Meta-analysis of immediate complete vs staged complete revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel disease.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown varying results between immediate and staged complete percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and multivessel disease (MVD). We conducted a meta-analysis to reconcile the findings. METHODS: Online databases were searched for RCTs comparing immediate vs staged complete PCI in patients presenting with ACS. The outcomes of interest were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all cause death, myocardial infarction (MI), cardiovascular death, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR), cerebrovascular events, bleeding and acute kidney injury (AKI)/contrast induced nephropathy (CIN). Risk ratios (RR) with 95 % confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the random-effects model. RESULTS: Nine RCTs with a total of 3637 patients - 1821 in the immediate PCI group and 1816 in the staged PCI group, were included. The mean age was 64 years, 78 % of patients were men and the mean duration of follow up was 1 year. As compared with staged complete PCI, the immediate PCI group was associated with significant reduction of MI (RR 0.53, 95 % CI 0.36-0.77) and TVR (RR 0.69, 95 % CI 0.53-0.90). The risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death, MACE, cerebrovascular events, stent thrombosis, bleeding and AKI/CIN were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In ACS patients selected for complete revascularization strategy, multivessel PCI during the index procedure may be associated with significant reduction in the risk of MI and TVR without harm when compared with a staged PCI strategy.

Oxygen Targets After Cardiac Arrest: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

BACKGROUND: Optimal oxygen saturation target in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest is unknown. Previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing restrictive oxygen therapy with liberal therapy have shown conflicting results. STUDY QUESTION: We performed a meta-analysis of available RCTs to consolidate the contrasting findings regarding the oxygen targets after cardiac arrest. DATA SOURCES: We searched electronic databases for RCTs comparing restrictive versus liberal oxygen targets in patients resuscitated after cardiac arrest. STUDY DESIGN: End points of interest were mortality, unfavorable neurological outcomes, and rearrests. Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to estimate the risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Eight RCTs with 1641 patients (restrictive n = 833, liberal n = 808) were included in the analysis. The oxygen targets were defined by either saturation, partial pressure (PaO2), or supplementation rates. The mean age and male percentage were 63 years and 80%, respectively. There was no significant difference observed in the 2 groups for overall mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.75-1.10, P = 0.33), unfavorable neurological outcomes (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.74-1.18, P = 0.56), and rearrests (RR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.22-1.98, P = 0.47). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this meta-analysis shows no significant difference in mortality, unfavorable neurological outcomes, and rearrests when using restrictive or liberal oxygen targets in patients after cardiac arrest. The limitations in the newer trials should be kept in mind while interpreting the overall results.

Renal denervation in hypertension: An updated meta-analysis of the randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Radiofrequency or ultrasound renal denervation (RDN) has shown conflicting results when used as an adjunctive option for hypertension management in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). METHODS: We searched Pubmed, MEDLINE, and other online databases for RCTs comparing RDN versus sham-control procedures in patients with uncontrolled or resistant hypertension. The endpoints of interest were 24-h ambulatory (AMB) blood pressure (BP), daytime AMB BP, and office BP. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis using the inverse variance method to estimate mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: Nine studies with 1643 patients were included in the final analysis. The mean follow-up was 5 months. As compared with the sham-controlled group, RDN was associated with a significant decrease in 24-h AMB BP (systolic [MD -4.20; 95% CI -5.36 to -3.03; p < 0.00001], diastolic [-2.38; -3.42 to -1.35]), and daytime AMB BP (systolic: -5.11; -6.75 to -3.47, diastolic: -2.88; -3.91 to -1.85). Similarly, office BP was reduced with RDN (systolic: -5.46; -7.12 to -3.81; diastolic: -3.17; -4.23 to -2.12) when compared with placebo. CONCLUSION: Our meta-analysis shows that RDN is associated with a significant reduction in the 24-h AMB BP, daytime AMB BP, and office BP.

Meta-Analysis Comparing Hypothermia Versus Normothermia in Patients After a Cardiac Arrest.

The current American Heart Association 2022 guidelines recommend actively preventing fever by targeting a temperature ≤37.5°C for comatose patients after cardiac arrest. Contemporary randomized controlled trials (RCTs) show conflicting results regarding the benefit of targeted hypothermia (TH). We performed this updated meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the role of hypothermia in patients after a cardiac arrest. We searched Cochrane, MEDLINE, and EMBASE from inception to December 2022. Trials with patients randomly allocated for targeted temperature monitoring and reported neurologic and mortality outcomes were included. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager using the random-effects model and calculated the pooled risk ratios of outcomes using the Mantel-Haenszel method. A total of 12 RCTs and 4,262 patients were included in the review. Compared with normothermia, the TH group had significantly improved neurologic outcomes (risk ratio 0.90, 95% confidence interval 0.83 to 0.98). However, no significant difference in mortality was observed (risk ratio 0.97, 95% confidence interval 0.90 to 1.06) between the groups. This meta-analysis supports the role of TH in patients after a cardiac arrest, especially secondary to improvement in neurologic outcomes.

Predicting if Lung Cancer Will Relapse-The Role of Neutrophil/Lymphocyte Ratio.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a surrogate marker for systemic inflammation and immunosuppression, is a well-studied prognostic marker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study tests if interim NLR is prognostic in NSCLC patients in remission. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective cohort study analyzed 131 NSCLC patients treated from 2010 to 2015 who achieved complete remission. NLR was calculated at baseline and from the first available blood sample during remission. Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall survival (OS) and time to recurrence were compared using the log-rank test for trend. Multivariable analysis was conducted using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Of the 131 cases, 63 had subsequently recurred at the last follow-up. The mean age was 64 ± 10 years. Patients with stage I (35%), II (24%), and III (41%) were included. Histology were adenocarcinoma (60%), squamous cell (33%), and unspecified (7%). The majority of patients were smokers. For the univariate analysis interim NLR was binned into tertiles, NLR < 2, 2-4.08, and > 4.08. Of those with an interim NLR > 4.08, prognosis and recurrence risk were higher. In the multivariable analysis, remission NLR was strongly prognostic for OS ( p < .001) as did patient's age ( p = .002), but not stage, race, sex, and baseline NLR. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found that interim NLR, obtained in remission, was strongly prognostic for OS and recurrence.

Short-term dual antiplatelet therapy for 1-3 months after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration and regimen in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using current generation drug eluting stents (DES) is still unclear. AIMS: To compare the safety and efficacy of short-term DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer duration DAPT (l-DAPT) after contemporary PCI. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing S-DAPT (≤3 months) followed by single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with aspirin or a P2Y12 inhibitor against L-DAPT (6-12 months) after PCI with current generation DES. Primary end-points of interest were major bleeding and stent thrombosis (ST) at 1 year. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Eleven RCTs (n = 48,946) were included in the primary analysis. Major bleeding was significantly lower with S-DAPT (n = 24,424) (odd ratio [OR 0.65; 95% confidence interval, CI 0.52-0.80]) compared with L-DAPT (n = 24,486). There were no differences in ST between the two groups [OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.97-1.63]. There were no significant differences in risks of all-cause death, cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction between S-DAPT and L-DAPT groups. In a subgroup analysis, there was borderline significantly higher ST with 1 month S-DAPT [1.39; 1.0-1.92], but not with 3 months S-DAPT [1.07; 0.70-1.64], when compared to L-DAPT. Finally, there were no significant treatment interactions observed when trials using SAPT with aspirin were compared with those using P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy. CONCLUSION: Among patients undergoing current generation DES implantation, S-DAPT for 1-3 months reduces major bleeding without an increase in ischemic events compared with L-DAPT. Three months S-DAPT might provide a better risk-benefit profile based on current analysis. Further study is needed to define the SAPT of choice after 1-3 months DAPT.

Myocarditis associated with COVID-19 and its vaccines - a systematic review.

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease of 2019) pandemic, myocarditis has received much attention and controversy as one of the more worrisome cardiovascular complications. After the availability of highly effective COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in late 2020, myocarditis was also appreciated as an important vaccine-related adverse event. Though the overall frequency of clinically evident viral myocarditis is rare in the general population, young males show a higher predilection for COVID vaccine-induced myocarditis. The severity of COVID-19 viral myocarditis is variable, ranging from very mild to severe, while vaccine-induced myocarditis is usually mild, and rarely a severe or fatal disease. The diagnosis of either COVID-19 or vaccine-induced myocarditis is based on typical clinical features, laboratory investigations, and imaging, preferably with cardiac magnetic resonance. The management of COVID-19 myocarditis is supportive care for mild or moderate disease. For the rare patient who develops severe disease, advanced heart failure therapies such as mechanical circulatory support devices may have to be employed and can be lifesaving. Avoidance of strenuous exercise during the bout of myocarditis and its recovery phase is important. Despite the small but finite risk of vaccine-induced myocarditis, the benefits of protection against COVID-19 disease and its attendant complications far outweigh the risks.

Vitamin D Supplementation in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported conflicting outcomes with the use of vitamin D in critically ill patients. With reporting of newer RCTs, we conducted this updated meta-analysis. Electronic databases were searched for RCTs comparing vitamin D with placebo in critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). A random-effects meta-analysis was used to calculate the risk ratio (RR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Eleven RCTs with a total of 2,187 patients (vitamin D: n = 1,120; placebo: n = 1,067) were included. Vitamin D when compared to placebo was associated with the decreased duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD = -0.50; 95% CI = [-0.97, -0.03]; p = 0.04) and ICU stay (SMD = -0.60; 95% CI = [-1.03, -0.16]; p = 0.007) without any difference in the mortality (RR = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.68, 1.04]; p = 0.12) and length of hospital stay (SMD = -0.21; 95% CI = (-0.51, 0.09); p = 0.18]. Subgroup analysis showed that parenteral vitamin D may reduce the risk of mortality (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = [0.35, 0.83], p = 0.005). Vitamin D supplementation in critically ill patients decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and ICU stay. Further studies should identify specific groups of patients who will derive the most benefit from vitamin D supplementation.

Mean Arterial Pressure Goal in Critically Ill Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Current guidelines recommend targeting a mean arterial pressure (MAP) goal of 65 mm Hg or more in critically ill medical patients. Prospective studies have shown that a higher MAP goal can improve survival and decrease end-organ damage. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have failed to show similar results. Thus, we performed this meta-analysis to evaluate whether a high MAP goal compared to a standard or low MAP goal will improve clinical outcomes in critically ill medical patients. Methods: We searched electronic databases for RCTs comparing standard MAP goals versus high MAP goals in critically ill medical patients. A standard MAP goal was defined as a MAP of 60 - 70 mm Hg, and a MAP of 70 mm Hg or more was considered a high MAP goal. Outcomes of interest were mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Subgroup analysis was performed based on the type of critically ill patients: cardiac arrest and septic shock. We used random-effects meta-analysis to estimate risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for a dichotomous outcome. For continuous outcomes, the inverse variance method was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% CI. A P value of 0.05 or less was considered significant. Results: Six RCTs with a total of 3,753 patients (standard MAP goal: n = 1,872 and high MAP goal: n = 1,881) were included in the final analysis. Both standard/low MAP goal and high MAP goal were associated with similar risk for mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI (0.87, 1.01), P = 0.11), duration of mechanical ventilation (SMD 0.51, 95% CI (-0.29, 1.31), P = 0.21) and ICU length of stay (SMD 0.22, 95% CI (-0.07, 0.5), P = 0.14). Subgroup analysis in cardiac arrest patient showed decreased ICU stay (SMD 0.55, 95% CI (0.31, 0.80), P < 0.000001) in patients with higher MAP goal compared to the standard MAP goal group without any difference in mortality or duration of mechanical ventilation. Subgroup analysis of patients with septic shock had similar outcomes in both MAP targets. Conclusions: In critically ill patients, a higher MAP goal of > 70 mm Hg was associated with a similar risk of mortality, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay when compared with a standard MAP goal of 60 - 70 mm Hg.

Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention using drug eluting stents in high bleeding risk patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Optimal dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) duration in patients at high bleeding risk (HBR) is not fully defined. We aimed to compare the safety and effectiveness of short-term DAPT (S-DAPT) with longer duration DAPT (L-DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stents (DES) in patients at HBR. METHODS: We searched for studies comparing S-DAPT (≤3 months) followed by aspirin or P2Y 12 inhibitor monotherapy against L-DAPT (6-12 months) after PCI in HBR patients. Primary end points of interest were major bleeding and myocardial infarction (MI). Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate odds ratios with 95% CIs. RESULTS: Six randomized trials and 3 propensity-matched studies (n = 16,848) were included in the primary analysis. Compared with L-DAPT (n = 8,422), major bleeding was lower with S-DAPT (n = 8,426) [OR 0.68; 95% CI 0.51-0.89] whereas MI did not differ significantly between the 2 groups [1.16; 0.94-1.44]. There were no significant differences in risks of death, stroke or stent thrombosis (ST) between S-DAPT and L-DAPT groups. These findings were consistent when propensity-matched studies were analysed separately. Finally, there was a numerically higher, albeit statistically non-significant, ST in the S-DAPT arm of patients without an indication for OAC [1.98; 0.86-4.58]. CONCLUSIONS: Among HBR patients undergoing current generation DES implantation, S-DAPT reduces bleeding without an increased risk of death or MI compared with L-DAPT. More research is needed to (1) evaluate risks of late ST after 1 to 3 months DAPT among patients with high ischemic and bleeding risks, (2) defining the SAPT of choice after 1 to 3 months DAPT.

Palliative Referrals in Advanced Cancer Patients: Utilizing the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool and Rothman Index.

BACKGROUND: Timely identification of palliative care needs can reduce hospitalizations and improve quality of life. The Supportive & Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) identifies patients with advanced medical conditions who may need special care planning. The Rothman Index (RI) detects patients at high risk of acutely decompensating in the inpatient setting. SPICT and RI among cancer patients were utilized in this study to evaluate their potential roles in palliative care referrals. METHODS: Advanced cancer patients admitted to an institution in Baltimore, Maryland in 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics, length of hospital stay (LOS), palliative care referrals, RI scores, and SPICT scores were obtained. Patients were divided into SPICT positive or negative and RI > 60 or RI < 60.Unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests were utilized to determine the associations between SPICT and RI and early palliative care needs and mortality. RESULTS: 227 patients were included, with a mean age of 68 years, 63% Black, 59% female, with the majority having lung and GI malignancies. Sixty percent were SPICT +, 21% had RI < 60. SPICT + patients were more likely to have RI < 60 (p = 0.001). SPICT + and RI < 60 patients were more likely to have longer LOS, change in code status, more palliative/hospice referrals, and increased mortality (p <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: SPICT and RI are valuable tools in predicting mortality and palliative/hospice care referrals. These can also be utilized to initiate early palliative and goals of care discussions in patients with advanced cancer.

Drug-eluting Stents Versus Bare-metal Stents for Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Studies With Longer Follow-up.

Randomized controlled trials comparing drug eluting stents (DES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) for saphenous vein graft (SVG) interventions have shown conflicting results. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the cumulative evidence for long-term efficacy and safety of DES vs BMS in SVG lesions. A systematic search was conducted of Randomized controlled trials comparing DES vs BMS in patients undergoing percutaneous interventions for SVG lesions. End-points of interest were all-cause death, cardiac death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization and target vessel revascularization at longest available follow-up. Random effects meta-analysis was conducted to estimate risk ratio with 95% confidence intervals for individual end-points. Seven studies with 1639 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean follow-up period was 32 months. Compared with BMS, DES was associated with similar risks of all-cause death (risk ratio 1.06; 95% confidence intervals 0.76-1.48) and cardiac death (0.95; 0.59-1.54). Similarly, there were no differences between DES and BMS in terms of myocardial infarction (0.81; 0.50-1.29), target vessel revascularization (0.73; 0.48-1.110 or target lesion revascularization (1.05; 0.76-1.43). Current analysis suggests no strong evidence for routine DES use in patients undergoing SVG intervention. Future studies should evaluate if SVG lesion characteristics could influence these results.

Long-term follow-up of percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass grafting in left main coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the long-term outcomes of PCI compared to CABG in patients with LMCAD. BACKGROUND: Recent data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has raised concerns regarding the long-term efficacy and safety of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) compared with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with left main coronary artery disease (LMCAD). METHODS: We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for published RCTs comparing PCI using stenting with CABG in patients with LMCAD. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis guidelines were used for the present study. End-points of interest were all-cause mortality, cardiovascular (CV) mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and repeat revascularization at longest available follow-up. Relevant data were collected and pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using random-effects model. RESULTS: Five RCTs including a total of 4,499 patients were included in the final analysis. Mean duration of follow-up was 96 months. The risks of all-cause mortality [OR 1.09 (95% CI 0.88-1.34)] and cardiovascular mortality [1.14 (0.88-1.47)] were comparable between PCI and CABG. There were no statistically significant differences between PCI and CABG for MI [1.52 (0.98-2.37)] and stroke [0.84 (0.48-1.45)]. Conversely, repeat revascularization was significantly higher with PCI as compared with CABG [1.82 (1.49-2.22)]. CONCLUSION: At long-term follow-up, PCI is associated with similar risks of mortality but a higher risk of repeat revascularization compared with CABG in LMCAD. Long-term risk of MI with PCI compared to CABG needs to be further explored in future studies.

Meta-Analysis of the Usefulness of Therapeutic Hypothermia After Cardiac Arrest.

Despite current guidelines recommending therapeutic hypothermia (TH) for post cardiac arrest comatose patient, its use remains limited. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have also reported conflicting results on the efficacy of TH. Therefore, we conducted an updated meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of TH in post cardiac arrest patients. We searched electronic databases for RCTs comparing TH (32°C to 34°C) with controls (normothermia or temperature ≥36°C) in comatose patients who sustained cardiac arrest. Mortality and neurological outcomes were the outcomes of interest. We used random effect meta-analysis to estimate risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Eight RCTs with a total of 2,026 patients (TH n = 1,025 and control n = 1,001) were included. Irrespective of initial rhythm, TH was associated with significant reduction in poor neurological outcomes (RR 0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.98; p = 0.02) without any difference in mortality (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.03; p = 0.17). In patients with initial shockable rhythm compared with control, TH reduced mortality (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p = 0.04) and poor neurological outcomes (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.99; p = 0.04). Whereas, in patients with initial nonshockable rhythm, TH was associated with decreased poor neurological outcomes after excluding one trial (RR 0.95 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; p = 0.05). In conclusion, TH is associated with improved neurological outcomes in all patients sustaining cardiac arrest and with decreased mortality in patients with initial shockable rhythm.