Follow-up and symptom persistence after esophageal food impaction.

Esophageal food impactions (EFI) are associated with esophageal pathology, most commonly eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Obtaining biopsies provides opportunity for diagnosis, which is important since treatment of EoE decreases the risk for future EFI. Outpatient follow-up rates remain suboptimal and outcomes of patients without timely follow-up are unknown. We aimed to identify the factors associated with pediatric subspecialty follow-up post-EFI and to determine the symptom burden in patients without follow-up. We performed a retrospective review of patients presenting with EFI at a tertiary children's hospital between 2010 and 2018. Patients without subspecialty follow-up within 1 year of EFI were included in a prospective telephone survey investigating the barriers to care, outcomes, and symptoms. Clinical characteristics were compared between groups. Multivariate analysis was used to control for multiple variables. There were 127 EFI identified in 123 individuals (73% male, mean age: 12.2 years). Esophageal biopsies were collected in 76% of cases, and 49% of patients had follow-up. Individuals with follow-up were more likely (P ≤ 0.05) to have had biopsies. In a multivariate analysis, written recommendation for follow-up (Odds Ratio: 6.9 [2.4-19.5], P = 0.001) as well as atopic history and identified stricture were associated with a higher likelihood of follow-up. Those without follow-up had subsequent stricture (35%), dilation (44%), or EFI (39%), and 55% (12/22) described ongoing esophageal symptoms. Identification of treatable findings at time of EFI and ongoing symptom burden after EFI support an imperative for follow-up after EFI. Clear recommendations are a modifiable factor that may improve follow-up in this population.

Quality Improvement Initiative to Improve Endoscopic Reassessment of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

The eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is a validated system for description, recognition, and reporting of EoE findings during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). This scoring system correlates with esophageal eosinophilia and therapeutic responses and has validated diagnostic accuracy with good inter- and intraobserver reliability in pediatric and adult patients. In this study, we aimed to improve physician education on and documentation of EREFS and correlate EREFS scoring with eosinophil density on histology. Methods: Applying the "Plan, Do, Study, Act" methodology for quality improvement between October 2018 and November 2019, we established a baseline rate of EREFS completion by review of the electronic medical record (EMR). Key drivers were identified, and 3 interventions were implemented. Results: Over 12 months, 542 distinct endoscopies were performed on 410 patients for EoE surveillance. Patients were 68% male with a mean age of 10.9 years (SD 5.7 years), mean EREFS score of 2.14 (SD 1.88), and mean peak eosinophil count 30.9 eos/hpf (SD 37.1 eos/hpf). Baseline EREFS completion rate of 72.7% (90% CI, 67.4-77.4). Following all 3 PDSA cycles, EREFS completion rate significantly improved to greater than desired target of 90% (94.9%; 90% CI, 90.6-97.6; P < 0.001). Conclusion: Interventions including provider education and the inclusion of EREFS in documentation templates can increase adoption rates of EREFS among providers caring for patients with known EoE.

Implementation of a Timed Barium Esophagram Protocol for Assessment of Esophageal Function in Children.

OBJECTIVES: Timed barium esophagram (TBE) is a fluoroscopic study that is widely employed as an adjunctive tool for diagnosing esophageal emptying disorders in adults (eg, achalasia, esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction [EGJOO]) and for following response to treatment. We aimed to describe the characteristics and feasibility of a pediatric TBE protocol and provide a first report of the potential value of TBE for assessment of esophageal emptying in the pediatric population. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of pediatric patients at a tertiary pediatric hospital who underwent TBE from October 2017 to October 2019. Patient and test characteristics were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results from patients who had both TBE and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) were used to generate ROC curves for TBE to identify esophageal emptying disorders. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients underwent 25 TBE. Fourteen of 23 (61%) received 150 mL barium volume per protocol. Nearly half (42%) of subjects could tolerate ingesting barium within 20 seconds. Nine individuals underwent HRM. The sensitivity of standard adult TBE criteria (1 cm barium column height at 5 minutes) to detect emptying disorder was 100%, specificity 40%. A modified diagnostic cutoff (1.6 cm height at 5 minutes) offered 100% sensitivity, 80% specificity. CONCLUSIONS: TBE is feasible and should be considered an adjunctive noninvasive screen for impaired esophageal emptying in children. There was heterogeneous adherence to protocol for timing and volume of barium; however, studies remained interpretable. This population may benefit from different diagnostic cutoffs than adults, and clinical judgment should be used until specific diagnostic cutoffs are determined in children.

Patterns of arthritis medication use in a community sample.

BACKGROUND: Although arthritis is disabling, highly prevalent, and often treated without health professional input, little is known about the treatments selected by affected individuals. Such information is important because of the toxicity associated with some arthritis treatments. OBJECTIVE: To describe the pattern of drug treatment use in a sample of persons with arthritis. METHOD: The authors distributed an 11-item survey to veterans attending veterans' organization post meetings in southeastern Wisconsin during November and December 2009. Of 32 posts, 26 (81%) returned surveys from 446 persons; survey count and attendance figures suggest that the majority of attendees completed surveys at participating posts. Most respondents were older (75% aged 60 years or older) men (90%). Respondents with arthritis reported whether they had used each of seven drug therapies in the past year. RESULTS: Almost all members of participating posts responded to the survey, increasing the likelihood that this was a representative sample. Most respondents (290 of 446, 65%) reported having arthritis, which impaired function in 78.6% of them. Most of those with arthritis (252 of 290, 86.9%) had used at least one drug treatment for arthritis in the last year. Acetaminophen use (41.0%) and use of an over-the-counter nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (42.1%) were common. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use did not decrease with older age or increase with greater functional impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Self-medication for arthritis is common and often does not follow clinical guidelines. Efforts to improve the quality of osteoarthritis care that focus solely on health care providers are unlikely to ensure optimal osteoarthritis care.