Factors Associated With Margin Positivity After Lung Resection Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study is to utilize a representative national sample to investigate the factors associated with margin positivity after attempted surgical resection. Given the changes in surgical approaches to lung cancer for the last 10 years, margin positivity and outcomes between robotic, video assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) and open surgical resections may vary. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized the National Cancer Database. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer, 18 or older and who had a surgical lung resection between 2010 and 2019 were included. Demographic data, along with patient-level clinical variables were extracted. Patient-level outcome variables including 30-day, 90-day mortality and readmission rates were analyzed. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess factors associated with margin positivity. RESULTS: A total of 226,884 patients were identified. Of the total cohort, 9229 had positive margins (4.2%). Patients with positive margins had statistically significant increased 30-day, 90-day mortality, as well as increased readmission rate. Older age, male sex, patients undergoing an open resection, patients who underwent a wedge resection, higher clinical stage, larger tumor size, squamous and adenosquamous histologies, and higher Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index were all associated with having a positive margin after resection. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there was no difference in margin positivity when comparing robotic and VATS resection, however, open resection had increased rates of margin positivity. Increasing tumor size, clinical stage, squamous and adenosquamous histologies, male sex, and patients undergoing a wedge resection were all associated with increased rates of margin positivity.

Wedge Resection Outcomes: A Comparison of Video-Assisted and Robot-Assisted Wedge Resections.

BACKGROUND: Quality of oncologic resection for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) may differ by surgical approach. Minimally invasive surgery has become the standard for surgical treatment of NSCLC. Our study compares quality of wedge resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) vs robotic video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (RVATS). We hypothesized that RVATS would result in higher quality resections and improved patient outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort analysis was completed using the National Cancer Database for patients with clinical stage 1 NSCLC with tumor size ≤2 cm who underwent a minimally invasive surgery wedge resection from 2010 to 2019. Wedge resections approached with RVATS were compared with VATS. A 1:1 propensity score matched analysis was performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 16,559 patients; 80.4% (13,406) received VATS and 18.9% (3153) received RVATS. Compared with RVATS, a VATS approach was associated with a lower likelihood of lymph nodes being examined (59.0% vs 75.2%; P < .001), fewer nodes dissected (median, 4 vs 5; P < .001), and less adjuvant systemic therapy administered (1.3% vs 2.2%; P < .001). Propensity score matching resulted in 2590 balanced pairs. Statistical significance was maintained for likelihood of lymph nodes examined, number of nodes dissected, and adjuvant systemic therapy administered. There was no significant difference in nodal upstaging after propensity score matching (3.7% vs 4.3%; P = .37). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with the VATS approach, wedge resections by RVATS for early-stage NSCLC were more likely to be associated with increased lymph nodes resected. These data may support increased use of RVATS for wedge resections.

Is wedge a dirty word? Demographic and facility-level variables associated with high-quality wedge resection.

Objectives: Although sublobar resections have gained traction, wedge resections vary widely in quality. We seek to characterize the demographic and facility-level variables associated with high-quality wedge resections. Methods: The National Cancer Database was queried from 2010 to 2018. Patients with T1/T2 N0 M0 non-small cell lung cancer 2 cm or less who underwent wedge resection without neoadjuvant therapy were included. A wedge resection with no nodes sampled or with positive margins was categorized as a low-quality wedge. A wedge resection with 4 or more nodes sampled and negative margins was categorized as a high-quality wedge. Facility-specific variables were investigated via quartile analysis based on the overall volume and proportion of high-quality wedge or low-quality wedge resections performed. Results: A total of 21,742 patients met inclusion criteria, 6390 (29.4%) of whom received a high-quality wedge resection. Factors associated with high-quality wedge resection included treatment at an academic center (3005 [47.0%] vs low-quality wedge 6279 [40.9%]; P < .001). The 30- and 90-day survivals were similar, but patients who received a high-quality wedge resection had improved 5-year survival (4902 [76.7%] vs 10,548 [68.7%]; P < .001). Facilities in the top quartile by volume of high-quality wedge resections performed 69% (4409) of all high-quality wedge resections, and facilities in the top quartile for low-quality wedge resections performed 67.6% (10,378) of all low-quality wedge resections. A total of 113 facilities were in the top quartile by volume for both high-quality wedge and low-quality wedge resections. Conclusions: High-quality wedge resections are associated with improved 5-year survival when compared with low-quality wedge resections. By volume, high-quality wedge and low-quality wedge resections cluster to a minority of facilities, many of which overlap. There is discordance between best practice guidelines and current practice patterns that warrants additional study.

Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (EDKA) after pancreaticoduodenectomy: An under-recognized metabolic abnormality with outcome implications.

BACKGROUND: Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis is a metabolic condition characterized by relative euglycemia, ketonemia, and metabolic acidosis that occurs through mechanisms resembling starvation. Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a complex abdominal operation that subjects patients to a prolonged fasting and an inflammatory state. This study examined the incidence of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis and potential opportunities for early diagnosis and management in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review of 350 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy between 2017 and 2020 was performed. Primary endpoints were peak beta-hydroxybutyrate levels, peak lactate levels, lowest pH, peak base deficits, and urinary output within the first 24 hours, postoperatively. Additional endpoints included incidence of postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying, total complications, postoperative hospital length of stay, readmission rates, and changes in insulin regimen at discharge. RESULTS: Of the 350 cases reviewed, 39 (11.1%) patients developed euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis. Male sex and pancreatic cancer were associated with a risk for euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (P < .05). Patients with euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis had significantly higher peak beta-hydroxybutyrate levels than patients without euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (mean difference = 19.8 mg/dL, 95% confidence interval = 14.7-24.9, P < .001), and were nearly four times more likely to require insulin at discharge (odds ratio 3.8, 95% confidence interval = 1.1-13.0, P < .05). CONCLUSION: This is the first large descriptive study that investigates euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy. Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy is associated with significantly higher beta-hydroxybutyrate levels and new or increased insulin requirement at discharge. Our study demonstrates potential markers for euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis after pancreaticoduodenectomy, offering an opportunity to identify and successfully treat this disease in a timely manner.

Assessing the role of urologists and general surgeons in the open repair of bladder injuries: Analysis of a large, statewide trauma database.

BACKGROUND: Bladder injuries often occur in the setting of polytrauma, and if severe, may require open surgical repairs. We assess the role of urologists and general surgeons (GS) in the open surgical management of bladder injuries and their outcomes in a traumatic setting. METHODS: Patients who underwent open bladder injury repair secondary to trauma from 2000 to 2017 by urology or GS were identified in the Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study database by International Classification of Diseases-9th Rev.-Clinical Modification procedure codes (57.19-57.93). Patient demographics, initial trauma assessment, length of hospital stay, associated complications, and mortality were evaluated. Urology management of a bladder injury was defined by documentation of a urologist in the operating room or urological consultation during the hospital stay. GS management was defined by documented bladder repair without urology involvement as described previously. RESULTS: Of 624,504 patients in the database, 701 met inclusion criteria (419 managed by urology, 282 by GS). The most commonly performed procedure was suturing of bladder lacerations (80.5%). On univariate analysis, GS was more likely to manage patients with penetrating injuries and those who required exploratory laparotomy less than 2 hours upon arrival. Urology was more likely to manage patients with concomitant pelvic fractures and higher Injury Severity Score (ISS). On multivariate analysis, higher ISS was predictive of urology management (odds ratio, 1.83; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.87, p = 0.008), while patients who required urgent exploratory laparotomy was predictive of GS management (odds ratio, 0.34; 95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.55, p < 0.001). Patients with concomitant pelvic fractures (n = 318) were also more likely to have higher ISS (p < 0.001) and were more likely to be managed by urology (odds ratio, 1.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.30, p = 0.046). Mortality, length of hospital stay, and complication rates were not significantly different between the two specialties and among individual procedures. CONCLUSION: Our study describes the landscape of traumatic bladder repairs between urology and GS. GS may maintain similar patient outcomes when managing select cases of traumatic bladder injuries in the absence of urologists. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, level IV.

Prostatic Stromal Tumors of Uncertain Malignant Potential.

We present a 53-year-old man with a multilocular solid and cystic mass measuring 19 cm on cross-sectional imaging. After undergoing pelvic mass excision, final histopathology confirmed the diagnosis of primary prostatic stromal tumor of uncertain malignant potential (STUMP). Prostatic STUMPs are rare mesenchymal tumors with diverse histologic patterns. They are distinct from prostatic stromal sarcomas as they do not behave aggressively, although some may occasionally demonstrate local recurrence after resection. Due to their unpredictable malignant potential, lack of correlation between histologic patterns, and sarcomatous differentiation, these patients warrant surgical excision and close follow-up.