Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization via dose modifying factor modeling for FLASH effective dose.

BACKGROUND: Although the FLASH radiotherapy (FLASH) can improve the sparing of organs-at-risk (OAR) via the FLASH effect, it is generally a tradeoff between the physical dose coverage and the biological FLASH coverage, for which the concept of FLASH effective dose (FED) is needed to quantify the net improvement of FLASH, compared to the conventional radiotherapy (CONV). PURPOSE: This work will develop the first-of-its-kind treatment planning method called simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization via dose modifying factor modeling (SDDRO-DMF) for proton FLASH that directly optimizes FED. METHODS: SDDRO-DMF models and optimizes FED using FLASH dose modifying factor (DMF) models, which can be classified into two categories: (1) the phenomenological model of the FLASH effect, such as the FLASH effectiveness model (FEM); (2) the mechanistic model of the FLASH radiobiology, such as the radiolytic oxygen depletion (ROD) model. The general framework of SDDRO-DMF will be developed, with specific DMF models using FEM and ROD, as a demonstration of general applicability of SDDRO-DMF for proton FLASH via transmission beams (TB) or Bragg peaks (BP) with single-field or multi-field irradiation. The FLASH dose rate is modeled as pencil beam scanning dose rate. The solution algorithm for solving the inverse optimization problem of SDDRO-DMF is based on iterative convex relaxation method. RESULTS: SDDRO-DMF is validated in comparison with IMPT and a state-of-the-art method called SDDRO, with demonstrated efficacy and improvement for reducing the high dose and the high-dose volume for OAR in terms of FED. For example, in a SBRT lung case of the dose-limiting factor that the max dose of brachial plexus should be no more than 26 Gy, only SDDRO-DMF met this max dose constraint; moreover, SDDRO-DMF completely eliminated the high-dose (V70%) volume to zero for CTV10mm (a high-dose region as a 10 mm ring expansion of CTV). CONCLUSION: We have proposed a new proton FLASH optimization method called SDDRO-DMF that directly optimizes FED using phenomenological or mechanistic models of DMF, and have demonstrated the efficacy of SDDO-DMF in reducing the high-dose volume or/and the high-dose value for OAR, compared to IMPT and a state-of-the-art method SDDRO.

Beam angle optimization for proton therapy via group-sparsity based angle generation method.

BACKGROUND: In treatment planning, beam angle optimization (BAO) refers to the selection of a subset with a given number of beam angles from all available angles that provides the best plan quality. BAO is a NP-hard combinatorial problem. Although exhaustive search (ES) can exactly solve BAO by exploring all possible combinations, ES is very time-consuming and practically infeasible. PURPOSE: To the best of our knowledge, (1) no optimization method has been demonstrated that can provide the exact solution to BAO, and (2) no study has validated an optimization method for solving BAO by benchmarking with the optimal BAO solution (e.g., via ES), both of which will be addressed by this work. METHODS: This work considers BAO for proton therapy, for example, the selection of 2-4 beam angles for IMPT. The optimal BAO solution is obtained via ES and serves as the ground truth. A new BAO algorithm, namely angle generation (AG) method, is proposed, and demonstrated to provide nearly-exact solutions for BAO in reference to the ES solution. AG iteratively optimizes the angular set via group-sparsity (GS) regularization, until the planning objective does not decrease further. RESULTS: Since GS alone can also solve BAO, AG was validated and compared with GS for 2-angle brain, 3-angle lung, and 4-angle brain cases, in reference to the optimal BAO solutions obtained by ES: the AG solution had the rank (1/276, 1/2024, 4/10 626), while the GS solution had the rank (42/276, 279/2024, 4328/10 626). CONCLUSIONS: A new BAO algorithm called AG is proposed and shown to provide substantially improved accuracy for BAO from current methods with nearly-exact solutions to BAO, in reference to the ground truth of optimal BAO solution via ES.

Simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization (SDDRO) of the FLASH effect for pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy.

PURPOSE: Compared to CONV-RT (with conventional dose rate), FLASH-RT (with ultra-high dose rate) can provide biological dose sparing for organs-at-risk (OARs) via the so-called FLASH effect, in addition to physical dose sparing. However, the FLASH effect only occurs, when both dose and dose rate meet certain minimum thresholds. This work will develop a simultaneous dose and dose rate optimization (SDDRO) method accounting for both FLASH dose and dose rate constraints during treatment planning for pencil-beam-scanning proton therapy. METHODS: SDDRO optimizes the FLASH effect (specific to FLASH-RT) as well as the dose distribution (similar to CONV-RT). The nonlinear dose rate constraint is linearized, and the reformulated optimization problem is efficiently solved via iterative convex relaxation powered by alternating direction method of multipliers. To resolve and quantify the generic tradeoff of FLASH-RT between FLASH and dose optimization, we propose the use of FLASH effective dose based on dose modifying factor (DMF) owing to the FLASH effect. RESULTS: FLASH-RT via transmission beams (TB) (IMPT-TB or SDDRO) and CONV-RT via Bragg peaks (BP) (IMPT-BP) were evaluated for clinical prostate, lung, head-and-neck (HN), and brain cases. Despite the use of TB, which is generally suboptimal to BP for normal tissue sparing, FLASH-RT via SDDRO considerably reduced FLASH effective dose for high-dose OAR adjacent to the target. For example, in the lung SBRT case, the max esophageal dose constraint 27 Gy was only met by SDDRO (24.8 Gy), compared to IMPT-BP (35.3 Gy) or IMPT-TB (36.6 Gy); in the brain SRS case, the brain constraint V12Gy≤15cc was also only met by SDDRO (13.7cc), compared to IMPT-BP (43.9cc) or IMPT-TB (18.4cc). In addition, SDDRO substantially improved the FLASH coverage from IMPT-TB, e.g., an increase from 37.2% to 67.1% for lung, from 39.1% to 58.3% for prostate, from 65.4% to 82.1% for HN, from 50.8% to 73.3% for the brain. CONCLUSIONS: Both FLASH dose and dose rate constraints are incorporated into SDDRO for FLASH-RT that jointly optimizes the FLASH effect and physical dose distribution. FLASH effective dose via FLASH DMF is introduced to reconcile the tradeoff between physical dose sparing and FLASH sparing, and quantify the net effective gain from CONV-RT to FLASH-RT.

An adaptive spot placement method on Cartesian grid for pencil beam scanning proton therapy.

Pencil beam scanning proton radiotherapy (RT) offers flexible proton spot placement near treatment targets for delivering tumoricidal radiation dose to tumor targets while sparing organs-at-risk. Currently the spot placement is mostly based on a non-adaptive sampling (NS) strategy on a Cartesian grid. However, the spot density or spacing during NS is a constant for the Cartesian grid that is independent of the geometry of tumor targets, and thus can be suboptimal in terms of plan quality (e.g. target dose conformality) and delivery efficiency (e.g. number of spots). This work develops an adaptive sampling (AS) spot placement method on the Cartesian grid that fully accounts for the geometry of tumor targets. Compared with NS, AS places (1) a relatively fine grid of spots at the boundary of tumor targets to account for the geometry of tumor targets and treatment uncertainties (setup and range uncertainty) for improving dose conformality, and (2) a relatively coarse grid of spots in the interior of tumor targets to reduce the number of spots for improving delivery efficiency and robustness to the minimum-minitor-unit (MMU) constraint. The results demonstrate that (1) AS achieved comparable plan quality with NS for regular MMU and substantially improved plan quality from NS for large MMU, using merely about 10% of spots from NS, where AS was derived from the same Cartesian grid as NS; (2) on the other hand, with similar number of spots, AS had better plan quality than NS consistently for regular and large MMU.

Pulmonary dose tolerance in hemithorax radiotherapy for Ewing sarcoma of the chest wall: Are we overestimating the risk of radiation pneumonitis?

BACKGROUND: Children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma with malignant pulmonary effusion or pleural stranding require hemithorax radiation, often with plans that exceed lung constraints. We investigated disease control and pneumonitis in children requiring hemithorax radiation. PROCEDURE: Eleven children (median age 13 years) received hemithorax radiotherapy. Symptomatic radiation pneumonitis was considered National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1+ with respiratory symptoms. Mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung exposed to a dose ≥5 Gy (V5), ≥20 Gy (V20), and ≥35 Gy (V35) were recorded. Adult and pediatric lung constraints were obtained from Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) guidelines and Children's Oncology Group (COG) protocols, respectively. RESULTS: Median hemithorax dose was 15 Gy (1.5 Gy/fraction). Median total dose was 51 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction). Most plans delivered both protons and photons. The ipsilateral MLD, V5, and V20 were 27.2 Gy, 100%, and 48.3%; the bilateral MLD, V20, and V35 were 14.1 Gy, 22.8%, and 14.3%, respectively. One hundred percent, 36%, and 91% of treatments exceeded recommended adult ipsilateral lung constraints of V5 <65%, V20 <52%, and MLD of 22 Gy; 64%, 45%, and 82% exceeded COG bilateral lung constraints of V20 <20%, MLD <15 Gy, and MLD <12 Gy, respectively; 82% of treatments exceeded the COG ipsilateral lung constraint of V20 <30%. At a median 36 months (range 12-129), the symptomatic radiation pneumonitis incidence was 0%. Two patients progressed with nonpulmonary metastatic disease and died at a median 12 months following radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Existing guidelines may overestimate pneumonitis risk, even among young children receiving multiagent chemotherapy. For children with chest wall Ewing sarcoma and other thoracic malignancies, more data are needed to refine pediatric dose-effect models for pulmonary toxicity.

Clinical Outcomes Following Dose-Escalated Proton Therapy for Skull-Base Chordoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of external-beam proton therapy (PT) on local control and survival in patients with skull-base chordoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of patients with skull-base chordoma treated with definitive or adjuvant high-dose PT and updated their follow-up when feasible. We assessed overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and freedom from distant metastasis. Radiotherapy toxicities were scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: A total 112 patients were analyzed, of whom 105 (94%) received PT and 7 (6%) received combined proton-photon therapy between 2007 and 2019. Eighty-seven patients (78%) underwent a subtotal resection, 22 (20%) a gross total resection, and 3 (3%) a biopsy alone. The median radiotherapy dose was 73.8 Gy radiobiologic equivalent (GyRBE; range, 69.6-74.4). Ninety patients (80%) had gross disease at radiotherapy and 7 (6%) were treated for locally recurrent disease following surgery. Median follow-up was 4.4 years (range, 0.4-12.6); for living patients, it was 4.6 years (range, 0.4-12.6), and for deceased patients, 4.1 years (range, 1.2-11.2). At 5 years after radiotherapy, the actuarial overall survival, disease-specific survival, local control, and freedom from distant metastasis rates were 78% (n = 87), 83% (n = 93), 74% (n = 83), and 99% (n = 111), respectively. The median time to local progression was 2.4 years (range, 0.8-7). Local control and disease-specific survival by resection status was 95% versus 70% (P = 0.28) and 100% versus 80% (P = 0.06) for gross total, versus subtotal, resection or biopsy alone, respectively. There were no serious acute toxicities (grade ≥ 3) related to radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: High-dose PT alone or after surgical resection for skull-base chordoma reaffirms the favorable 5-year actuarial local control rate compared with conventional techniques with acceptable late-complication-free survival. Outcomes following gross total resection and adjuvant PT were excellent. Further follow-up of this cohort is necessary to better characterize long-term disease control and late toxicities.

Proton therapy for adult medulloblastoma: Acute toxicity and disease control outcomes.

PURPOSE: We report disease control, survival outcomes, and treatment-related toxicity among adult medulloblastoma patients who received proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) as part of multimodality therapy. METHODS: We reviewed 20 adults with medulloblastoma (≥ 22 years old) who received postoperative proton CSI ± chemotherapy between 2008 and 2020. Patient, disease, and treatment details and prospectively obtained patient-reported acute CSI toxicities were collected. Acute hematologic data were analyzed. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 27 years; 45% of patients had high-risk disease; 75% received chemotherapy, most (65%) after CSI. Eight (40%) patients received concurrent vincristine with radiotherapy. Median CSI dose was 36GyE with a median tumor bed boost of 54GyE. Median duration of radiotherapy was 44 days. No acute ≥ grade 3 gastrointestinal or hematologic toxicities attributable to CSI occurred. Grade 2 nausea and vomiting affected 25% and 5% of patients, respectively, while 36% developed acute grade 2 hematologic toxicity (36% grade 2 leukopenia and 7% grade 2 neutropenia). Those receiving concurrent chemotherapy with CSI had a 38% rate of grade 2 hematologic toxicity compared to 33% among those not receiving concurrent chemotherapy. Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 13), 100% completed ≥ 4 cycles and 85% completed all planned cycles. With a median follow-up of 3.1 years, 4-year actuarial local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 90%, 90%, and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Proton CSI in adult medulloblastoma patients is very well tolerated and shows promising disease control and survival outcomes. These data support the standard use of proton CSI for adult medulloblastoma.

Proton radiotherapy for infant rhabdomyosarcoma: Rethinking young age as an adverse prognostic factor.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: In infants with rhabdomyosarcoma, young age is considered an adverse prognostic factor and treatment is often attenuated to reduce side effects. Proton therapy may improve the therapeutic ratio in these patients. We report outcomes in infants with rhabdomyosarcoma treated with proton therapy. MATERIALS & METHODS: Between 2009 and 2019, 37 infants <24 months old with non-metastatic rhabdomyosarcoma received proton therapy. Local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier product limit. The log-rank test assessed significance between selected prognostic factors. Toxicity was graded per CTCAEv5.0. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 5.1 years. Overall, 76% of patients had an unfavorable primary site. Median dose was 50.4GyRBE. At 5 years, LC, PFS, and OS rates were 83%, 78%, and 83%. On univariate analysis, 5-year LC and OS were inferior for favorable versus unfavorable disease sites (67% vs 89%, 67% vs 89%, respectively; p < .05) and 5-year OS was superior in stage 3 versus stage 1-2 disease (91% vs 69%; p = .05), owing to inclusion of nasal ala patients among stage 1. Of 9 recurrences, 7 were in-field, 4 occurring in infants with nasal ala primaries. Recategorizing nasal ala as an unfavorable site resulted in 100% 5-year LC and OS for favorable sites. Six infants experienced late grade 3 toxicity. None developed grade 4 or 5 late toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: Young age alone may not be an adverse prognostic factor provided infants receive local therapy similar to older children. Consideration should be given to classifying nasal ala primaries as an unfavorable site.

Second tumor risk in children treated with proton therapy.

BACKGROUND: Out-of-field neutron dissemination during double-scattered proton therapy has raised concerns of increased second malignancies, disproportionally affecting pediatric patients due to the proportion of body exposed to scatter dose and inherent radiosensitivity of developing tissue. We sought to provide empiric data on the incidence of early second tumors. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2019, 1713 consecutive children underwent double-scattered proton therapy. Median age at treatment was 9.1 years; 371 were ≤3 years old. Thirty-seven patients (2.2%) had tumor predisposition syndromes. Median prescription dose was 54 Gy (range 15-75.6). Median follow-up was 3.3 years (range 0.1-12.8), including 6587 total person-years. Five hundred forty-nine patients had ≥5 years of follow-up. A second tumor was defined as any solid neoplasm throughout the body. RESULTS: Eleven patients developed second tumors; the 5- and 10-year cumulative incidences were 0.8% (95% CI, 0.4-1.9%) and 3.1% (95% CI, 1.5-6.2%), respectively. Using age- and gender-specific data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, the standardized incidence ratio was 13.5; the absolute excess risk was 1.5/1000 person-years. All but one patient who developed second tumors were irradiated at ≤5 years old (p < .0005). There was also a statistically significant correlation between patients with tumor predisposition syndromes and second tumors (p < .0001). Excluding patients with tumor predisposition syndromes, 5- and 10-year rates were 0.6% (95% CI, 0.2-1.7%) and 1.7% (95% CI, 0.7-4.0%), respectively, with all five malignant second tumors occurring in the high-dose region. CONCLUSION: Second tumors are rare within the decade following double-scattered proton therapy, particularly among children irradiated at >5 years old and those without tumor predisposition syndrome.

Vision loss following high-dose proton-based radiotherapy for skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma.

BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: Dose escalation for skull-based chordoma and chondrosarcoma can put critical adjacent structures at risk, specifically the anterior optic pathway. We report the incidence of vision loss following high-dose conformal proton-based radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed patients with skull-base chordoma or chondrosarcoma treated with proton-based therapy between 2007 and 2018. We analyzed 148 patients and 283 individual eyes with functional vision at baseline who received a minimum 30GyRBE to 0.1 cm3 of the anterior optic pathway. Eyes were classified as "functionally blind" if visual acuity was 20/200 or worse. Kaplan-Meier and normal tissue complication probability modeling were used to establish the relationship between radiation dose and risk of functional vision loss. RESULTS: At last follow-up, 110 of 148 patients were alive with no evidence of disease progression. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (range, 0.5-12.8), 5 eyes in 3 patients developed functional blindness, with 2 patients developing bilateral blindness. Median time to blindness was 15.2 months. The 5-year incidence of vision loss was 2.1% (95% CI: 0.9-4.9%). On univariate analysis, development of blindness was associated with presence of multiple medical comorbidities (p = 0.0040). While there were no events with a maximum dose < 60GyRBE delivered to the anterior optic pathway, the crude rate was 3.6% over 60GyRBE, with all events occurring between 60-65GyRBE. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the high radiotherapy dose delivered to patients with skull-base chordoma and chondrosarcoma, the rate of vision loss is low and no events occurred in those who received a maximum dose under 60GyRBE.

Local Control After Proton Therapy for Pediatric Chordoma.

PURPOSE: Due to the location and high dose required for disease control, pediatric chordomas are theoretically well-suited for treatment with proton therapy, but their low incidence limits the clinical outcome data available in the literature. We sought to report the efficacy and toxicity of proton therapy among a single-institution cohort. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 2008 and 2019, 29 patients with a median age of 14.8 years (range, 3.8-21.8) received passive-scattered proton therapy for nonmetastatic chordoma. No patient received prior irradiation. Twenty-four tumors arose in the clivus/cervical spine region and 5 in the lumbosacral spine. Twenty-six tumors demonstrated classic well-differentiated histology and 3 were dedifferentiated or not otherwise specified. Approximately half of the tumors underwent specialized testing: 14 were brachyury-positive and 10 retained INI-1. Three patients had locally recurrent tumors after surgery alone (n = 2) or surgery + chemotherapy (n = 1), and 17 patients had gross disease at the time of radiation. The median radiation dose was 73.8 Gy relative biological effectivness (range, 69-75.6). RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.3 years (range, 1.0-10.7), the 5-year estimates of local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 85%, 82%, and 86%, respectively. No disease progression was observed beyond 3 years. Excluding 3 patients with dedifferentiated/not-otherwise-specified chordoma, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 92%, 92%, and 91%, respectively. Serious toxicities included 3 patients with hardware failure or related infection requiring revision surgery, 2 patients with hormone deficiency, and 2 patients with Eustachian tube dysfunction causing chronic otitis media. No patient experienced brain stem injury, myelopathy, vision loss, or hearing loss after radiation. CONCLUSIONS: In pediatric patients with chordoma, proton therapy is associated with a low risk of serious toxicity and high efficacy, particularly in well-differentiated tumors. Complete resection may be unnecessary for local control, and destabilizing operations requiring instrumentation may result in additional complications after therapy.

Visual decline in pediatric survivors of brain tumors following radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy-related visual decline is a significant concern in survivors of childhood cancer; however, data establishing the dose-response relationship between dose to the optic apparatus and visual acuity decline in children are sparse. We aimed to determine this relationship in a cohort of children treated with proton therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified 458 children with 875 eyes at risk treated with proton therapy for intracranial malignancy between December 2006 and September 2018. Eyes were considered at risk if either the ipsilateral optic nerve or optic chiasm received ≥30 GyRBE to 0.1 cm3. Kaplan-Meier and Normal Tissue Complication Probability modeling was used to establish the relationship between radiotherapy dose and risk of visual decline. RESULTS: Excluding children with tumor progression, no patient experienced complete vision loss. The actuarial 5-year rate of any visual acuity decline was 2.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5%-4.6%). The dose to 0.1 cm3 of the ipsilateral optic nerve or optic chiasm resulting in a 1%, 5%, and 10% risk of acuity decline were 52.7 GyRBE, 56.6 GyRBE, and 58.3 GyRBE. Visual decline was only seen in children with primary tumors of the optic pathway or suprasellar region. CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity decline following radiotherapy for intracranial malignancies in children is rare. A dose of approximately 56 GyRBE to 0.1 cm3 results in an approximately 5% risk of visual acuity decline for children with suprasellar or optic pathway tumors. A dose to 0.1 cm3 of 56 GyRBE appears to be safe for children with tumors elsewhere in the brain.

Treatment Outcomes After Proton Therapy for Ewing Sarcoma of the Pelvis.

PURPOSE: Ewing sarcoma of the pelvis is associated with inferior local control compared with those arising from other primary sites. Despite its increased use, outcome data for treatment with proton therapy remain limited. We report 3-year disease control and toxicity in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-five patients aged ≤21 years (median, 14 years) with nonmetastatic pelvic Ewing sarcoma received proton therapy and chemotherapy between 2010 and 2018. Overall survival and tumor control rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. A log-rank test assessed significance between strata of prognostic factors. Significant toxicity was reported per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0. RESULTS: Most patients received definitive radiation (n = 26; median dose 55.8 Gy relative biological effectiveness [RBE]; range, 54.0-64.8), 7 received preoperative radiation (50.4 Gy RBE), and 2 received postoperative radiation (45 Gy RBE and 54 Gy RBE). The median primary tumor size was 10.5 cm. With a median follow-up of 3 years (range, 0.3-9.0 years), the 3-year overall survival, progression-free survival, and local control rates were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65%-93%), 64% (95% CI, 45%-79%), and 92% (95% CI, 74%-98%), respectively. There was no association between local control, progression-free survival, or overall survival and tumor size, patient age, radiation dose, or definitive versus pre-/postoperative radiation therapy. Median time to progression was 1 year (range, 0.1-1.9 years). All patients with large tumors (≥8 cm) who underwent definitive proton therapy with a higher dose (≥59.4 Gy RBE) remained free from tumor recurrence (n = 5). Five patients experienced grade ≥2 subacute/late toxicity, all of whom were treated with combined surgery and radiation. CONCLUSIONS: Definitive proton therapy offers local control comparable to photon therapy in pediatric patients with pelvic Ewing sarcoma. These data lend preliminary support to radiation dose escalation without significant toxicity, which may contribute to the favorable outcomes. Combined surgery and radiation therapy, particularly preoperative radiation, is associated with postoperative complications, but not survival, compared with radiation alone.

Clinical outcomes following proton therapy for adult craniopharyngioma: a single-institution cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Craniopharyngioma is a benign tumor that commonly develops within the suprasellar region. The tumor and treatment can have debilitating consequences for pediatric and adult patients, including vision loss and pituitary/hypothalamic dysfunction. Most craniopharyngioma series focus on treatment of the pediatric population. We evaluated the outcomes of all adult craniopharyngioma patients treated at our institution using proton therapy to report outcomes for disease control, treatment-related toxicity, and tumor response. METHODS: We analyzed 14 adult patients (≥ 22 years old). All patients had gross disease at the time of radiotherapy. Five were treated for de novo disease and 9 for recurrent disease. Patients received double-scattered conformal proton therapy to a mean dose of 54 GyRBE in 1.8 GyRBE/fraction (range 52.2-54 GyRBE). Weekly magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helped to evaluate tumor changes during radiotherapy. RESULTS: With median clinical and radiographic follow-up of 29 and 26 months, respectively, the 3-year local control and overall survival rates were both 100%. There were no grade 3 or greater acute or late radiotherapy-related side effects. There was no radiotherapy-related vision loss or optic neuropathy. No patients required intervention or treatment replanning due to tumor changes during radiotherapy. Two patients experienced transient cyst expansion at their first post-radiotherapy MRI. Both patients were followed closely clinically and radiographically and had subsequent dramatic tumor/cyst regression, requiring no interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Our data support the safety and efficacy of proton therapy in the treatment of adult craniopharyngioma as part of primary or salvage treatment. We recommend early consideration of radiotherapy. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03224767.

Outcomes Following Proton Therapy for Group III Pelvic Rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report on the institutional outcomes after proton therapy for pelvic rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Thirty-one children (≤21 years old) with group III pelvic RMS were enrolled on a prospective outcome study and treated between 2007 and 2018. Patients with vaginal/cervical RMS were excluded. The median age was 2.6 years. Twenty-four patients had embryonal RMS. At diagnosis, the median tumor volume was 185 cm3 and the median maximum diameter was 9.4 cm. Seven patients had N1 disease. Nineteen and 12 patients received European Pediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group- and Children's Oncology Group-based chemotherapy, respectively. Fourteen patients underwent resection of the primary tumor after induction chemotherapy, including 6 patients who had a total cystectomy. The median radiation dose was 50.4 Gy relative biological effectiveness. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 4.2 years, the 5-year local control, progression-free survival, and overall survival rates were 83%, 80%, and 84%, respectively. Patients <3 years old had better local control (100% vs 68%; P = .02), and patients with embryonal histology had better survival (96% vs 54%; P = .02). No other factors were significantly associated with disease control or survival. Specifically, no statistically significant difference was observed in local control, progression-free survival, or overall survival when comparing patients who underwent biopsy versus gross total resection (75% vs 93%, 68% vs 93%, 75% vs 93%, respectively). Excluding patients who underwent cystectomy, urinary toxicity was limited to 2 patients with nocturnal enuresis. Exploratory surgery to address a persistent mass or thickened bladder wall after radiation was the most common source of serious toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This cohort of young children with large pelvic tumors treated with proton therapy demonstrates similar local control with less toxicity than historic reports. Functional bladder preservation is possible in most patients. Exploratory biopsy in the 18 months after radiation should be approached with caution.

Outcomes following proton therapy for Ewing sarcoma of the cranium and skull base.

PURPOSE: Despite the dosimetric advantages of proton therapy, little data exist on patients who receive proton therapy for Ewing sarcoma of the cranium and skull base. This study reports local disease control and toxicity in such patients. MATERIALS/METHODS: We reviewed 25 patients (≤21 years old) with nonmetastatic Ewing sarcoma of the cranium and skull base treated between 2008 and 2018. Treatment toxicity was graded per the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0. The Kaplan-Meier product limit method provided estimates of disease control and survival. RESULTS: Median patient age was 5.9 years (range, 1-21.7). Tumor subsites included the skull base (48%), non-skull-base calvarial bones (28%), paranasal sinuses (20%), and nasal cavity (4%). All patients underwent multiagent alkylator- and anthracycline-based chemotherapy; 16% underwent gross total resection (GTR) before radiation. Clinical target volume (CTV) 1 received 45 GyRBE and CTV2 received 50.4 GyRBE following GTR or 54-55.8 GyRBE following biopsy or subtotal resection. Median follow-up was 3.7 years (range, 0.26-8.3); no patients were lost. The 4-year local control, disease-free survival, and overall survival rates were 96%, 86%, and 92%, respectively. Two patients experienced in-field recurrences. One patient experienced bilateral conductive hearing loss requiring aids, two patients developed intracranial vasculopathy, and 6 patients required hormone replacement therapy for neuroendocrine deficits. None developed a secondary malignancy. CONCLUSION: Proton therapy is associated with a favorable therapeutic ratio in children with large Ewing tumors of the cranium and skull base. Despite its high conformality, we observed excellent local control and no marginal recurrences. Treatment dosimetry predicts limited long-term neurocognitive and neuroendocrine side effects.

Dose-Effect Analysis of Early Changes in Orbital Bone Morphology After Radiation Therapy for Rhabdomyosarcoma.

PURPOSE: In survivors of orbital embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS), late effects include facial deformation and asymmetry. We sought to quantify orbital asymmetry in ERMS survivors and characterize the dose effect of radiation to the orbital bones. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We evaluated the most recent follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 17 children (≤21 years old) with stage 1 group III orbital ERMS treated with proton therapy between 2007 and 2018. For all patients, the orbital socket volumes were calculated and compared with the contralateral, unirradiated orbital socket. Patient age, orbital tumor quadrant, and the radiation dose delivered to the major orbital bones (maxillary, frontal, and zygomatic bones) were recorded and correlated with the orbital socket volume difference. RESULTS: The mean age at diagnosis was 5.4 years old (range, 1.1-9.7 years). All patients received a prescription dose of 45 GyRBE. The mean time interval between radiation and MRI was 2.9 years (range, 0.8-3.2 years). The mean age at most recent MRI was 8.4 years (range, 2.3-12.9 years). In 16 of 17 patients, the volume of the ipsilateral orbit was significantly smaller than the contralateral orbit on follow-up MRI (P ≤ .0001). In one patient with nonviable tumor in situ, the irradiated orbit was larger. The volume difference increased with follow-up time and did not correlate with age at treatment or age at MRI. A dose >40 GyRBE to all bones of the orbital rim was associated with a significant decrease in orbital volume (P < .05), but an isolated dose of >40 GyRBE to either the frontal, maxillary, or zygomatic bone was not. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the dosimetric precision of proton therapy, orbital asymmetry will develop after >40 GyRBE to multiple bones of the orbital rim. These data may be used to guide treatment planning and counsel patients on expected cosmesis.

Multidisciplinary Imaging Review Conference Improves Neuro-oncology Radiation Treatment Planning and Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To review the impact of a weekly multidisciplinary neuroradiology imaging review on the management of patients undergoing radiotherapy. METHODS: A prospective study of the management of 118 patients (30=head and neck, 40=skull base, central nervous system=48) was conducted over a 12-month period from January 2018 through January 2019. After review of each patient's history and relevant imaging, a radiation oncologist completed a form detailing the changes that were made in diagnosis and management. Imaging source (external and internal examinations), availability of outside reports, report timeliness, the value of reports, changes in interpretation, changes in clinical management, and changes in prognosis were documented. Changes in interpretation and management were designated as major or minor depending on the significance of the change. The managing radiation oncologist indicated whether the imaging review conference substituted for a peer-to-peer consultation with a neuroradiologist. RESULTS: Nearly half (47%) of all patients had a change in interpretation. Of those, 32% of patients had a major change in interpretation, while 14% had a minor change in interpretation. The existence of the multidisciplinary imaging review conference prevented a peer-to-peer consultation (interruption) by the radiation oncologists to the neuroradiologists in 90% of the cases presented. Further analysis was performed. CONCLUSION: The involvement of neuroradiologists in a joint radiation oncology imaging review conference resulted in changes in diagnostic imaging interpretation that led to significant changes in management, expected prognosis, and workflow.