Personal and environmental factors and household assistance in Down syndrome: cross-sectional study.

According to a biopsychosocial framework, personal and environmental factors might be mediators or facilitators/barriers, respectively, to functioning. However, it is not known how these factors can impact independence in household chores in children/adolescents with Down syndrome (DS). This study explored whether and how personal/environmental factors are associated with the independence level in household chores of children/adolescents with DS in Brazil. Caregivers of twenty-eight children/adolescents with DS were interviewed using the CHORES and a standardized questionnaire about personal (child's age and sex) and environmental (socioeconomic level and maternal schooling) factors. Multiple linear regression analysis identified if/how these factors are associated with level of independence. For CHORES self-care and CHORES total, sex was a significant variable explaining 21.8% and 15.8%, respectively, of the variation in the outcomes. For the outcome CHORES family care none of the variables was significant. Female sex was associated with a lower need for assistance. We conclude that only the personal factor assessed related to female sex in children with DS was associated with the independence level in household chores. This finding highlights the importance of health care providers and families to encourage the independence in chores regardless of sex and promote opportunities for both boys and girls.

Relato Familiar da Motricidade Grossa: Refinamento e avaliação das propriedades psicométricas.

OBJETIVO: Refinar o Relato Familiar da Motricidade Grossa (GM­FR) utilizando a contribuição dos pais e avaliar as suas propriedades psicométricas. MÉTODO: Neste estudo metodológico, 12 pais de crianças e adolescentes com paralisia cerebral (PC), com idade entre 2 e 18 anos, classificados em todos os níveis do Sistema de Classificação da Função Motora Grossa (GMFCS), foram entrevistados sobre sua experiência na conclusão do GM­FR (validade de conteúdo). O feedback dos pais foi usado para refinar o instrumento que foi então preenchida por 146 famílias para avaliar a consistência interna, e a validade discriminativa e concorrente. 46 pais completaram o GM­FR novamente, 7 a 30 dias depois, para avaliar a confiabilidade teste­reteste. RESULTADOS: A pontuação do GM­FR, as imagens, as descrições e o número total de itens foram revisados com base no feedback dos pais. O GM­FR versão 2.0 demonstrou alta consistência interna (α de Cronbach = 0,99), ausência de efeitos piso/teto e excelente confiabilidade teste­reteste (coeficiente de correlação intraclasse = 0,99). Os escores do GM­FR discriminaram entre os níveis do GMFCS (p < 0,05) e foram fortemente correlacionados negativamente com o nível do GMFCS (r = −0,92; p < 0,001). Os escores do GM­FR correlacionaram­se de forma positiva e forte com o Gross Motor Function Measure­66 (r = 0,94; p < 0,001) e com o domínio de mobilidade do Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory ­ Computer Adaptive Test (r = 0,93; p < 0,001). INTERPRETAÇÃO: A participação ativa das famílias no desenvolvimento do GM­FR facilitou a criação de um instrumento amigável à família. Este estudo fornece fortes evidências de confiabilidade e validade para apoiar o uso do GM­FR na prática clínica e em pesquisas para avaliar o desempenho motor grosso de crianças e adolescentes com PC.

Disseminating the F-Words for Child Development to Parents of Children With Developmental Disabilities in Iran: A Qualitative Pilot Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Attitudes toward childhood disability have historically focused on biomedical efforts on 'fixing'. The introduction of WHO's ICF framework for health and Canadian researchers' 'F-words' (functioning, fitness, fun, friends, family and future) have significantly changed the field. To explore whether the F-words ideas influenced parents' perspectives on their child's abilities and rehabilitation goals, this qualitative pilot study introduced the F-words to Iranian parents with a child with a developmental disability. METHODS: This study was conducted in Tabriz, Iran, in 2023, using Iranian educational F-words materials built on ideas available on the CanChild F-words Knowledge Hub. Data were collected through semistructured interviews with five mothers of children <5 years old with a developmental disability before and after attending an 'F-words Awareness Session' and analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: In the preinterviews, six themes (and 20 subthemes) were identified: (i) routines (5); (ii) challenges (4); (iii) parental concerns (3); (iv) child's needs and priorities (3); (v) the role of parents in satisfying needs and challenges (2); and (vi) expectations of rehabilitation (3). In the postinterview, the same six themes and four additional subthemes emerged. CONCLUSION: Findings from the pilot study showed that the intervention had an impact on the attitudes and behaviours of participants. Specifically, teaching about the F-words reduced parents' emphasis on the concept of 'normality'. Families' positive response to the 'F-words Awareness Session' indicates their openness to incorporating this approach into their daily lives. These findings highlight the potential benefits of utilizing the F-words in rehabilitation in Iran. Studies like these can serve as a foundation for developing effective strategies for integrating the F-words into existing rehabilitation practices in Iran.

Perspectives in childhood-onset disabilities: integrating 21st-Century concepts to expand our horizons.

PURPOSE: A powerful aphorism states: "If I hadn't believed it, I wouldn't have seen it!" This challenging notion reminds us how strongly we are influenced by prevailing ideas, and how we interpret things according to current fashions and teachings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this paper we present and discuss contemporary perspectives concerning childhood-onset disability and the evolving nature of how people are thinking and acting. We illustrate these ideas by reminding readers of how we have all traditionally been trained and acculturated to think about many dimensions of neurodevelopmental disability ("What?"); reflect on the impact of these ways of thinking in terms of what we have conventionally "seen" and done ("So What?"); and contrast those traditions with contemporary concepts that we believe or know impact the field ("Now What?"). RESULTS: Many of the concepts discussed here will be familiar to readers. In taking this analytically critical perspective we aim to illustrate that by weaving these individual threads together we are able to create a coherent fabric that can serve children with childhood-onset NDD, their families, service providers, the community, and policy-makers. We do not purport to offer a comprehensive view of the whole field. CONCLUSIONS: We encourage readers to consider the integration of these new ways of thinking and acting in our still-evolving field of "childhood-onset disability".

21st-century thinking about childhood-onset neurodisability builds on WHO's ICF framework for health, expanding well beyond traditional primary biomedical foci on diagnosis and management and toward a focus on functioning and belonging.New emphases put family at the centre, attending to family voices and prioritizing family wellbeing as targets for intervention equal to a focus on the child.There is strong emerging evidence to support the value and impact of these broader approaches on overall family functioning and wellbeing.These developments are primarily conceptual rather than technical: they emphasize child and family development, parenting, promotion of functioning, and a life-course approach from the start of intervention.

Examining the impact and implementation of the ENabling VISions And Growing Expectations (ENVISAGE) program in Croatia: a discourse analysis pilot study.

PURPOSE: To explore the impact of the online ENVISAGE program for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) on parents' perception of themself, their child with a disability, and their family, as well as to explore experiences of participating in the program in Croatia. METHODS: In this before-after discourse analysis study, participants took part in the five-week ENVISAGE program. There were two semi-structured interviews for each participant: within one month before and after participating in the program. The proportions of positive, neutral, and negative sentences about themself, their child, and their family from two interviews were compared on an individual and group level. The perceived changes and experiences with the program were also analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: Data from thirteen participants were included. From the three pre-determined discourse categories (self, child, and family), most changes were observed in parents' perception of self (average increase in positive views of 8.8% and decrease in negative of 5.3%). Qualitative results showed multiple positive self-perceived impacts on parents' lives. Participants' experiences with ENVISAGE were consistently positive; all believed they benefited from the program. CONCLUSIONS: The results support our assumption that participation in ENVISAGE positively affects multiple areas of life, particularly parents' views of themself.

ENVISAGE is an online, 5-week empowerment program for parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities that was tested for the first time in Croatia in this study.Results show that ENVISAGE mostly led to the improvements in the perception of self and their child with a disability.For all parents, ENVISAGE was a positive experience and a program they would recommend to other parents.

Gross Motor Family Report: Refinement and evaluation of psychometric properties.

AIM: To refine the Gross Motor Family Report (GM-FR) using parents' input and to evaluate its psychometric properties. METHOD: In this measurement study, 12 parents of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), aged 2 to 18 years, classified in all levels of the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), were interviewed about their experience completing the GM-FR (content validity). Parents' feedback was used to refine the measure which was then completed by 146 families to evaluate internal consistency, and discriminative and concurrent validity. Forty-six parents completed the GM-FR again, 7 to 30 days later, to evaluate test-retest reliability. RESULTS: GM-FR scoring, pictures, descriptions, and the total number of items were revised based on parents' feedback. The GM-FR version 2.0 demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.99), no floor/ceiling effects, and excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.99). GM-FR scores discriminated between GMFCS levels (p < 0.05) and were strongly negatively correlated with GMFCS level (r = -0.92; p < 0.001). GM-FR scores correlated positively and strongly with the Gross Motor Function Measure-66 (r = 0.94; p < 0.001) and the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory - Computer Adaptive Test mobility domain (r = 0.93; p < 0.001). INTERPRETATION: Active participation of families in the GM-FR's development facilitated creation of a family-friendly instrument. This study provides strong evidence of reliability and validity to support GM-FR use in clinical practice and research for assessing gross motor performance of children and adolescents with CP.

Looking beyond Body Structure and Function: ICF Foci and Who Is Being Assessed in Research about Adolescents and Young Adults with Cerebral Palsy-A Scoping Review.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to summarize the ICF foci, looking beyond body structures and function, and to analyze who has been assessed in research about adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with CP in the phase of transition to adulthood. METHOD: Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases were searched using terms related to cerebral palsy, adolescents/young adults, health development, participation, and independence. Studies including youth with CP (13-30 years old) published in English from 2014 to 2021 were considered. The methods of assessment reported in the included studies were used to identify the ICF foci and who was assessed. RESULTS: In this study, 86 studies were reviewed. The main ICF foci are activity and participation (51% of the studies), personal factors (23%), ICF not covered (14%), ICF not defined (9%), with environmental factors being the least focused ICF component (3%). Most studies assessed AYAs directly (49% of studies). CONCLUSIONS: Activity- and participation-related constructs are the leading research focus of studies, and more attention is needed concerning environmental factors. AYAs are the main source of information, and the perspectives of other key figures are also being valued. To bridge the gap between child and adult health care, a broader view of health development and approaches to explore AYA developmental issues must be taken.

Illuminating their reality: the use of metaphor by parents of children with disabilities to express their experiences of health care.

PURPOSE: To explore the nature and meaning of metaphors used by parents of children with disabilities when describing their healthcare experiences. METHOD: A systematic procedure was used to identify and analyze metaphors spontaneously mentioned by parents in 13 focus groups held with 65 Canadian parents of children with disabilities. Attention was paid to identifying deep (i.e., meaningful) metaphors rather than common expressions. RESULTS: A total of 214 deep metaphors were identified and categorized into four target-source groupings. Parents used journey metaphors to describe experiences of uncertainty, conflict and harm metaphors to describe confrontational, harmful, and demeaning experiences of care, games and puzzles to describe the unknowns of care and attempts to resolve these unknowns, and metaphors concerning environmental barriers (i.e., walls and doors) to express feelings of exclusion and difficulties accessing care. CONCLUSIONS: Parents' metaphors expressed experiences of uncertainty, powerlessness, and attempts to exert agency in healthcare interactions. The metaphorical groupings provide new insights into how and why lack of family-centeredness in service delivery is bewildering, distressing, and disempowering to parents. Implications for service providers include paying attention to what metaphor use reveals about parents' experiences, and discussing parents' metaphors with them to create joint understanding, providing a fertile ground for collaboration.

Study findings indicated a clear lack of family-centeredness in gaining access to services, communicating with service providers and being listened to, and in decision-making power.Given that many service providers believe they are family-centered, the strong negative connotations of the metaphors used by parents are surprising and worrisome.Parents' use of metaphors not only reflects a lack of family-centered care, but indicates that parents experience unintentional harm in their interactions with service providers.Service providers can benefit from knowing the fundamental issues of uncertainty and power that underlie parents' use of metaphors to communicate vividly the tensions and issues they face.

The Pediatric Autism Research Cohort (PARC) Study: protocol for a patient-oriented prospective study examining trajectories of functioning in children with autism.

INTRODUCTION: The developmentally variable nature of autism poses challenges in providing timely services tailored to a child's needs. Despite a recent focus on longitudinal research, priority-setting initiatives with stakeholders highlighted the importance of studying a child's day-to-day functioning and social determinants of health to inform clinical care. To address this, we are conducting a pragmatic multi-site, patient-oriented longitudinal investigation: the Pediatric Autism Research Cohort (PARC) Study. In young children (<7 years of age) newly diagnosed with autism, we will: (1) examine variability in trajectories of adaptive functioning from the point of diagnosis into transition to school; and (2) identify factors associated with trajectories of adaptive functioning. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to recruit 1300 children under 7 years of age with a recent (within 12 months) diagnosis of autism from seven sites: six in Canada; one in Israel. Participants will be followed prospectively from diagnosis to age 8 years, with assessments at 6-month intervals. Parents/caregivers will complete questionnaires administered via a customized online research portal. Following each assessment timepoint, families will receive a research summary report describing their child's progress on adaptive functioning and related domains. Analysis of the longitudinal data will map trajectories and examine child, family and service characteristics associated with chronogeneity (interindividual and intraindividual heterogeneity over time) and possible trajectory turning points around sensitive periods like the transition to school. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approvals have been received by all sites. All parents/respondents will provide informed consent when enrolling in the study. Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, where stakeholders are directly engaged in the research process, the PARC Study will identify factors associated with trajectories of functioning in children with autism. Resulting evidence will be shared with government policy makers to inform provincial and national programs. Findings will be disseminated at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Family-centered service through the eyes of insiders: Healthcare providers who are parents speak about receiving and providing healthcare in child health.

BACKGROUND: When healthcare providers (HCPs) become patients, the experience affects their sense of identity, the care they receive, and their clinical practice. In child health, considerably less is known about the experiences of HCP-parents who access the pediatric healthcare system with their own children with disabilities and/or chronic medical conditions. AIMS: This study aimed to examine the experiences of HCPs who have children with disabilities to identify their experiences with healthcare delivery. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with HCP-parents, using focus groups and open-ended interviews. Data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: For HCP-parents, the experience of having a child with a disability affects how they see themselves, their patients, service organizations, and the healthcare system in general. Having medical knowledge and access to networks brings both benefits and unique challenges. HCP-parents also have unique needs that are not currently being addressed. The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute to improving patient care. However, the value of this lived experience is unrecognized and underutilized. CONCLUSIONS: The lived experiences of HCP-parents can contribute important insights regarding service delivery, and in particular regarding the application of Family-Centered Service.

"From All, To All": Implementing a collaborative online conference to reflect on the daily living of individuals with cerebral palsy.

BACKGROUND: Translating knowledge to improve paediatric rehabilitation has become a research area of interest. This study describes the development and evaluation of an online conference that brought together perspectives of individuals with cerebral palsy (CP), families, health care professionals, and researchers to discuss the daily living of individuals with CP. METHODS: We anchored the development and implementation of the online conference in the action cycle of the Knowledge to Action Framework. To develop the meeting, we included representatives from each stakeholder group in the programme committee. The conference programme was designed having the lifespan perspective of individuals with CP, from birth to adulthood, as its central core, with themes related to daily living (e.g., self-care, mobility, and continuing education). Participants' satisfaction with the conference was assessed using an anonymized online survey sent to all participants. RESULTS: The conference had 1656 attendees, of whom 675 answered the online satisfaction survey. Most participants rated the structure of the conference (i.e., quality of the technical support, audio and video, and online platform) and discussed topics (i.e., relevance, content, discussion, speakers, and available time) positively. CONCLUSION: Collaborative conferences that include stakeholders throughout the planning and implementation are a viable, effective knowledge translation strategy that allows for sharing experiences and disseminating knowledge among families and individuals with CP, health care professionals, and researchers.

Tasks performed by parents to enable telepractice for children with communication disorders: an interview study with clinicians and parents.

PURPOSE: Current service models in childhood rehabilitation promote the active participation of parents/caregivers in their children's therapies. The existing literature provides a limited understanding of the tasks and responsibilities parents undertake in their children's therapies, especially over telepractice. This study describes the tasks undertaken by parents in their children's speech therapy delivered virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with parents and speech-language pathologists, using open-ended interviews. Interviews were analyzed using a combination qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Parents performed many tasks to enable telepractice. These tasks happened before (e.g., setting up both physical and virtual space for therapy), during (e.g., managing child's behavior), and after the virtual therapy session (e.g., carrying out home practice). While parents were willing to perform these tasks in order to help their children, some expressed the toll that it can take on them. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to what is known from in-person visits, some of these tasks were novel and unique to telepractice. We recommend that clinicians and parents collaboratively decide on tasks and responsibilities to avoid burdening parents, and that they weigh the costs associated with performing these tasks against the benefits of teletherapy.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONParents perform many tasks to support their children's therapies, both during and outside of therapy sessionsTherapies delivered virtually require parents to assume additional tasks to support their childrenFor services to be Family-Centered, tasks and responsibilities need to be decided collaboratively between parents and clinicians.

Changing Directions and Expanding Horizons: Moving towards More Inclusive Healthcare for Parents of Children with Developmental Disabilities.

Family-centred service (FCS) acknowledges the importance of family engagement in therapeutic processes and focuses on the needs of all family members. This way of thinking and practicing is becoming increasingly recognized as an optimal care delivery model for families of children with developmental disabilities (DDs). However, in most places, disability services are oftentimes 'child-centric', wherein family members are seen only as partners in therapy or care delivery, while their own needs are not addressed. This arises from the lack of awareness of complex and highly individual family needs by professionals with whom they interact, but also from a significant lack of service infrastructure oriented towards parent-specific needs in existing service delivery models. This concept paper highlights the known challenges associated with parenting a child with a DD and discusses the intersectionality of factors impacting parental health and well-being, with a goal of promoting more equitable, holistic, and inclusive healthcare for all family members of children with DDs.

What do parents want from healthcare services? Reports of parents' experiences with pediatric service delivery for their children with disabilities.

PURPOSE: Family-centred service (FCS) is an established approach for delivering services in children's rehabilitation and healthcare. This article describes that parents continue to report mixed experiences with healthcare services for their children, as well as their ideas about what they need and want from these services. These findings will inform the development of an up-to-date measure of Family-Centred Service called Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC 2.0). METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted with parents, using focus groups and open-ended interviews. Data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Parents want care that is individualized, co-ordinated, easily accessible, and takes into account the entire family dynamic. They want service providers (SPs) to be informed and invested in their child's care, and to provide parents with practical assistance. They also want to be treated with respect, caring and empathy, and to work together with SPs on the care plan. Novel components of care not identified in the original FCS guiding principles include: responsiveness to needs and mental health; effective communication (vs information giving); practical support (in addition to emotional and informational support); and availability and scheduling. CONCLUSIONS: This article identifies components of healthcare that families find helpful and desirable.Implications for RehabilitationFamily-centred service (FCS) is an established approach for delivering services in children's rehabilitation and healthcare.However, parents continue to experiences aspects of care that are not family-centred.Parents of children with disabilities identified components of care that they want from healthcare services.New components of care that go beyond what was identified in the original measure of FCS (MPOC) include: effective communication (vs information giving); practical support (in addition to emotional and informational support); and availability and scheduling.

Development of the Gross Motor Function Family Report (GMF-FR) for Children with Cerebral Palsy.

Purpose: To describe the initial steps in the development of a family-completed, modified version of the Gross Motor Function Measure (GMFM-88) to report gross motor function of young people with cerebral palsy in their natural environments. Methods: Development of the Gross Motor Function - Family Report (GMF-FR) was based on expert opinion involving 13 experienced clinicians and researchers, in four steps: (1) item identification to target items that reflect functional gross motor performance; (2) item selection; (3) critical analysis of the items; and (4) item and scoring modification. Results: Several modifications to existing items and scoring were made, including wording changes to optimize ease of families' understanding, the addition of photographs to illustrate all items, changes to the items to enable use of furniture instead of specialized equipment, and modifications to scoring criteria to ensure a focus on functional motor skills. Ultimately, 30 items were selected, and specific testing/scoring instructions were created for each item. Conclusions: GMF-FR is a new family-report tool, based on the GMFM-88. When validated, it can be used as a telehealth outcome measure to capture family-reported functional motor skill performance in home and community environments.

Objectif : décrire les premières étapes de l'élaboration d'une version modifiée de la mesure de la fonction motrice globale (GMFM-88) remplie par la famille pour rendre compte de la fonction motrice globale des jeunes ayant la paralysie cérébrale dans leur environnement naturel. Méthodologie : l'élaboration de l'outil de fonction motrice globale ­ rapport familial (GMF-FR), qui repose sur l'avis d'experts ­ soit 13 cliniciens et chercheurs d'expérience ­, s'est déclinée en quatre étapes : 1) détermination des points, pour cibler ceux qui reflète le rendement de la fonction motrice globale; 2) sélection des points; 3) analyse critique des points et 4) modifications aux points et aux scores. Résultats : les experts ont apporté plusieurs modifications aux points et aux scores en place, y compris de la reformulation pour que les familles comprennent plus facilement, l'ajout de photos pour illustrer tous les points, des changements aux points pour utiliser des meubles plutôt que du matériel spécialisé et la modification des critères des scores afin de se concentrer sur les habiletés motrices fonctionnelles. Au bout du compte, les experts ont retenu 30 points, chacun étant assorti de directives précises sur le test et le score. Conclusions : La mesure GMF-FR est un nouvel outil de déclaration par la famille, inspiré du GMFM-88. Une fois validé, il peut être utilisé comme mesure de résultats en télésanté, afin de saisir le rendement des habiletés motrices fonctionnelles à la maison et dans les environnements communautaires.

Patients and Families as Partners in Patient-Oriented Research: How Should They Be Compensated?

Patient and family engagement has become a widely accepted approach in health care research. We recognize that research conducted in partnership with people with relevant lived experience can substantially improve the quality of that research and lead to meaningful outcomes. Despite the benefits of patient-researcher collaboration, research teams sometimes face challenges in answering the questions of how patient and family research partners should be compensated, due to the limited guidance and lack of infrastructure for acknowledging partner contributions. In this paper, we present some of the resources that might help teams to navigate conversations about compensation with their patient and family partners and report how existing resources can be leveraged to compensate patient and family partners fairly and appropriately. We also present some of our first-hand experiences with patient and family compensation and offer suggestions for research leaders, agencies, and organizations so that the health care stakeholders can collectively move toward more equitable recognition of patient and family partners in research.