RESUMO
Introduction: Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is the most frequently used neuromodulation treatment for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy (DRE) patients. Complications of VNS surgery include surgical site infection and unilateral vocal cord paresis. Complication rates vary across studies. Research question: What is the safety profile of VNS related surgeries? Materials and methods: Retrospective cohort study using patient files of DRE-patients who had undergone primary implantation of a VNS-system, replacement of the VNS pulse generator, replacement of the lead, replacement of both pulse generator and lead, or VNS removal surgery in the Maastricht UMC+. Multiple Imputation was used for missing data. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed to analyze possible risk factors, in case of a small sample size, an independent-samples t-test and Fisher's exact test or Pearson's X2-test were used. The complication rate was calculated as percentage. Results: This study included a total of 606 VNS surgical procedures, leading to 67 complications of which 3 permanent complications. Complication rate after primary implantation was 13.4%; 2,5% for pulse generator replacement; 21.4% for lead revision and 27.3% for complete VNS removal. No statistically significant results were found when analyzing the results of adults and children <18 years separately. Discussion and conclusion: Complication rates of VNS-related surgeries in our own institutional series are low and comparable to previously reported series. VNS surgery is a relatively safe procedure. The complication rate differs per type of surgery and mean surgery duration was longer for patients with complications after lead revision surgery compared to patients without complications.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: The development of post-stroke epilepsy (PSE) is related to a worse clinical outcome in stroke patients. Adding a biomarker to the clinical diagnostic process for the prediction of PSE may help to establish targeted and personalized treatment for high-risk patients, which could lead to improved patient outcomes. We assessed the added value of a risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment by conducting an early Health Technology Assessment. METHODS: Interviews were conducted with four relevant stakeholders in the field of PSE to obtain a realistic view of the current healthcare and their opinions on the potential value of a PSE risk assessment and subsequent targeted treatment. The consequences on quality of life and costs of current care of a hypothetical care pathway with perfect risk assessment were modeled based on information from a literature review and the input from the stakeholders. Subsequently, the maximum added value (the headroom) was calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of this result to variation in assumed input parameters, i.e. the accuracy of the risk assessment, the efficacy of anti-seizure medication (ASM), and the probability of patients expected to develop PSE. RESULTS: All stakeholders considered the addition of a predictive biomarker for the risk assessment of PSE to be of value. The headroom amounted to 12,983. The sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the headroom remained beneficial when varying the accuracy of the risk assessment, the ASM efficacy, and the number of patients expected to develop PSE. DISCUSSION: We showed that a risk assessment for PSE development is potentially valuable. This work demonstrates that it is worthwhile to undertake clinical studies to evaluate biomarkers for the prediction of patients at high risk for PSE and to assess the value of targeted prophylactic treatment.