Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros








Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Medicina (B Aires) ; 84(4): 764-768, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39172579

RESUMO

Neurosarcoidosis (NS) is a rare subtype of sarcoidosis with a poor prognosis and diverse clinical presentations that often poses a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. We describe the case of a 53-year-old male with an initial diagnosis of lingual sarcoidosis, who subsequently developed ataxia and rapidly progressive cognitive impairment. A lumbar puncture revealed hypoglycorrhachia, hyperproteinorrachia, lymphocytic pleocytosis, and elevated IL-6 levels (600 pg/ml). Cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry showed an elevated CD4 lymphocyte concentration and a CD4+/CD8+ ratio of 3.91, indicative of NS. Brain MRI showed hyperintense periventricular and subcortical lesions on FLAIR/T2 resembling progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), although negative PCR for JC virus ruled out the differential diagnosis. Following a favorable evolutionary course with corticosteroid pulses, the patient relapsed with normotensive hydrocephalus, treated with immunosuppressants and ventriculoperitoneal shunting with a good response to date. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a high index of suspicion for NS in individuals with sarcoidosis and neurologic symptoms. In these cases, cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers such as IL-6 and CD4+/CD8+ ratio are essential to guide the diagnosis. Furthermore, it highlights that hydrocephalus is a rare complication and requires a multidisciplinary approach, including medical and neurosurgical treatment.


La neurosarcoidosis es un subtipo raro de sarcoidosis con mal pronóstico y diversas presentaciones clínicas que a menudo plantea un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. Describimos el caso de un varón de 53 años con diagnóstico inicial de sarcoidosis lingual, que posteriormente desarrolló ataxia y deterioro cognitivo de rápida evolución. Una punción lumbar reveló hipoglucorraquia, hiperproteinorraquia, pleocitosis linfocítica y niveles elevados de IL-6 (600 pg/ml). La citometría de flujo del líquido cefalorraquídeo mostró una concentración elevada de linfocitos CD4 y un cociente CD4+/CD8+ de 3.91, indicativo de neurosarcoidosis. La RM cerebral evidenció lesiones hiperintensas periventriculares y subcorticales en FLAIR/T2 que se asemejaban a una leucoencefalopatía multifocal progresiva (LMP), aunque la PCR negativa para el virus JC descartó el diagnóstico diferencial. Tras un curso evolutivo favorable con pulsos de corticoides, el paciente recayó con hidrocefalia normotensiva, tratada con inmunosupresores y derivación ventriculoperitoneal con buena respuesta hasta la fecha. Este caso subraya la importancia de mantener un alto índice de sospecha de neurosarcoidosis en individuos con sarcoidosis y síntomas neurológicos. En estos casos, los biomarcadores del líquido cefalorraquídeo tales como la IL-6 y el cociente CD4+/CD8+ son esenciales para orientar el diagnóstico. Además, destaca que la hidrocefalia es una complicación poco frecuente y requiere un abordaje multidisciplinario, que incluya tratamiento médico y neuroquirúrgico.


Assuntos
Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central , Demência , Hidrocefalia de Pressão Normal , Sarcoidose , Humanos , Masculino , Sarcoidose/complicações , Sarcoidose/diagnóstico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Hidrocefalia de Pressão Normal/diagnóstico , Hidrocefalia de Pressão Normal/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Central/complicações , Demência/etiologia , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Progressão da Doença , Diagnóstico Diferencial
2.
BMJ Glob Health ; 9(4)2024 04 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649182

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic affected all WHO member states. We compared and contrasted the COVID-19 treatment guidelines of each member state with the WHO COVID-19 therapeutic guidelines. METHODS: Ministries of Health or accessed National Infectious Disease websites and other relevant bodies and experts were contacted to obtain national guidelines (NGs) for COVID-19 treatment. NGs were included only if they delineated specific pharmacological treatments for COVID-19, which were stratified by disease severity. We conducted a retrospective review using the adapted Reporting Checklist for Public Versions of Guidelines (RIGHT-PVG) survey checklist and a derived comparative metric based on the WHO guidelines was performed. RESULTS: COVID-19 therapeutics NGs could be obtained from 109 of the 194 WHO member states. There was considerable variation in guidelines and in disease severity stratifications. Therapeutic recommendations in many NGs differed substantially from the WHO guidelines. Overall in late 2022, 93% of NGs were recommending at least one treatment which had proved to be ineffective in large randomised trials, and was not recommended by WHO. Corticosteroids were not recommended in severe disease in nearly 10% of NGs despite overwhelming evidence of their benefit. NGs from countries with low-resource settings showed the greatest divergence when stratified by gross domestic product per year, Human Development Index and the Global Health Security Index. DISCUSSION: Our study is limited to NGs that were readily accessible, and it does not reflect the availability of recommended medicines in the field. Three years after the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, available COVID-19 NGs vary substantially in their therapeutic recommendations, often differ from the WHO guidelines, and commonly recommend ineffective, unaffordable or unavailable medicines.


Assuntos
Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , SARS-CoV-2 , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Pandemias , Saúde Global
3.
Front Cardiovasc Med ; 10: 1161914, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37260949

RESUMO

Many studies found that increased arterial stiffness is significantly associated with the presence and progression of Coronary Calcium Score (CCS). However, none so far have used machine learning algorithms to improve their value. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the association between carotid-femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (cfPWV) and CCS score through computational clustering. We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using data from a cardiovascular risk screening program that included 377 participants. We used an unsupervised clustering algorithm using age, weight, height, blood pressure, heart rate, and cfPWV as input variables. Differences between cluster groups were analyzed through Chi-square and T-student tests. The association between (i) cfPWV and age groups, (ii) log (CCS) and age groups, and (iii) cfPWV and log(CCS) were addressed through linear regression analysis. Clusters were labeled post hoc based on cardiovascular risk. A "higher-risk group" had significantly higher left (0.76 vs. 0.70 mm, P < 0.001) and right (0.71 vs. 0.66 mm, P = 0.003) intima-media thickness, CCS (42 vs. 4 Agatston units, P = 0.012), and ascending (3.40 vs. 3.20 cm, P < 0.001) and descending (2.60 vs. 2.37 cm, P < 0.001) aorta diameters. Association with age appeared linear for cfPWV and exponential for log (CCS). The progression of the log (CCS) and cfPWV through age groups was steeper in the "higher-risk group" than in the "lower-risk group". cfPWV strongly correlated with CCS, and CCS progression over cfPWV differed among clusters. This finding could improve PWV as a "gate-keeper" of CCS testing and potentially enhance cardiovascular risk stratification.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA