Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab for the treatment of severe asthma in a real-life French multi-centre adult cohort.

BACKGROUND: Dupilumab is a monoclonal anti-IL-4Rα antibody developed for the treatment of severe asthma (SA). An early access programme for dupilumab was opened in France in SA patients experiencing unacceptable steroids side-effects and/or life-threatening exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: To assess changes in asthma control between baseline and 12 months of treatment. METHODS: Multi-centre (n = 13) retrospective real-life cohort study. This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04022447). RESULTS: Overall, 64 patients with SA (median age 51, interquartile range [44-61]; 53% females) received dupilumab as add-on therapy to maximal standard of care; and 76% were on oral daily steroids at baseline. After 12 months, median asthma control test score improved from 14 [7-16] to 22 [17-24] (P < .001); median forced expiratory volume in 1 seconds increased from 58% [47-75] to 68% [58-88] (P = .001); and daily prednisone dose was reduced from 20 [10-30] to 5 [0-7] mg/d (P < .001). Annual exacerbations decreased from 4 [2-7] to 1 [0-2] (P < .001). Hypereosinophilia ≥1500/mm3 was observed at least once during follow-up in 16 patients (25%), persisting after 6 months in 8 (14%) of them. Increase in blood eosinophil count did not modify the clinical response during the study period. Injection-site reaction was the most common side effect (14%). Three deaths were observed, none related to treatment by investigators. CONCLUSION & CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In this first real-life cohort study of predominantly steroid-dependent SA, dupilumab significantly improved asthma control and lung function and reduced oral steroids use and exacerbations rate. Despite limitations due to the retrospective study, these results are consistent with controlled trials efficacy data. Further studies are required to assess the clinical significance and long-term prognosis of sustained dupilumab-induced hypereosinophilia.

Routine administration of a single dose of cisplatin ≥ 75 mg/m2 after short hydration in an outpatient lung-cancer clinic.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is a pivotal drug in combined chemotherapy for non-small cell and small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC or SCLC), but its renal toxicity limits its use. Current guidelines recommend 24 h hydration: thus hospitalization is required. The aim of this retrospective study was to confirm the safety of short hydration before giving an intermediate-to-high dose of cisplatin in an outpatient clinic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients eligible had NSCLC or SCLC and were being treated with a chemotherapy regimen that included cisplatin ≥ 75 mg/m(2). They were given the same short hydration protocol for 1 day. Nephrotoxicity was defined as ≥ grade 1 according to NCIC common toxicity criteria. Predictive factors for nephrotoxicity were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients (median age 58 years, range: 25-81) were reviewed. Twenty-one patients (6%) had ≥ grade 1 nephrotoxicity and all except one had grade 1 toxicity according to NCIC criteria for common toxicity (SC < 1,5 N). Predictive factors independently associated with nephrotoxicity included associated co-morbid conditions (hypertension, diabetes, heart disease) (OR = 4.97 CI 95% [1.8-13.7] P = 0.002), initial serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (OR = 8.3 CI 95% [2.55-27.4] P = 0.0005), and dose cycle of cisplatin ≥ 100 mg/m(2) (OR = 10.8 CI 95% [3.6-32.5] P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Rapid outpatient administration of a single dose of cisplatin at ≥ 75 mg/m(2) is feasible without a high risk of nephrotoxicity.

Management of acute asthma exacerbations by general practitioners: a cross-sectional observational survey.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) have a central place in the management of asthma, particularly in the context of acute exacerbations. AIM: To evaluate the management of asthma exacerbations by GPs, and to investigate the ability of risk factors for near fatal asthma to predict the severity of asthma attacks in the community. DESIGN OF STUDY: A 1-month multicentre cross-sectional survey. SETTING: One thousand and ninety-four GPs of the French Sentinel Network were contacted; 365 responded. METHOD: Asthma exacerbations were classified according to severity at presentation. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by logistic regression to identify those factors associated with severe exacerbations. RESULTS: Exacerbations were described in 219 patients with asthma. Over half (54%) of exacerbations were severe. Peak expiratory flow was recorded during the consultation in 55% of patients who were more than 5 years old. beta(2) agonists were prescribed to 93% of patients, systemic corticosteroids to 71%, and antibiotics to 64%. Only 42% of patients had a written action plan for self-management of exacerbations. Risk factors for near fatal asthma, identified in 26% of patients, were not significantly associated with severe asthma exacerbations. Short duration of exacerbation before consultation (<3 hours) was associated with an increase in relative risk of severe exacerbation of 3.38, 95% confidence intervals (CIs) = 1.19 to 9.61, compared with duration of >3 hours. CONCLUSION: Risk factors for near fatal asthma identified in previous studies were not predictive of a severe exacerbation in general practice, with the exception of short duration of exacerbation before consultation. This suggests that new methods to predict risk in the outpatient settings should be developed.