Role of social comparison in preparedness for practice as a junior doctor in Singapore: a longitudinal qualitative study.

OBJECTIVES: To date, most research on medical graduates' preparedness for practice has conceptualised preparedness as something possessed by the individual. However, new doctors work within social settings with other people and, given this, we argue that preparedness has a social and comparative dimension. The aim of this paper is to explore medical students'/graduates' self-assessments of their preparedness for practice using the lens of social comparison theory. SETTING: We invited medical students from one of Singapore's three medical schools who were in their final-year Student Assistantship Programme to participate in semi-structured interviews, and follow-up interviews 6 months later when they were working as junior doctors. Data was collected from two cohorts, in 2018 and 2019. Initial analysis of interview transcripts was inductive and thematic. Social comparison theory was used for subsequent theory-driven analysis. PARTICIPANTS: 31 participants took part, of whom 21 also engaged in follow-up interviews. RESULTS: We identified three uses of social comparison: as coping strategy to manage uncertainties in transitions where there was no formal, objective testing of their performance; as a means to confirm their self-perceived preparedness (upwards or downwards, eg, being better or worse prepared than comparator others); and as the basis for decision-making (eg, changing career choices). CONCLUSIONS: Senior medical students and newly-graduated doctors compare themselves with peers and near-peers in terms of prior learning and current performance to evaluate and understand their own performance at work. Future studies need to examine further how the feeling of preparedness or unpreparedness generated from social comparisons may affect subsequent clinical performance and professional development.

Inducing System-1-type diagnostic reasoning in second-year medical students within 15 minutes.

Purpose: Diagnostic reasoning literature debates the significance of "dual-process theory" and the importance of its constituent types of thinking: System-1and System-2. This experimental study aimed to determine whether novice medical students could be trained to utilize System-1 thinking when making diagnoses based on chest X-rays. Method: Second-year medical students were recruited and presented with a series of eight online chest X-rays cases. Participants were shown half of the cases repeatedly during a training phase and the other half only twice. During the final test phase, they were shown all eight cases, providing a diagnosis as a free text answer. Dependent variables were diagnostic accuracy and response time. Results: Thirty-two students participated. During the test phase, students responses were significantly more accurate and faster for cases which had been seen repeatedly during the training phase (mean score = 3.56/4, mean time = 2.34 s) compared with cases which had been seen only twice (mean score = 1.59/4, mean time = 7.50 s). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that it is possible to induce in novice students the speed-to-diagnosis and diagnostic accuracy typical of System-1-type reasoning. The full experimental design and the chest X-rays used may provide new opportunities to explore some of the issues surrounding dual-process theory.