg. Data support no ramp-up at TDLs close to 0.4 g/kg but additional data are needed for higher doses.

A Phase 1 Open-Label Study to Assess the Tolerability, Safety, and Immunogenicity of Hyaluronidase-Facilitated Subcutaneous Immunoglobulin 20% in Healthy Adults.

PURPOSE: Hyaluronidase-facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin (fSCIG) 20% will allow reduced infusion volumes and frequency versus existing subcutaneous therapies such as fSCIG 10% and conventional subcutaneous immunoglobulin 20%, respectively. We assessed the tolerability, safety, and immunogenicity of warmed and unwarmed fSCIG 20%. METHODS: This phase 1, single-dose, open-label, three-arm study enrolled healthy adults aged 19-50 years (inclusive) at a single US center (NCT05059977). Post-screening, participants received a single fSCIG 20% dose comprising recombinant human hyaluronidase and varying doses of in-line warmed or unwarmed immunoglobulin G (IgG) during a 4-day treatment period in a sentinel and sequential dosing design (treatment arm 1, warmed IgG 20% 0.4 g/kg; treatment arm 2, warmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg; treatment arm 3, unwarmed IgG 20% 1.0 g/kg). Participants were followed for 12 (± 1) weeks post-infusion. The primary endpoint was tolerability ("tolerable" infusions were not interrupted, stopped, or reduced in rate owing to fSCIG 20%-related treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs)). Secondary endpoints included occurrence of TEAEs. RESULTS: Overall, 24 participants were included, 8 per treatment arm (mean age 39.0 years, 54.2% men). All participants tolerated the infusions. All TEAEs were mild (107 events, in all participants), and all participants experienced fSCIG 20%-related (105 events) and local (102 events) TEAEs. Infusion site erythema and infusion site swelling were most frequently reported. No serious TEAEs occurred, and no participants discontinued the study owing to TEAEs. CONCLUSION: fSCIG 20% was well-tolerated with a favorable safety profile in healthy adults. Future studies will evaluate fSCIG 20% in primary immunodeficiency diseases. Trial registration number (ClinicalTrials.gov): NCT05059977 (registered 28 September 2021).

A phase I, open-label, single-dose study to evaluate the effect of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics and safety of futibatinib.

Futibatinib is a covalently binding FGFR1-4 inhibitor that received US Food and Drug Administration approval for the treatment of patients with previously treated, advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene fusions/rearrangements. This phase I trial evaluated the pharmacokinetics (PKs), safety, and tolerability of futibatinib in subjects with impaired hepatic function and matched healthy volunteers. Twenty-two subjects with hepatic impairment (8 mild [Child-Pugh 5-6], 8 moderate [7-9], and 6 severe [10-15]) and 16 matched healthy control subjects received a single oral dose of futibatinib 20 mg. Futibatinib PKs were compared between subjects with mild/moderate/severe hepatic impairment and each corresponding control cohort and the overall control cohort. Relationships between futibatinib PKs and Child-Pugh scores and liver function tests were examined via scatter/regression plots. Compared with matched controls, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity increased by 21%/20%/18% and the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ) increased by 43%/15%/10% in subjects with mild/moderate/severe hepatic impairment, respectively. Changes were not considered clinically relevant: geometric mean ratios were within 80%-125%, except for Cmax in subjects with mild hepatic impairment (143%). No obvious trends were observed among futibatinib PK parameters versus Child-Pugh scores, bilirubin, albumin, international normalized ratio, and aspartate aminotransferase (all p > 0.05). Futibatinib was well-tolerated, with only four grade 1 treatment-emergent adverse events (mild hepatic impairment = 2 and control = 2). The results demonstrate that futibatinib dose adjustments due to mild/moderate/severe hepatic impairment are not necessary in patients receiving futibatinib 20 mg daily.

Bioequivalence Studies of Sildenafil Citrate Orodispersible Film Administered with and without Water vs ViagraⓇ Film-Coated Tablets in Healthy Male Volunteers.

Background: Orodispersible film (ODF) formulation offers ease of use, convenience of administration, and other advantages, especially for patients who have difficulty in swallowing or are on liquid restriction compared with conventional oral formulations for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Objectives: These studies compared the bioequivalence of 50 mg sildenafil citrate ODF formulation (test drug) with the marketed 50 mg sildenafil citrate film-coated tablet (FCT) (ViagraⓇ; Pfizer, New York, NY) (reference drug), with and without water in 2 randomized cross-over studies. Methods: Two randomized cross-over studies were conducted. The first study explored the bioequivalence of test drug administered with and without water compared with the reference drug with water. The second study investigated the bioequivalence of test drug, without water, compared with the reference drug with water. Forty-two and 80 healthy male volunteers were recruited in the first and second study, respectively. All volunteers fasted for 10 hours pre-dose. A 1-day washout period between doses was observed. Blood samples were collected at both before (up to 120 minutes before dosing) and after dosing (at different intervals up to 14 hours) stages. Statistical analyses on pharmacokinetic parameters were performed. Safety and tolerability for both the formulations were evaluated. Results: In the first study, bioequivalence was demonstrated for sildenafil citrate ODF administered with water when compared with the ViagraⓇ FCT. The ratios of adjusted geometric means (90% confidence interval (CI)) were maximum plasma concentration: 1.02 (94.91-108.78) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve: 1.09 (104.49-113.21) for sildenafil citrate ODF administered with water vs ViagraⓇ FCT. These ratios were within the bioequivalence acceptance range of 80% to 125%, indicating that the bioequivalence criteria were met. The pharmacokinetic parameters for the second study also showed bioequivalence for sildenafil citrate ODF (without water) compared with ViagraⓇ FCT. The ratios of adjusted geometric means (90% CI) were maximum plasma concentration: 1.02 (95.47-109.36) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve: 1.06 (103.42-108.40) for sildenafil citrate ODF administered without water vs ViagraⓇ FCT. Adverse events in both the studies occurred at similar rates for the 2 formulations and were mild in intensity. Conclusions: These results suggest that the new ODF formulation can be used interchangeably with the marketed FCT formulation. Sildenafil citrate ODF administered with and without water met bioequivalence criteria compared with ViagraⓇ FCT administered with water under fasted conditions in healthy adult male volunteers. The new ODF formulation can be used as a suitable alternative to the conventional oral solid dosage form.

Safety and immunogenicity of intramuscular, single-dose V590 (rVSV-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine) in healthy adults: Results from a phase 1 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging trial.

BACKGROUND: Vaccines against COVID-19 are needed to overcome challenges associated with mitigating the global pandemic. We report the safety and immunogenicity of V590, a live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus-based COVID-19 vaccine candidate. METHODS: In this placebo-controlled, double-blind, three-part phase 1 study, healthy adults were randomised to receive a single intramuscular dose of vaccine or placebo. In Part 1, younger (18-54 years) and, in Part 2, older (≥55 years) adults seronegative for SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid received one of four V590 dose levels (5.00 × 105; 2.40 × 106; 1.15 × 107; or 5.55 × 107 plaque-forming units [pfu]) or placebo. In Part 3, a single V590 dose level (5.55 × 107 pfu) or placebo was administered to younger SARS-CoV-2 seropositive adults. Primary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and for Parts 1 and 2 anti-SARS-CoV-2 serum neutralising antibody responses measured by 50% plaque reduction neutralisation (PRNT50) assay at Day 28. Registration NCT04569786 [P001-02]. FINDINGS: 232 participants were randomised and 219 completed the study. In seronegative participants, anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific antibody responses to V590 were low and comparable to placebo across the lower dose levels. At the highest dose level (5.55 × 107 pfu), anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific PRNT50 was 2.3-fold higher than placebo. The most frequently reported AEs were injection-site pain (38.4%), headache (15.1%) and fatigue (13.4%). INTERPRETATION: V590 was generally well-tolerated. However, Day 28 anti-SARS-Cov-2 spike-specific antibody responses in seronegative participants following a single intramuscular administration of V590 were not sufficient to warrant continued development. FUNDING: The study was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Effects of bimagrumab, an activin receptor type II inhibitor, on pituitary neurohormonal axes.

BACKGROUND: Bimagrumab is a human monoclonal antibody inhibitor of activin type II receptors (ActRII), with anabolic action on skeletal muscle mass by blocking binding of myostatin and other negative regulators of muscle growth. Bimagrumab is under evaluation for muscle wasting and associated functional loss in hip fracture and sarcopenia, and in obesity. Bimagrumab also blocks other endogenous ActRII ligands, such as activins, which act on the neurohormonal axes, pituitary, gonads and adrenal glands. AIM: To evaluate the effect of bimagrumab on the pituitary-gonadal and pituitary-adrenal axes in humans. METHODS: Healthy men and women, aged 55 to 75 years, received bimagrumab intravenously 10 mg/kg or placebo on Day 1 and Day 29. Pituitary-gonadal and pituitary-adrenal functions were evaluated with basal hormone measurement and standard gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation tests at baseline, Week 8 and at the end of study (EOS)-Week 20. RESULTS: At Week 8, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels were reduced by 42.16 IU/L (P < .001) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were increased by 2.5 IU/L (P = .08) over placebo in response to bimagrumab in women but not in men. Effects that were reversible after bimagrumab was cleared. Gonadal and adrenal androgen levels were not affected by exposure to bimagrumab. CONCLUSION: Bimagrumab alters the function of pituitary gonadotroph cells, consistent with blockade of activin on local ActRII. This effect is reversible with clearance of bimagrumab. Bimagrumab did not impact gonadal and adrenal androgen secretion.