Infection After Lower-Limb Osseointegration: A Single-Center Retrospective Evaluation of Pathogens, Management, and Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Osseointegration (OI) is a novel alternative to traditional socket-suspended prostheses for lower-limb amputees, eliminating the socket-skin interface and allowing for weight bearing directly on the skeletal system. However, the stoma through which the implant attaches to the external prosthesis creates an ingress route for bacteria, and infection rates as high as 66% have been reported. The aims of this study are to classify infection management and long-term outcomes in this patient population to maximize implant salvage. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent lower-limb OI at our institution between 2017 and 2022. Demographic, operative, and outcome data were collected for all patients. Patients were stratified by the presence and severity of infection. Chi-square and t tests were performed on categorical and continuous data, respectively, using an alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred two patients met our study criteria; 62 had transfemoral OI and 40 had transtibial OI. Patients were followed for 23.8 months on average (range, 3.5-63.7). Osteomyelitis was more likely than soft tissue infection to be polymicrobial in nature (71% vs 23%, P < 0.05). Infections at the stoma were mostly (96%) managed with oral antibiotics alone, whereas deeper soft tissue infections also required intravenous antibiotics (75%) or operative washout (19%). Osteomyelitis was managed with intravenous antibiotics and required operative attention; 5 (71%) underwent washout and 2 (29%) underwent explantation. Both implants were replaced an average of 3.5 months after explantation. There was no correlation between history of soft tissue infection and development of osteomyelitis (P > 0.05). The overall implant salvage rate after infection was 96%. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes our institution's experience managing infection after OI and soft tissue reconstruction. Although infections do occur, they are easily treatable and rarely require operative intervention. Explantation due to infection is rare and can be followed up with reimplantation, reaffirming that OI is a safe and effective treatment modality.

Limb salvage reconstruction of the lower limb with complex ankle arthrodesis and magnetic internal lengthening nail.

PURPOSE: With advances in orthopedic implants, the use of intramedullary lengthening devices has gained increasing popularity as an alternative technique compared to lengthening with external fixators, with alleged comparable or better outcomes. The aim of this study is to report our single-center technique and outcomes of combined ankle arthrodesis and proximal tibial lengthening using external fixator with a motorized intramedullary nail, respectively. METHOD: Fourteen patients with post-traumatic advanced ankle arthritis underwent staged ankle arthrodesis with external fixator and proximal tibial lengthening using the PRECICE® ILN. Amount of shortening, length achieved, bone healing index, infection rate, ankle fusion rate, and ASAMI score were evaluated. RESULTS: The average age was 44 years old (range, 30-62). The mean follow up is 70 months (range, 43-121.4). The average amount of limb shortening for patients after ankle fusion was 36.7 mm (18-50) while lengthening was 35.9 mm (range, 18-50). Patients had the nail implanted for an average of 479 days (range, 248-730). Ankle fusions were healed in an average of 178.3 days. There were no surgical infections. All osteotomy-lengthening sites healed after an average 202 days (106-365). The mean bone healing index (BHI) was 56.0 days/cm (21.2-123.6) among the whole cohort. There were no cases of nonunion. ASAMI bone scores were excellent or good among all patients. CONCLUSION: Ankle arthrodesis with external fixation along with proximal tibial lengthening using motorized IMN yielded high rates of fusion and successful lengthening. This technique could be offered as a reasonable alternative to using external fixation for both purposes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Retrospective cohort study.

Constructing an Osseointegrated Prosthetic Leg.

Background: Constructing an osseointegrated prosthetic leg is the necessary subsequent phase of care for patients following the surgical implantation of an osseointegrated prosthetic limb anchor. The surgeon implants the bone-anchored transcutaneous implant1,2 and the prosthetist constructs the prosthetic leg, which then attaches to the surgically implanted anchor. An osseointegration surgical procedure is usually considered in patients who are unable to use or are dissatisfied with the use of a socket prosthesis. Description: This present video article describes the techniques and principles involved in constructing a prosthetic leg for transfemoral and transtibial amputees, as well as postoperative patient care. Preoperatively, as part of a multidisciplinary team approach, the prosthetist should assist in patient evaluation to determine suitability for osseointegration surgery. Postoperatively, when approved by the surgeon, the first step is to perform an implant inspection and to take patient measurements. A temporary loading implant is provided to allow the patient to start loading the limb. When the patient is approved for full-length leg to begin full weight-bearing, the implant and prosthetic quality are evaluated, including torque, implant position, bench alignment, static alignment in the standing position, and initial dynamic alignment. This surgical procedure also requires long-term, continued patient care and prosthetic maintenance. Alternatives: For patients who are dissatisfied with the use of a socket prosthesis, adjustments can often be made to improve the comfort, fit, and performance of the prosthesis. Non-osseointegration surgical options include bone lengthening and/or soft-tissue contouring. Rationale: Osseointegration can be provided for amputees who are expressing dissatisfaction with their socket prosthesis, and typically provides superior mobility and quality of life compared with nonoperative and other operative options3,4. Specific differences between the appropriate design and construction of osseointegrated prostheses versus socket prostheses include component selection, component fit, patient-prosthesis static and dynamic alignment, tolerances and accommodations, and also the expected long-term changes in patient joint mobility and behavior. Providing an osseointegrated prosthesis according to the principles appropriate for socket prostheses may often leave an osseointegrated patient improperly aligned and provoke maladaptive accommodations, hindering performance and potentially putting patients at unnecessary risk for injury. Expected Outcomes: Review articles describing the clinical outcomes of osseointegration consistently suggest that patients with osseointegrated prostheses have improved prosthesis wear time, mobility, and quality of life compared with patients with socket prostheses. Importantly, studies have shown that osseointegrated prostheses can be utilized in patients with short residual limbs that preclude the use of a socket prosthesis, allowing them to regain or retain function of the joint proximal to the short residuum5,6. Osseoperception improves patient confidence during mobility7. Because there is an open skin portal, low-grade soft-tissue infection can occur, which is usually treated with a short course of oral antibiotics. Much less often, soft-tissue debridement or implant removal may be needed to treat infection8. Periprosthetic fractures can nearly always be treated with familiar fracture fixation techniques and implant retention9,10. Important Tips: Falls can lead to periprosthetic fractures.Malalignment can lead to unnecessary pathologic joint forces, soft-tissue contractures, and an accommodative gait.Inadequately sophisticated components can leave patients at a performance deficit.Wearing the prosthetic leg while sleeping may lead to rotational forces exerted on the limb, which may cause prolonged tension on the soft tissue. Acronyms and Abbreviations: QTFA = Questionnaire for Persons with a Transfemoral AmputationLD-SRS = Limb Deformity Modified Scoliosis Research SocietyPROMIS = Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information SystemEQ-5D = EuroQol 5 Dimensions.

Distal Femoral Osteotomy for the Management of Coronal Deformity Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: We present 2 cases demonstrating the management of coronal malalignment with an existing total knee arthroplasty using opening wedge distal femur osteotomy. The mechanical axis was corrected, and the primary total knee implants were maintained. Patients resumed full activity 3 to 4 months after surgery. CONCLUSION: In certain cases, opening wedge distal femoral osteotomy is an option to correct coronal malalignment with an existing total knee arthroplasty without revising the implant.

Avoiding Compartment Syndrome, Vascular Injury, and Neurologic Deficit in Tibial Osteotomy: An Observational Study of 108 Limbs.

INTRODUCTION: Tibial deformities are common, but substantial concern may be associated with corrective osteotomy regarding major complications reported in classic literature. Such studies chiefly focused on high tibial osteotomy, with relatively little investigation of other areas and types of deformity. The primary aim of this study was to identify the rate of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, nerve injury, and other major complications after elective tibial osteotomy. METHODS: One hundred eight tibia osteotomies performed during 2019 to 2021 were evaluated, representing all tibia osteotomies except situations of existing infection. A retrospective chart review was performed to identify patient demographics, surgical indications, anatomic location of osteotomy, fixation used, and complications prompting additional surgery. RESULTS: The most common osteotomy locations were high tibial osteotomy (35/108 = 32%, 32/35 = 91% medial opening, and 3/35 = 9% medial closing), proximal metaphysis (30/108 = 28%), and diaphysis (32/108 = 30%). The most common fixation was plate and screw (38/108 = 35%) or dynamic frame (36/108 = 33%). Tranexamic acid was administered to 107/108 = 99% of patients and aspirin chemoprophylaxis was used for 83/108 = 86%. A total of 33/34= 97% of anterior compartment prophylactic fasciotomies were performed for diaphyseal or proximal metaphysis osteotomies. No events of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, nerve injury, or pulmonary embolism occurred. One patient required débridement to address infection. Additional surgery for delayed/nonunion occurred for nine segments (8%). Additional surgery for other reasons were performed for 10 segments (9%), none resulting in reduced limb function. CONCLUSION: Tibial osteotomy can be safely performed for a variety of indications in a diverse range of patients, without a notable risk of the most feared complications of compartment syndrome, vascular injury, and neurologic deficit. Prophylactic fasciotomy and reducing postoperative bleeding using tranexamic acid, along with location-specific safe surgical techniques, may help prevent major complications and thereby facilitate optimized deformity care.

Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms.

Aims: The Precice Stryde® internal magnetic lengthening nail allowed many patients a full weight-bearing experience during femur and tibia lengthening, but concerns over corrosion, pain and radiographic changes led to the implant's recall. Despite the recall, it is important to understand the rate of these occurrences and their influence on the overall success of the lengthening procedure. We aimed to investigate radiographic changes, patient-reported symptoms and bone healing indices for our cohort of Stryde lengthening. Materials and methods: Our surgical database and electronic medical record system were used to review and document patient demographics, indications for lengthening, length achieved, bone healing index (BHI), location and type of radiographic changes, time until radiographic changes were first visible, presence of pain symptoms (not attributable to surgery or distraction), time to implant removal and if the pain symptoms resolved following implant extraction. Results: From January 2019 to February 2021, 90 Stryde nails (78 femur and 12 tibia) were implanted in 63 patients. The cohort included 48 males and 15 females. The average length [± standard deviation (SD)] achieved was 58.4 ± 22.7 mm. The 66 bones (73%) developed radiographic changes and were found to be 58/78 (74%) femurs and 8/12 (67%) tibias. The average time to initial radiographic changes was 168 ± 108.1 days (femur) and 276 ± 126.8 days (tibia). Late-onset pain developed in 10 femur lengthening (11.1% of all nails) surgeries across eight patients (12.7% of all patients). All patients' pain resolved; three instances prior to nail removal and the remaining seven after nail removal. No patients were re-presented with worsening pain or radiographic changes following implant removal. Radiographic or symptomatic abnormalities did not impair bone formation. The BHI for femurs with (29.6 ± 16.6 days/cm, n = 58) vs without (29.4 ± 17.9 days/cm, n = 20) radiographic or symptomatic irregularity were nearly identical (p = 0.961). The difference between BHI for tibias with (39.3 ± 7.8 days/cm, n = 8) vs without (86.1 ± 38.2 days/cm, n = 4) radiographic changes was influenced by outliers and underpowered to draw a conclusion. Conclusion: Bone lengthening with the Stryde nail was associated with high rates of radiographic abnormalities, but symptoms were uncommon and resolved with explantation. The radiographic changes did not affect bone healing in the femur. Clinical significance: Radiographic changes including bone hypertrophy and osteolysis were common after bone lengthening with the Stryde nail, but the development of pain following consolidation was rare and resolved with implant removal.The BHI in femurs was not affected by radiographic changes. How to cite this article: Reif TJ, Geffner A, Hoellwarth JS, et al. Precice Stryde® Magnetic Internal Lengthening Nail does not Impair Bone Healing Despite Radiographic and Clinical Symptoms. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(2):94-99.

Signficant Femoral Version Abnormalities and Patient-Reported Quality of Life.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to determine how the Limb Deformity-Modified Scoliosis Research Society (LD-SRS) and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaire scores differ between patients with femoral version abnormalities and healthy control subjects. METHODS: A retrospective database review identified patients with femoral version abnormalities between December 2018 and September 2022. A total of 21 adult patients scheduled for femoral derotational osteotomy and 33 control subjects were included. All individuals completed the LD-SRS and PROMIS questionnaires. RESULTS: Patients with femoral version abnormalities reported significantly worse scores than control subjects on all LD-SRS and PROMIS domains: LD-SRS (Total [3.46 ± 0.66 vs. 4.58 ± 0.37, P < 0.001]; Function/Activity [3.48 ± 0.83 vs. 4.44 ± 0.4, P < 0.001]; Mental Health [3.41 ± 0.96 vs. 4.3 ± 0.73, P < 0.001]; Pain [3.55 ± 0.9 vs. 4.81 ± 0.31, P < 0.001]; and Self-Image/Appearance [3.37 ± 0.79 vs. 4.75 ± 0.43, P < 0.001]) and PROMIS (Function [41.6 ± 7.58 vs. 60.0 ± 7.28, P < 0.001]; Pain Intensity [45.85 ± 8.04 vs. 33.7 ± 4.89, P < 0.001]; Pain Interference [56.78 ± 9.63 vs. 42.8 ± 6.6, P < 0.001]; Global Mental Health [47.97 ± 9.68 vs. 55.3 ± 7.81, P = 0.004]; and Global Physical Health [45.23 ± 7.49 vs. 58.2 ± 7.07, P < 0.001]). DISCUSSION: Patients with femoral version abnormalities reported markedly worse quality of life as measured on the LD-SRS and PROMIS scores compared with healthy control subjects. The combination of these two surveys effectively captures the multifaceted quality-of-life-deficit individuals with excessive femoral version may experience.

Staged Extra-Articular Deformity Correction in the Setting of Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Background: Extra-articular lower-leg deformities mandate unique considerations when planning total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Poor limb alignment may increase perioperative complications and cause early implant failure. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of staged, extra-articular deformity correction about the knee in the setting of osteoarthritis and TKA. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted from December 2007 to December 2019 identifying 30 deformities in 27 patients (average age: 52.7 years; range 31-74) who underwent staged surgical correction of extra-articular deformity in preparation for TKA. Patient demographics, surgical details, clinical and radiographic measurements, severity of knee arthritis, and complications were collected. Results: There were 17 femur and 12 tibia deformities. There was an average improvement of 14.7° of deformity measured in the coronal plane and 12.7° of deformity in the sagittal plane in the femur and 13.5° in the coronal plane and 10.3° in the sagittal plane in the tibia. Leg length discrepancies improved by 26 mm on average (1-100 mm). After an average 3.1-year follow-up, 12 out of 27 patients proceeded with primary or revision TKA. There were no cases of blood transfusion, nerve palsy, or compartment syndrome, and all patients achieved bony union. Conclusions: Staged, extra-articular deformity correction is a safe and effective approach to improve limb alignment in the setting of knee osteoarthritis and TKA.

The Management of Tibial Bone Defects: A Multicenter Experience of Hexapod and Ilizarov Frames.

INTRODUCTION: Bone defects may be managed with bone transport or acute shortening and lengthening using circular external fixation devices. We performed a multicenter retrospective cohort study to compare the outcomes between the Ilizarov frames and hexapod frames for the management of bone defects. METHODS: Patients treated for bone defects using either Ilizarov or hexapod frames were included for analysis in two specialist institutions. Primary outcomes were time to consolidation, bone healing index (BHI), and external fixator index (EFI). Radiographic parameters included the medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal tibial angle, posterior proximal tibial angle, and anterior distal tibial angle. RESULTS: There were 137 hexapods and 90 Ilizarov frames in total. The mean time to follow-up was 3.7 years in the hexapod group and 4.0 years in the Ilizarov group. Hexapods had a significantly lower time to consolidation (253 days versus 449 days) (P < 0.0001) and BHI (59.1 days/cm versus 87.5 days/cm) (P < 0.0001). Hexapods had a significantly better EFI (72.3 days/cm versus 96.1 days/cm) (P = 0.0009). CONCLUSION: Hexapods may confer a significant advantage over Ilizarov frames in the management of bone defects. Time to consolidation, radiographic parameters, BHI, and EFI are all superior in hexapods.

Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty: A Survivorship Review and Meta-Analysis.

Multiple treatments exist for ankle osteoarthritis. Ankle arthrodesis is the gold standard in late-stage osteoarthritis, but sacrifices range of motion and risks nonunion. Total ankle arthroplasty is typically reserved for low-demand patients as the long-term outcomes are poor. Ankle distraction arthroplasty is a joint sparing procedure which utilizes external fixator frame to unload the joint. This promotes chondral repair and improves function. This study aimed to organize clinical data and survivorship in published papers and direct further research efforts. Thirty-one publications were evaluated and 16 were included in the meta-analysis. The Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess quality of the individual publications. Random effects models were used to estimate the failure risk after ankle distraction arthroplasty. Ankle Osteoarthritis Score (AOS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Van Valburg, and Visual Analog Scores (VAS) all improved postoperatively. Random effects model analysis revealed an overall failure ratio of 11% (95% CI: 7%-15%; p value ≤ .001; I2 = 87.01%) after 46.68 ± 7.17 months follow up, 9% (95% CI: 5%-12%; p value≤0.001 I2=81.59%) with less than 5 years follow-up and 28% (95% CI: 16%-41%; p value≤0.001 I2=69.03%) for patients with more than 5 years follow-up. Ankle Distraction Arthroplasty has promising short to intermediate term outcomes which makes this a reasonable treatment option to delay joint sacrificing surgery. The selection of the optimal candidates and consistent technique would improve research and subsequently outcomes. Based on our meta-analysis, negative prognostic factors include female sex, obesity, ROM < 20°, leg muscle weakness, high activity level, low preoperative pain levels, higher preoperative clinical scores, inflammatory arthritis, septic arthritis, and deformity.

Comparative fixation devices for preventing migration of the proximal tibiofibular joint during tibial lengthening: a tether versus screw fixation.

BACKGROUND: When lengthening the tibia segment using motorized internal lengthening nails (MILN), undesired distal migration of the proximal fibula segment is prevented by tibiofibular stabilization, traditionally using a screw. A tightened cortical suspensory fixation rope (tether) is an alternative option, but its appropriateness has never been studied. The primary outcome was comparing the amount of proximal fibular migration between patients who were stabilized with either a tether or a screw. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the effect of fibular migration on the clinical outcome between both groups. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent tibial lengthening with MILN between April 2016 and June 2022. Two cohorts were compared: 18 limbs with tether fixation versus 29 limbs with screw fixation. Data on the patient's age, sex, etiologies, and clinical outcomes were collected. Radiographic measurements included the lengthening distance and the amount of proximal fibular migration. RESULTS: In total, 47 limbs from 41 patients, with average age 35.01 ± 13.72 years old. There were 28 males (68.29%) and 13 females (31.71%). The tether group demonstrated a statistically significant greater distance of migration than the screw group (p < 0.001), with an average migration distance of 8.39 ± 5.09 mm and 2.59 ± 3.06 mm, respectively. No correlation was found between the amount of tibial lengthening and the distance of proximal fibular migration in both the tether group (p = 0.96) and the screw group (p = 0.32). There was no significant difference in the change of knee extension between both groups (p = 0.3), and no patients reported knee pain or tightness. CONCLUSION: A screw provides better resistance to proximal tibiofibular joint migration during MILN lengthening, but the difference appears clinically inconsequential. Either option appears suitable.

Outcomes of percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomy in pediatric patients.

Background: Percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomies are performed in both adult and pediatric patients. There is little published on the outcomes after femoral derotational osteotomy in pediatric patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients treated with percutaneous femoral derotational osteotomy by one of two surgeons between 2016 and 2022 was performed. Data collected included patient demographics; surgical indications; femoral version; tibial torsion; magnitude of rotational correction; complications; time to hardware removal; pre-operative and post-operative patient-reported outcome scores, including Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System; and time to consolidation. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and t tests used to compare means. Results: Thirty-one femoral derotational osteotomies in 19 patients were included with an average age of 14.7 (9-17) years. The average rotational correction was 21.5° ± 6.4° (10°-40°). The average length of follow-up was 17.9 ± 6.7 months. There were no instances of nonunion, joint stiffness, or nerve injury. No patients returned to the operating room for additional surgeries other than routine hardware removal. There were no cases of avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Of the 19 patients, 8 completed both a pre-operative and post-operative survey set. There were significant improvements in the Limb Deformity-Scoliosis Research Society Self-Image/Appearance sub-category and the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Physical Function sub-category. Conclusion: Femoral derotational osteotomy using a percutaneous drill hole technique with antegrade trochanteric entry femoral nail is safe in the pediatric population and improves self-image in patients with symptomatic femoral version abnormalities.

Treatment of Angular Deformity and Limb Length Discrepancy With a Retrograde Femur Magnetic Intramedullary Nail: A Fixator-assisted, Blocking Screw Technique.

BACKGROUND: Fixator-assisted nailing techniques that incorporate magnetic internal lengthening nails (MILNs) permit acute deformity correction and then gradual limb lengthening without needing postoperative external fixators. PURPOSES: We sought to investigate the safety and accuracy of a fixator-assisted, blocking screw technique using retrograde MILNs for the correction of LLD and limb malalignment. METHODS: Forty-one patients (13 patients with genu varum and 28 patients with genu valgum) with LLD treated with fixator-assisted, blocking screw retrograde MILN reconstruction were included. Preoperative LLD, mechanical axis deviation, and joint orientation angles were compared with values at the end of treatment, and bone healing indices were calculated. Perioperative complications were tracked. RESULTS: Preoperatively, the mean mechanical lateral distal femoral angle of the varus cohort was 98 ± 12°, whereas the mean lateral distal femoral angle of the valgus cohort was 82±4°. Both cohorts had an average 3-cm LLD. 99% of the planned limb lengthening was achieved. Final LDFAs were 91 ± 6° and 89 ± 4° in the varus and valgus cohorts, respectively, and the limb mechanical axis angles were normalized. 10 patients underwent a total of 21 returns to the operating room. Most commonly, this involved percutaneous injection of bone marrow aspirate concentrate to bone regenerate exhibiting delayed union (6 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a retrograde MILN with a fixator-assisted, blocking screw technique is an effective means of acute deformity correction and gradual limb lengthening through minimal incisions. The accuracy of deformity correction relies on intraoperative execution of the appropriate nail start site, osteotomy location, and placement of blocking screws.

Osseointegration for Lower Limb Amputation: Understanding the Risk Factors and Time Courses of Soft Tissue Complications.

PURPOSE: Lower-limb osseointegrated prostheses are a novel alternative to traditional socket-suspended prostheses, which are often associated with poor fit, soft tissue damage, and pain. Osseointegration eliminates the socket-skin interface and allows for weight-bearing directly on the skeletal system. However, these prostheses can also be complicated by postoperative issues that can negatively impact mobility and quality of life. Little is known about the incidence of or risk factors for these complications as few centers currently perform the procedure. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on all patients who underwent single-stage lower limb osseointegration at our institution between 2017 and 2021. Patient demographics, medical history, operative data, and outcomes were collected. Fisher exact test and unpaired t tests were performed to identify risk factors for each adverse outcome, and time-to-event survival curves were generated. RESULTS: Sixty patients met our study criteria: 42 males and 18 females with 35 transfemoral and 25 transtibial amputations. The cohort had an average age of 48 years (range, 25-70 years) and follow-up period of 22 months (range, 6-47 months). Indications for amputation were trauma (50), prior surgical complication (5), cancer (4), and infection (1). Postoperatively, 25 patients developed soft tissue infections, 5 developed osteomyelitis, 6 had symptomatic neuromas, and 7 required soft tissue revisions. Soft tissue infections were positively correlated with obesity and female sex. Neuroma development was associated with increased age at osseointegration. Neuromas and osteomyelitis were both associated with decreased center experience. Subgroup analysis by amputation etiology and anatomic location did not show significant differences in outcomes. Notably, hypertension (15), tobacco use (27), and prior site infection (23) did not correlate with worse outcomes. Forty-seven percent of soft tissue infections occurred in the 1 month after implantation, and 76% occurred in the first 4 months. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide preliminary insights into risk factors for postoperative complications arising from lower limb osseointegration. These factors are both modifiable (body mass index, center experience), and unmodifiable (sex, age). As this procedure continues to expand in popularity, such results are necessary to inform best practice guidelines and optimize outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm the above trends.

Management of Segmental Tibial Bone Defects With the Magnetic Motorized Intramedullary Transport Nail: A Case Series.

SUMMARY: Critical-sized bone defects in the tibia can arise as sequelae of trauma, infection, tumor, or the treatment of congenital limb deficiencies. Treatment of these defects often requires bone transport, which has traditionally been accomplished using circular external fixators. The development of a bone transport nail facilitated tibia reconstruction through distraction osteogenesis using an all-internal device, thus avoiding the complications associated with chronic external fixation. Given the rarity of these cases, few studies have been published on the reconstruction outcomes using this implant. We sought to investigate the bone healing indices (including regenerate consolidation and time to docking site union) associated with the use of a magnetically controlled all-internal bone transport nail for the reconstruction of 4 patients treated for posttraumatic tibial bone loss. Perioperative and device-related complications are also reported.

Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis: Planning and improving outcomes: Case series and literature review.

Background: Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) is a safe surgical procedure to treat medial compartmental osteoarthritis caused by a varus deformity. Over-correction of this varus deformity can lead to lateral compartment over-loading. In our study, we planned our correction by using the mechanical axis deviation (MAD). Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical and radiological results of OWHTO based on planning using the MAD measurements. Study Design: Retrospective Case Series. Methods: 14 patients with Kellgren- Lawrence classification (KL) grade 3 or above underwent OWHTO, with plans to have the mechanical axis pass through 5-15 mm lateral to the center of the tibial plateau. Pre-operative and post-operative radiographic measurements were made and compared using the student t-test. SF-36 scores were obtained for clinical performance. Results: Our patients experienced MAD from 25.9 mm medial to the center of the tibial plateau pre-operatively to 12.7 mm lateral to the center of the plateau post-operatively. The mean change in MAD was 38.7 mm (p < 0.0001). The accuracy of our correction compared to the planned MAD was 98.3%. The mechanical axis angle shifted from 7.35° of varus to 3.5° of valgus (p < 0.0001). All patients had post-operative alignments of 1-6° of valgus, with 11 of out the 14 patients with alignments less than 5° of valgus, preventing over-loading of the lateral compartment. Conclusion: Using MAD measurements is an accurate planning method for OWHTO that corrects varus deformity without over-loading the lateral compartment, and leads to improved clinical outcomes.

Modern Internet Search Analytics and Osseointegration: What are Patients Asking and Reading Online?

Background: Osseointegration (OI) limb has been performed for over 30 years and is an example of an advance in technology and surgical technique which has led to improvements in patient mobility and quality of life. An increasing number of patients seek information about osseointegration. The aim of this study was to categorise the most frequently asked questions by patients using the Google search engine and the most frequently accessed websites with the highest return on answers. The secondary aims of this study were to assess the quality of the information provided on those websites and to stratify, by category, which websites provide the best quality information. Materials and methods: Ten permutations and conjugations of the word 'osseointegration' were entered into Google. The first fifty 'People also ask' and associated websites by Google's machine learning and natural language processing engine were collected for each search term. The Rothwell classification system of questions by topic (Fact, Value, Policy) and websites by category was used (Commercial, Academic, Medical Practice, Single Surgeon Personal, Government, Social Media). Website quality was assessed using the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria (Likert-style rating 0-4). Pearson's Chi-squared and Student's t-tests were performed for statistical analysis as appropriate (significance, p < 0.05). Results: The 10 search terms generated 454 questions and referenced 408 websites. Of the 454 questions generated, the most common question categories were fact (70.8%), value (19.2%), and policy (10%). The most common website type was social media (37.4%). The most common question types were technical details (30.4%), specific activity (20.6%), and cost (14.1%). Only 1.6% of questions related to risks and complications. Generally, website quality was poor with 64.1% having a JAMA score of 0 or 1. Websites that were categorised as 'Government' had the highest overall JAMA scores: 71.4% had a score of 4. Conclusion: Based on Google search engine's results, the most commonly asked questions about osteointegration related to technical details, specific activities and cost; only 1.6% related to risks and complications. Interestingly, social media websites represented the highest volume of search result referrals. Overall, the quality of websites was poor with the most factual information coming from governmental websites. How to cite this article: Murphy EP, Sheridan GA, Page BJ, et al. Modern Internet Search Analytics and Osseointegration: What Are Patients Asking and Reading Online? Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(3):163-168.

Universal Long Bone Nonunion Classification.

Aim and background: The management of bone union disorders is a complex problem in orthopaedics, requiring a reliable and comprehensive classification system for accurate diagnosis and treatment. Despite advances in understanding pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment in this area, there is no generally accepted classification system. The aim of our work was to create a comprehensive classification, which will systemize the vast majority of bone union disorders, underline their differences and form the basis for their treatment. Methods: The key criteria for nonunion evaluation and treatment were identified based on the conducted literature review: Time from the initial event (delayed union or nonunion), location, type of pathology (A, Hypertrophic; B, Normotrophic; C, Oligotrophic) and the presence of hardware. Based on these criteria the ULBNC has been developed. Atrophic nonunions were excluded from this classification as they are considered segmental bone defects with special classification. Results: The ULBNC is based on the same principles of coding as the "gold standard" AO/OTA Fractures Classification system with alpha-numeric coding "from simple to complex." The choice of treatment method depends on the type, group, and subgroup of the nonunion as described. Conclusion: Universal Long Bone Nonunion Classification (ULBNC) is an alphanumeric system that describes the localization, type of pathology and morphologic characteristics of a nonunion. The use of ULBNC in practice and research will optimize and standardize the treatment of various types of bone healing disorders and eventually improve clinical outcomes. How to cite this article: Solomin LN, Semenistyy AA, Komarov AV, et al. Universal Long Bone Nonunion Classification. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr 2023;18(3):169-173.

Osseointegration for Lower-Extremity Amputees: Operative Considerations from the Plastic Surgeon's Perspective.

➢: Osseointegration for lower-extremity amputees, while increasing in frequency, remains in its relative infancy compared with traditional socket-based prostheses. ➢: Ideal candidates for osseointegration have documented failure of a traditional prosthesis and should be skeletally mature, have adequate bone stock, demonstrate an ability to adhere to a longitudinal rehabilitation protocol, and be in an otherwise good state of health. ➢: Lowering the reoperation rate for soft-tissue complications depends heavily on surgical technique and on the implant device itself; the current gold standard involves a smooth implant surface for dermal contact as well as maximal skin resection to prevent skin breakdown against the prosthesis. This may include the need for thighplasty to optimize skin reduction. ➢: Interdisciplinary peripheral nerve management, such as targeted muscle reinnervation, performed in tandem with a plastic surgery team can treat existing and prevent future symptomatic neuromas, ultimately improving pain outcomes.

Calcium sulfate in the management of osteomyelitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

BACKGROUND: Calcium sulfate (CS) is used extensively as an antibiotic carrier in the treatment of chronic osteomyelitis, largely due to its biodegradable nature. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyze the comprehensive performance of CS in the literature when compared to other biomaterials or treatments for osteomyelitis. We assess the ability of CS to eradicate infection and achieve other key clinical outcomes. METHODS: All studies comparing the use of CS to any other surgical technique for the surgical management of osteomyelitis were eligible for analysis. The indication for surgery in each case was chronic osteomyelitis. The minimum dataset required included details regarding infection eradication rates, union rates (in cases of nonunion), all-cause revision surgery and wound leakage. The primary outcome variables of concern were infection eradication and all-cause revision surgery. Secondary outcome variables included union and wound leakage. A random effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Five studies were deemed eligible for inclusion. The CS group had a significantly higher rate of infection eradication (P = .013) and a significantly lower rate of revision for all causes (P < .001) when compared to the comparative group. In total, the CS group had 30 cases of wound leakage compared to 8 in the comparative group (P = .064). CONCLUSION: CS demonstrates superior rates of infection eradication and all-cause revision when compared with alternative treatment methods for chronic osteomyelitis. While the current study reports on differing but nonsignificant rates of wound leakage between CS and other treatments, future studies are required to accurately investigate this clinically important complication.