Impaired Brain Satiety Responses After Weight Loss in Children With Obesity.

CONTEXT: Obesity interventions often result in increased motivation to eat. OBJECTIVE: We investigated relationships between obesity outcomes and changes in brain activation by visual food cues and hormone levels in response to obesity intervention by family-based behavioral treatment (FBT). METHODS: Neuroimaging and hormone assessments were conducted before and after 24-week FBT intervention in children with obesity (OB, n = 28), or children of healthy weight without intervention (HW, n = 17), all 9- to 11-year-old boys and girls. We evaluated meal-induced changes in neural activation to high- vs low-calorie food cues across appetite-processing brain regions and gut hormones. RESULTS: Among children with OB who underwent FBT, greater declines of BMI z-score were associated with lesser reductions after the FBT intervention in meal-induced changes in neural activation to high- vs low-calorie food cues across appetite-processing brain regions (P < 0.05), and the slope of relationship was significantly different compared with children of HW. In children with OB, less reduction in brain responses to a meal from before to after FBT was associated with greater meal-induced reduction in ghrelin and increased meal-induced stimulation in peptide YY and glucagon-like peptide-1 (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In response to FBT, adaptations of central satiety responses and peripheral satiety-regulating hormones were noted. After weight loss, changes of peripheral hormone secretion support weight loss, but there was a weaker central satiety response. The findings suggest that even when peripheral satiety responses by gut hormones are intact, the central regulation of satiety is disturbed in children with OB who significantly improve their weight status during FBT, which could favor future weight regain.

General and Food-Specific Impulsivity and Inhibition Related to Weight Management.

Background: Understanding child characteristics that relate to weight management treatment outcome could help identify opportunities for intervention innovation or tailoring. The limited evidence available is inconsistent regarding whether and which aspects of children's general or food-specific impulsivity and inhibition relate to treatment outcomes. Methods: Children with (n = 54) and without obesity (n = 22) were compared on various measures of impulsivity and inhibition. Children with obesity (n = 40) then completed family-based treatment for weight management. Analyses examined associations between baseline children's impulsivity and inhibition and child weight status change (BMI z-score) and between treatment-based changes in impulsivity and inhibition and weight status change, with and without adjustment by baseline functional magnetic resonance imaging-measured appetitive drive. Results: Children with obesity scored more poorly on some, but not all, measures of impulsivity and inhibition than children without obesity. Lower baseline general inhibition and greater parent-report of child impulsivity were associated (independently) with greater improvements in child weight status, with modest attenuation after appetite drive adjustment. Children improved task-based general inhibition during treatment. Improvements in general inhibition and snack food discounting were associated with better child weight outcomes, although adjusting for baseline values attenuated these associations. Conclusions: Children with obesity having greater initial impulsivity had better weight outcomes in treatment even after adjusting for initial appetitive drive. In contrast, improvements in task-based inhibition and food-related discounting during treatment were also related to better outcomes. Research is needed on innovative approaches to better address impulsivity and inhibition in children's weight management. Clinical Trial Registration number: NCT02484976.

Child neurobiology impacts success in family-based behavioral treatment for children with obesity.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Family-based behavioral treatment (FBT) is the recommended treatment for children with common obesity. However, there is a large variability in short- and long-term treatment response, and mechanisms for unsuccessful treatment outcomes are not fully understood. In this study, we tested if brain response to visual food cues among children with obesity before treatment predicted weight or behavioral outcomes during a 6-month behavioral weight management program and/or long-term relative weight maintenance over a 1-year follow-up period. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven children with obesity (age 9-11 years, 62% male) who entered active FBT (attended two or more sessions) and had outcome data. Brain activation was assessed at pretreatment by functional magnetic resonance imaging across an a priori set of appetite-processing brain regions that included the ventral and dorsal striatum, mOFC, amygdala, substantia nigra/ventral tegmental area, and insula in response to viewing food images before and after a standardized meal. RESULTS: Children with more robust reductions in brain activation to high-calorie food cue images following a meal had greater declines in BMI z-score during FBT (r = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.09, 0.66; P = 0.02) and greater improvements in Healthy Eating Index scores (r = -0.41; 95% CI: -0.67, -0.06; P = 0.02). In whole-brain analyses, greater activation in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, specifically by high-calorie food cues, was predictive of better treatment outcomes (whole-brain cluster corrected P = 0.02). There were no significant predictors of relative weight maintenance, and initial behavioral or hormonal measures did not predict FBT outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Children's brain responses to a meal prior to obesity treatment were related to treatment-based weight outcomes, suggesting that neurophysiologic factors and appetitive drive, more so than initial hormone status or behavioral characteristics, limit intervention success.

Behavioral counseling to promote a healthy lifestyle in persons with cardiovascular risk factors: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

BACKGROUND: Most Americans do not meet diet and physical activity recommendations despite known health benefits. PURPOSE: To systematically review the benefits and harms of lifestyle counseling interventions in persons with cardiovascular risk factors for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2001 to October 2013); experts; and existing systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Two investigators independently reviewed 7218 abstracts and 553 articles against a set of inclusion and quality criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Data from 74 trials were abstracted by one reviewer and checked by a second. DATA SYNTHESIS: At 12 to 24 months, intensive lifestyle counseling in persons selected for risk factors reduced total cholesterol levels by an average of 0.12 mmol/L (95% CI, 0.16 to 0.07 mmol/L) (4.48 mg/dL [CI, 6.36 to 2.59 mg/dL]), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 0.09 mmol/L (CI, 0.14 to 0.04 mmol/L) (3.43 mg/dL [CI, 5.37 to 1.49 mg/dL]), systolic blood pressure by 2.03 mm Hg (CI, 2.91 to 1.15 mm Hg), diastolic blood pressure by 1.38 mm Hg (CI, 1.92 to 0.83 mm Hg), fasting glucose levels by 0.12 mmol/L (CI, 0.18 to 0.05 mmol/L) (2.08 mg/dL [CI, 3.29 to 0.88 mg/dL]), diabetes incidence by a relative risk of 0.58 (CI, 0.37 to 0.89), and weight outcomes by a standardized mean difference of 0.25 (CI, 0.35 to 0.16). Behavioral changes in dietary intake and physical activity were generally concordant with changes in physiologic outcomes. LIMITATION: Sparse reporting of patient health outcomes, longer-term follow-up of outcomes, and harms. CONCLUSION: Intensive diet and physical activity behavioral counseling in persons with risk factors for cardiovascular disease resulted in consistent improvements across various important intermediate health outcomes up to 2 years. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

Low-dose aspirin for prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. PURPOSE: To systematically review benefits and harms of low-dose aspirin for preventing morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (January 2006 to June 2013); previous systematic reviews, clinical trial registries, and surveillance searches for large studies (June 2013 to February 2014). STUDY SELECTION: Randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) to assess benefits among women at high preeclampsia risk and RCTs or large cohort studies of harms among women at any risk level. English-language studies of fair or good quality were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Dual quality assessment and abstraction of studies. DATA SYNTHESIS: Two large, multisite RCTs and 13 smaller RCTs of high-risk women (8 good-quality) were included, in addition to 6 RCTs and 2 observational studies of average-risk women to assess harms (7 good-quality). Depending on baseline risk, aspirin use was associated with absolute risk reductions of 2% to 5% for preeclampsia (relative risk [RR], 0.76 [95% CI, 0.62 to 0.95]), 1% to 5% for intrauterine growth restriction (RR, 0.80 [CI, 0.65 to 0.99]), and 2% to 4% for preterm birth (RR, 0.86 [CI, 0.76 to 0.98]). No significant perinatal or maternal harms were identified, but rare harms could not be ruled out. Evidence on long-term outcomes was sparse, but 18-month follow-up from the largest trial found no developmental harms. LIMITATIONS: Benefits may have been overestimated due to small-study effects. Predictive intervals were not statistically significant. Future studies could shift findings toward the null. CONCLUSION: Daily low-dose aspirin beginning as early as the second trimester prevented clinically important health outcomes. No harms were identified, but long-term evidence was limited.