A spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) study of intraretinal hyperreflective foci and its relationship with visual acuity and grades of retinopathy among patients of diabetes mellitus in Indian population.

Background: Hyperreflective foci (HRF) are biomarkers in detection of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Presence of HRF on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) can give a correlation with visual acuity change and grades of DR. Purpose of this study is to determine the presence, location, and role of HRF in the retina of DM patients with and without retinopathy. Methods: A total of 192 eyes of patients suffering from type II DM were evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups, with Group A having diabetes without retinopathy (20 patients) and group B (76 patients) having diabetes and various grades of retinopathy. SD-OCT was performed in all patients, passing through the center of fovea. On OCT, presence and absence of HRF were noted. Characteristics of the hyper-reflective spots were evaluated: location, shape, size, back shadowing and association with central macular thickness (CMT), visual acuity, and grades of retinopathy. Results: HRF were present in 169 eyes (88%) out of 192 eyes. The shape and location of HRF tend to change with disease progression. HRF were significantly associated with increasing grades of retinopathy (χ2 = 57.586, p < 0.01) Association of macular edema was significant with both retinopathy (χ2 = 8.895, p < 0.05) and HRF (χ2 = 34.720, p < 0.01). Association of best-corrected visual acuity with HRF (χ2 = 21.232, p < 0.01), macular edema (χ2 = 86.960, p < 0.01), and CMT (χ2 = 47.959, p< 0 .01) was significant. Conclusion: HRF is a great indicator for early diagnosis of subclinical retinopathy and can be used to monitor the progression of disease and development of macular edema. Significant difference is present in HRF distribution and morphology.

Systemic treatment of psoriasis in special population.

Psoriasis is a common skin disorder affecting approximately 1% of the general population. The treatment of psoriasis depends on the body surface area involvement, quality of life impairment and associated co-morbidities. Special population comprising of pregnant women, lactating mothers, elderly individuals and children, is more vulnerable. They are not included in drug trials; rendering the data for use of systemic treatment scant and is mainly based on anecdotal evidence. In this narrative review, we discuss systemic treatment options in this special population. Though couples planning a family are not considered a special population, they form a subset that require special therapeutic consideration and have also been included in this review.

Intradermal Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Melasma: A Clinical and Dermoscopic Evaluation in Dark Skin.

Background: Melasma is a common dermatosis in both men and women showing varying degrees of success with treatment. Relapse of melasma is high in dark skin types, which necessitates the need for finding a modality of treatment, which not only treats but also prevents relapse. Aims: To study the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) in patients of melasma both clinically and dermoscopically in dark skin types. Materials and Methods: A prospective study of 20 female patients of Fitzpatrick skin type IV-V with mixed type of melasma and bilateral involvement of the face were enrolled for the study. PRP was injected intradermally at 4 weeks interval for three sittings, and the results were assessed clinically (by modified melasma area and severity score) and dermoscopically. Patients were counselled to ensure strict sun protection measures. Patient satisfaction was noted at baseline, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, and 12 weeks. Patients were followed up for 3 months to see for any relapse of the pigmentation. The follow-up showed no relapse of melasma in these patients. Statistical Analysis: Analysis of variance was used with Bonferroni correction for modified melasma area and severity score at various time interval. Subject global aesthetic improvement scale (SGAIS) and physician global esthetic improvement scale (PGAIS) were expressed in counts. P-value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Modified melasma area and severity score and dermoscopic changes showed statistically significant improvement compared at the end of study in mild to severe cases. The subjective assessment was made by PGAIS. Patient satisfaction levels (assessed by SGAIS) also showed significant improvement in successive weeks of treatment. Few patients had mild redness and burning post procedure, which resolved spontaneously after few hours. Conclusion: From this study we concluded that PRP shows a significant improvement in melasma after 12 weeks of treatment with no relapse even after 3 months. Hence, PRP may be used not only as an adjuvant but also as a first line treatment in the view of longer sustained results when combined with strict sun protection. There is a paucity of studies showing results of PRP treatment in dark skin types, which is more resistant to treatment than lighter skin. Moreover, clinical improvement should not be the only parameter to decide on stopping treatment as chances of relapse can be higher. Dermoscopic evaluation helps in determining the changes in vasculature (telangiectasias) and pigmentation (dots and globules), which are better indicators of success of treatment.